Advertisement

Aerobiologia

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 613–633 | Cite as

Pollen calendars and maps of allergenic pollen in North America

  • Fiona Lo
  • Cecilia M. Bitz
  • David S. Battisti
  • Jeremy J. HessEmail author
Open Access
Original Paper
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

Pollen is a common allergen that causes significant health and financial impacts on up to a third of the population of the USA. Knowledge of the main pollen season can improve diagnosis and treatment of allergic diseases. Our objective in this study is to provide clear, quantitative visualizations of pollen data and make information accessible to many disciplines, in particular to allergy sufferers and those in the health field. We use data from 31 National Allergy Bureau (NAB) pollen stations in the continental USA and Canada from 2003 to 2017 to produce pollen calendars. We present pollen season metrics relevant to health and describe main pollen season start and end dates, durations, and annual pollen integrals for specific pollen taxa. In most locations, a small number of taxa constitute the bulk of the total pollen concentration. Start dates for tree and grass pollen season depend strongly on latitude, with earlier start dates at lower latitudes. Season duration is correlated with the start dates, such that locations with earlier start dates have a longer season. NAB pollen data have limited spatiotemporal coverage. Increased spatiotemporal monitoring will improve analysis and understanding of factors that govern airborne pollen concentrations.

Keywords

Allergy Aeroallergens Quercus Start date Duration Latitude 

1 Introduction

Pollen allergies are widespread and associated with several chronic conditions, including allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and allergic asthma, with allergic rhinitis the most common (Pawankar et al. 2011). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2016 National Health Interview Survey (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016) estimated allergic rhinitis prevalence in the USA at 21.5 million (6.5% of adults and 7.5% of children), though estimates using self-reported symptoms approach 30% for the total US population (Wheatley and Togias 2015). Allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for asthma, and the two diseases are highly correlated, though allergic asthma is less prevalent (Bousquet et al. 2008). Altogether, allergic diseases impose a significant financial burden in the USA, with direct cost of treatment and medications estimated at $11.2 billion in 2005 (Meltzer and Bukstein 2011), and substantial indirect costs from lower workplace productivity, adverse school performance, and reduced quality of life (Lamb et al. 2006; Marcotte 2015; Nathan 2007). This burden is a significant public health concern.

Pollen allergy is a regionally variable disease driven by numerous environmental factors, including local flora, weather, climate, and air pollution (i.e., Sung et al. 2017; Lou 2017; Silverberg et al. 2015; De Weger et al. 2013; Ziska et al. 2003). Prior pollen exposure drives disease sensitization, while current pollen exposure drives exacerbation of disease among those who are sensitized (Kihlström et al. 2002; Jantunen et al. 2012). The temporal and spatial distributions of allergenic pollen types are important to allergic disease epidemiology and in diagnosis and management of allergic diseases. Pollen calendars are useful for visualizing and understanding the distribution, timing, and concentration of different pollen taxa at given locations and can help allergy sufferers and clinicians identify potential triggers, guide diagnostic testing, and initiate appropriate therapies (Katotomichelakis et al. 2015). Pollen calendars can also help public health officials assess exposure, develop early warning systems, improve guidance to limit exposure, and promote therapy in advance of high pollen loads. Although some pollen grains can be transported hundreds to thousands of kilometers in the atmosphere (Rogers and Levetin 1998; Campbell et al. 1999; Sofiev et al. 2006), local pollen emissions are the principal driver of pollen concentrations in a given area (Keynan et al. 1991; Ranta et al. 2006). Pollen calendars are thus location specific, with pollen concentrations closely linked to the local distribution of flora, meteorology, and climate.

To understand pollen concentrations on a continental scale, large-scale coordinated studies are necessary. Summarizing pollen calendar research in Europe, D’Amato et al. (1998) concluded that a continent-wide understanding of pollen concentrations was not possible due to inconsistent methods across studies and regionally fragmented sampling. There have been some single-station pollen calendar studies in the continental USA and Canada (Kosisky et al. 2010; Levetin 1998; Fuhrmann et al. 2016; Rogers 1997). A few studies examine the large-scale distribution of pollen in North America (Solomon and Platts-Mills 1998; Rogers 2001); however, recent studies have focused on changes over time rather than on regional pollen distributions (Zhang et al. 2014a). Our work updates main pollen season characteristics by describing the seasonal dynamics, timing, and regional variations of major allergenic pollen concentrations across the continental USA and Canada.

2 Methods

2.1 Pollen data

We obtained pollen data from the National Allergy Bureau (NAB), a section of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology’s (AAAAI) Aeroallergen Network. The NAB aggregates and manages distribution of pollen data collected at the NAB stations. Pollen stations are run by AAAAI member volunteers and are self-funded.

A station in the NAB network is required to collect pollen samples at a minimum of 3 days per week from an unobstructed rooftop at least one story above ground with no local pollen sources. Pollen counts are collected with a Burkard volumetric air sampler or a Rotorod rotation impaction sampler. The Burkard collects higher counts than the Rotorod, particularly for smaller particles, and is more sensitive to wind speed (Frenz 1999; Crisp et al. 2013). Nonetheless, daily pollen counts using the two methods are positively and significantly correlated, and the absolute difference associated with the sampling instruments is small enough that it may not be meaningful from a clinical standpoint (Crisp et al. 2013). We will use and compare pollen counts sampled from both devices. Daily pollen counts are reported as daily average pollen concentrations (pollen grains/m3) which is the number of pollen grains divided by the volume of the air sampled over 24 h.

The NAB provided data from 51 stations for 2003–2017: 50 stations in the continental USA and one station (London, ON) in Canada. For simplicity, we will refer to the region covered by these stations as the Continental USA and Southern Canada (CUSSC). For stations to be included in our study, we required at least 2 years of data and with an average of three or more days per week of data between March 1 and October 1 for all years sampled. We excluded individual years of station data for a given taxon if the annual sum of the daily pollen concentration was 10 pollen grain*day/m3 or less, or if sampling began on or after June 1 of that year. Cumulative pollen concentrations are integrals of concentration over time, so are given in units of pollen grain*day/m3.

The NAB pollen data are grouped into 43 pollen categories: 38 for specific genera and families and five other composite categories: “Total Pollen,” “Other Tree Pollen,” “Other Weed Pollen,” “Other Grass Pollen,” and “Unidentified Pollen.”

2.2 Pollen calendars

We created pollen calendars by taking the daily average pollen concentrations for eligible years. Average annual pollen integral concentrations of less than 150 pollen grain*day/m3 were considered to have insufficient collection of data for a particular taxon, so pollen calendars only include pollen taxa with an average annual integral concentration greater than 150 pollen grain*day/m3.

2.3 Pollen season indices

Pollen season indices describe characteristics of the main pollen season. We chose to use pollen indices relevant to health: annual pollen integral (APIn), season start and end dates, and season duration. APIn is correlated with allergy symptom severity among sensitized individuals (Bastl et al. 2016). Knowledge of start dates is important for initiating medical therapy because antihistamine and anti-inflammatory allergy medications can take 1–4 weeks to be fully effective. This information can also be used to modify immunotherapy: patients in immunotherapy are exposed to increasing allergen doses and may be at risk of anaphylaxis if immunotherapy dosing is advanced when ambient pollen concentrations are increasing. Knowledge of end dates is useful for public health surveillance and for deciding when medical therapy can be discontinued.

2.3.1 Annual pollen integral (APIn)

The APIn is the integral of the daily pollen concentration for a specific taxon over the pollen year. A pollen year is a year that includes one complete pollen season, beginning when the plant is dormant. In most regions of CUSSC, the pollen year begins with the calendar year on January 1, but in warmer regions some pollen taxa are present in the atmosphere before January 1, in which case the pollen year begins earlier. Most Ambrosia species are short-day plants and they flower when the duration of daylight begins to decrease. However, there are some Ambrosia species in the Southwestern USA, southern California and coastal Florida that flower in the spring. We do not have pollen data from these areas and no data on spring-flowering Ambrosia, and so we define the pollen year for Ambrosia, using the more common fall-flowering species, to begin on the summer solstice, June 21. For other taxa, we assessed pollen concentrations to determine their dormant periods. Using these criteria, we define the pollen years to be January 1–December 31, except for stations in California, Texas, Georgia, and Oklahoma, where pollen years are September 1–August 31 for Cupressaceae, November 1–October 31 for Fraxinus, and December 1–November 30 for all other taxa.

2.3.2 Start date of the main pollen season

A variety of approaches to defining start and end dates of the main pollen season have been taken (Jato et al. 2006). A common approach is to define a start date as the date when the integral of the pollen concentration over the pollen year exceeds threshold percentage of the APIn for a given year. However, this approach has several disadvantages. First, it is necessarily retrospective, so the start date cannot be computed until the pollen year is over and the APIn is known. Second, because the threshold value is a percentage of the APIn, it varies year to year with fluctuating APIns. Third, it is location specific and makes interpretation of start date over a large region difficult. We chose our metric to avoid these pitfalls and to allow for a priori calculation based on historical APIns.

Studies have found that mild allergy symptoms are observed at relatively low pollen concentrations of ~ 10–20 pollen grains/m3, moderate symptoms at ~ 50–90 pollen grains/m3, and severe symptoms at ~ 80–90 pollen grains/m3 (Rapiejko et al. 2007; Negrini et al. 1992; Frenz 2001; de Weger et al. 2013). For most taxa, we define the start date as the day when the integral of pollen concentration over that pollen year reaches a threshold of 50 pollen grain*day/m3. Sensitive allergic individuals likely experience symptoms below this threshold. Due to the priming effects of allergens, a phenomenon in which increased allergic response is observed with daily sequential exposure (Sin and Togias 2011; Bruin-Weller et al. 1999; Connell 1968), allergic symptoms may occur at a cumulative threshold of 50 pollen grain*day/m3. For taxa with APIn below 2000 pollen grain*day/m3, we define the start date as the date on which the integral reaches a threshold of 2.5% of the historical mean APIn. The start date of the main pollen season is computed for each pollen taxon at each station location for every year.

NAB pollen taxon categories are either families or genera, and they can be composed of many species. As a result, there may be a diverse range of timing for pollen release for different species within a taxon. Calculations of the start date of the main pollen season for a specific taxon will be the start date of the species that releases pollen first and may not be indicative of the start date for other species within that taxon.

To evaluate the interannual variability, the standard deviation of start date was calculated for each important allergenic pollen. This was done by (1) obtaining the anomalous start dates for each station by subtracting the long-term mean start date for that station, and then (2) stringing together the anomalous start dates from all stations for which there were reliable start dates for each taxon at each station (which ensures a stable long-term mean value at each station).

2.3.3 End date of the main pollen season

The end date is calculated in a similar manner to the start date. For taxa with high APIn (> 2000 pollen grain*day/m3), the end date is defined as the date at which the integral of pollen concentration from that date to the end of the pollen year is less than 50 pollen grain*day/m3. If the long-term mean APIn is less 2000 pollen grain*day/m3, then the end date threshold is calculated as the date at which accumulated pollen concentration reaches 97.5% of the long-term mean APIn.

2.3.4 Duration of the main pollen season

Duration of the main pollen season is the number of days between the start date and the end date of main pollen season inclusive.

3 Results

3.1 Pollen data used in analysis

3.1.1 Pollen sampling characteristics

Of the 51 stations received from the NAB, 31 stations met inclusion criteria (Fig. 1, Table 1).
Fig. 1

National Allergy Bureau (NAB) station locations that meet inclusion criteria

Table 1

National Allergy Bureau (NAB) station locations, air sampler used to collect pollen, average sampling range over the calendar year, and average percentage of days sampled

Location of station

Latitude (°N)

Longitude (°W)

