Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 85–92 | Cite as

Tree Regeneration and Sapling Damage of Pedunculate Oak Quercus robur in a Grazed Forest in Galicia, NW Spain: A Comparison of Continuous and Rotational Grazing Systems

  • P. M. McEvoy
  • J. H. McAdam
  • M. R. Mosquera-Losada
  • A. Rigueiro-Rodríguez
Article

Abstract

Forest grazing has been recognised as being a useful tool in fire-risk reduction, in addition to having the potential to preserve or enhance forest biodiversity if managed correctly. Concern for natural regeneration of forest trees in Europe has also prompted interest in the effects of large herbivores on seedling and sapling growth and mortality. An investigation was carried out into sapling damage and density of natural regeneration of oak (Quercus robur) in a mature, pony-grazed, Pinus radiata forest in Galicia, NW Spain under two different grazing regimes (continuous and rotational). In all treatments significantly more oak seedlings and saplings were recorded in areas of grass sward than areas dominated by taller ground flora species. Damage to oak saplings was assessed from the form (height and canopy) relative to stem diameter. The height and average canopy diameter of similar-aged saplings were found to be significantly greater in ungrazed (control) than both continuous and rotationally grazed treatments. Height and canopy diameters of similar-aged oak were not significantly different between the two grazing treatments. Significant differences were observed in tree form, with unbrowsed saplings having the greatest height to canopy width ratio and those in the continuously browsed plots having the smallest. An obvious decrease in the goodness of fit (R2) of regression analyses were found in continuously grazed areas compared to rotational and control plots for both height and canopy data. The differences in damage observed were not significantly different enough to suggest one method of grazing over the other as being better for minimising sapling damage. Management requirements are more likely to dictate grazing regime. Overall, stock density is likely to have a more significant effect on damage than stocking system.

Keywords

Browsing Quercus robur Regeneration Sapling damage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon,  1996Grazing in upland woods: managing the impacts. Managing the English upland booklet seriesEnglish NaturePeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  2. Butterschon, J., Butterschon, R.M. 1978The effect of browsing by cattle and sheep on trees and bushesNatura Jutlandica207994Google Scholar
  3. Cramer, W. 2001Fire ecology, Mediterranean forests and global changeForest Ecol. Manag.14712Google Scholar
  4. Draper, N.R., Smith, H. 2001Applied Regression AnalysisWileyNew York672Google Scholar
  5. Dunlop, B.M.S. 1975Regeneration of our native pine woodsScot. Far.29111119Google Scholar
  6. Étienne, M. 1996Western European silvopastoral systemsINRAParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitter, A.H., Jennings, R.D. 1975The effects of sheep grazing on the growth and survival of seedling junipers (Juniperus communis L.)J. Appl. Ecology12637642Google Scholar
  8. GillR .M.A.1992 A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests 1. Deer. Forestry 65.Google Scholar
  9. Gill, R.M.A., Beardall, V. 2001The impact of deer on woodlands: the effects of browsing and seed dispersal on vegetation structure and compositionForestry74209218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. González-Hernández, M.P., Silva-Pando, F.J. 1996Grazing effects of ungulates in a Galician oak forestForest Ecol. Manag.886570Google Scholar
  11. Hester, A.J., Edenius, L., Butterschon, R.M., Kuiters, A.T. 2000Interactions between forests and herbivores: the role of controlled grazing experimentsForestry73381391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hester, A.J., Kirby, K.J., Mitchell, F.J.G., Gill, R.M.A., Latham, J., Armstrong, H. 1998Ungulates and forest management in Great Britain and IrelandHumphrey, J.Gill, R.Claridge, J. eds. Grazing as a Management Tool in European Forest EcosystemsForestry CommissionEdinburgh2435Google Scholar
  13. Hester, A.J., Mitchell, F.J.G., Kirby, K. 1996Effects of season and intensity of sheep grazing on tree regeneration in a British upland woodlandForest Ecol. Manag.8899106Google Scholar
  14. Humphrey, J.W., Swaine, M.D. 1997Factors affecting the natural regeneration of Quercus in Scottish oakwoods I. Competition from Pteridium aquilinumJ. Appl. Ecol.34577584Google Scholar
  15. Ide, Y., Miyashige, T., Sato, S., Shijimaya, K. 2001Grazing in secondary forest developed on abandoned field in southwestern Japan 1. Characteristics of cattle tracks formed in secondary forestGrassland Sci.47134138Google Scholar
  16. Kampf, H. 2000The role of large grazing animals in nature conservation - a Dutch perspectiveBrit. Wildlife373746Google Scholar
  17. Kirby, K.J., Mitchell, F.J., Hester, A.J. 1994A role for large herbivores (deer and domestic stock) in nature conservation management in British semi-natural woodsArboricult. J.18381399Google Scholar
  18. Kuiters, A.T., Kirby, K.J. 1999Methodologies in forest grazing researchForest Ecol. Manag.12012Google Scholar
  19. Kuiters, A.T., Mohren, G.M.J., Wieren, S.E. 1996Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystemsForest Ecol. Manag.8815Google Scholar
  20. Kuiters, L. 1998Ungulates and forest management in the NetherlandsHumphrey, J.Gill, R.Claridge, J. eds. Grazing as a management tool in European Forest EcosystemsForestry CommissionEdinburgh1119Google Scholar
  21. McEvoy P.M., Flexen M., Cameron A. and McAdam J.H. 2003. A comparison of botanical diversity in grazed and ungrazed woodlands in Northern Ireland; suggestions for grazing management. unpublished.Google Scholar
  22. Mayle, B. 1999Domestic stock grazing to enhance woodland biodiversity, Rep. No. Information Note 28Forestry CommissionEdinburghGoogle Scholar
  23. Miles, K., Kinnaird, J.W. 1979The establishment and regeneration of birchjuniper and Scots pine in the Scottish HighlandsScott. Forest.33102107Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, F.J.G., Kirby, K.J. 1990The impact of large herbivores on the conservation of semi-natural woods in the British uplandsForestry63333353Google Scholar
  25. Peterken, G.F. 1996Woodland Conservation and Management2Chapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Putman, R. 1994Effects of grazing and browsing by mammals on woodlandsBrit. Wildlife5205213Google Scholar
  27. Putman, R.J. 1996Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: perspectives and recommendations for future researchForest Ecol. Manag.88205214Google Scholar
  28. Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Silva-Pando, F.J., Rodríguez-Soalleiro, R., Castillón-Palomeque, P.A., Álvarez-Álvarez, P., Mosquera-Losada, R., Romero-Franco, R., González-Fernández, M.P. 1997Manual de sistemas silvopastoralesADAPTSantiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
  29. Silva-Pando, F.J., González-Hernández, M.P. 1992Agroforestry helps prevent forest firesAgroforest. Today478Google Scholar
  30. Starkey, E.E., Happe, P.J., Gonzalez-Hernanadez, M.P., Lange, K.M., Karchesy, J.J. 1999Tannins as Nutritional Constraints for Elk and Deer of the Coastal Pacific NorthwestPolyphenols 2: Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, Ecology (ed Gross)Kluwer Academic/Plenum PublishersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Vallentine, J.F. 2001Grazing management2Academic PressSan Diego659Google Scholar
  32. Van Wieren S.E. 1995. The potential role of large herbivores in nature conservation and extensive land use in Europe. In: Bullock D.J. and Harvey H.J. (eds), The National Trust and Nature Conservation: 100 years on Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, Vol. 56. pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  33. Vera, F.W.M. 2000Grazing ecology and forest historyCAB InternationalWallingfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. M. McEvoy
    • 1
  • J. H. McAdam
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. R. Mosquera-Losada
    • 3
  • A. Rigueiro-Rodríguez
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied Plant ScienceQueen’s UniversityBelfastNorthern Ireland
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentNewforge LaneBelfastNorthern Ireland
  3. 3.Escuela Polytecnica SuperiorUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaLugoSpain

Personalised recommendations