Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 123–128 | Cite as

Preference and Palatability of Indigenous and Exotic Acid Soil-tolerant Multipurpose Trees and Shrubs by West African Dwarf Sheep

Article

Abstract

Eleven acid soil-tolerant multipurpose trees and shrubs (MPTS) were assessed for preference and palatability with mature West African Dwarf (WAD) sheep using the cafeteria method. About 500 g each of the MPTS were weighed in triplicates into plastic feeding troughs and randomly placed around the perimeter of a Panicum maximum paddock (25 m × 25 m). Five ewes averaging 25.24 ± 0.69 kg were allowed 4 h access to the browse species daily for 12 d. Dry matter intake differed (p<0.05), ranging from 0.0 g in C. calothyrsus to 70.8 g in M. barterii. The number of animal visits, time spent and number of bites per visit on the browses also differed (p<0.05). There were positive correlations between DM intake and number of visits, number of bites, time spent on each fodder browsing and the coefficient of preference. The preference of the various MPTS by animals in descending order was M. barterii > A. cordifolia > L. leucoephala > B. monandra > D. guineensis > H. madagascariensis > T. tetraptera > T. africana > A. bella > B. grandiflora > C. calothyrsus.

Keywords

Browsing behaviour Fodder trees Intake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdulrazak, S.A., Fujihara, T., Ondiek, J.K., Ørskov, E.R. 2000Nutritive evaluation of acacia tree leaves from KenyaAnim. Feed Sci. Technol.858998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Goodchild, A.V., McMeniman, N.P. 1994Intake and digestibility of low quality roughages when supplemented with leguminous browseJ. Agr. Sci.122151160Google Scholar
  3. Kaitho, R.J., Umunna, N.N., Nsahlai, I.V., Tamminga, S., Bruchem, J., Vandwouw, M. 1996Palatability of multipurpose tree species: effect of species and length of study on intake and relative palatability by sheepAgroforest. Syst.33249261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaitho, R.J., Umunna, N.N., Nsahlai, I.V., Tamminga, S., Bruchem, J., Hanson, J. 1997Palatability of wilted and dried multipurpose tree species fed to sheep and goatsAnim. Feed Sci. Technol.65151163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karbo N., Barnes P. and Rudat H. 1996. An evaluation of browse forage preferences by sheep and goats in the Northern Guinea Savannah zoneGhana. In: Ndikumana J. and de Leeuw P.N. (eds.),Sustainable Feed Production and Utilization for Smallholder Livestock Enterprises in Sub-saharan Africa. Proc. Sub-Saharan Afr. Feed Resources Network, Harare, Zimbabwe6–10 Dec. 1993, 201 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Larbi, A., Jabbar, M.A., Orok, E.J., Idiong, E., Cobbina, J. 1993Alchornea cordifoliaa promising indigenous browse species adapted to acid soils in southeastern Nigeria for integrated crop–livestock systemsAgroforest. Syst.332939Google Scholar
  7. Marten, G.C. 1978The animal plant complex in forage palatability phenomenaJ. Anim. Sci.4614701477Google Scholar
  8. Mtenga L.A., Komwinhangilo D.M. and Kifaro G.C. 1992. Selectivity in sheep and goats fed AlbiziaGliricidiaLeucaena and Tamarind multipurpose trees. In: Lebbie S.H.B., Rey B. and Irungu E.K. (eds.), Proc. Sec. Biennial Conf. Afr. Small Rum Res. Network, AICC ArushaTanzania7–11 Dec. 1992, pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
  9. Osolo N.K., Kinuthia J.N., Gachuiri C.K., Okeyo A.M., Wanyoike M.M. and Okomo M. 1996. Small ruminant research and development in Africa. In: Lebbie S.H.B. and Kagwini E. (eds.), Proc Third Biennial Conf. Afr. Small Rum. Res. Network., KampalaUganda 5–9 Dec. 1994 ILRI NairobiKenya326 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Owino F. 1989. Methods for general and alley-farming specific of multipurpose trees and shrubs screening. Paper prepared for IITA/ILCA/ICRAF: AFNETA training course. Ibadan, NigeriaAugust 1989, 37 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Personius, T.L., Wambolt, C.L., Stephens, J.R., Kelsey, R.G. 1987Crude terpenoid influence on mule deer preference for sagebrushJ. Range Manage.408488Google Scholar
  12. SAS 1989. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc. User's GuideVersion 6, 4th ed. Vol. I. Cary, North CarolinaUSA943 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Topark-Ngarm A. and Gutteridge R.C. 1986. Forages in Thailand. In: Blair G.J., Ivory D.A. and Evans T.R. (eds.), Forages in South East Asia and South Pacific Agriculture. Proc. Int. Workshop CisarruaIndonesia19–23 Aug. 1985, ACIAR Proc. No. 12, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
  14. Topps, J.H. 1992Potential, composition and use of legume shrubs and trees as fodder for livestock in the tropicsJ. Agric. Sci. Camb.11818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wahua, T.A.T., Oji, U.I. 1987

    Survey of browse plants in upland areas of Rivers State of Nigeria

    Reynolds, L.Atta-Krah, A.N. eds. Browse Use and Small Ruminant Production in Southeast NigeriaILCA Humid Zone ProgrammeIbadan, Nigeria2333
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceRivers State University of Science and TechnologyPort HarcourtNigeria
  2. 2.International Livestock Research Institute, c/o IITAIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations