Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 43–53 | Cite as

Cumulative Forage Production, Forage Quality and Livestock Performance from an Annual Ryegrass and Cereal Rye Mixture in a Pine Walnut Silvopasture

  • R.L. KallenbachEmail author
  • M.S. Kerley
  • G.J. Bishop-Hurley
Article

Abstract

Annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) pastures can extend the grazing season in the lower Midwest. There is little data from this region on the productivity of these forages in a silvopasture system. Our objective was to determine the forage and livestock production from annual ryegrass/cereal rye in a silvopasture versus an open (non-forested) system. This study was conducted near New Franklin, MO, USA. The treatments were (1) annual ryegrass/cereal rye planted into a 6- to 7-year-old stand of pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.) × loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) hybrids and black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) (TREE treatment) and (2) the same forages planted into pastures without trees (OPEN treatment). Marshall annual ryegrass and cereal rye were no-till seeded at 22 and 67 kg ha-1 of pure live seed, respectively, on 18 September 2000 and 30 August 2001. Treatments were replicated three times in a randomized complete block. In March 2001 and 2002, three beef heifers were assigned to each pasture and rotationally grazed until early June. Cumulative forage production and quality were measured for each treatment. Cumulative forage production in the TREE treatment was reduced by approximately 20% compared to the OPEN treatment. However, beef heifer average daily gain and gain ha-1 were equal for both treatments. Beef producers using a annual ryegrass/cereal rye in a silvopasture system likely would not sacrifice livestock production when hybrid pine and black walnut trees are 6- to 7-year-old when compared to an open pasture.

Key words

Beef heifers Black walnut Grazing Pine Winter annual forages 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alley, J.L., Garrett, H.E., McGraw, R.L., Dwyer, J.P., Blanche, C.A. 1999Forage legumes as living mulches for trees in agroforestry practices preliminary resultsAgroforest. Syst.44281291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altom, W., Rogers, J.L., Raun, W.R., Johnson, G.V., Taylor, S.L. 1996Long-term rye-wheat-ryegrass forage yields as affected by rate and date of applied nitrogenJ. Prod. Agric.9510516Google Scholar
  3. Balandier, P., Lacointe, A., Le Roux, X., Sinoquet, H., Cruiziat, P., Dizes, S. 2000SIMWAL: A structural-functional model simulating single walnut tree growth in response to climate and pruningAnn. Forest Sci.57571585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bendfeldt, E.S., Feldhake, C.M., Burger, J.A. 2001Establishing trees in Appalachian silvopasture: Response to shelters, grass control, mulchand fertilizationAgroforest. Syst.53291295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertin, C., Yang, X., Weston, L.A. 2003The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizospherePlant Soil2566783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop-Hurley, G.J., Kallenbach, R.L. 2001The economics of grazing beef cows during winterTerril, T. eds. Proc. Am. Forage Grassl. Coun., 2001, SpringdaleAR, 2225 April, 2001AFGCGeorgetown, TX274Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, G.E., Lottes, G.J., Dawson, J.O. 1991Design and development of agroforestry systems for Illinois USA; silvocultural and economic considerationsAgroforest. Syst.13203224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clary, W.P. 1979Grazing and overstory effects on rotationally burned slash pine plantation rangesJ. Range Manage.32264266Google Scholar
  9. Clason, T.R., Sharrow, S.H. 2000Silvopastoral practicesGarrett, H.E.Rietveld, W.J.Fisher, R.F. eds. North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and PracticeASAMadison, WI119147Google Scholar
  10. Dwyer, J.P., Plain, R.L., Kurtz, W.B. 1990Managing oak timberlands for profitabilityProc. Am. Agric. Econ. Assn., VancouverBritish Columbia 58 August 1990Am. Agric. Econ. Assn.Menasha, WI6975Google Scholar
  11. Earle, D.F., McGowan, A.A. 1979Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pastureAust. J. Agric. Anim. Husb.19337343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frost, W.E., McDougald, N.K. 1989Tree canopy effects on herbaceous production of annual rangeland during droughtJ. Range Manage.42281283Google Scholar
  13. Hawke, M.F. 1991Pasture production and animal performance under pine agroforestry in New ZealandForest Ecol. Manage.45109118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung, G.A., Van Wijk, A.J.P., Hunt, W.F., Watson, C.E. 1996RyegrassesMoser, L.E. eds. Cool-season Forage GrassesMadisonWI605641Agron. Monogr. No. 34. ASACSSAand SSSAGoogle Scholar
  15. Kallenbach, R.L., Bishop-Hurley, G.J., Massie, M.D., Kerley, M.S., Roberts, C.A. 2003Stockpiled annual ryegrass for winter forage in the lower Midwestern USACrop Sci.4314141419Google Scholar
  16. Keatinge, J.D.H., Garrett, M.K., Stewart, R.H. 1980Response of perennial and Italian ryegrass cultivars to temperature and soil water potentialJ. Agric. Sci.94171176Google Scholar
  17. Kephart, K.D., Buxton, D.R. 1993Forage quality responses of C3 and C4 perennial grasses to shadeCrop Sci.33831837Google Scholar
  18. Kurtz, W.B. 2000Economics and policy of agroforestryGarrett, H.E.Rietveld, W.J.Fisher, R.F. eds. North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and PracticeASAMadison, WI321360Google Scholar
  19. Kurtz, W.B., Garrett, H.E., Kincaid, W.H.,Jr. 1984Investment alternatives for black walnut plantation managementJ. Forestry82604608Google Scholar
  20. Lin, C.H., McGraw, R.L., George, M.F., Garrett, H.E. 2001Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potentialAgrofor. Syst.53269281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malik, R.K., Green, T.H., Brown, G.F., Mays, D. 2000Use of cover crops in short rotation hardwood plantations to control erosionBiomass Bioenergy18479487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McArthur, A.J. 1991Forestry and shelter for livestockFor. Ecol. Manage.4593107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mott, G.O., Lucas, H.L. 1952The design, conduct and interpretation of grazing trials on cultivated and improved pasturesPennsylvania State University, State CollegePA13801385Proc. 6th Int. Grassl. Congr. State CollegePA. 1723 Aug. 1952Google Scholar
  24. Nuttonson M.Y. 1958. Climate relationships and the use of phenology in ascertaining the thermal and photo-thermal requirements of rye. In: Nuttonson M.Y. (ed.), Rye. Am. Int. Crop Ecol. Washington, DC, pp. 158.Google Scholar
  25. Pearson, H.A., Whitaker, L.B. 1974Forage and cattle responses to different grazing intensities on southern pine ridgeJ. Range Manage.27444446Google Scholar
  26. Phillips, W.A., Dalrymple, R.L., Klepper, E.L., Rao, S.C. 1996Annual cool-season grassesMoser, L.E. eds. Cool-Season Forage GrassesMadisonWI781802Agron. Monogr. No. 34. ASACSSAand SSSAGoogle Scholar
  27. Roth P.L. and Mitchell R.J. 1982. Effects of selected cover crops on the growth of black walnut. In: Black Walnut for the Future. USDA For. Serv. North Central Forest Exp. Stn., St. Paul, MN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-74, pp. 110113.Google Scholar
  28. Seigler, D.S. 1996Chemistry and mechanisms of allelopathic interactionsAgron. J.88876885Google Scholar
  29. Shenk, J.S., Westerhaus, M.O. 1991Population structuring of near infrared spectra and modified partial least squares regressionCrop Sci.3115481555Google Scholar
  30. Short, S.D. 2001Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Cow-Calf OperationsU.S. Gov. Print. OfficeWashington, DCUSDA Economic Res. Serv. Stat. Bull. 9743Google Scholar
  31. Sibbald, A.R., Griffiths, J.H., Elston, D.A. 1991The effects of the presence of widely spaced conifers on under-storey herbage production in the U.K. ForEcol. Manage.457177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silva-Pando, F.J., Gonzalez-Hernandez, M.P., Rozados-Lorenzo, M.J. 2002Pasture production in a silvopastoral system in relation with microclimate variables in the Atlantic coast of SpainAgrofor. Syst.56203211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sollenberger, L.E., Cherney, D.J.R. 1995Evaluating forage production and qualityBarnes, R.F.Miller, D.A.Nelson, C.J. eds. Forages. Vol. II. The Science of Grassland Agriculture5th edIowa State University PressAmes, IA97110Google Scholar
  34. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach2nd edMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Teklehaimanot, Z., Jones, M., Sinclair, F.L. 2002Tree and livestock productivity in relation to tree planting configuration in silvopastoral system in North Wales, UKAgroforest. Syst.564755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. USDA 1998. 1997 Census of Agriculture Highlights [Online]. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/census97/highlights/ag-state.htm (verified 26 Jul. 2004).Google Scholar
  37. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. 1980Systems analyses for evaluation of fibrous feedsPigden, W.J. eds. Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds. IDRC-134eOttawaON4960Google Scholar
  38. Vesterby, M., Krupa, K.S. 2001Major Uses of Land in the United States, 1997U.S. Gov. Print. OfficeWashington, DCEconomic Res. Serv. Stat. Bull. 973Google Scholar
  39. Wall, L.L., Gerke, G.W. 1975An automated total protein nitrogen methodJ. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.5812211226Google Scholar
  40. Wheeler, D.M., Upsdell, M.P. 1997Flexi 2.4 Bayesian Smoother Reference ManualNew Zealand Pastoral Agric. Res. Inst. Ltd.Hamilton, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, S., Allen, H.L., Dougherty, P.M. 1997Shoot and foliage growth phenology of loblolly pine trees as affected by nitrogen fertilizationCan. J. Forest Res.2714201426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.L. Kallenbach
    • 1
    Email author
  • M.S. Kerley
    • 2
  • G.J. Bishop-Hurley
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Sciences UnitUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Animal Sciences UnitUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations