Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 141–155 | Cite as

Causes and consequences of shifting cultivation and its alternative in the hill tracts of eastern Bangladesh

  • Syed Ajijur RahmanEmail author
  • Md. Faizar Rahman
  • Terry Sunderland
Article

Abstract

Shifting cultivation, which is still prevalent in the uplands of eastern Bangladesh, contributes significantly to forest loss and is the main cause of land degradation. This paper presents the causes and consequences of shifting cultivation and its potential land use alternatives. The analysis presented is primarily qualitative with a supplementary quantitative analysis of the causes of forest loss by logistic regression. The results of the study show that traditional land practices, exacerbated by poverty and associated with a lack of technical knowledge is the main cause for the continuation of unsustainable shifting cultivation. Population pressure, inadequate land for cultivation, low education levels, policy planning and implementation without local participation are all factors that influence farmers’ decision to continue shifting cultivation. Intensive land management through agroforestry is a promising alternative that can sustainably manage the remaining forest resources. If adopted, such systems potentially provide good economic returns, and may significantly reduce rural poverty.

Keywords

Ethnic minorities Shifting cultivation Deforestation Poverty Agroforestry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is a part of the global project of CIFOR, the Poverty and Environment Network (PEN). The authors would like to thanks Arild Angelsen, Bruce Campbell, Ramadhani Achdiawan and Ronnie Babigumira for their support and guidance. The authors are also thankful to the Department of Sociology, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh who supported this research. Many thanks are also extended to the farmers at the study site where field survey was undertaken, who share their precious time, thought and concerns.

References

  1. Ahmed AU, Azad AK (1987) Social forestry in Bangladesh: a case study of Betagi and Pomora experiments. University of Chittagong, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam MK, Mohiuddin M, Basak SR (1996) Village trees of Bangladesh: diversity and economic aspects. Bangladesh J For Sci 27:67–78Google Scholar
  3. Alim A (1988) Forestry with the people and for the people. Institute of Forestry, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  4. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2001) Chittagong Hill Tracts region development plan. Final report, ADB TA no. 3328, Rangamati, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  5. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC) (1999) Land degradation situation of Bangladesh. Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  6. BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2007) 2007 Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh. Ministry of Planning, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  7. BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2009) Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh. Ministry of Planning, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhuiyan AA (1994) Forest land agroforestry: the North Bengal experience. BARC-Winrock International Agroforestry and Participatory Forestry Research and Training Support Program, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  9. Brammer H (1986) Reconnaissance soil and land use survey: Chittagong Hill Tracts (1964–1965). Soil Resources Development Institute, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  10. DANIDA (Danish International Development Agency) (2000) Identification report. Watershed Development Project, Chittagong Hill Tracts, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  11. Elevitch CR, Wilkinson KM (2000) Economics of farm forestry: financial evaluation for landowners. In: Elevitch CR, Wilkinson KM (eds) Agroforestry guides for Pacific Islands #7. Permanent Agricultural Resources (PAR), HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005: progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Farid ATM, Hossain MSM (1988) Diagnosis of farming practices and their impact on soil resource loss and economic loss in the hill tract area of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  14. Farid ATM, Iqbal A, Karim Z (1992) Soil erosion in the Chittagong Hill Tract and its impact on nutrient status of soil. Bangladesh J Soil Sci 23:92–101Google Scholar
  15. Gafur A (2001) Effects of shifting cultivation on soil properties, erosion, nutrient depletion, and hydrological responses in small watershed of the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. PhD Dissertation, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HARS (Hill Agricultural Research Station) (2000) Hill farming system and resource utilization in Chittagong Hill Tracts. Hill Agricultural Research Station, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  18. Huq MM (2000) Government institutions and underdevelopment: a study of the tribal people of Chittagong Hill Tracts. Dhaka University, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan NA, Khisa SK (2000) Sustainable land management with rubber-based agroforestry: a Bangladeshi example of upland community development. Sustain Dev 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan FK, Khisha AL (1970) Shifting cultivation in East Pakistan. Orient Geogr 14:24–43Google Scholar
  21. Knudsen JL, Khan NA (2002) An exploration of the problems and prospects of integrated watershed development in the CHT. In: Khan NA, Alam MK, Khisa SK, Millat-e-Mustafa M (eds) Farming practices and sustainable development in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. CHTDB and VFFP-IC, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  22. Mai PT (1999) Socio-economic analysis of shifting cultivation versus agroforestry system in the upper stream of lower mekong watershed in Dak Lak province. MA thesis in Economics of Development, National University-HCMC, Viet Nam and Institute of Social Study (ISS), The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Miah MAM, Islam SMF (2007) Shifting cultivation and its alternatives in Bangladesh: productivity, risk and discount rates. SANDEE working paper no. 24-07, NepalGoogle Scholar
  24. Miah MMU, Habibullah, Ali MF (1993) Depletion of organic matter in upland soils of Bangladesh. In: Soil resilience and sustainable land use. Proceedings of international symposium, 28 Sept–2 Oct 1992, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagaland Environmental Protection and Economic Development (NEPED), International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR) (1999) Building upon traditional agriculture in Nagaland, India. Nagaland, India and Silang, CaviteGoogle Scholar
  26. Quddus AHG, Ali SMI, Bhuiyan AMA, Hossain M (1992) Greening the hills: The Betagi-Pomora agroforestry experience. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, and Winrock International, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  27. Rahman A (1992) Participatory approach to forest resource management in Bangladesh: some major initiatives and lessons learned. Paper prepared for international seminar on forest administration and management, Michigan School of Natural Resources, Michigan, 8 Sept 2005Google Scholar
  28. Rahman A, Islam SS (1997) Financial viability of agroforestry under participatory approach in Bangladesh: the case of forest department’s first logged over plots of Dinajpur. Bangladesh J For Sci 26:47–55Google Scholar
  29. Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Codilan AL, Farhana KM (2007) Analysis of the economic benefits from systematic improvements to shifting cultivation and its evolution towards stable continuous agroforestry in the upland of eastern Bangladesh. Int For Rev 9(1):536–547Google Scholar
  30. Rasul G, Thapa GB, Zoebisch MA (2004) Determinants of and-use changes in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Appl Geogr 24:217–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Riessen AV (2000) Chittagong Hill Tracts region development plan. Interim report no. 7. Sociology and Indigenous People, Asian Development Bank, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  32. Sfeir-Younis A, Dragun AK (1993) Land and soil management: technology, economics and institutions. West View Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharma NP (1992) Managing the world’s forests—looking for balance between conservation and development. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, IowaGoogle Scholar
  34. Shoaib JU, Mostafa G, Rahman M (1998) Soil erosion hazard in Chittagong Hill Tracts: a case study. Annual report. Soil Resources Development Institute, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  35. Spencer JE (1966) Shifting cultivation in southeastern Asia. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. Suraswadi P, Thomas DE, Pragtong K, Preechapanya P, Weyerhauser H (2000) Changing land use mosaics of (former) shifting cultivators in watersheds of north Thailand. In: Sanchez P (ed) Alternatives to slash-and-burn. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutter P (2000) Livelihood security in the Chittagong Hill Tracts: findings from a rural assessment undertaken by CARE. CARE, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  38. Turkelboom F, Van KK, Ongprasert S, Sutigoolabud P, Pelletier J (1996) The changing landscape of the Northern Thai hills: adaptive strategies to increasing land pressure. Chiang Mai University, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  39. Watters RF (1971) Shifting cultivation in Latin America. Food and Agricultural Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Ajijur Rahman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Md. Faizar Rahman
    • 2
  • Terry Sunderland
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)Bogor BaratIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh

Personalised recommendations