Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 87, Issue 6, pp 1283–1293 | Cite as

Diversity, composition and density of trees and shrubs in agroforestry homegardens in Southern Ethiopia

  • Tesfaye AbebeEmail author
  • F. J. Sterck
  • K. F. Wiersum
  • F. Bongers
Article

Abstract

Diversity of trees and shrubs in agricultural systems contributes to provision of wood and non-wood products, and protects the environment, thereby, enhancing socioeconomic and ecological sustainability of the systems. This study characterizes the diversity, density and composition of trees in the agroforestry homegardens of Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia, and analyses physical and socioeconomic factors influencing diversity and composition of trees in the systems. A total of 144 homegardens were surveyed from 12 sites. In total, 120 species of trees and shrubs were recorded of which, 74.2 % were native to the area. The mean number of tree species per farm was 21. Density of trees varied between sites with mean values ranging from 86 to 1,082, and the overall average was 475 trees ha−1. Four different crop-based enset (Enset ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman)-coffee homegarden types were recognized and they differed not only in the composition of major crops but also in the diversity, density and composition of trees. The composition, diversity and density of trees is influenced by physical and socioeconomic factors. The major physical factors were geographical distance between sites and differences in altitude of farms. The most important socioeconomic factors were farm size and access to roads. Tree species richness and density increased with farm size. Increased road access facilitated marketing opportunities to agricultural products including trees, and lead to a decline in the basic components of the system, enset, coffee and trees. In the road-access sites, the native trees have also been largely replaced with fast growing exotic species, mainly eucalypts. The decrease in diversity of trees and perennial components of the system, and its gradual replacement with new cash and annual food crops could jeopardize the integrity and complexity of the system, which has been responsible for its sustenance.

Keywords

Determinants of on-farm tree diversity Enset-coffee homegardens On-farm density of trees Landuse changes Sidama Zone 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the World Agroforestry Centre (formerly, the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), for financing the field research, and Wageningen University for a PhD sandwich scholarship to TA. Also we thank the farmers and agricultural offices of the four districts in Sidama Zone (Aleta Wondo, Dale, Dara and Hawassa Zurya) for all their support and unreserved cooperation during data collection.

Supplementary material

10457_2013_9637_MOESM1_ESM.doc (234 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 234 kb)

References

  1. Abdoellah OS, Hadikusumah HY, Takeuchi K, Okubo S, Parikesit (2006) Commercialization of homegardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 233–250Google Scholar
  2. Abebe T (2005) Diversity in homegarden agroforestry systems of Southern Ethiopia. Ph.D. Dissertation, tropical resource management papers no. 59, Wageningen University, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  3. Abebe T, Bongers F (2012) Land-use dynamics in enset-based agroforestry homegardens in Ethiopia. In: Arts B, van Bommel S, Ros-Tonen M, Verschoor G (eds) Forest people interfaces: understanding community forestry and biocultural diversity. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abebe T, Wiersum KF, Bongers F, Sterck F (2006) Diversity and dynamics in homegardens of Southern Ethiopia. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  5. Abebe T, Wiersum KF, Bongers F (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in crop diversity in agroforestry homegardens of Southern Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 78:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez-Buylla Roces ME, Lazos Chavero E, Garcia-Barrios JR (1989) Homegardens of humid tropical region in Southeast Mexico: an example of an agroforestry cropping system in a recently established community. Agrofor Syst 8:133–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardhan S, Jose S, Biswas S, Kabir K, Rogers W (2012) Homegarden agroforestry systems: an intermediary for biodiversity conservation in Bangladesh. Agrofor Syst 85(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biggelaar C, Gold MA (1996) Development of utility and location indices for classifying agroforestry species: the case of Rwanda. Agrofor Syst 34:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandes ECM, Oktingati A, Maghembe J (1984) The Chagga homegardens: a multistoreyed agroforestry cropping system on Mt. Kilimanjaro, Northern Tanzania. Agrofor Syst 2:73–86Google Scholar
  10. Huston MA (1995) Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacob VJ, Alles WS (1987) Kandyan gardens of Srilanka. Agrofor Syst 5:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen M (1993) Productivity and nutrient cycling of Javanese homegarden. Agrofor Syst 24:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jose S (2012) Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 85(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaya M, Kammesheidt L, Weidelt HJ (2002) The forest garden system of Saparua island, central Maluku, Indonesia, and its role in maintaining tree species diversity. Agrofor Syst 54:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessy JF (1998) Conservation and utilization of natural resources in the East Usambara forest reserves: conventional views and local perspectives. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) (2006) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar MB, George SJ, Chinnamani S (1994) Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in Peninsular India. Agrofor Syst 25:243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marten GD, Abdoellah OS (1988) Crop diversity and nutrition in West Java. Ecol Food Nutr 21:17–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendez VE, Kok L, Somarriba E (2001) Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. Agrofor Syst 51:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michon G, Bompard J, Hecketsweiler P, Ducatillon C (1983) Tropical forest architectural analysis to agroforests in the humid tropics: the examples of traditional village-agroforests in west Java. Agrofor Syst 1:117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michon G, De Foresta H, Levang P, Verdeaux F (2007) Domestic forests: a new paradigm for integrating local communities’ forestry into tropical forest science. Ecol Soc 12(2):1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art1/ Google Scholar
  23. Nair MA, Sreedharan C (1986) Agroforestry farming systems in the homesteads of Kerala, Southern India. Agrofor Syst 4:339–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Negash M, Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O (2012) Potential of indigenous multistrata agroforests for maintaining native floristic diversity in the south-eastern Rift Valley escarpment, Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 85(1):9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oduol PA, Aluma JRW (1990) The banana (Musa spp.)-Coffee robusta: traditional agroforestry system of Uganda. Agrofor Syst 11:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okafor JC, Fernandes ECM (1987) Compound farms of South Eastern Nigeria: a predominant agroforestry homegarden system with crops and small livestock. Agrofor Syst 5:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2012) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.1-21. http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/vegan/. Accessed 21 March 2013
  28. Padoch C, Jong W (1991) The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Econ Bot 45:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peet RK (1974) The measurement of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perera AH, Rajapakse NRM (1991) A baseline study of Kandayan gorest gardens of Srilanka: structure, composition and utilization. For Ecol Manag 45:269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peyre A, Guidal A, Wiersum KF, Bongers F (2006) Homegarden dynamics in Kerala, India. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 87–103Google Scholar
  32. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  34. Rugalema GH, Okting’ati A, Johnson FH (1994) The homegarden agroforestry systems of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. 1. Farming systems analysis. Agrofor Syst 26:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shannon CE, Wiener W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. Soemarwoto O (1987) Homegadens: a traditional agrforestry system with a promising future. In: Steppler H, Nair PKR (eds) Agroforestry: a decade of development. International Council for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, pp 157–170Google Scholar
  37. Soemarwoto O, Conway GR (1991) The Javenese homegarden. J Farming Syst Res Extension 2:95–117Google Scholar
  38. SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) (2008) SPSS statistics 17.0. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  39. SZPEDD (Sidama Zone Planning and Economic Development Department) (1997) Sidama administrative zone: a socio-economic profile. Awassa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  40. Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide, software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  41. Torquebiau E (1992) Are tropical agroforestry homegardens sustainable? Agric Ecosyst Environ 41:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Wal H, Bongers F (2013) Bio-social and bio-numerical diversity and home garden size in Tabasco, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 87:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiersum KF (1982) Tree gardening and Taungya on Java: examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics. Agrofor Syst 1:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wiersum KF (2006) Diversity and change in homegarden cultivation in Indonesia. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–24Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tesfaye Abebe
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. J. Sterck
    • 2
  • K. F. Wiersum
    • 3
  • F. Bongers
    • 2
  1. 1.College of AgricultureHawassa UniversityHawassaEthiopia
  2. 2.Centre for Ecosystem StudiesWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations