Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microbial biomass and cellulase activity in soils under five different cocoa production systems in Alto Beni, Bolivia

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cocoa is one of the most important crops of the “Alto Beni” region in Bolivia. This crop is produced in different systems, among them monoculture and agroforestry. In order to determine the effect of the production system on microbiological soil characteristics, we measured microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen and cellulase activity and we determined the microbial quotient in soil under five different cocoa production systems (conventional monoculture, organic monoculture, conventional agroforestry, organic agroforestry and successional agroforestry) and in fallow plots. The measurements were carried out in dry and rainy season. Soil from fallow plots and soil under agroforestry had higher microbial biomass than soils under monocultures, probably due to the effect of fresh organic matter input on microbial biomass. No significant difference for microbial biomass in soil from plots subjected to organic management and soil from plots subjected to conventional management was observed, possibly because of the short time elapsed from the initial establishment of the plots. In dry season, the microbial quotient showed a significantly higher value in soils under conventional agroforestry than in soils under organic monoculture, suggesting that besides the input of fresh organic matter, mineral fertilization may play a role on the fraction of available carbon. Cellulase activity was not affected by any of the factors tested, indicating that, under our assay conditions, it was not a good indicator of changes in soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Cellulase activity. In: Alef P (ed) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1989) Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (2010) Soil microbial biomass: the eco-physiological approach. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2039–2043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Kjøller A, Struwe S (2004) Microbial enzyme activities in leaf litter, humus and mineral soil layers of European forests. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1527–1537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo ASF, Santos VB, Monteiro RTR (2008) Responses of soil microbial biomass and activity for practices of organic and conventional farming systems in Piauı´ state, Brazil. Eur J Soil Sci 44:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam A (2002) Dynamics of soil nutrients and microbial biomass during first year cropping in an 8-year jhum cycle. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 64:283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barbhuiya AR, Arunachalam A, Pandey HN, Arunachalam K, Khan ML, Nath PC (2004) Dynamics of soil microbial biomass C, N and P in disturbed and undisturbed stands of a tropical wet-evergreen forest. Eur J Soil Biol 40:113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behera N, Sahani U (2003) Soil microbial biomass and activity in response to Eucalyptus plantation and natural regeneration on tropical soil. For Ecol Manag 174:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijayalaxmi Devi N, Yadava PS (2006) Seasonal dynamics in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in a mixed-oak forest ecosystem of Manipur, North-east India. Appl Soil Ecol 31:220–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer J, Mulvaney C (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Miller A, Keeney D (eds) Methods of soil analyses part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, pp 595–624

    Google Scholar 

  • de Alcantara Notaro K, Valente de Medeiros E, Pereira Duda G, Oliveira Silva A, Maia de Moura P (2014) Agroforestry systems, nutrients in litter and microbial activity in soils cultivated with coffee at high altitude. Sci Agric 71(2):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley SR, Treseder KK (2012) The effect of fire on microbial biomass: a metaanalysis of field studies. Biogeochemistry 109:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliessbach A, Fuchs J, Thürig B, Bruns C, Palmer M, Schmidt C (2006) Handbook of methods used in WP 3.1.1 of the European integrated project. Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (FiBL), Frick, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Orenes F, Guerrero C, Roldán A, Mataix-Solera J, Cerdà A, Campoy M, Zornoza R, Bárcenas G, Caravaca F (2010) Soil microbial biomass and activity under different agricultural management systems in a semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem. Soil Till Res 109:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden SR, Treseder K (2013) A meta-analysis of soil microbial biomass responses to forest disturbances. Front Microbiol 4(163):1–17. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00163

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyyemperumal K, Shi W (2008) Soil enzyme activities in two forage systems following application of different rates of swine lagoon effluent or ammonium nitrate. Appl Soil Ecol 38:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi J, Andres C, Scheneider M, Pillco M, Calizaya P, Rist S (2013) Carbon stocks, tree diversity, and the role of organic certification in different cocoa production systems in Alto Beni. Agrofor Syst, Bolivia. doi:10.1007/s10457-013-9643-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen R, Emmerling C (2006) Methods for evaluating human impact on soil microorganisms based on their activity, biomass, and diversity in agricultural soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169:295–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jörgensen R (1995) The fumigation extraction method. In: Nannipieri P, Alef K (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaschuk G, Alberton O, Hungria M (2010) Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maluche-Baretta CRD, Klauberg-Filho O, Talamini do Amarante CV, Mafra Ribeiro G, Almeida D (2007) Atributos Microbianos e Químicos do solo en Sistemas de Producao Convencional e Organico de macas no Estado de Santa Catarina. R Bras Ci Solo 31:655–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moscatelli MC, Lagomarsino A, Marinari S, De Angelis P, Grego S (2005) Soil microbial indices as bioindicators of environmental changes in a poplar plantation. Ecol Indic 5(3):171–179

  • Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns R, Dick R (eds) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology, and application. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153:375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onyekwelu JC (2012) Soil microbial biomass and population in response to seasonal variation and age in Gmelinaarborea plantations in south-western Nigeria. J For Res 23:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz M, Somarriba E (2005) Sombra y especies arbóreas en los cacaotales del Alto Beni, Bolivia. Agroforestería en las Américas N° 43–44:54–61

  • Powlson DS, Brookes PC, Christensen BT (1987) Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 19:159–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-de León Y, de Melo E, Soto G, Johnson-Maynard J, Lugo-Perez J (2006) Earthworm populations, microbial biomass and production in different experimental coffee agroforestry management systems. Carib J Sci 42:397–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos VB, Araújo ASF, Leite LFC, Nunes LAPL, Melo WJ (2012) Soil microbial biomass and organic matter fractions during transition from conventional to organic farming systems. Geoderma 170:227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Seidel R (2010) Estudios de línea base en biodiversidad en Sara Ana, Alto Beni, en el marco de la comparación de sistemas de producción de cacao a largo plazo. Biodiversidad y Ecología en Bolivia, pp 105–107

  • Sugihara S, Funakawa S, Kilasara M, Kosaki T (2010) Effect of land management and soil texture on seasonal variations in soil microbial biomass in dry tropical agroecosystems in Tanzania. Appl Soil Ecol 44:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRB IWG (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome

  • Zaia FC, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Gama-Rodrigues EF, Moço MKS, Fontes AG, Machado RCR, Baligar VC (2012) Carbon, nitrogen, organic phosphorus, microbial biomass and N mineralization in soils under cacao agroforestry systems in Bahia, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 86(2):197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was possible thanks to support of Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and the Ecotop team at Sara Ana, the donors of the long term trial which are Biovision Foundation, Coop Sustainability Fund, Lichtenstein Development Service and Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, and a grant from the Institute of Ecology of the “Universidad Mayor de San Andrés” (La Paz Bolivia). We warmly thank Lic. Patricia Amurrio from the Soils Unity of the Institute of Ecology, all the analysis were carried out in the laboratories of the Soil Unity. We also thank M.Sc. Christian Andres of FiBL for his valuable suggestions to early versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Calle 27 s/n Campus Universitario, Cota Cota, La Paz, Bolivia

    Adalid Alfaro-Flores & Isabel Morales-Belpaire

  2. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse 113, Postfach 219, 5070, Frick, Switzerland

    Monika Schneider

Authors
  1. Adalid Alfaro-Flores
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabel Morales-Belpaire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monika Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Morales-Belpaire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alfaro-Flores, A., Morales-Belpaire, I. & Schneider, M. Microbial biomass and cellulase activity in soils under five different cocoa production systems in Alto Beni, Bolivia. Agroforest Syst 89, 789–798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9812-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9812-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation