Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 91–101 | Cite as

Filling the gap: improving estimates of working tree resources in agricultural landscapes

  • C. H. Perry
  • C. W. Woodall
  • G. C. Liknes
  • M. M. Schoeneberger


Agroforestry plantings and other trees intentionally established in rural and urban areas are emerging as innovative management options for addressing resource issues and achieving landscape-level goals. An understanding of the ecosystem services contributed by these and future plantings would provide critical information to policy and program developers, and a comprehensive inventory would contribute to estimating the cumulative effects of these plantings. Trees used in these practices are not explicitly inventoried by the primary national forest resource inventory of the United States: the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program of the USDA Forest Service. The FIA program currently limits its inventories to trees in forests meeting specific size and density criteria, but the draft FIA Strategic Plan suggests the addition of an “other treed land inventory” (excluding urban forests). In this study, we use FIA data to estimate the agroforestry and other tree resources of the Midwest and document some obstacles to effective inventories of agroforestry practices. We compare our estimates of forestland area in the Midwest to those derived from MODIS (MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) Vegetative Continuous Fields (VCF). The differences between these two estimates, particularly in sparsely forested states, support the idea that the expansion of the FIA program to an all-tree inventory would fill an important gap. We propose minor modifications to the inventory that would lead to an improved assessment of agroforestry and other tree resources and practices.


Inventory Land use Monitoring Natural resources Policy 



The authors would like to thank the following individuals for their comments on this and earlier versions of the manuscript: D. Coble, Stephen F. Austin State University; T. Morgan, University of Montana; J. Blehm, W. Burkman, R. Czaplewski, M. Hatfield, D. Haugen, R. McRoberts, R. Piva, USDA Forest Service; and J. Goebel, V. Lessard, B. Wight and D. Williams, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.


  1. Bechtold WA, Scott CT (2005) The forest inventory and analysis plot design. In: Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (eds) The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program: national sampling design and estimation procedures. Gen Tech Rep SRS-80. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC, pp 27–42Google Scholar
  2. Brand GJ, Nelson MD, Wendt DG, Nimerfro KK (2000) The hexagon/panel system for selecting FIA plots under and annual inventory. In: McRoberts RE, Reams GA, Van Deusen PC (eds) Proceedings of the first annual forest inventory and analysis symposium. Gen Tech Rep NC-213. USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, pp 8–13Google Scholar
  3. Gallagher PW (2006) Energy production with biomass: what are the prospects? Choices 21:21–26Google Scholar
  4. Godsey L (2003) Funding incentives for agroforestry in Missouri. 5-2002. University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry, Columbia, MO. Available online at Cited 15 March 2008
  5. Guo Q (2000) Climate change and biodiversity conservation in Great Plains agroecosystems. Glob Environ Change 10:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen M (1985) Line intersect sampling of wooded strips. For Sci 31(2):282–288Google Scholar
  7. Hansen M, DeFries R, Townshend JRG et al (2002) Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS. Rem Sens Environ 83:303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen M, DeFries R, Townshend JR, Carroll M, Dimiceli C, Sohlberg R (2003) 500 m MODIS vegetation continuous fields. Global Land Cover Facility, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartong AL, Moessner KE (1956) Wooded strips in Iowa. Forest Survey Release 21. USDA Central States Forest Experiment Station, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  10. National Research Council (1993) Soil and water quality: an agenda for agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. National Research Council (2002) Riparian areas: functions and strategies for management. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Olson R, Schoeneberger MM, Aschmann S (2000) An ecological foundation for temperate agroforestry. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 31–61Google Scholar
  13. Ruark G, Josiah S, Riemenschneider D, Volk T (2006) Perennial crops for bio-fuels and conservation. Paper presented at 2006 USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum, Prospering In Rural America, Arlington, VA, 16 Feb 2006 [On-line] Available at Cited 15 March 2008
  14. Schoeneberger MM (2005) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on ag lands. In: Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF (eds) Moving agroforestry into the mainstream. Proceedings of the 9th North American agroforestry conference, Rochester, MN, 12–15 June 2005 [CD-ROM]. Dept. Forest Resources, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Schoeneberger MM, Bentrup G, Francis CF (2001) Ecobelts: reconnecting agriculture and communities. In: Flora C (ed) Interactions between agroecosystems and rural human communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 239–260Google Scholar
  16. Smith WB (2002) Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program. Environ Pollut 116:S233–S242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stolte K, Conkling B, Campbell S, Gillespie A (2002) Forest health indicators: forest inventory and analysis program. FS-746. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. USDA Forest Service (2004) Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide. vol 1: field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 3.0 [Online]. USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN. Available at Cited 15 March 2008
  19. USDA National Agroforestry Center (2003) Incentives for agroforestry: 2002 Farm Bill. In: Inside Agroforestry [Online]. USDA National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NE. Available at Cited 15 March 2008
  20. USDA National Agroforestry Center (2004) Working trees for water quality [Online]. USDA Forest Service and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Available at Cited 15 March 2008
  21. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (1996) Agroforestry for farms and ranches. Agroforestry Technical Note No. 1 [Online]. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE. Available at Cited 15 March 2008
  22. Vogelman JE, Howard SM, Yang L, Larson CR, Wylie BK, Driel NV (2001) Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 67:650–662Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Perry
    • 1
  • C. W. Woodall
    • 1
  • G. C. Liknes
    • 1
  • M. M. Schoeneberger
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA Forest Service, Northern Research StationSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest Service, National Agroforestry CenterLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations