Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 23–36 | Cite as

Adoption potential of fruit-tree-based agroforestry on small farms in the subtropical highlands

  • J. G. Bellow
  • R. F. Hudson
  • P. K. R. Nair


Worldwide, fruit-tree-based agroforestry systems have been only modestly studied, although they are common on smallholder farms. Such systems based on apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and pear (Pyrus spp.) are common in northwest Guatemala as low intensity homegardens and are known to increase total farm productivity in communities where farm size is a limiting factor. This study investigated the potential for adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry by resource-limited farmers using ethnographic investigation and linear programming simulations of farm activities at the household level. Two communities with differing demographics, infrastructure, and access to regional markets were selected based on the presence of extensive fruit-tree-based agroforestry. The influences of family size, land holdings, and tree and crop yields on the optimal adoption levels of fruit trees were evaluated through a comparative study of the varying social and physical infrastructure present in the two communities. Fruit-tree-based agroforestry was potentially more attractive to relatively prosperous families or those with larger land holdings. Improvements in fruit-tree productivity and interspecies competition were of greater importance where family land holdings were smaller. The inability of families to produce sufficient food to meet annual needs, poor fruit quality, and lack of market infrastructure were identified as constraints that limit adoption. The complementarity of production with the dominant maize (Zea mays) crop, home consumption of fruit, and the potential to generate additional cash on limited land holdings were identified as factors promoting adoption of fruit-tree-based agroforestry.


Farming systems Guatemala Homegardens Linear programming Livelihoods Mixed cropping Orchard Pyrus 



The authors are deeply indebted to the families of Chuculjulup and Cabrican, Guatemala for their contributions and the personnel of ICTA, in Quetzaltenango for their support and collaboration. The principal author was supported by an E.T. York Presidential Fellowship, University of Florida, and by a Bowen fellowship from the National Security Education Program. The study was also supported by a USDA/Initiative for Future Agricultural and Food Systems CSREES grant to the University of Florida (Center for Subtropical Agriculture), Gainesville, FL., USA.


  1. Bellow J (2004) Fruit-tree-based agroforestry in the western highlands of Guatemala. Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Byerlee D, Biggs S, Collinson M, Harrington L, Martinez J, Moscardi E, Winkelmann D (1981) On-farm research to develop technologies appropriate to farmers. I.A.A.E. occasional paper – Int Assoc Agric Econ 2:170–177Google Scholar
  3. Delobel T, Evers G, Maerere A (1991) Position and functions of deciduous fruit trees in the farming systems at Upper Mgeta, Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania. Acta Hort 270:91–102Google Scholar
  4. Garcia de Ceca J, Gebremedhin K, Jarvis P (1991) A decision support system for planning agroforestry systems. For Ecol Manag 45:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gramajo S (1993) Autogestion comunitaria de recursos naturales, estudio de caso en Totonicapan. FLACSO programa, Guatemala City, Guatemala, 109 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Hildebrand P (1986) The sondeo: a team rapid survey approach. In: Hildebrand P (ed) Perspectives on farming research and extension. Lynne Rienner Publishing, Bolder, Colorado, 167 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Immink M, Alarcon J (1991) Household food security, nutrition and crop diversification among smallholder farmers in the highlands of Guatemala. Ecol Food Nutrition 25:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Immink M, Alarcon J (1993) Household income, food availability, and commercial crop production by small-holder farmers in the western highlands of Guatemala. Econ Dev Cult Change 41:319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas) (1994) Departmento de Totonicapan, caracteristicas generales de poblacion y habitacion. Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas, Guatemala, Guatemala, 125 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Kapp G (1998) Financial evaluation tools for smallholder forestry: a methodological comparison of two forms of cost-benefit analysis and optimization. Int Tree Crops J 9:233–246Google Scholar
  11. Kaya B, Hildebrand P, Nair PKR (2000) Modeling changes in farming systems with the adoption of improved fallows in southern Mali. Agrofor Sys 66:51–68Google Scholar
  12. Knapp K, Sadorsky P (2000) Economics of agroforestry production in irrigated agriculture. J Agric Res Econ 25:286–306Google Scholar
  13. Li L, Yang S, Li X, Zhang F, Christie P, Li L, Yang SC, Li XL, Zhang FS (1999) Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean. Plant Soil 212:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahat T (1987) Forestry farming linkages in the mountains. ICIMOD (International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development) Occasional Paper. No. 7, 47 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Mudhara M, Hildebrand P, Nair PKR (2003) Potential for adoption of Sesbania sesban improved fallows in Zimbabwe: a linear programming-based case study of small-scale farmers. Agrofor Sys 59:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mulk M, Jodha N, Banskota M, Partap T (1992) Diversity of farming systems and farmers’ strategies in the mountain valley of Chitral, Pakistan. In: Jodha N, Banskota M (eds) Sustainable mountain agriculture. V. 2: farmer’s strategies and innovative approaches. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 477–496Google Scholar
  17. Nasendi B, Hasanudin Nugroho I, Mulyaningrum Karyono O, Tryono Murod A, Sipayung W (1996) Analysis of industrial plantation forest model development with a mosaic system using a linear programming modeling approach: a proposed model for the Padang Lawas area, North Sumatra. Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan 14:291–307Google Scholar
  18. Njiti C (1988) Development of a goal programming model for land use planning with emphasis on wood for energy production in the Republic of Cameroon. Dissertation Abstracts International: Humanities-and-Social-Sciences. Southern Illinois University, 150 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith C (1989) Survival strategies among petty commodity producers in Guatemala. Int Labor Rev 128:791–813Google Scholar
  20. Storck H, Emana B, Adenew B, Borowiecki A, Hawariat S (1991) Farming systems and farm management practices of smallholders in the Hararghe highlands – a baseline survey. Farming Sys Res Econ Trop 11:195Google Scholar
  21. Tsongo N (1993) The impact of the introduction of an innovation on the development of peasant farms in the mountainous zones of Kivu (Zaire). Tropicultura 11:11–15Google Scholar
  22. Vasquez J (2000) El Manzano (Malus pumila) y recomendaciones para el cultivo en Guatemala. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia Agricolas, Guatemala, 112 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams W, Vasquez J (1990) El Cultivo de Pera. Programa de Desarrollo Agricola, MAGA-AID, 16 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams W, Cifuentes S, del Aguila V, Perez R (1992) Rejuvenation of a peach orchard in the highlands of Guatemala through integrated management. Trop Agric 69:341–346Google Scholar
  25. Wirodidjojo S (1989) Application linear programming model for watershed management planning. Duta Rimba 15:3–17, 24–29, 107–108Google Scholar
  26. Wojtkowski P (1990) Bioeconomic simulation of agroforestry systems: an application to southeast Bahia, Brasil. Dissertation Abstracts International: Humanities and Social Sciences. Thesis, University of Georgia, 117 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction StudiesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Florida Center for Reading ResearchFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  3. 3.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations