Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 87, Issue 4, pp 729–746 | Cite as

Productivity of Jatropha curcas under smallholder farm conditions in Kenya

  • Miyuki Iiyama
  • David Newman
  • Cristel Munster
  • Meshack Nyabenge
  • Gudeta W. Sileshi
  • Violet Moraa
  • James Onchieku
  • Jeremias Gasper Mowo
  • Ramni Jamnadass


With the global bioenergy boom, the planting of jatropha (Jatropha curcas) was widely promoted by the private sector and non-government organizations as one of the candidate tree species for bioenergy in Kenya. This was motivated by the belief that it grows easily with minimal management requirements. The present study attempts to determine whether management practices by smallholder farmers, which are heterogeneous, are optimal for jatropha yields in Kenya. A survey conducted in different agro-ecological zones showed that yields are very low under Kenyan farm conditions. Regardless of the age and management condition, 41 % of the farmers obtained no seed yield, while 79 % obtained up to 0.1 kg/tree. This is dismal in comparison with the figures (up to 2.0 kg/tree) reported from elsewhere for 1–5 year old trees grown under similar conditions. Examination of farmer management practices indicated that irrigation, manuring and weeding, in order to maximize yields, could be offset by misapplication of other components especially, selection of planting materials, timing of planting and choice of intercrops during the establishment phases. This indicates that the anticipated high yields have not been achieved partly because growers are still using unimproved germplasm, management practices are sub-optimal, and the biophysical boundaries of high jatropha yield are poorly defined. Thus at the current stage, jatropha should not be grown by smallholder farmers in Kenya because of low or dismal productivity. If jatropha is to play a role in the pro-poor bioenergy development, future projects need to identify management recommendations that optimize yields. This also needs to take into consideration the preferences and constraints of farm households on labor and land allocation to other farm and livelihood activities.


Jatrophacurcas Sub-optimal management Agroforestry Domestication 


  1. Achten WMJ, Verchot L, Frunken YJ, Mathuijs E, Singh VP, Aerts R, Muys B (2008) Jatropha bio-diesel production and use. Biomass Bioenergy 32(12):1063–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achten WMJ, Nielsen LR, Aerts R, Lengkeek AG, Kjær ED, Trabucco A, Hansen JK, Maes WH, Graudal L, Akinnifesi FK, Muys B (2010a) Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas. Biofuels 1(1):91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achten WMJ, Maes WH, Reubens B, Mathijs E, Singh VP, Verchot L, Muys B (2010b) Biomass production and allocation in Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. Biomass Bioenergy 34:667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anonymous (2009) African Agriculture. Jatropha for biodiesel is not a miracle crop. Accessed 16 April 2009
  5. Anonymous (2010) African Agriculture. Jatropha goes from buzz to bust in Namibia. Accessed 14 June 2010
  6. Ariza-Montobbio P, Lele S (2010) Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India: viability, livelihood trade-offs, and latent conflict. Ecol Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.011 Google Scholar
  7. Augustus GDPS, Jayabalan M, Seiler GJ (2000) Evaluation and bioinduction of energy components of Jatropha curcas. Biomass Bioenergy 23:161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azam MM, Waris A, Nahar BN (2005) Prospects and potential of fatty acid methyl esters of some non-traditional seed oils for use as biodiesel in India. Biomass Bioenergy 29:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Behera SK, Srivastava P, Tripathi R, Singh JP, Singh N (2010) Evaluation of plant performance of Jatropha curcas L. under different agro-practices for optimizing biomass—a case study. Biomass Bioenergy 34:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bos S, Leonardo W, Lemer A, Schut MLW (2010) Assessing the potential of bio-energy production in smallholder farming systems: the case of Nhambia community. GTZ-PROBEC and Wageningen University and Research Centre, MaputoGoogle Scholar
  11. Camberlin P, Moron V, Okoola R, Philippon N, Gitau W (2009) Components of rainy seasons’ variability in Equatorial East Africa: onset, cessation, rainfall frequency and intensity. Theor Appl Climatol 98:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlisle T (2010) BP abandons biofuel venture. The national. Accessed 7 June 2010
  13. Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP, Gowda CLL (2010) Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: a review. Appl Energy 87:732–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (2008) The state of food and agriculture—biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. FAO (2010) Jatropha: a smallholder bioenergy crop: the potential for pro-poor development. Integrated Crop Management, vol 8–2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Garnayak DK, Pradhan RC, Naik SN, Bhatnagar N (2008) Moisture-dependent physical properties of Jatropha seed (Jatropha curcas L.). Ind Crop Prod 27:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gathura G (2010) Daily nation. Miracle tree may lack the magic touch it’s fabled to have after all. Accessed 7 June 2010
  18. Gour VK (2006) Production practices including post-harvest management of Jatropha curcas. In: Singh B, Swaminathan R, Ponraj V (eds) Proceedings of the biodiesel conference toward energy independence—focus of Jatropha, Hyderabad, India, June 9–10. Rashtrapati Bhawan, New Delhi, pp 223–251Google Scholar
  19. Gressel J (2008) Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci 174:246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GTZ (2009) Jatropha reality check: a field assessment of the agronomic and economic viability of jatropha and other oilseed crops in Kenya. Study conducted by Endelevu Energy in collaboration with World Agroforestry Centre and Kenya Forestry Research Institute. GTZ—Regional Energy Advisory Platform (East Africa), NairobiGoogle Scholar
  21. Habib-Mintz M (2010) Biofuel investment in Tanzania: omissions in implementation. Energy Policy 38(8):3985–3997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller J (1996) Physic nut. Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Henning RK (2000) The Jatropha manual: a guide to the integrated exploitation of the Jatropha plant in Zambia. GTZ GTZ-ASIP-Support-Project, Southern ProvinceGoogle Scholar
  24. Iiyama M, Zante P (2008) Jatropha field trip report Shimba hills, Kwale District, Coast Province—June 24–25, 2008. MIMEO, KwaleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jongschaap REE, Coreé WJ, Bindraban PS, Brandenburg WA (2007) Claims and facts on Jatropha curcas L. Plant Research International B.V., WageningenGoogle Scholar
  26. Jongschaap REE, Blesgraaf RAR, Bogaard TA, van Loo EN, Savenije HHG (2009) The water footprint of bioenergy from Jatropha curcas L. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:E92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaushik N, Kumar K, Kumar S, Kaushik N, Roys S (2007) Genetic variability and divergence studies in seed traits and oil content of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) accessions. Biomass Bioenergy 31:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kheira AAA, Atta NMM (2009) Response of Jatropha curcas L. to water deficits: yield, water use efficiency and oilseed characteristics. Biomass Bioenergy 3:1343–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loos TK (2009) Socio-economic impact of a Jatropha-project on smallholder farmers in Mpanda, Tanzania: case study of a public–private-partnership project in Tanzania. University of Hohenheim, HohenheimGoogle Scholar
  30. Maes WH, Achten WMJ, Reubens B, Raes D, Samson R, Muys B (2009a) Plant–water relationships and growth strategies of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings under different levels of drought stress. J Arid Environ 73:877–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maes WHA, Trabucco A, Achten WMJ, Muys B (2009b) Climatic growing conditions of Jatropha curcas L. Biomass Bioenergy 33:1481–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Messemaker L (2008) The green myth? Assessment of the Jatropha value chain and its potential for pro-poor biofuel development in northern Tanzania. Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  33. Mutai CC, Ward MN (2000) East African rainfall and the tropical circulation/convection on intraseasonal to interannual timescales. J Climate 13(22):3915–3939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ndurya M, Kihara G (2010) Business daily. Canadian company eyes Tana delta for biofuel projects. Accessed 7 June 2010
  35. Openshaw K (2000) A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass Bioenergy 19:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orange R (2009) Jatropha seeds yield little hope for India’s oil dream. The national. Accessed on 12 May 2009
  37. Ouwens KD, Francis G, Franken YJ, Rijssenbeek W, Riedacker A, Foidl N, Jongschaap R, Bindraban P (2007) Position paper on Jatropha curcas. State of the art, small and large scale project development. Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  38. Pant KS, Khosla V, Kumar D, Gairola S (2006) Seed oil content variation in Jatropha curcas Linn. in different altitudinal ranges and site conditions in H.P. India. Lyonia 11(2):31–34. Accessed 7 June 2010
  39. Paramathma M, Venkatachalam P, Sampathrajan A, Balakrishnan A, Sudhakar JR, Parthiban KT, Subramanian P, Kulanthaisamy S. (2007) Cultivation of Jatropha and biodiesel production. Professor and Nodal Officer, Center of Excellence in Biofuels. Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, p 180Google Scholar
  40. Prajapati ND, Prajapati T. (2005) A hand book of Jatropha curcas Linn. (Physic Nut). Asian Medical Plants and Health Care Trust, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  41. Reddy KC, Naole VV (2009) Enhancing Jatropha curcas productivity by canopy management. Nat Proc. doi:10.1038/npre.2009.3700.1 Google Scholar
  42. Renner R (2007) Green gold in a shrub. Sci Am. Accessed 7 June 2010
  43. Sombroek WG, Braun HMH, van der Pouw BJA (1982) Exploratory soil map and agro-climatic zone map of Kenya, 1980. Scale: 1:1,000,000. Exploratory soil survey report no. E1. Kenya Soil Survey Ministry of Agriculture, National Agricultural Laboratories, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  44. Sunil N, Varaprasad KS, Sivaraj N, Kumar TS, Abraham B, Prasad RBN (2008) Assessing Jatropha curcas L. Germplasm in situ—a case study. Biomass Bioenergy 32:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi K, Hoisington DA, Devi P, Varshney RK (2010) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci 176(4):505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tewari DN (2007) Jatropha and biodiesel. Ocean Books Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  47. van Noordwijk M, Khasanah N, Lusiana B (2007) Jatropha in agroforestry context? WaNuLCAS predictions. World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF, SEA Regional Office, BogorGoogle Scholar
  48. Wahl N, Jamnadass R, Baur H, Munster C, Iiyama M (2010) Economic viability of Jatropha curcas L. Plantations in northern Tanzania: assessing farmers’ prospects via cost–benefit analysis. ICRAF working paper no. 97. World Agroforestry Centre, NairobiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miyuki Iiyama
    • 1
  • David Newman
    • 2
  • Cristel Munster
    • 3
  • Meshack Nyabenge
    • 1
  • Gudeta W. Sileshi
    • 5
  • Violet Moraa
    • 1
  • James Onchieku
    • 4
  • Jeremias Gasper Mowo
    • 1
  • Ramni Jamnadass
    • 1
  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)NairobiKenya
  2. 2.Endelevu EnergyNairobiKenya
  3. 3.Norwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway
  4. 4.Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI)NairobiKenya
  5. 5. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)LilongweMalawi

Personalised recommendations