Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 361–378 | Cite as

Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: II. Development of a simple process-based model and preliminary results

  • Marcel van OijenEmail author
  • Jean Dauzat
  • Jean-Michel Harmand
  • Gerry Lawson
  • Philippe Vaast


Research on coffee agroforestry systems in Central America has identified various environmental factors, management strategies and plant characteristics that affect growth, yield and the impact of the systems on the environment. Much of this literature is not quantitative, and it remains difficult to optimise growing area selection, shade tree use and management. To assist in this optimisation we developed a simple dynamic model of coffee agroforestry systems. The model includes the physiology of vegetative and reproductive growth of coffee plants, and its response to different growing conditions. This is integrated into a plot-scale model of coffee and shade tree growth which includes competition for light, water and nutrients and allows for management treatments such as spacing, thinning, pruning and fertilising. Because of the limited availability of quantitative information, model parameterisation remains fraught with uncertainty, but model behaviour seems consistent with observations. We show examples of how the model can be used to examine trade-offs between increasing coffee and tree productivity, and between maximising productivity and limiting the impact of the system on the environment.


Yield Environmental impact Climate Soil Management Sensitivity analysis 



This work was part of the project “Sustainability of Coffee Agroforestry Systems in Central America” (CASCA) supported by the European Union under contract ICA4-2001-10071. We acknowledge our colleagues in the project for the many useful discussions on agroforestry modelling and data availability.


  1. Aguilar A, Beer JW, Vaast P, Jimenez F, Staver C, Kleinn C (2001) Desarrollo del cafe asociado con Eucalyptus deglupta o Terminalia ivorensis en la etapa de establecimiento. Agrofor en las Am 8:28–31Google Scholar
  2. Amaral JAT, DaMatta FM, Rena AB (2001) Effects of fruiting on the growth of Arabica coffee trees as related to carbohydrate and nitrogen status and to nitrate reductase activity. Revista Brasileira De Fisiologia Vegetal 13:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babbar LI, Zak DR (1994) Nitrogen cycling in coffee agroecosystems: net N mineralization and nitrification in the presence and absence of shade trees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 48:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babbar LI, Zak DR (1995) Nitrogen loss from coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica—leaching and denitrification in the presence and absence of shade trees. J Environ Qual 24:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barradas VL, Fanjul L (1986) Microclimatic characterization of shaded and open-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantations in Mexico. Agric For Meteorol 38:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer JW (1992) Production and competitive effects of the shade trees Cordia alliodora and Erythrina poeppigiana in an agroforestry system with Coffea arabica. University of Oxford, Oxford, p 230Google Scholar
  7. Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1997) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouman BAM, Van Keulen H, Van Laar HH, Rabbinge R (1996) The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric Syst 52:171–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campanha MM, Santos RHS, de Freitas GB, Martinez HEP, Garcia SLR, Finger FL (2005) Growth and yield of coffee plants in agroforestry and monoculture systems in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 63:75–82Google Scholar
  10. Cannell MGR (1985) Physiology of the coffee crop. In: Clifford MN, Willson KC (eds) Coffee: botany, biochemistry and production of beans and beverage. Croom Helm, London, pp 108–134Google Scholar
  11. Dauzat J, Rapidel B, Berger A (2001) Simulation of leaf transpiration and sap flow in virtual plants: model description and application to a coffee plantation in Costa Rica. Agric For Meteorol 109:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dereffye P (1981) Random mathematical model and simulation of growth and structure of the coffee tree Robusta. 1. Study of behavior of meristems and growth of the vegetative axes. Cafe Cacao The 25:83–102Google Scholar
  13. Dereffye P (1983) Random mathematical model and simulation of growth and structure of the coffee tree Robusta. 4. Programming of a 3-dimensional drawing of the structure of a tree for a micro-computer—application to the coffee tree. Cafe Cacao The 27:3–20Google Scholar
  14. Dix ME, Bishaw B, Workman SW, Barnhart MR, Klopfenstein NB, Dix AM (1999) Pest management in enery- and labor-intensive agroforestry systems. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 131–155Google Scholar
  15. Driessen PM (1986) The water balance of the soil. In: Van Keulen H, Wolf J (eds) Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 76–116Google Scholar
  16. FAO (1995) FAOCLIM 1.2. A CD-ROM with a compilation of monthly worldwide agroclimatic data. FAO, Rome, p 68Google Scholar
  17. Farquhar GD, Von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farre I, van Oijen M, Leffelaar PA, Faci JM (2000) Analysis of maize growth for different irrigation strategies in northeastern Spain. Eur J Agron 12:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fournier LA (1988) El cultivo del cafeto (Coffea arabica L.) al sol o a la sombra: un enfoque agronomico y ecofisiologico. Agron Costarricense 12:131–146Google Scholar
  20. Franck N, Vaast P (2009) Limitation of coffee leaf photosynthesis by stomatal conductance and light availability under different shade levels. Trees-Struct Funct 23:761–769Google Scholar
  21. Gifford R (1980) Carbon storage in the biosphere. In: Pearman G (ed) Carbon dioxide and climate. Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, pp 167–181Google Scholar
  22. Gifford RM (2003) Plant respiration in productivity models: conceptualisation, representation and issues for global terrestrial carbon-cycle research. Funct Plant Biol 30:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goudriaan J (1990) Atmospheric CO2, global carbon fluxes and the biosphere. In: Rabbinge R, Goudriaan J, Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries FWT, van Laar HH (eds) Theoretical production ecology: reflections and prospects. PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 17–40Google Scholar
  24. Goudriaan J, Ketner P (1984) A simulation study for the global carbon cycle, including man’s impact on the biosphere. Clim Change 6:167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartemink AE (2005) Plantation agriculture in the tropics—environmental issues. Outlook Agric 34:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hergoualc’h K, Skiba U, Harmand JM, Henault C (2008) Fluxes of greenhouse gases from Andosols under coffee in monoculture or shaded by Inga densiflora in Costa Rica. Biogeochemistry 89:329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Höglind M, Schapendonk AHCM, Van Oijen M (2001) Timothy growth in Scandinavia: combining quantitative information and simulation modelling. New Phytol 151:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imbach AC, Fassbender HW, Beer J, Borel R, Bonnemann A (1989) Agroforestry systems of Arabica Coffee and Laurel (Cordia-Alliodora) and of Arabica Coffee and Poro (Erythrina-Poeppigiana) in Turrialba, Costa-Rica. 6. Water balances, rainfall interception and lixiviation of nutrients. Turrialba 39:400–414Google Scholar
  29. Johns TC, Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Johnson CE, Jones A, Lowe JA, Mitchell JFB, Roberts DL, Sexton DMH, Stevenson DS, Tett SFB, Woodage MJ (2003) Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios. Clim Dyn 20:583–612Google Scholar
  30. Kass DCL, Thurston HD, Schlather K (1999) Sustainable mulch-based cropping systems with trees. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 361–379Google Scholar
  31. Keith H, Raison RJ, Jacobsen KL (1997) Allocation of carbon in a mature eucalypt forest and some effects of soil phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 196:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kropff MJ (1993) Mechanisms of competition for water. In: Kropff MJ, van Laar HH (eds) Modelling crop–weed intercations. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 63–76Google Scholar
  33. Malhi Y, Baldocchi DD, Jarvis PG (1999) The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests. Plant Cell Environ 22:715–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews R, Stephens W, Hess T, Mason T, Graves A (2000) Applications of crop/soil simulation models in developing countries. Cranfield University, Silsoe, UK, p iv + iii + 173Google Scholar
  35. Matthews R, Van Noordwijk M, Gijsman AJ, Cadisch G (2004) Models of below-ground interactions: their validity, applicability and beneficiaries. In: Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CA (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  36. Mobbs DC, Cannell MGR, Crout NMJ, Lawson GJ, Friend AD, Arah J (1998) Complementarity of light and water use in tropical agroforests—I. Theoretical model outline, performance and sensitivity. For Ecol Manag 102:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muetzelfeldt RI, Sinclair FL (1993) Ecological modelling of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Abstr 6:207–247Google Scholar
  38. Muschler RG, Bonnemann A (1997) Potentials and limitations of agroforestry for changing land-use in the tropics: experiences from Central America. For Ecol Manag 91:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nair PKR, Buresh RJ, Mugendi DN, Latt CR (1999) Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: myths and science. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  40. Nunes MA, Bierhuizen JF, Ploegman C (1968) Studies on productivity of coffee. I. Effect of light, temperature and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of Coffea arabica. Acta Bot Neerl 1:93–102Google Scholar
  41. Nygren P (1993) Simulation of the shading pattern of periodically pruned trees in agroforestry systems. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 28:177–188Google Scholar
  42. Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation for open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond, Ser A 193:120–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ramirez LG (1993) Produccion de café (Coffea arabica) bajo diferentes niveles de fertilizacion con y sin sombra de Erythrina poeppigiana (Walpers) O.F. Cook. In: Westley SB, Powell MH (eds) Erythrina in the new and old worlds. Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association, Paia, USA, pp 121–124Google Scholar
  44. Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE—revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46:30–33Google Scholar
  45. Reynolds-Vargas JS, Richter DD, Bornemisza E (1994) Environmental impacts of nitrification and nitrate adsorption in fertilized Andisols in the Valle Central of Costa Rica. Soil Sci 157:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodriguez D, Van Oijen M, Schapendonk AHMC (1999) LINGRA-CC: a sink-source model to simulate the impact of climate change and management on grassland productivity. New Phytol 144:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ryan MC, Graham GR, Rudolph DL (2001) Contrasting nitrate adsorption in Andisols of two coffee plantations in Costa Rica. J Environ Qual 30:1848–1852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Starr GC, Lal R, Malone R, Hothem D, Owens L, Kimble J (2000) Modeling soil carbon transported by water erosion processes. Land Degrad Dev 11:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vahrson W-G (1991) Taller de erosion de suelos: resultados, comentarios y recomendaciones. Agron Costarric 15:197–203Google Scholar
  50. Van Kanten R (2003) Competitive interactions in agroforestry systems: competitive interactions between Coffea arabica L. and fast-growing timber shade trees in southern Costa Rica. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany, p xii + 66Google Scholar
  51. Van Noordwijk M, Rahayu S, Williams SE, Hairiah K, Khasanah N, Schroth G (2004) Tree root architecture. In: Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CA (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 83–107Google Scholar
  52. Van Oijen M, Ewert F (1999) The effects of climatic variation in Europe on the yield response of spring wheat cv. Minaret to elevated CO2 and O3: an analysis of open-top chamber experiments by means of two crop growth simulation models. Eur J Agron 10:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Oijen M, Dreccer MF, Firsching K-H, Schnieders BJ (2004) Simple equations for dynamic models of the effects of CO2 and O3 on light-use efficiency and growth of crops. Ecol Model 179:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Oijen M, Rougier J, Smith R (2005) Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiol 25:915–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Oijen M, Dauzat J, Harmand J-M, Lawson G, Vaast P (2010) Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: I. A review of quantitative information on physiological and ecological processes. Agrofor Syst (submitted)Google Scholar
  56. Von Gadow K, Hui G (1999) Modelling forest development. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, vii + 213 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, vii + 320 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel van Oijen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean Dauzat
    • 2
  • Jean-Michel Harmand
    • 2
  • Gerry Lawson
    • 3
  • Philippe Vaast
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH-Edinburgh)PenicuikUK
  2. 2.CIRADMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.NERCSwindonUK
  4. 4.CATIETurrialbaCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations