Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 81–89

Developing silvopastoral systems and their effects on diversity of fauna

  • J. H. Mcadam
  • A. R. Sibbald
  • Z. Teklehaimanot
  • W. R. Eason
Article

Abstract

Silvopastoral systems, where stock graze between widely spaced trees, are a viable land use option in the British Isles. An experiment (the National Network Silvopastoral Experiment—NNE) was set up at 6 sites in the late 1980s to quantify outputs from and to study the ecological interactions occurring between components of the system. Studies were carried out on the effect of developing silvopastoral systems on certain invertebrate groups, including carabid beetles and spiders and on the number of individuals and species of birds. The common protocols adopted across sites enable broad conclusions on the impact of such systems on wildlife to be made. The presence of trees on grassland attracted invertebrates of epigeal groups which may have provided an enhanced food supply which attracted birds. Spiders responded more rapidly after planting of the silvopastoral systems than did carabid beetles. It was concluded that, even at this early stage, silvopastoral systems have an impact on birds: birds normally associated with woodland are being attracted to silvopasture along with birds normally found in open fields, although there are problems in the scale of evaluation in the assessment of impact. However, it has been shown that even relatively recently established silvopastoral systems can significantly enhance biodiversity.

Keywords

Birds Carabids Invertebrates Spiders Silvopastoral systems 

References

  1. Agnew RDM, Sibbald A (1996) The avifauna of the Glensaugh silvopastoral site. Agroforest Forum 7(3):20–21Google Scholar
  2. Crowe SR, McAdam JH (1992) Sward dynamics in a mature poplar agroforestry system grazed by sheep. Asp Appl Biol 29:413–418Google Scholar
  3. Cuthbertson A, McAdam JH (1996) The effect of tree density and species on carabid beetles in a range of pasture – tree agroforestry systems on a lowland site. Agroforest Forum 7(3):17–20Google Scholar
  4. Dennis P Shellard LJF, Agnew RDM 1996 Shifts in arthropod species assemblages in relation to silvopastoral establishment in upland pastures. Agroforest Forum 7(3):14–17Google Scholar
  5. Eason WR (1988) Effect of tree litter on sward botanical composition and growth. In: Proceedings of a Research Meeting held at the Welsh Agricultural College, Aberystwyth 13–15 September 1988. UK British Grassland Society, Hurley, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg CH, Forrest TG (2003) Seasonal abundance of ground – occurring macroarthropods in forest and canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. Southeast Nat 2(4):591–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenberg CH, McGrane A (1996) A comparison of relative abundance and biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods under different forest management practices. For Ecol Man 89:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawke MF, Gillingham AG (1997) Changes in understorey pasture composition in agroforestry regimes in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 1997 XVIII International Grassland Congress, Saskatchewan, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnston R (1996) The effect of tree density and species on spiders in a range of lowland pasture-tree agroforestry systems. Unpublished thesis. Queen’s University of Belfast, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones D, Eason WR (1995) The influence of a developing agroforestry system on bird population dynamics. Q J For 89(2):120–125Google Scholar
  11. McAdam JH (1996) Vegetation change and management in temperate agroforestry systems. Asp Appl Biol 44:95–100Google Scholar
  12. McAdam JH, Hoppe GM, Toal L, Whiteside L (1999) The use of wide-spaced trees to enhance faunal diversity in managed grasslands. Grassl Sci Eur 4:293–296Google Scholar
  13. Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam JH, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) (2005) Silvopastoralism sustainable land management, CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Nwaigbo LC, Sibbald AR, Hudson G (1995) Tree-scale trends in available soil nutrient and cone penetration resistance in a grazed hybrid larch (Larix eurolepis) silvopastoral system. Agroforest Forum 6(2):48–50Google Scholar
  15. Poulin B, Lefebvre G (1997) Estimation of arthropods available to birds: effect of trapping technique, prey distribution, and bird diet. J Field Ornithol 68(3):426–442Google Scholar
  16. Rushdon SD, Luff ML, Eyre MD (1989) Effects of pasture improvement and management on the ground beetle and spider communities of upland grasslands. Appl Ecol 26:489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sibbald AR, Sinclair F (1990) A review of agroforestry research in progress in the UK. Agrofor Abstr 3:149–164Google Scholar
  18. Sibbald AR, Dick J, Iason GR (1995) The effects of the presence of widely spaced trees on the behaviour of sheep. Agroforest Forum 6(2):22–25Google Scholar
  19. Sibbald AR, Eason WR, McAdam JH, Hislop AM (2001) The establishment phase of a silvopstoral national network experiment in the United Kingdom. Agroforest Sys 39:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv 10:1839–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teklehaimanot Z, Sinclair F, Jones M (2002) Tree and livestock productivity in relation to tree-planting configuration in a silvopastoral system in North Wales, UK. Agroforest Sys 56:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toal L, McAdam JH (1995) Avifauna in establishing silvopastoral systems in Northern Ireland. Agroforest Forum 6(2):25–30Google Scholar
  23. Wilson JD, Morris AJ, Arroyo BE, Clark SC, Bradbury RB (1999) A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrates and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 75:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Mcadam
    • 1
  • A. R. Sibbald
    • 2
  • Z. Teklehaimanot
    • 3
  • W. R. Eason
    • 5
  1. 1.Applied Plant Science DivisionAgri-Food and Biosciences InstituteBelfastUK
  2. 2.Macaulay Land Use Research InstituteCraigiebuckler, AberdeenUK
  3. 3.University of WalesBangorUK
  4. 4.Institute of Grassland and Environmental ResearchAberstwyth, CeredigionUK
  5. 5.Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilSwindonUK

Personalised recommendations