Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 87–101

Farmers’ perceptions of tree mortality, pests and pest management practices in agroforestry in Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia

  • Gudeta Weldesemayat Sileshi
  • Elias Kuntashula
  • Patrick Matakala
  • Philip O. Nkunika
Article

Abstract

Pest management research within the context of agroforestry is in its infancy, and it is often difficult to say when a particular pest justifies investment in research to establish facts. Understanding the potentials and drawbacks of farmers’ indigenous ecological knowledge (ethnoecology) may form the basis for constructive collaboration between farmers, agroforestry scientists and extension staff. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to (1) assess farmers’ knowledge and perceptions of pests, (2) prioritize pest problems that limit tree planting and maize production based on farmers’ own criteria and (3) to identify farmers’ indigenous pest management practices for priority pests. Data were collected using community meetings, individual interviews and direct observation by the first author. The farmers involved in this study in eastern Zambia had over ten years of experience, while most of the farmers in Mozambique and parts of southern Malawi were new to agroforestry. Farmers perceived insects as the major causes of tree mortality, followed by drought, bush fires and browsing by livestock. Among the biological constraints to maize production, insects (particularly termites and stalk bores) and weeds (particularly Striga asiatica) were more important in farmers’ minds than crop diseases. Fundamentally, the farmers’ perception of the causes of tree mortality and crop pests agreed with researchers’ perceptions and the literature. Both termite and witch weed problems were associated with low soil quality, and farmers use various indigenous control practices to control these pests. Some farmers did not know the causes of tree mortality, and hence do not take action. Farmer’s perception of tree mortality was found to be a function of operator-specific variables such as sex, level of education and years of experience with tree species.

Keywords

Ethnoecology Indigenous knowledge Striga Termites 

References

  1. Akinnifesi FK, Kwesiga F, Mhango J, Chilanga T, Mkonda A, Kadu CAC, Kadzere I, Mithofer D, Saka JDK, Sileshi G, Ramadhani T, Dhliwayo P (2006) Towards the development of miombo fruit trees as commercial tree crops in southern Africa. Forest Trees Livel 16:103–121Google Scholar
  2. Altieri MA (1993) Ethnoscience and biodiversity: key elements in the design of sustainable pest management systems for small farmers in developing countries. Agr Ecosyst Environ 46:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balley KD (1982) Methods of social research. The Free press, Mcmillan Publisheres, Nova, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Björnsen Gurung A (2003) Insects—a mistake in God’s creation? Tharu farmers’ perception and knowledge of insects: a case study of Gobardiha village development committee, Dang-Deukhuri, Nepal. Agric Hum Value 20:337–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boa ER (1998) Diseases of agroforestry trees: do they really matter? Agroforest Forum 9:19–22Google Scholar
  6. Gacheru E, Rao MR (1998) Prospects of agroforestry for Striga management. Agroforest Forum 9:22–27Google Scholar
  7. Guimarães AS, Mourão JS (2006) Management of plant species for controlling pests, by peasant farmers at Lagoa Seca, Paraíba state, Brazil: an ethnoecological approach. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ICRISAT (1986) Annual report 1985. ICRISAT, PatancheruGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones JA (1990) Termites, soil fertility and carbon cycling in dry tropical Africa: a hypothesis. J Trop Ecol 6:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuntashula E, Mafongoya PL (2005) Farmer participatory evaluation of agroforestry trees in eastern Zambia. Agr Syst 84:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwesiga FR, Franzel S, Place F, Phiri D, Simwanza CP (1999) Sesbania sesban improved fallows in eastern Zambia: their inception, development and farmer enthusiasm. Agroforest Syst 47:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwesiga F, Akinnifesi FK, Mafongoya PL, McDermott MH, Agumya A (2003) Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: review and challenges ahead. Agroforest Syst 59:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawless JF (1987) Negative binomial and mixed Poisson regression. Can J Stat 15:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mchombo S (2007) Background on Chichewa and related languages. http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/aflang/chichewa/background.html)
  15. Mchowa JW, Ngugi DN (1994) Pest complex in agroforestry systems: the Malawi experience. Forest Ecol Manag 64:277–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morse S, Buhler W (1997) Integrated pest management: ideals and realities in developing countries. Lynne Riener Publishers, 171 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Munthali DC, Logan JWM, Wood TG, Nyirenda GKC (1999) Termite distribution and damage to crops on smallholder farms in southern Malawi. Insect Sci Appl 19:43–49Google Scholar
  18. Nkunika POY (1994) Control of termites in Zambia: practical realities. Insect Sci Appl 15:241–245Google Scholar
  19. Nkunika POY (2002) Smallholder farmers’ indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) in maize IPM: a case study in Zambia. Insect Sci Appl 22:235–240Google Scholar
  20. Nyeko P, Edwards-Jones G, Day RK, Raussen T (2002) Farmers’ knowledge and perceptions of pests in agroforestry with particular reference to Alnus species in Kabale district, Uganda. Crop Prot 21:929–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nyeko N, Olubayo FM (2005) Participatory assessment of farmers’ experiences of termite problems in agroforestry in Tororo district, Uganda. Agricultural Research & Extension Network Paper No. 143, 13 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Orr A, Ritchie JM (2004) Learning from failure: smallholder farming systems and IPM in Malawi. Agr Syst 79:31–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pattanayak SK, Mercer DE, Sills EO, Yang JC, Cassingham K (2002) Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. RTI international working paper 02_04, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Price LL (2001) Demystifying farmers’ entomological and pest management knowledge: a methodology for assessing the impacts on knowledge from IPM-FFS and NES interventions. Agric Hum Value 18:153–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Price LL, Björnsen Gurung AB (2006) Describing and measuring ethno-entomological knowledge of rice pests: tradition and change among Asian farmers. Environ Dev Sustain 8:507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sekamatte MB, Ogenga-Latigo M, Russell-Smith A (2003) Effect of maize-legume intercrops on termite damage to maize, activity of predatory ants and maize yield in Uganda. Crop Prot 22:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL (2003) Effect of rotational fallows on abundance of soil insects and weeds in maize crops in eastern Zambia. Appl Soil Ecol 23:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL (2006) Long-term effect of legume-improved fallows on soil invertebrates and maize yield in eastern Zambia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 115:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sileshi G, Maghembe JA, Rao MR, Ogol CKPO, Sithanantham S (2000) Insects feeding on Sesbania sesban (L.) Merrill in natural stands and agroforestry systems in southern Malawi. Agroforest Syst 49:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL, Kwesiga F (2002) Performance of Sesbania sesban infested by the defoliating beetle Mesoplatys ochroptera in Zambia. Agroforest Syst 56:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sileshi G, Mafongoya PL, Kwesiga F, Nkunika P (2005) Termite damage to maize grown in agroforestry systems, traditional fallows and monoculture on nitrogen-limited soils in eastern Zambia. Agr Forest Entomol 7:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sileshi G, Kuntashula E, Mafongoya PL (2006) Legume improved fallows reduce weed problems in maize in eastern Zambia. Zambia J Agric Scie 8:6–12Google Scholar
  33. Snapp SS, Mafongoya PL, Waddington S (1998) Organic matter technologies for integrated management in smallholder cropping systems of southern Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 71:185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toledo VM (1992) What is ethnoecology? Origins, scope and implications of a rising discipline. Etnoecológica 1:5–27Google Scholar
  35. UNAIDS (2002) Report on the Global HIV/AIDS epidemicGoogle Scholar
  36. Wightman JA, Wightman AS (1994) An insect, agronomic and sociological survey of groundnut fields in southern Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 51:311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudeta Weldesemayat Sileshi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elias Kuntashula
    • 3
  • Patrick Matakala
    • 4
  • Philip O. Nkunika
    • 5
  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SADC-ICRAF Agroforestry ProgrammeChitedze Agricultural Research StationLilongweMalawi
  2. 2.Post Dot NetLilongweMalawi
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of ZambiaLusakaZambia
  4. 4.SDC-ICRAF Regional OfficeHarareZimbabwe
  5. 5.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of ZambiaLusakaZambia

Personalised recommendations