Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 85–96 | Cite as

Natural stands diversity and population structure of Lophira lanceolata Tiegh. ex Keay, a local oil tree species in Burkina Faso, West Africa

  • Benjamin Lankoandé
  • Amadé Ouédraogo
  • Joseph Issaka Boussim
  • Anne Mette Lykke
Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

Non Timber Forest Products play an important role as source of food and income generation in developing countries. In Burkina Faso, many wild tree species provide various useful products, among them the local oil tree, Lophira lanceolata which occurs in the western part of the country. This study aimed at assessing the habitat diversity and population structure of L. lanceolata’s natural stands according to land cover types. Two sites were considered: Banfora, where the use value of fruits is unknown and Orodara, where fruits are exploited for oil production. A stratified and oriented sampling scheme based on the occurrence of L. lanceolata and land cover was applied using rectangular plots of 50 m × 20 m. Phytosociological and quantitative inventories were carried out to assess the woody species diversity of stands and L. lanceolata population structure, respectively. Species diversity indices, structural parameters were computed and analyses of variance, Chi square test were performed to compare sites according to land cover types. The results showed high woody species diversity associated with L. lanceolata stands (H = 3.2–3.6). The densities of L. lanceolata ranged between 94 and 280 trees per hectare, with significant differences between land cover types and sites. The population pattern showed a good regeneration potential and high resource availability. L. lanceolata was fairly resilient to human pressure and tended to recolonize disturbed lands. With a high potential for sustainable management, L. lanceolata is a promising NTFP species which can contribute to improve the local and national economy.

Keywords

Land cover Lophira lanceolata Oil plant Species occurrence Population structure Regeneration potentials 

References

  1. Ajbilou R, Maranon T, Arroyo J, Ater M (2007) Structure and diversity of the shrubby stratum of peninsula Tingitane’s forest (Moroco). Acta Bot Malacca 32:147–160Google Scholar
  2. Akoègninou A, Van Der Burg WJ, Van Der Maesen LJG (2006) Flore analytique du Bénin. Backhuys Publishers, Cotonou & WageningenGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbonnier M (2002) Arbres, arbustes et lianes des zones sèches d’Afrique de l’Ouest. 2e édition, CIRAD, MNHN-UICN, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  4. Assogbadjo AE, Glèlè Kakaï R, Sinsin B, Pelz D (2009) Structure of Anogeissus leiocarpa Guill. & Perr. natural stands in relation to anthropogenic pressure within Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin. Afr J Ecol 48:644–653Google Scholar
  5. Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Badruddin IA, Fayaz H (2013) Non-edible vegetable oils: a critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:211–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avocèvou-Ayisso C, Sinsin B, Adégbidi A, Dossou G, Van Damme P (2009) Sustainable use of non-timber forest products: impact of fruit harvesting on Pentadesma butyracea regeneration and financial analysis of its products trade in Benin. For Ecol Manage 257:1930–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azihou AF, Glèlè Kakaï R, Bellefontaine R, Sinsin B (2013) Distribution of tree species along a gallery forest-savanna gradient: patterns, overlaps and ecological thresholds. J Trop Ecol 29:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bationo BA, Ouédraogo SJ, Somé AN, Pallo F, Boussim IJ (2005) The natural regeneration of Isoberlinia doka Craib and Stapf in the Nazinon classified forest (Burkina Faso). Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones 14:297–304Google Scholar
  9. Bazongo P, Bassole IHN, Nielsen S, Dicko MH, Shukla VKS (2014) Studies in the Evaluation of Unconventional Oils from Burkina Faso Rich in Linoleic Acid, Oleic Acid or Other Unusual Fatty Acids. J Food Process Technol 5:303Google Scholar
  10. Bellefontaine R, Edelin C, Ichaou A (2000) Le drageonnage, alternative aux semis et aux plantations de ligneux dans les zones semi-arides. Sécheresse 11:221–226Google Scholar
  11. Bognounou F, Thiombiano A, Savadogo P, Boussim JI, Oden PC, Guinko S (2009) Woody vegetation structure and composition at four sites along a latitudinal gradient in Western Burkina Faso. Bois For Trop 300:30–44Google Scholar
  12. Braun-Blanquet J (1932) Plant sociology. Macgran-Hill, New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham AB (2001) Applied ethnobotany. People and Plants Conservation Manuals. People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation. Earthscan Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (1986) Goodness-of-fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Djossa BA, Fahr J, Wiegand T, Ayihouenou BE, Kalko EE, Sinsin BA (2008) Land use impact on Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaerten. stand structure and distribution patterns: a comparison of Biosphere Reserve of Pendjari in Atacora district in Benin. Agrofor Syst 72:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2008) Harmonized world soil database (version 1.0). FAO, Rome, p 37Google Scholar
  17. FAO (2010) Evaluation des ressources forestières mondiales. Etude FAO: forêts 163, rapport principal, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Fariku S, Kidah M (2008) Biomass potential of Lophira lanceolata fruit as a renewable energy resource. Afr J Biotechnol 7:308–310Google Scholar
  19. Feeley JK, Davies SJ, NurSupardi Noor MD, Kassim AR, Tan S (2007) Do current stem size distributions predict future population changes? An empirical test of intraspecific patterns in tropical trees at two spatial scales. J Trop Ecol 23:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fontes J, Guinko S (1995) Vegetation and’s map of Burkina Faso. Explanatory Note. Ministry of French Cooperation, Campus Project (88 313 101), ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  21. Kakaï RG, Sinsin B (2009) Structural description of two Isoberlinia dominated vegetation types in the Wari–Maro Forest Reserve (Benin). S Afr J Bot 75:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gnoumou A, Bognounou F, Hahn K, Thiombiano A (2011) A comparison of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. stands in South West Burkina Faso-community structure and regeneration. J Forest Res 23:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green RH (1966) Measurement of non-randomness in spatial distributions. Res Pop Ecol 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greig-Smith P (1983) Quantitative plant ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw JA Jr (2003) Forest mensuration, 4th edn. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jayaraman K (1999) A statistical manual for forestry research. FORSPA-FAO Publications, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson NL, Kotz S (1970) Distributions in statistics: continuous univariate distributions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Lohlum SA, Maikidi GH, Salomon M (2010) Proximate composition, amino acid profile and phytochemical screening of Lophira lanceolata seeds. Afri J Food Agr Nutr Dev 10:1–12Google Scholar
  29. Natta AK, Adomou AC, Tchabi VI, Sogbegnon AR, Mensah GA, Sinsin BA (2011) Inventaire, typologie et structure des populations naturelles de Pentadesma butyracea (Clusiaceae) de la chaîne de l’Atacora au Nord-Ouest du Bénin. Bull Recherche Agron Bénin 70:10–24Google Scholar
  30. Obiri J, Lawes M, Mukolwe M (2002) The dynamics and sustainable use of high-value tree species of the coastal Pondoland forest of the Eastern Cape Province South Africa. For Ecol Manag 166:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okullo JBL, Waithum G (2007) Diversity and conservation of on-farm woody plants by field types in Paromo Subcountry, Nebbi District, North Werstern Uganda. Afr J Ecol 45:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouédraogo A, Thiombiano A (2012) Regeneration pattern of four threatened tree species in Sudanian savannas of Burkina Faso. Agrofor Syst 86:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ouédraogo A, Thiombiano A, Hahn-Hadjali K, Guinko S (2006) Diagnostic de l’état de dégradation des peuplements de quatre espèces ligneuses en zone soudanienne du Burkina Faso. Sécheresse 17:485–491Google Scholar
  34. Ouédraogo A, Lykke AM, Lankoandé B, Korbéogo G (2013a) Potential for promoting oil products identified from traditional knowledge of native trees in Burkina Faso. Ethnobot Res Appl 11:71–83Google Scholar
  35. Ouédraogo A, Glèlè Kakaï R, Thiombiano A (2013b) Population structure of the widespread species, Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. & Perr. across the climatic gradient in West Africa semi-arid area. S Afr J Bot 88:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ouôba P, Boussim J, Guinko S (2005) Le potentiel fruitier de la forêt classée de Niangoloko au Burkina Faso. Fruits 61:17–81Google Scholar
  37. Ouôba P, Lykke AM, Boussim J, Guinko S (2006) La flore médicinale de la forêt classée de Niangoloko (Burkina Faso). Études sur la flore et la végétation du Burkina Faso et des Pays avoisinants 10:5–16Google Scholar
  38. Peters CM (1997) Exploitation soutenue de produits forestiers autres que le bois en forêt tropicale humide: Manuel d’initiation écologique. Programme d’Appui à la Biodiversité, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Rondeux J (1999) La mesure des arbres et des peuplements forestiers. Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 2e édition, GemblouxGoogle Scholar
  40. Sambaré O, Bognounou F, Wittig R, Thiombiano A (2011) Woody species composition, diversity and structure of riparian forests of four watercourses types in Burkina Faso. J Forest Res 22:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schmidt M, Kreft H, Thiombiano A, Zizka G (2005) Herbarium collections and field data-based plant diversity maps for Burkina Faso. Divers Distrib 11:509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shackleton S, Delang CO, Angelsen A (2011) From subsistence to safety nets and cash income: exploring the diverse values of non-timber forest products for livelihoods and poverty alleviation. Trop Forest 7:55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sinsin B, Eyog Matg O, Assobgadjo AE, Gaoué OG, Sinadouwirou T (2004) Dendrometric characteristics as indicators of pressure of Afzelia africana Sm. dynamic changes in trees found in different climatic zones of Benin. Biodivers Conserv 13:1555–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sokpon N, Dotonhoué F, Ouinsavi C (2011) Patterns of ecological structure and spatial distribution of kapok tree (Ceiba pentandra) populations in Bénin. Ann Univ Parakou Sér 2:5–26Google Scholar
  45. Tabuti JRS, Mugula BB (2007) The ethnobotany and ecological status of Albizia coriaria Welw. ex Oliv. in Budondo Sub-county, eastern Uganda. Afr J Ecol 45:126–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thiombiano A, Schmidt M, Dressler S, Ouédraogo A, Hahn K, Zizka G (2012) Catalogue des plantes vasculaires du Burkina Faso. Boisseria 65:1–391Google Scholar
  47. Traoré L, Ouédraogo I, Ouédraogo A, Thiombiano A (2011) Perceptions, usages et vulnérabilité des ressources végétales ligneuses dans le Sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso. Int J Biol Chem Sci 5:258–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van der Vossen HAM, Mkamilo GS (2007) Plant resources of tropical Africa 14. Vegetable oils. PROTA Foundation, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  49. Venter SM, Witkowski ETF (2010) Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) density, size-class distribution and population trends between four land-use types in northern Venda, South Africa. For Ecol Manag 259:294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wild RG, Mutebi J (1996) L’utilisation des ressources végétales par les communautés, un moyen de conservation. Peuples et Plantes 5:1–49Google Scholar
  51. Yadav M, Dugaya D (2013) Non-timber forest products certification in India: opportunities and challenges. Environ Dev Sustain 15:567–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Lankoandé
    • 1
  • Amadé Ouédraogo
    • 1
  • Joseph Issaka Boussim
    • 1
  • Anne Mette Lykke
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales, UFR Sciences de la Vie et de la TerreUniversité de OuagadougouOuagadougou 03Burkina Faso
  2. 2.Department of BioscienceAarhus UniversitySilkeborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations