Agroforestry Systems

, 83:101 | Cite as

Managing native and non-native plants in agroforestry systems

Article

Abstract

Indigenous knowledge has influenced native species selection in agroforestry systems worldwide. However, scientific advancements in plant sciences, agroforestry technologies and trade have accelerated species movements and establishment beyond their native range. Managing native and non-native species is an important area of research in agroforestry and this thematic issue includes 13 papers that cover a range of topics from the role of non-native species in agroforestry to management interventions to improve yield. As evident from these papers, non-native plants are still an important component of agroforestry in many parts of the world. Whether native or non-native, management interventions can increase the economic, environmental and social values of these species and that of agroforestry. Collectively, these papers attest to the increasing body of foundational knowledge in agroforestry.

Keywords

Exotic plants Complementary interactions Competition Climate change 

References

  1. Cannell MGR, van Noordwijk M, Ong CK (1996) The central agroforestry hypothesis: the trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agrofor Syst 34:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Antonio C, Meyerson LA (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Rest Ecol 10:703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Holzmueller EJ, Jose S (2011) Invasion success of cogongrass, an alien C4 perennial grass, in the southeastern United States: Exploration of the ecological basis. Biol Invasions 13:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Biehle DJ (2000) Defining competition vectors in a temperate alleycropping system in the midwestern USA: II. Compet water Agrofor Syst 48:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kohli R, Jose S, Batish D, Singh H (2008) Invasive plants and forest ecosystems. CRC/Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pimentel D (2005) Ecological consequences and economic costs of alien species. In: Inderjit S (ed) Invasive plants: ecological and agricultural aspects. Birkhauser-Verlag AG, BaselGoogle Scholar
  9. Wanvestraut R, Jose S, Nair PKR, Brecke BJ (2004) Competition for water in a pecan-cotton alley cropping system in the southern United States. Agrofor Syst 60:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Bubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zamora D, Jose S, Napolitano K (2009) Competition for 15N labeled nitrogen in a loblolly pine-cotton alley cropping system in the southern United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Center for Agroforestry, School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations