Wind speed reductions as influenced by woody hedgerows grown for biomass in short rotation alley cropping systems in Germany
- 556 Downloads
The cultivation of fast growing trees on agricultural sites is an area undergoing a growth in interest due to the rising demand for woody biomass as a source of bioenergy. Short rotation alley cropping systems (SRACS) represent a promising possibility to combine annual crops for food, fodder or bioenergy with woody plants for biomass production, doing so through an integration of hedgerows of fast growing trees into conventional agricultural sites. Against such developments, the question has arisen as to what extent hedgerows in SRACS can act as an effective windbreak despite their management-related low height of only a few meters. On the basis of multiannual recorded wind velocity data in high resolution at two sites in Germany, it could be shown that the wind speed on crop alleys was reduced significantly by such hedgerows. At the central point of 24 m wide crop alleys, the wind speed decreased on an annual average basis by more than 50 % when compared to the wind speeds of open field. The overall amount of reduction was strongly dependent on the location within the crop alleys, the height of trees, the distance between two hedgerows, and their orientation. In reflection upon these results, it was concluded that the establishment of SRACS could lead to enhanced soil protection against wind erosion and thus to ecological and economic benefits for agricultural sites.
KeywordsAlley cropping Bioenergy Shelterbelt Short rotation Windbreak Wind speed
The authors wish to thank the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (Project “AgroForstEnergie II”, Project Number: 22000312), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Project “INKA BB”, Project Number: 01LR0803D) and the Vattenfall Europe New Energy Ltd. for their financial support.
- Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2011) Yield prediction of young black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations for woody biomass production using allometric relations. Annals of Forest Research 54:215–227Google Scholar
- Böhm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2012) Vergleichende Betrachtung des Agrarholz- und Energiemaisanbaus aus Sicht des Bodenschutzes. Bodenschutz 02(12):36–43Google Scholar
- Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North America agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78Google Scholar
- Cui Q, Feng Z, Pfiz M, Veste M, Kuppers M, He K, Gao J (2012) Trade-off between shrub plantation and wind-breaking in the arid sandy lands of Ningxia, China. Pak J Bot 44:1639–1649Google Scholar
- Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (2013a) Anbaufläche für nachwachsender Rohstoffe 2012. http://mediathek.fnr.de/grafiken/anbauflache-fur-nachwachsende-rohstoffe-2012-grafik.html. Accessed 30 May 2013
- Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (2013b) Tabelle der Anbaufläche für nachwachsende Rohstoffe 2012. http://mediathek.fnr.de/grafiken/daten-und-fakten/anbau/anbauflache-fur-nachwachsende-rohstoffe-2012-tabelle.html. Accessed 30 May 2013
- Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (2010) Erneuerbare Energien in Zahlen—nationale und internationale Entwicklung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU), Information brochureGoogle Scholar
- Pretzschel M, Bohme G, Krause H (1991) Effects of shelterbelts on crop yield. Feldwirtschaft 32:229–231Google Scholar