Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 181–195 | Cite as

Biomass production and C-sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India

  • S.L. SwamyEmail author
  • Sunil Puri
Article

Abstract

Tree based land use systems make a valuable contribution to sequester carbon and improve productivity and nutrient cycling within the systems. This study was conducted to determine biomass production, C-sequestration and nitrogen allocation in Gmelina arborea planted as sole and agrisilviculture system on abandoned agricultural land. At 5 years, total stand biomass in agrisilviculture system was 14.1 Mg ha−1. Plantations had 35% higher biomass than agrisilviculture system. At 5 years, leaves, stem, branches and roots contributed 4.1, 65.2, 10.0 and 20.7%, respectively to total standing biomass (17.9 Mg ha−1). Over the 5 years of study, trees had 3.5 Mg ha−1 more C and 36 kg ha−1 more N in plantation than agrisilviculture system. Biomass and C storage followed differential allocation. Relatively more C was allocated in above ground components in plantations compared to agrisilviculture system. C:N ratios for tree components were higher in stem wood (135–142) followed by roots (134–139), branches (123–128) and leaves (20–21). In agrisilviculture system crops recommended are: soybean and cowpea in rainy season; wheat and mustard in winter season. After 5 years, soil organic C increased by 51.2 and 15.1% and N by 38.4 and 9.3% in plantation and agrisilviculture system, respectively. Total C storage in abandoned agricultural land before planting was 26.3 Mg ha−1, which increased to 33.7 and 45.8 Mg ha−1 after 5 years in plantation and agrisilviculture system, respectively. Net C storage (soil + tree) was 7.4 Mg ha−1 in agrisilviculture system compared to 19.5 Mg ha−1 in G. arborea monoculture stands. The studies suggest that competitive interactions played a significant role in agrisilviculture system. Plantations were more efficient in accreting C than agrisilviculture system on abandoned agricultural land.

Keywords

Afforestation Agrisilviculture Environmental benefits Nutrient cycling Resource partitioning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carnus J.M., Parrota J., Brockerhoff E.G., Arbez M., Jacket H., Kremer A., Lamb D., Hara K.O. and Walters B. 2003. Planted forests and biodiversity. Contributions of 3rd session of UN Forum on Forests in GenevaSwitzerlandIUFRO, Occasional Paper 15, ISSN 1024–414, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, S.X., Amatya, G., Beare, M.H., Mead, D.J. 2002Soil properties under a Pinus radiate rye grass silvipastoral system in New Zealand. Part I. Soil N and moisture availability, soil C and tree growthAgroforest. Syst54137147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chavan, K.N., Kenjale, R.Y., Chavan, A.S. 1995Effect of forest tree species on properties of red lateritic soilJ. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci434346Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Datta, M., Dhiman, K.R. 2001Effect of some multipurpose trees on soil properties and crop productivity in Tripura areaJ. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci49511515Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon, R.K., Brown, S., Houghton, R.A., Soloman, A.M., Trexler, M.C., Wisniewski, J. 1994Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystemsScience263185190Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodale, C.L., Aber, J.D. 2001The long term effects of land use history on nitrogen cycling in northern hard wood forestsEcol. Appl11253267Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haripriya, G.S. 2000Estimates of biomass in Indian forestsBiomass Bioenergy19245258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haynes, B.E., Gower, S.T. 1995Below-ground carbon allocation in non-fertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern WisconsinTree Physiol15317325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IGAU 1997. Package of Practices Recommendations Crops. Directorate of Extension, Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, RaipurIndia76 pp.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kadeba, O. 1991Above-ground biomass production and nutrient accumulation in an age sequence of Pinus caribaea standsForest Ecol. Mgmt41237248Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaur, B., Gupta, S.R., Singh, G. 2002Carbon storage and nitrogen cycling in silvipastural system on a sodic soil in north western IndiaAgroforest. Syst542129Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin, J.G., Kloeppa, B.D., Schaffer, T.C., Kimbler, D.C., Mcnulty, S.G. 1998Above-ground biomass and nitrogen allocation of ten deciduous Southern Appalachian tree speciesCan. J. Forest. Res2816481659Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naugraiya, M.N., Puri, S. 1997Fuel wood production in an energy plantation on red lateritic soilsJ. Tree Sci168186Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Negi, J.D.S., Bahuguna, V.K., Sharma, D.C. 1990Biomass production and distribution of nutrients in 20 year old teak (Tectona grandis) and gamhar (Gmelina arborea) plantations at TripuraInd. Forest116681686Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Puri, S., Nair, P.K.R. 2004Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national programAgroforest. Syst61–62437452Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puri, S., Swamy, S.L., Jaiswal, A.K. 2002Evaluation of Populus deltoides clones under nursery, field and agrisilviculture system in sub-humid tropics of central IndiaNew Forests234561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raich, J.W., Nadelhoffer, K.J. 1989Below ground carbon allocation in forest ecosystem: global trendsEcology7013461354Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao, M.R., Nair, P.K.R., Ong, C.K. 1998Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systemsAgroforest. Syst38350Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, M.G. 1991Effects of climate change on plant respirationEcol. Appl1157167Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh, L.J., Singh, J.S. 1991Storage and flux of nutrients in a dry tropical forest in IndiaAnn. Bot68263273Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd edMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swamy, S.L., Mishra, A., Puri, S. 2003aBiomass production and root distribution of Gmelina arborea under an agrisilviculture system in sub-humid tropics of Central IndiaNew Forests26167186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swamy, S.L., Puri, S., Singh, A.K. 2003bGrowthbiomass, carbon storage and nutrient distribution in Gmelina arborea (Linn.) stands on red lateritic soils in central IndiaBioresour. Technol90109126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Troech, F.R., Thompson, L.M. 1993Soils and Soil Fertility, 5th edOxford University PressNew York462Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verma, R.K, Khatri, P.K., Kunhikannan, C., Verma Ram, K., Totey, N.G. 1998Advantageous effects of the tree plantation on the rehabilitation of Bhata land ecosystemInd. J. Forest21197203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ForestryIndira Gandhi Agricultural UniversityRaipur (C.G.)India

Personalised recommendations