Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Forage production and nitrogen nutrition in three grasses under coconut tree shades in the humid-tropics

  • C. B. PandeyEmail author
  • S. K. Verma
  • J. C. Dagar
  • R. C. Srivastava
Article

Abstract

Reduction in forage production (FP) under trees in the humid tropics is well known, but information on how different levels of nitrogen (N) fertilizer influence FP under trees is meager. The present study reports effects of four N fertilizer levels (0, 60, 80 and 120 kg ha−1 N) on net soil N mineralization rate (NMR) and soil moisture (SM), FP, shoot biomass/root biomass ratio (SB/RB), N concentration in SB, N uptake and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of three grasses [guinea (Panicum maximum Jacq.), para (Brachiaria mutica (Forssk) Stapf) and hybrid-napier (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.)] under three canopy positions [under canopy (UC, representing high shade), between canopy (BC, representing low shade) and open] of coconut trees (Cocos nucifera L.) in a coconut based silvopastoral system in the humid tropical climate of South Andaman Island of India. The study was performed for two annual cycles (2005–2006 and 2006–2007). The hypotheses tested were: (1) FP would decline under tree shades, both in N fertilized as well as no N fertilized conditions, when SM was not growth limiting in the open. However, amount of decline in the FP would depend on grass species and intensity of shades i.e., higher was the shade greater would be the decline; (2) N fertilizer would increase FP under tree shades, but the increase depended on grass species, intensity of shades and amount of N applied. Amount of N applied, however, would not annul the shades effects when SM was not growth limiting in the open. The study revealed that the tree reduced light 59% under UC and 32% under BC positions, but the N fertilizer levels increased NMR by 11–51% under UC and 3–44% under BC positions compared to the open. SM did not differ across the canopy positions. Under all situations, FP of all grasses declined under UC (47–78%) and BC (18–32%) positions compared to the open; the decline was greater in Hybrid-napier than Guinea and Para grasses. Forage production of all grasses increased with N fertilizer increments under all canopy positions reaching 32 t ha−1 dry matters for hybrid-napier at 120 kg ha−1 N in the open. Both guinea and para grasses outyielded hybrid-napier grass under UC but not under BC or in the open. N concentration in the forage (SB) also increased as N fertilizer level increased. These observations support our hypotheses and suggest that forage production under coconut palms can be increased by the application of N fertilizer with both guinea and para grasses being more productive than hybrid-napier grass under the high shade. Where light conditions are better, hybrid-napier would produce more forage than the other species.

Keywords

Competitive interaction Soil moisture Shoot/root ratio Net soil N-mineralization rate High rainfall Tree shades 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Central Agricultural Research Institute under Institute Project Scheme of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India. Authors are thankful to two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their valuable suggestions on the manuscript, and to Dr. O. P. Chaturvedi for technical check, Dr. S. N. Pandey for editing English language, and Dr. Manish Sharma for helping with statistical analysis of data.

References

  1. Anderson LJ, Brumbaugh MS, Jackson RB (2001) Water and tree-understorey interactions: a natural experiment in a savanna with oak wilt. Ecology 82:33–49Google Scholar
  2. Arun MN, Ahlawat SPS, Sharma AK (1993) Fodder in view of livestock farming in the Andaman Islands. Isl March 6(1):4–7Google Scholar
  3. Basic Statistics (2001) Andaman and Nicobar Islands: basic statistics. Directorate of Economics and statistics, Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Port BlairGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister D, Callaway RM (2006) Facilitation by Pinus flexilis during succession:a hierarchy of mechanisms benefits other plant species. Ecology 87:1816–1830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belsky AJ (1994) Influence of trees on savanna productivity: test of shade, nutrients, and tree-grass competition. Ecology 75:922–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belsky AJ, Amundson RG, Duxbury JM, Riha SJ, Ali AR, Mwonga SM (1989) The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environment in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya. J Appl Ecol 26:1005–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benavides R, Douglas GB, Osoro K (2009) Silvopastoralism in New Zealand: review of effects of evergreen and deciduous trees on pasture dynamics. Agrofor Syst 76:327–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen 8. In: Black A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, agronomy 9. Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1149–1179Google Scholar
  9. Burner DM, MacKown CT (2006) Nitrogen effects on herbage nitrogen use and nutritive value in a meadow and Loblolly pine alley. Crop Sci 46:1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78(7):1958–1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaire FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz P (1996) Growth and nitrogen nutrition of a Dichanthium aristatum pasture under shading. Trop Grassl 30:407–413Google Scholar
  13. Cruz P, Munier-Jolain NM, Tournebize R, Sinoquet H (1993) Growth and mineral nutrition in a Dichanthium aristatum sward shaded by tree. In: Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress, Rockhampton, pp 2056–2057Google Scholar
  14. Cruz P, Tournebize R, Gaudichau C, Haegelin A, Munier-Jolain NM (1995) Effect of shade on growth, nitrogen content and CO2 leaf assimilation in a tropical perennial grass. In: Sinoquet H, Cruz P (eds) Ecophysiology of tropical intercropping. INRA, Paris, pp 285–293Google Scholar
  15. Delogu G, Cattivelli L, Pecchioni N, DeFalcis D, Maggiore T, Stanca AM (1998) Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur J Agron 9:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dodd MB, McGowan AW, Power IL, Thorrold BS (2005) Effects of variation in shade level, shade duration and light quality on perennial pasture. NZJ Agirc Res 48:531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durr PA, Rangel J (2000) The response of Panicum maximum to a simulated subcanopy environment: soil × shade interaction. Trop Grassl 34:110–117Google Scholar
  18. Eno CF (1960) Nitrate production in the field by incubating the soil in polyethylene bags. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksen FI, Whitney AS (1981) Effects of light intensity on growth of some tropical forage species. I. Interaction of light intensity and nitrogen fertilization on six forage grasses. Agron J 73:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Field C (1983) Allocating leaf nitrogen for maximization of carbon gain: leaf age as a control on the allocation program. Oecologia 56:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gea-Izquierdo G, Montero G, Canellas I (2009) Changes in limiting resources determine spatio-temporal variability in tree-grass interactions. Agrofor Syst 76:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman D, Grunow JO, Theron GK (1980) Biomass cycling, accumulation rates and nutritional characteristics of grass layer plants in canopied and uncanopied subhabitats of Burkea savanna. Proc Grassl Soc South Africa 15:157–161Google Scholar
  23. Guevara-Escobar A, Kemp PD, Mackay AD, Mackay AD, Hodgson J (2007) Pasture production and composition under poplar in a hill environment in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 69:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heggenstaller AH, Moore KJ, Liebman M, Anex RP (2009) Nitrogen influences biomass and nutrients partitioning by perennial, warm-season grasses. Agron J 101:1363–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hiremath AJ, Ewel JJ, Cole TG (2002) Nutrient use efficiency in three fast growing tropical trees. Forest Sci 48:662–672Google Scholar
  26. Koukoura Z, Nastis AS (1989) Effect of shade on production and forage quality of herbaceous species. Geotehnika Epistimonika Themata 1:17–25 (In Greek, English summary)Google Scholar
  27. Koukoura Z, Kyriazopoulos AP, Parissi ZM (2009) Growth characteristics and nutrient content of some herbaceous species under shade and fertilization. Spanish J Agric Res 7(2):431–438Google Scholar
  28. Ludwig F, de Kroon H, Berendse F, Prins HHT, Berendse F (2001) The effects of nutrients and shade on tree-grass interactions on an East African savanna. J Veg Sci 12:579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ludwig F, de Kroon H, Berendse F, Prins HHT (2004) The influence of savanna trees on nutrient, water and light availability and the understory vegetation. Plant Ecol 170:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michon G, Mary F, Bompard J (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Agrofor Syst 4:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millate-E-Mustafa MD, Hall JB, Teklehaimanot Z (1996) Structure and floristics of Bangladesh homegardens. Agrofor Syst 33:263–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mordelet P, Menaut JC (1995) Influence of trees on aboveground production dynamics of grasses in a humid savanna. J Veg Sci 6:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mosquera-Losada MR, Lopez-Diaz L, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (2001) Sewage sludge fertilization of a silvopastoral system with pines in northwestern Spain. Agrofor Syst 53:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pandey CB, Singh JS (1992) Rainfall and grazing effects on net primary productivity in a tropical savanna, India. Ecology 73:2007–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pandey CB, Singh L (2009) Soil fertility under homegarden trees and native moist evergreen forest in South Andaman, India. J Susta Agric 33(30):303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pandey CB, Rai RB, Singh L (2007a) Seasonal dynamics of mineral N pools and N-mineralization in soils under homegarden trees in South Andaman, India. Agrofor Syst 71:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pandey CB, Rai RB, Singh L, Singh AK (2007b) Homegardens of Andaman and Nicobar, India. Agric Syst 92:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pandey CB, Singh GB, Singh SK, Singh RK (2010) Soil nitrogen and microbial biomass carbon dynamics in native forests and derived agricultural land uses in a humid tropical climate of India. Plant Soil 333:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Polley HW, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS (1997) Leaf physiology, production, water use, and nitrogen dynamics of the grassland invader Acacia smallii at elevated CO2 concentrations. Tree Physi 17:89–96Google Scholar
  40. Power IL, Dodd MB, Thorrold BS (2001) Deciduous or evergreen does it make a difference to understorey pasture yield and riparian zone management? Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:121–125Google Scholar
  41. Rhoades CC (1997) Single-tree influences on soil properties in agroforestry: lessons from natural forests and savanna ecosystems. Agrofor Syst 35:71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sagan C, Toon OB, Pollack JB (1979) Anthropogenic albedo changes and the earth’s climate. Science 206:1363–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarmiento G (1984) The ecology of neotropical savannas. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Scanlan JC, Wilson BJ, Anderson ER (1991) Sustaining productive pasture in the tropics. 2. Managing woody vegetation in grazing lands. Trop Grassl 25:85–90Google Scholar
  45. Sierra J, Marban L (2000) Nitrogen mineralization pattern of an oxisol of Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Sol Sci Soc Am J 64:2002–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soder KJ, Stout WL (2003) Effect of soil type and fertilization level on mineral concentration of pasture: potential relationships to ruminant performance and health. J Anim Sci 81:1603–1610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Somarriba E (1988) Pasture growth and floristic composition under the shade of guava (Psidium guajava L.) trees in Costa Rica. Agrofor Syst 6:153–162Google Scholar
  48. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilman D, Wedin D (1991) Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72:685–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tothill JC, Mott JJ (1985) The ecology and management of the world’s savanna. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
  51. Tournebize R, Sinoquet H (1994) Light interaction and partitioning in a shrub/grass mixture. Agril For Meterol 72:277–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vetaas OR (1992) Micro-site effects of trees and shrubs in dry savannas. J Veg Sci 3:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wong CC, Wilson JR (1980) Effects of shading on the growth and nitrogen content of green panic and siratro in pure and mixed swards defoliated at two frequencies. Aust J Agric Res 31:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. B. Pandey
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. K. Verma
    • 1
  • J. C. Dagar
    • 2
  • R. C. Srivastava
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Agricultural Research InstitutePort BlairIndia
  2. 2.Central Soil Salinity Research InstituteKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations