Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp 209–220 | Cite as

The Effects of Cultivation Site on Forage Quality of Calliandra calothyrsus var. Patulul

  • H. D. Hess
  • T. T. Tiemann
  • F. Noto
  • S. Franzel
  • C. E. Lascano
  • M. Kreuzer
Original Paper


An in vitro experiment was performed to compare the forage quality of foliage of Calliandra (Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner var. Patulul) cultivated on either low or medium-fertility soils in Colombia and Kenya, respectively. A grass-alone diet, with and without urea supplementation, and five legume-supplemented diets (1/3 of dietary dry matter) were tested with the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) (n = 4). The legume supplements consisted of Cratylia (Cratylia argentea), Calliandra from Colombia or Kenya, or 1:1 mixtures of Cratylia with Calliandra Colombia or Kenya. The tannin content of Calliandra Colombia was almost twice as high as that of Calliandra Kenya. Supplementation with urea or Cratylia alone, but not with Calliandra alone, increased ammonia concentration in the fermenter fluid. Unlike Calliandra Colombia, Calliandra Kenya in mixture with Cratylia increased ammonia concentration. The apparent degradation of organic matter increased with all types of supplementation, except with Calliandra Colombia alone. Although the foliage of Calliandra from the two cultivation sites had similar contents of organic matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fibre, they differed in␣nearly all fermentation properties. The material from Kenya showed a higher apparent nutrient degradability. These results indicate that C. calothyrsus var. Patulul cultivated at the Kenyan site had a clearly higher forage quality than foliage from the same variety cultivated in Colombia. However, both materials had a much lower forage quality than Cratylia. The Cratylia-related effects on ruminal fermentation were mainly the results of an increased supply of fermentable nitrogenous compounds as was obvious from the comparison with the urea-supplemented grass.


Brachiaria humidicola Colombia Cratylia argentea Kenya Ruminal fermentation Tannins 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study was supported by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the Swiss Centre for International Agriculture (ZIL). The authors are grateful to P. Avila, B. Schneider, C.R. Soliva and C. Wambugu for their assistance in this study.


  1. Abreu A, Carulla JE, Lascano CE, Díaz TE, Kreuzer M, Hess HD (2004) Effects of Sapindus saponaria fruits on ruminal fermentation and duodenal nitrogen flow of sheep fed a tropical grass diet with and without legume. J Animal Sci 82:1392–1400Google Scholar
  2. Broderick GA, Albrecht KA (1997) Ruminal in vitro degradation of protein in tannin-free and tannin-containing forage legume species. Crop Sci 37:1884–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carulla JE, Kreuzer M, Machmüller A, Hess HD (2005) Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decrease methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Aust J Agric Res 56:961–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carulla J, Lascano C, Klopfenstein T (2001) Reduction of tannin level in a tropical legume (Desmodium ovalifolium) with polyethylene glycol (PEG): effects on intake and N balance, digestion and absorption by sheep. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal 9:17–24Google Scholar
  5. France J, Siddons RC (1993) Volatile fatty acid production. In: Forbes JM, France J (eds) Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism. CAB International, Oxon UK, pp 107–121Google Scholar
  6. Franzel S, Wambugu C, Tuwei P, Karanja G (2003) The adoption and scaling up of the use of fodder shrubs in central Kenya. Trop Grasslands 37:239–250Google Scholar
  7. Hagerman AE, Butler L (1980) Condensed tannin purification and characterization of tannin-associated proteins. J Agric Food Chem 28:947–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess HD, Beuret RA, Lötscher M, Hindrichsen IK, Machmüller A, Carulla JE, Lascano CE, Kreuzer M (2004a) Ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis and nitrogen utilization of sheep receiving tropical grass hay-concentrate diets offered with Sapindus saponaria fruits and Cratylia argentea foliage. Animal Sci 79:177–189Google Scholar
  9. Hess HD, Monsalve LM, Lascano CE, Carulla JE, Díaz TE, Kreuzer M (2003) Supplementation of a tropical grass diet with forage legumes and Sapindus saponaria fruits: effects on in vitro ruminal nitrogen turnover and methanogenesis. Aust J Agric Res 54:703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hess HD, Valencia FL, Monsalve LM, Lascano CE, Kreuzer M (2004b) Effects of tannins in Calliandra calothyrsus and supplemental molasses on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J Animal Feed Sci 13(Suppl. 1):95–98Google Scholar
  11. Lascano C, Avila P, Stewart J (2003) Intake, digestibility and nitrogen utilization by sheep fed with provenances of Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner with different tannin structure. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal 11:21–28Google Scholar
  12. Leng RA (1990) Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor-quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 3:277–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Becker K (1995) In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. J Sci Food Agric 69:481–493Google Scholar
  14. Maasdorp BV, Muchenje V, Titterton M (1999) Palatability and effect on dairy cow milk yield of dried fodder from the forage trees Acacia boliviana, Calliandra calothyrsus and Leucaena leucocephala. Animal Feed Sci Technol 77:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McSweeney CS, Palmer B, Bunch R, Krause DO (2001) Effect of the tropical forage calliandra on microbial protein synthesis and ecology in the rumen. J Appl Microbiol 90:78–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Min BR, Barry TN, Attwood GT, McNabb WC (2003) The effect of condensed tannins on the nutrition and health of ruminants fed fresh temperate forages: a review. Animal Feed Sci Technol 106:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paterson RT, Kiruiro E, Arimi HK (1999) Calliandra calothyrsus as a supplement for milk production in the Kenya Highlands. Trop Animal Health Product 31:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Plazas CH, Lascano CE (2005) Utilidad de Cratylia argentea en ganaderias de doble proposito del piedemonte de los llanos orientales de Colombia. Pasturas Trop 27:65–72Google Scholar
  19. Stewart JL, Mould F, Mueller-Harvey I (2000) The effect of drying treatment on the fodder quality and tannin content of two provenances of Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner. J Sci Food Agric 80:1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tangerman A, Nagengast FM (1996) A gas chromatographic analysis of fecal short-chain fatty acids, using the direct injection method. Anal Biochem 236:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Terrill TH, Rowan AM, Douglas GB, Barry TN (1992) Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains. J Sci Food Agric 58:321–329Google Scholar
  22. Tuwei PK, Kang’ara JNN, Mueller-Harvey I, Poole J, Ngugi FK, Stewart JL (2003) Factors affecting biomass production and nutritive value of Calliandra calothyrsus leaf as fodder for ruminants. J Agric Sci (Camb.) 141:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wambugu C, Franzel S, Tuwei P, Karanja G (2001) Scaling up the use of fodder shrubs in central Kenya. Dev Pract 11:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Hess
    • 1
    • 4
  • T. T. Tiemann
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Noto
    • 1
  • S. Franzel
    • 3
  • C. E. Lascano
    • 2
  • M. Kreuzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal Science, Animal NutritionSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), ETH-Centre/LFWZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Tropical Grass and Legume ProjectCentro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)CaliColombia
  3. 3.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)NairobiKenya
  4. 4.Swiss Federal Research Station for Animal Production and Dairy Products (ALP)PosieuxSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations