Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 517–523 | Cite as

Agroforestry systems as habitat for herpetofauna: is there supporting evidence?

  • Camila P. Palacios
  • Belén Agüero
  • Javier A. Simonetti
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The need to carry out biological conservation outside protected areas requires avoiding, minimizing or mitigating impacts brought about by habitat transformation upon the biota. Usually, forest plantations hold fewer species than the original forest. However, structurally complex plantations support more species and individuals than simpler ones. Here we test if this phenomenon occurs in amphibian and reptilian assemblages, analyzing information regarding their richness and abundance in forestry plantations from 14 countries and 72 case studies which compare species richness and abundance in plantations and forests. Among amphibians, species richness is lower in plantations than in forests while among reptiles there is no significant difference. The abundance of reptiles increases in plantations. Three studies dealt with reptile assemblages in relation to structural complexity of plantation, which suggest that species richness and abundance is higher in complex plantations. Despite accounting for 50 % of the terrestrial vertebrates, herpetological studies account for 15 % of the research available regarding the impact of plantation upon vertebrates, information deficiency that hampers decision-making on the conservation of herpetozoans outside protected areas.

Keywords

Amphibians Meta-analysis Reptiles Plantations Structural complexity Understory 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This wok has been supported by Fondecyt 1095046 and Programa Domeyko-Biodiversidad (Iniciativa Transversal 3), Universidad de Chile.

References

  1. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Brito D (2008) Amphibian conservation: are we on the right track? Biol Conserv 141:2912–2917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity CBD (2010) Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2012 and the Aichi targets “Living in harmony with nature” [Online] http://www.cbd.int/doc/strategic-plan/2011-2020/Aichi-Targets-EN.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2012
  4. De Maynadier PG, Hunter ML Jr (1998) Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. Conserv Biol 12:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donald P (2004) Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conserv Biol 18:17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700–2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:589–606Google Scholar
  7. Faria D, Paciencia MLB, Dixo M, Laps RR, Baumgarten J (2007) Ferns, frogs, lizards, birds and bats in forest fragments and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic forest, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 16:2335–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gardner T (2001) Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in conservation biology. Anim Biodivers Conserv 24(2):25–44Google Scholar
  9. Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA (2007) Paradox, presumption and pitfalls in conservation biology: the importance of habitat change for amphibians and reptiles. Biol Conserv 138:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartley M (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 155:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harvey C, González-Villalobos JA (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IUCN (2010) IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2010.2. IUCN Gland, Switzerland. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 19 Aug 2010
  13. Krebs J (1989) Ecological methodology. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Macip-Ríos R, Muñoz-Alonso A (2008) Diversidad de lagartijas en cafetales y bosque primario en el Soconusco Chiapaneco. Rev Mex Biodivers 79:185–195Google Scholar
  15. Nájera A, Simonetti JA (2010a) Enhancing avifauna in commercial plantations. Conserv Biol 24:319–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nájera A, Simonetti JA (2010b) Can oil palm plantations become bird friendly? Agrofor Syst 80:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norris K (2008) Agriculture and biodiversity: opportunity knocks. Conserv Lett 1:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramírez PA, Simonetti JA (2011) Conservation opportunities in agroforestry plantations: the case of mammals. J Nat Conserv 19:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubio AV, Simonetti JA (2011) Lizard assemblages in a fragmented landscape of central Chile. Eur J Wildl Res 57:195–199Google Scholar
  20. Sala EO, Chapin FA III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walter M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simonetti JA (2001) La biodiversidad de países extratropicales: el caso de Chile. In: Primack R, Rozzi R, Feinsinger P, Dirzo R, Massardo F (eds.) Fundamentos de conservación biológica: perspectivas latinoamericanas Fondo de Cultura Económica, México D.F., México 115–116Google Scholar
  22. Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Clements R, Wagner TC, Hill JK, Hamer KC, Clough Y, Tscharntke T, Posa MRC, Lee TM (2010) Conserving southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 143:2375–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995–6000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polansky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wanger TC, Saro A, Iskandar DT, Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Clough Y, Tscharntke T (2009) Conservation value of cacao agroforestry for amphibians and reptiles in south-east Asia: combining correlative models with follow-up field experiments. J Appl Ecol 46:823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wanger TC, Iskandar DT, Motzke I, Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Clough Y, Tscharntke T (2010) Effects of land-use change on community composition of tropical amphibians and reptiles in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 24:795–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young BE, Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Boucher TM (2004) Disappearing jewels: the status of new world amphibians. Nature Serve, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice–Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Camila P. Palacios
    • 1
  • Belén Agüero
    • 1
  • Javier A. Simonetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations