Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview

Article

Abstract

Agroforestry systems are believed to provide a number of ecosystem services; however, until recently evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking. This special issue brings together a series of papers from around the globe to address recent findings on the ecosystem services and environmental benefits provided by agroforestry. As prelude to the special issue, this paper examines four major ecosystem services and environmental benefits of agroforestry: (1) carbon sequestration, (2) biodiversity conservation, (3) soil enrichment and (4) air and water quality. Past and present evidence clearly indicates that agroforestry, as part of a multifunctional working landscape, can be a viable land-use option that, in addition to alleviating poverty, offers a number of ecosystem services and environmental benefits. This realization should help promote agroforestry and its role as an integral part of a multifunctional working landscape the world over.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation Carbon sequestration Clean air Clean water Multifunctional working landscape Soil enrichment 

References

  1. Allen S, Jose S, Nair PKR, Brecke BJ, Nkedi-Kizza P, Ramsey CL (2004) Safety net role of tree roots: experimental evidence from an alley cropping system. For Ecol Manage 192:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Seobi T, Garrett HE (2009) Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agrofor Syst 75:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou X (2004) Windbreaks in sustainable agriculture. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandez ECM (1998) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems (advances in agroecology). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 416Google Scholar
  5. Bugg RL, Sarrantonio M, Dutcher JD, Phatak SC (1991) Understory cover crops in pecan orchards: possible management systems. Am J Alt Agric 6:50–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry system: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ewel JJ (1999) Natural systems as models for the design of suitable systems of land use. Agrofor Syst 45:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO State of Food and Agriculture Report (2007) FAO Economic and Social Development Department, Corporate Document Repository. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1200e/a1200e00.htm Accessed on March 27, 2009
  10. Garrett HE, McGraw RL (2000) Alley cropping practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. ASA, Madison, pp 149–188Google Scholar
  11. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillespie AR, Miller BK, Johnson KD (1995) Effects of ground cover on tree survival and growth in filter strips of the Cornbelt Region of the midwestern US. Agric Ecosyst Environ 53:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey CA, González Villalobos JA (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey CA, Gonzales JG, Somarriba E (2006) Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forest, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodivers Conserv 15:555–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey CA, Schroth G, Zerbock O (2007) Designing agroforestry systems to mitigate climate change, conserve biodiversity and sustain rural livelihoods. http://web.catie.ac.cr/cd_multiestrata/Poster/session2/Designing_agroforestry.pdf Accessed on March 26, 2009
  16. International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (2008) Executive summary of the synthesis report. http://www.agassessment.org/docs/SR_Exec_Sum_280508_English.htm. Accessed on March 27, 2009
  17. IPCC (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. A special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 375Google Scholar
  18. Izac AMN (2003) Economic aspects of soil fertility management and agroforestry practices. In: Schroth G, Sinclair F (eds) Trees crops and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 464Google Scholar
  19. Johnson RJ, Beck MM (1988) Influences of shelterbelts on wildlife management and biology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):301–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kabir EM, Webb EL (2009) Can homegardens conserve biodiversity in Bangladesh? Biotropica 40:95–103Google Scholar
  22. Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manage 246:208–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Advances in agroforestry, vol 3. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan–cotton alley cropping system in southern USA. Agrofor Syst 58:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58:1–8Google Scholar
  27. McNeely JA (2004) Nature vs nurture: managing relationships between forests, agroforestry and wild biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 61:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McNeely JA, Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation–traditional practices, present dynamics and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv 15:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montagnini F (2006) Environmental services of agroforestry systems. Food Products Press, USA 126Google Scholar
  32. Nair VD, Graetz DA (2004) Agroforestry as an approach to minimizing nutrient loss from heavily fertilized soils: the Florida experience. Agrofor Syst 61:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nair PKR, Latt CR (eds) (1997) Directions in tropical agroforestry research. Agrofor Syst 38: 1–249Google Scholar
  34. Nair VD, Nair PKR, Kalmbacher RS, Ezenwa IV (2007) Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse-textured soils of Florida, USA. Ecol Eng 29:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perfecto I, Rice R, Greenberg R, van der Voorst ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46:598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schroth G, Sinclair F (2003) Trees crops and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 464Google Scholar
  38. Schroth G, da Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac AN (2004) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Seiter S, Ingham ER, William RD, Hibbs DE (1995) Increase in soil microbial biomass and transfer of nitrogen from alder to sweet corn in an alley cropping system. In: Ehrenreich JH, Ehrenreich DL, Lee HW (eds) Growing a sustainable future. University of Idaho, Boise, ID, pp 56–158Google Scholar
  40. Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforest Syst 60:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith MW, Arnold DC, Eikenbary RD, Rice NR, Shiferaw A, Cheary BS, Carroll BL (1996) Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biol Cont 6:164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiv Cons 10:1839–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1997) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agroforest Syst 39:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tyndall J, Colletti J (2007) Mitigating swine odor with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: a review. Agrofor Syst 69:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Garrett HE (2008a) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on pore characteristics measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008b) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160Google Scholar
  48. van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumaré A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree–Crop interactions: a physiological approach. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 319–364Google Scholar
  49. Williams-Guillén K, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Bats limit insects in a tropical agroforestry system. Science 320:70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. p 320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations