The endothelial cell tube formation assay on basement membrane turns 20: state of the science and the art
- 5.8k Downloads
It has been more than 20 years since it was first demonstrated that endothelial cells will rapidly form capillary-like structures in vitro when plated on top of a reconstituted basement membrane extracellular matrix (BME, Matrigel, EHS matrix, etc.). Subsequently, this morphological differentiation has been demonstrated with a variety of endothelial cells; with endothelial progenitor cells; and with transformed/immortalized endothelial cells. The differentiation process involves several steps in blood vessel formation, including cell adhesion, migration, alignment, protease secretion, and tubule formation. Because the formation of vessel structures is rapid and quantifiable, endothelial cell differentiation on basement membrane has found numerous applications in assays. Such differentiation has been used (1) to study angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, (2) to define mechanisms and pathways involved in angiogenesis, and (3) to define endothelial cell populations. Further, the endothelial cell differentiation assay has been successfully used to study processes ranging from wound repair and reproduction to development and tumor growth. The assay is easy to perform and is the most widely used in vitro angiogenesis assay.
KeywordsAngiogenesis Basement membrane Endothelial cell tubes Morphological differentiation Quantitative assay High throughput screen
The authors wish to thank Dr. George R. Martin for careful reading of this manuscript.
- 5.Mukai N, Akahori T, Koaki M, Li Q, Kanayasu-Toyoda T, Ishii-Watanabe A, Kobayashi A, Yamaguchi T, Abe M, Amagasa T, Morita I (2008) A comparison of the tube forming potentials of early and late endothelial progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 314:430–440. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.11.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Vukicevic S, Kleinman HK, Luyten FP, Roberts AB, Roche NS, Reddi AH (1992) Identification of multiple active growth factors in basement membrane matrigel suggests caution in interpretation of cellular activity related to extracellular matrix components. Exp Cell Res 202:1–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90397-Q PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kleinman HK, Malinda KM, Gho YS, Ponce ML (2000) In vitro and in vivo models of angiogenesis. In: Rubyani GM (ed) Angiogenesis in health and disease: from basic to clinical applications. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 291–299Google Scholar
- 29.Irulea-Arispe ML, Hasselaar P, Sage H (1991) Differential expression of extracellular proteins in correlated with angiogenesis in vitro. Lab Invest 64:174–186Google Scholar
- 32.Grant DS, Lelkes PI, Fukuda K, Kleinman HK (1991) Intracellular mechanisms involved in basement membrane induced blood vessel differentiation in vitro. In Vitro 27:327–335Google Scholar
- 37.Fukushima K, Murata M, Hachisuga M, Tsukimori K, Seki H, Takeda S, Kato K, Wake N (2008) Gene expression profiles by microarray analysis during matrigel-induced tube formation in a human extravillous trophoblast cell line: comparison with endothelial cells. Placenta 29:898–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar