Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 229–241 | Cite as

Planning tree species diversification in Kenya based on differences in tree species composition between farms. II. Analysis of tree niches.

  • R. Kindt
  • P. Van Damme
  • A. J. Simons
  • H. Beeckman
Article

Abstract

Concerns exist about the limited diversity of tree species in agricultural landscapes. Complete tree inventories were carried out on 201 farms from four villages in western Kenya to establish whether significant differences in tree species composition existed between farms, and if so their magnitude and implications for new introductions and plantings. Novel types of ordination using the Hellinger ecological distance and polynomial Redundancy Analysis indicated wide heterogeneity between farms with respect to tree species composition of five niches, including homestead, cropland, fallow, woodlot, and external boundary (p ≤ 0.05). Multiple regression analysis confirmed the ordination results using the abundance of dominant species as the response variable. The relationship between location and species composition differed with those of two previous surveys. Methodological differences in sampling intensity, locations and time of sampling between these surveys could have caused the difference. The maps of spatial distribution of compositional types provided in the previous surveys were not confirmed, whereas villages were found to contain several farms with a species composition that was not typical of their village. Meaningful results about the species composition of a landscape should include several farms per village and use a sampling grid finer than 5×5 km2.

Keyword

Diversification Domestication Hellinger distance Landscape Ordination Redundancy analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asner, G.P., Vitousek, P.M. 2005Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical changeProc. Natl. Acad. Sci.10243834386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atta-Krah, K., Kindt, R., Skilton, J.N., Amaral, W. 2004Managing biological and genetic diversity in tropical agroforestryAgroforest. Syst.61183194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beentje, H.J. 1994Kenya Trees, Shrubs and LianasNational Museums of KenyaNairobi722Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, P.N. 1991Woodfuel, Women and WoodlotsMacmillan Education LtdLondon and Basingstoke338Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, P.N., Chavangi, N., Gelder, A. 1985Development research and energy planning in KenyaAmbio14228236Google Scholar
  6. Di Falco, S., Perrings, C. 2003Crop genetic diversity, productivity and stability of agroecosystems. A theoretical and empirical investigationScot. J. Polit. Econ.50207216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorward, A., Poole, N., Morrison, J., Kydd, J., Urey, I. 2003Markets, institutions and technology: missing links in livelihoods analysisDev. Policy Rev.21319332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrity, D.P. 2004Agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development GoalsAgroforest. Syst.61517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harmand, J.M., Donfack, P., Njiti, C.F. 2003Tree-root systems and herbaceous species-characteristics under tree species introduced into grazing lands in subhumid CameroonAgroforest. Syst.59131140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey, C.A., Haber, W.A. 1999Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pasturesAgroforest. Syst.443768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayek L.-A.C. and Buzas M.A. 1997. Surveying Natural Populations. Columbia University Press, New York. xvi, pp. 563.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, W., Luukkanen, W., Johanson, S., Kaarakka, V., Raisanen, S., Vihemaki, H. 2002Agroforestry for biodiversity conservation of nature reserves: functional group identification and analysisAgroforest. Syst.556572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaya, M., Kammesheidt, L., Weidelt, H.-J. 2002The forest garden system of Saparua islandCentral MalukuIndonesia and its role in maintaining tree species diversityAgroforest. Syst.54225234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kindt, R. 1997Local Perceptions on Tree Propagation and Domestication – Results from a Survey in Western KenyaInt. Centre Res. Agroforest.Nairobi45Google Scholar
  15. Kindt, R., Damme, P., Simons, A.J., Beeckman, H. 2006Planning tree species diversification in Kenya based on differences in tree species composition between farms I. Analysis of tree usesAgroforestry Systems67215228Google Scholar
  16. Kindt, R., Simons, A.J., Damme, P. 2004Do farm characteristics explain differences in tree species diversity among western kenyan farms?Agroforest. Syst.636374Google Scholar
  17. Kristensen, M., Balslev, H. 2003Perceptions, use and availability of woody plants among the Gourounsi in Burkina FasoBiodivers. Conserv.1217151739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lauriks, R. 1996Onderzoek naar veranderingen in landgebruik in West-Kenya met behulp van luchtfoto-interpretatieGhent UniversityGhent125Google Scholar
  19. Lauriks, R., Wulf, R., Carter, S.E., Niang, A. 1999A methodology for the description of border hedges and the analysis of variables influencing their distribution: a case study in western KenyaAgroforest. Syst.446986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leakey, R.R.B., Simons, A.J. 1998The domestication and commercialization of indigenous trees in agroforestry for the alleviation of povertyAgroforest. Syst.38165176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Legendre, P., Gallagher, E.D. 2001Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species dataOecologia129271280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Legendre, P., Legendre, L. 1998Numerical EcologyElsevier Science BVAmsterdam853Google Scholar
  23. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D., Wardle, D.A. 2001Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challengesScience294804807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. x+179.Google Scholar
  25. Makarenkov, V., Legendre, P. 2002Nonlinear redundancy analysis and canonical correspondence analysis based on polynomial regressionEcology8311461161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McNeely, J.A. 2004Nature vs. nurture: managing relationships between forests, agroforestry and wild biodiversityAgroforest. Syst.61155165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathsoft I. 1999. S-Plus 2000 User's Guide. MathSoft Inc., Seattlepp. xii+558.Google Scholar
  28. Quinn, G., Keough, M. 2002Experimental Design and Data Analysis for BiologistsCambridge University PressCambridge520Google Scholar
  29. Rojas, L., Godoy, C., Hanson, P., Kleinn, C., Hilje, L. 2001Hopper (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha) diversity in shaded coffee systems of TurrialbaCosta RicaAgroforest. Syst.53171177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simons, A.J., Leakey, R.R.B. 2004Tree domestication in tropical agroforestryAgroforest. Syst.61167181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wezel, A., Bender, S. 2003Plant species diversity of homegardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supplyAgroforest. Syst.573949CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kindt
    • 1
  • P. Van Damme
    • 2
  • A. J. Simons
    • 1
  • H. Beeckman
    • 3
  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)NairobiKenya
  2. 2.Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture and EthnobotanyGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  3. 3.Royal Museum for Central-AfricaTervurenBelgium

Personalised recommendations