Air Sampler

Years

Average first sampling date

Average last sampling date

Percentage of days sampled between average first and last sampling date

Percentage of days sampled over calendar year

Atlanta, GA*

33.8

84.4

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 03

Dec 29

69.8

68.9

Austin, TX*

30.3

97.8

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 06

Dec 29

71.0

69.5

Baltimore, MD*

39.3

76.6

Rotorod

2003–2017

Mar 02

Oct 24

90.0

58.1

Bellevue, NE*

41.1

95.9

Burkard

2003–2017

Feb 15

Dec 03

91.0

72.5

Charlotte, NC

35.2

80.8

Rotorod

2012–2017

Feb 15

Nov 10

30.4

22.3

Coeur d’Alene, ID

47.7

116.8

Burkard

2011–2017

Mar 29

Sep 02

26.6

11.4

College Station, TX*

30.6

96.3

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 01

Dec 28

66.0

65.2

Colorado Springs, CO*

38.8

104.7

Rotorod

2006–2017

Feb 15

Nov 06

92.3

66.7

Dayton, OH*

39.7

84.2

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 08

Dec 23

66.2

63.4

Draper, UT*

40.5

111.9

Burkard

2003–2017

Mar 08

Oct 16

61.2

37.1

Erie, PA*

42.1

80.1

Burkard

2003–2017

Apr 08

Oct 16

62.8

32.8

Eugene, OR*

44.0

123.1

Burkard

2003–2016

Jan 08

Dec 25

51.5

49.4

Findlay, OH

41.0

83.7

Burkard

2014–2016

May 17

Jul 24

30.4

5.6

Greenville, SC*

34.9

82.4

Burkard

2003–2017

Feb 04

Dec 09

61.1

51.6

Houston, TX*

29.8

95.4

Burkard

2011–2017

Jan 03

Dec 29

67.6

66.7

Kansas, City MO*

39.1

94.5

Burkard

2003–2017

Feb 28

Nov 04

67.5

46.1

Knoxville, TN

36.0

84

Burkard

2003–2016

Mar 10

Oct 07

29.4

17.0

La Crosse, WI

43.9

91.2

Rotorod

2003–2016

Mar 25

Sep 28

48.3

24.7

London, ON*

43.0

81.2

Burkard

2003–2017

Feb 09

Oct 28

95.1

68.1

Louisville, KY

38.2

85.7

Burkard

2003–2016

Jan 06

Dec 29

90.6

88.7

Madison, WI*

43.1

89.4

Rotorod

2003–2017

Mar 21

Oct 22

54.9

32.3

Melrose Park, IL*

41.9

87.8

Burkard

2003–2017

Mar 25

Oct 16

69.1

38.6

Midland, TX

31.9

102.1

Burkard

2014–2017

Jan 26

Dec 13

24.1

21.2

Minneapolis, MN*

45.0

93.4

Rotorod

2010–2017

Mar 19

Nov 02

76.1

47.4

Mount Laurel, NJ

40.0

74.9

Burkard

2003–2016

Mar 09

Oct 30

44.7

28.7

New Castle, DE

39.6

75.6

Burkard

2005–2017

Mar 10

Oct 25

36.3

22.8

Oklahoma City1, OK*

35.5

97.5

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 04

Dec 21

67.1

64.5

Oklahoma City2, OK*

35.5

97.5

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 12

Dec 21

54.2

50.9

Oklahoma City3, OK

35.5

97.5

Burkard

2015–2017

Apr 28

Dec 22

38.7

25.1

Olean, NY

42.1

78.4

Burkard

2003–2017

Apr 01

Nov 05

39.8

23.7

Philadelphia, PA

40.0

75.1

Burkard

2003–2017

Mar 14

Oct 21

46.7

28.2

Pleasanton, CA

37.7

121.9

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 12

Dec 18

26.1

24.3

Pueblo, CO

38.2

104.6

Rotorod

2012–2016

Mar 13

Oct 19

42.2

25.3

Rochester, NY*

43.2

77.6

Burkard

2003–2017

Mar 11

Oct 23

70.6

43.6

Roseville, CA

38.8

121.2

Burkard

2007–2017

Jan 08

Dec 25

13.8

13.3

Saint Louis, MO*

38.6

90.3

Burkard

2003–2016

Jan 07

Dec 29

68.9

67.3

San Antonio2, TX*

29.4

98.5

Burkard

2010–2017

Jan 21

Dec 27

93.1

86.7

San Antonio3, TX

29.4

98.5

Burkard

2014–2017

Jan 01

Dec 30

99.6

99.1

San Jose, CA*

37.2

121.7

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 09

Dec 22

82.6

78.5

Seattle, WA*

47.6

122.3

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 26

Aug 25

85.6

49.6

Sparks, NV

40.1

119.6

Rotorod

2003–2017

Feb 16

Oct 25

19.7

13.5

Springfield, MO*

37.2

93.3

Burkard

2009–2017

Mar 28

Oct 30

69.2

40.9

Sylvania, OH

41.7

83.7

Burkard

2014–2017

Mar 11

Nov 08

91.5

60.6

Tampa, FL

27.9

82.5

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 18

Nov 12

32.7

26.7

Tulsa, OK*

36.1

96.0

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 09

Dec 19

45.9

43.3

Twin Falls, ID*

42.4

114.6

Rotorod

2003–2017

Mar 13

Oct 17

47.9

28.6

Waco, TX*

31.6

97.2

Burkard

2003–2017

Jan 06

Dec 29

65.7

64.3

Washington, DC*

38.9

77.0

Burkard

2003–2016

Jan 07

Dec 27

56.8

55.1

Waterbury, CT*

41.4

73.0

Burkard

2003–2017

Mar 31

Sep 29

69.2

34.2

Waukesha, WI

43.0

88.3

Burkard

2003–2016

Mar 31

Oct 16

21.6

11.8

York, PA*

40.0

76.7

Rotorod

2003–2017

Mar 15

Oct 19

66.0

39.3

Asterisk (*) indicates stations that meet inclusion criteria

3.1.2 Important allergenic pollen taxa

We elected to focus on eleven important allergenic pollen taxa in the CUSSC region as determined by their abundance in CUSSC (Table 2) and guided by previous studies (Lewis et al. 1983; Park et al. 2014; de Weger et al. 2013; Emberlin 2009). In the past, Pinaceae pollen has been considered a mild allergen and disregarded as an important allergenic pollen. Recent studies suggest that rates of allergic reactivity to Pinaceae pollen are on the rise (Park et al. 2014) and that the abundance of Pinaceae pollen and cross-reactivity of Pinaceae pollen with Poaceae pollen warrant Pinaceae pollen to be considered potentially allergenic (Gastaminza et al. 2009). We will refer to pollen taxa by their scientific names, and some of their common names are also provided in Table 2.
Table 2

Description and allergenic potential of 11 most important pollen taxa in the CUSSC region ranked by percent abundance relative to the sum of all pollen taxa over 31 NAB stations that meet inclusion criteria, 2003–2017

Rank

Scientific name (taxon)

Common name(s)

Pollen group

Percent abundance

Description

1

Quercus (genus)

Oak

Tree

19.6

Most Quercus trees produce heavy pollen loads. Quercus genus has many species found all over the CUSSC. They are commonly found in residential areas, parks, and forests

2

Cupressaceae (family)

Cypress, Juniper, Cedar

Tree

19.4

Most allergenic species in this family are evergreen conifers, including the genera Cupressus (Cypress) and Juniperus (Juniper). All Cupressaceae shed profuse amounts of pollen. Reactions to Cupressaceae pollen are often severe

3

Ambrosia (genus)

Ragweed

Weed

7.2

Ambrosia typically grows in areas that have been disturbed and left bare (e.g., agricultural borders and river banks). Ambrosia pollen is the primary cause of late summer, early fall allergic symptoms. Ambrosia is found throughout the CUSSC; it is most common in the Midwest

4

Morus (genus)

Mulberry

Tree

6.7

Allergenic reaction to Morus pollen is often severe. Morus is found throughout the CUSSC

5

Pinaceae (family)

Pine

Tree

4.5

Pinaceae family consists of evergreen coniferous trees and shrubs. They release large amounts of pollen. The pollen is considered to be low allergenic potential because the grains are large and contain fewer number of allergens, but Pinaceae pollen are potentially allergenic where abundant

6

Ulmus (genus)

Elm

tree

4.6

All Ulmus produce allergenic pollen and release significant amounts of pollen. Deciduous Ulmus produce pollen in early spring. U. parvifolia (Chinese elms) are evergreen in areas with warm winters and their pollen is very allergenic

7

Fraxinus (genus)

Ash

Tree

3.7

Deciduous Fraxinus trees can produce copious amounts of potent pollen. Fraxinus trees are widespread in the CUSSC.

8

Betula (genus)

Birch

Tree

3.8

Betula are usually smaller trees, so do not produce a large volume of pollen but Betula pollen is a well-known aeroallergen. They have a short pollen season as Betula blooms for only a few days

9

Poaceae, Gramineae (family)

Grass

Grass

3.7

Grass lawns are found throughout the country and used for urban landscaping in gardens and parks. Popular lawn grasses include Poa pratensis (Bluegrass), Phleum pretense (Timothy Grass), Cynodon dactylon (Burmuda) and Lolium (Ryegrass). Poaceae is also grown for pasture and hay. Poaceae pollen is highly allergenic

10

Acer (genus)

Maple

Tree

3.7

Acer are deciduous trees with a large number of species. Many species cause allergies, but not all. Acer are commonly found in the eastern CUSSC region and are also popular for ornamental and street plantings

11

Populus (genus)

Poplar, aspen, cottonwood

Tree

2.5

Populus trees such as poplars, aspens, and cottonwoods are large, deciduous trees. They are found throughout the CUSSC

3.1.3 Reliability of main pollen season start date calculation

Our choice of start date metrics balances sensitivity to relatively low pollen concentrations, an important consideration from a health standpoint, with robustness to missing values, a significant consideration with this pollen dataset. As explained in “Methods,” our start date is defined based on an integral of pollen concentrations that begin on the first day of the pollen year (usually January 1) and days with missing data do not contribute. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to have measurements begin in a calendar year after pollen is already present in the atmosphere. In these cases, the calculated start date is biased late. We illustrate this sampling problem with time series of start date for seven of the most abundant pollen taxa from London, ON (Fig. 2). The station began sampling pollen around January 1 in 2003–2007 and in mid-March in 2008–2017. The start dates for Cupressaceae pollen in the period of 2008–2017 almost immediately follow the date of the first sampling in those calendar years and are much later than in the period 2003–2007, suggesting that data collection between 2008 and 2017 sometimes began after the Cupressaceae main pollen season had already started.
Fig. 2

Start date of the main pollen season at London, ON, for the taxa: Cupressaceae (brown), Acer (green), Populus (blue), Quercus (purple), Morus (red), Poaceae (pink), and Ambrosia (orange). Open circles indicate unreliable start dates (calculated start dates that occur within 7 sampled days of the first sampling date). Filled circles indicate reliable start dates. Grayed out areas are dates at which pollen was not sampled

Cupressaceae can be one of the earliest tree pollen taxa to emit pollen, with observations as early as August in Waco, TX (see Sect. 3.3.1). A start date is considered unreliable if the calculated start date occurs within 7 sampled days of the first sampling date. Only 28% of station-years have reliable start dates for Cupressaceae pollen (not shown). Unreliable start dates are not further included in our study. Start dates can be determined with confidence for taxa that emit pollen later in the season, such as Quercus.

3.2 Proportional distribution of allergenic pollen taxa

The number of dominant pollen taxa varies among stations. For all stations in the CUSSC region, 70% of the APIn at a location is comprised of eight or fewer pollen taxa (Fig. 3). Relative abundances of the important allergenic taxa show that Quercus and Cupressaceae are the most abundant pollen taxa in the CUSSC (Table 2, stacked bar chart and radar charts in supplementary materials).
Fig. 3

Cumulative percentage of APIn by number of pollen taxa. Each line represents a station; the color of the line indicates latitude

3.3 Pollen calendars

The airborne pollen season varies in time and space depending on the pollen taxon. We selected four methods for describing the main pollen season to present both the location perspective and the taxon perspective. We first present two types of pollen calendars. The first calendar type describes the long-term mean of all observed allergenic pollen taxa, using four locations as examples. These locations are chosen to highlight regional variability and chosen on the basis of data completeness. Pollen calendars for other locations are available in supplementary materials. The second type of pollen calendar describes taxon-specific seasonal characteristics over the CUSSC region. Again, we present a subset of available results, with complete results available in supplementary materials. Third, we show maps of the long-term average start dates and season duration for specific pollen types to demonstrate the spatial variability of the main pollen season. Lastly, we present taxon-specific start dates for a station to show the year-to-year variability.

3.3.1 Location-specific pollen calendars

We describe pollen calendars for four stations in different climate and ecological regions in the CUSSC: Seattle, Washington; San Jose, California; Waco, Texas; and London, Ontario.

Seattle, Washington, is located in the Pacific Northwest with a cool, moist climate with dry summers and wet, generally snowless winters. Evergreen trees dominate the region. We see evidence of the large number of evergreens in the airborne pollen composition with Cupressaceae as the most abundant pollen at 37% (Fig. 4a). Trees dominate the sample, with grass constituting 2.9% and weeds 1.3%. The two most abundant taxa, Cupressaceae and Alnus, comprise about two-thirds of the total APIn. Cupressaceae is the earliest pollen present; hence, the start of the Seattle main pollen season is primarily governed by Cupressaceae pollen. Unlike most other stations, Seattle detects very little pollen after July and thus has a relatively short pollen season.
Fig. 4

Pollen calendar for a Seattle, Washington, b San Jose, California, c London, Ontario, and d Waco, Texas. Daily long-term mean of pollen concentration by pollen taxa, 2003–2017. Percent abundance is the ratio of that taxon’s APIn to the sum of APIn over all pollen taxa. Only pollen taxa with average APIn over 150 pollen grain*day/m3 are shown. Missing data are shaded gray and denoted NaN in the color bar

San Jose, California, is located in central California with a warm, mild Mediterranean climate. The semiarid region receives most of its rainfall in the wintertime. San Jose is an urbanized area within a region of chaparral shrubland mixed with grassland and oak woodlands. San Jose is one of the few NAB stations that sample year-round, which is necessary because pollen is present in the atmosphere throughout the year (Fig. 4b).

Tree pollen is dominant, contributing 94% of the total sample of identified pollen. No one tree pollen dominates; Ulmus and Olea are most abundant, at 14% each. The double peak in Ulmus pollen concentration occurs because there are species that release pollen in the spring as well as in the late summer and early fall. Olea pollen is not observed by other NAB stations except in very small amounts; however, it is significant for this area because Olea pollen is a potent allergen (Elvira-Rendueles et al. 2017). Morus and Pinaceae pollen taxa are the next most abundant pollen taxa at almost 12%. Pinaceae pollen is a mild allergen; however, it may be considered an important pollen in San Jose because of its abundance and its presence throughout the year (Gastaminza et al. 2009).

London, Ontario, is located in the Great Lakes region with cold winters and humid summers. The land cover is characterized by a mix of agriculture, forest, wetlands, and glacial lakes. Of the total pollen sampled at the station (Fig. 4c), the pollen composition is 81% trees, 13% weeds, and 6% grasses. London tree pollen is diverse, with eight pollen taxa explaining 70% of the APIn. The most abundant is Morus, at 22%. London’s main pollen season runs from March through September. The end of the tree pollen season overlaps with the beginning of the grass pollen season in late May. Ambrosia is the most abundant weed pollen and has a distinct season from mid-August to mid-September.

Waco, Texas, is located in the south central part of the Great Plains and has a humid subtropical climate with hot dry summers and rains in mid to late spring. Much of the region was originally grassland but is now crops and rangeland. Waco is similar to other stations located in warmer climates in that it has pollen present in the atmosphere throughout the year. Waco’s APIn for all pollen taxa is very high (Fig. 4d) compared to many stations in the CUSSC region but is similar to other nearby stations (Austin and San Antonio, TX).

Waco’s lowest pollen concentrations occur in July, in contrast to more northern stations where the lowest pollen concentrations occur in winter. There are three peaks in the main pollen season in Waco. The earliest peak occurs in January when Cupressaceae, which is the second most abundant pollen at 19%, emits pollen. The main peak occurs between late March and late April, when Quercus, the most abundant pollen at 20%, peaks along with Carya, Acer and spring-pollinating Ulmus. The third peak occurs from mid-September through October, when Ambrosia, the third most abundant pollen at 11%, fall-pollinating Ulmus, and other weed pollen types release pollen.

3.3.2 Latitudinal dependence of the main pollen season

To better understand large-scale patterns of specific pollen taxa, we created taxon-specific pollen calendars with NAB stations ordered by latitude. We present pollen calendars for four of the important allergenic pollen taxa (Fig. 5). In general, stations at lower latitudes have an earlier start to the Quercus pollen season (Fig. 5a). In addition, the length of the Quercus pollen season is longer at lower latitudes. A similar latitudinal dependence on the start of the main pollen season is observed in all of the important allergenic pollen taxa, with the exception of Ulmus and Ambrosia.
Fig. 5

Pollen calendar for aQuercus, bUlmus, cAmbrosia, and dPoaceae, 2003–2017. NAB stations are ordered by latitude. For each taxon, the percentage abundance is the ratio of the long-term mean APIn at that station to the APIn summed over all NAB stations with data. Missing data are shaded gray and denoted NaN in the color bar. Only NAB stations with average APIn over 150 pollen grain*day/m3 are shown

The pollen calendar for Ulmus has a unique pattern, peaking twice annually at lower latitudes (Fig. 5b). This is because some Ulmus species release pollen in the spring and others in the late summer and early fall. The spring-pollinating species have a latitude dependence similar to other allergenic tree pollen taxa. The fall-pollinating Ulmus species are present only at latitudes south of 39°N and do not have a clear latitude dependence.

The Ambrosia pollen calendar (Fig. 5c) exhibits patterns distinct from allergenic trees. Ambrosia is most commonly a short-day plant that begins flowering when days begin to shorten, and Ambrosia produces pollen in late summer and early fall. At high latitudes, Ambrosia season start shows little latitudinal dependence, consistent with plant physiology and others’ findings (Sofiev and Bergmann 2013; Deen et al. 1998). However, the end of the Ambrosia season, determined by date of the first frost (Ziska et al. 2011), ends later at lower latitudes.

Poaceae are generally known to be a summertime allergen. However, the pollen calendar for Poaceae (Fig. 5d) shows that the season can range from March to November. The allergenic Poaceae family is comprised of many species, and this can be seen by the various pollen patterns at different stations: Oklahoma City, OK, has one long season; Eugene, OR, has one short season; and Austin, TX, has two distinct seasons in a year. In general, longer duration Poaceae seasons occur at lower latitudes, where the season starts earlier and ends later.

3.4 Regional variability in the long-term mean start dates, end dates, and season duration

A summary of the spatial variability of the long-term mean start date, end date, and season duration for each of the 11 important allergenic pollen taxa is shown in Fig. 6. The start dates of Betula, Populus, and Acer have a relatively narrow range among locations, whereas Cupressaceae, Ulmus, and Pinaceae are more variable. Bias start dates due to sampling issues from some stations, and the large number of species in Cupressaceae family may contribute to the wide range of start dates for Cupressaceae (Sect. 3.1.3). The mean duration of the Ulmus main pollen season has two distinct groups corresponding to the presence or absence of fall-pollinating Ulmus (Sect. 3.3.2). The mean duration of Fraxinus and Populus main pollen seasons is relatively similar across the CUSSC, and the mean duration of the Poaceae season varies greatly.
Fig. 6

Range of long-term mean main pollen season start dates (red), end dates (blue), and duration (green) for important pollen taxa; each square represents the long-term mean of a NAB station

3.4.1 Start date of the main pollen season

There are regional patterns in the mean start date of the main pollen season in the CUSSC. The dominant pattern is a latitudinal dependence in which higher-latitude stations have a later start date (e.g., Figs. 5a, 7a for Quercus pollen). Quercus pollen is representative of other important allergenic tree pollen taxa in that they all show latitudinal dependence on the mean start date. The mean start dates for Quercus range from February 11, at Houston, TX, to May 2, at Rochester, NY; this almost 3-month difference in the start date indicates that the regional differences in start date are large compared to the interannual variability and length of the season. Location is a very important factor in determining the start date of the season. Note that stations in the west coast (San Jose, CA, Eugene, OR, Seattle, WA) have an earlier start date than stations at the same latitude in the interior USA.
Fig. 7

Map of a long-term mean start date and b long-term mean duration of the Quercus main pollen season

3.4.2 Duration of the main pollen season

The duration of the main pollen season also exhibits regional variation. Average Quercus season duration ranges from 23 days in Seattle, WA, to 103 days in San Jose, CA (Fig. 7b). In general, the duration of the season is also longer at lower latitudes for other taxa (not shown). The start date and duration of the Quercus main pollen season are significantly and negatively correlated at 99%, such that the higher-latitude stations have a later start date and a shorter season (Fig. 8). Quercus pollen is representative of the other allergenic tree pollen taxa in that they all have start dates significantly and negatively correlated with the duration of the main pollen season (not shown).
Fig. 8

Scatter plot of start date of Quercus main pollen season with duration of Quercus main pollen season for all years for NAB stations. Colors indicate station’s latitude

3.5 Year-to-year variability in start date of the main pollen season

There is considerable interannual variability in main pollen season start dates. Figure 2 illustrates that start dates for six of the seven taxa from London, Ontario, can be assessed with reasonable reliability (see Sect. 3.3 for a discussion of the influence of first sampling date on the calculation of main pollen season start date). For these six taxa in London, standard deviation of start dates ranges from 3 to 13 days, with Ambrosia at the smallest and Morus and Acer at the largest.

The standard deviation of start date was calculated for each important allergenic pollen taxon for station-years with unbiased start dates. The standard deviation varies from 8.4 days for Ambrosia to 32.2 days for Ulmus pollen (Table 3). Larger variability is indicative of taxa with physiology that depends on many climatic factors such as temperature, precipitation, humidity, length of daylight, and soil moisture. Because the start of the Ambrosia main pollen season is strongly dependent on length of daylight, the start date for Ambrosia has relatively low variability compare to other pollen taxa.
Table 3

Standard deviation of start dates for important allergenic pollen taxa. Only years with reliable start dates from the 31 NAB stations are included

Taxa

Standard deviation of start date (days)

Number of station-years included

Quercus

11.8

232

Cupressaceae

25

63

Ambrosia

8.4

292

Morus

10.6

228

Pinaceae

13

230

Ulmus

32.2

112

Fraxinus

12.2

214

Betula

13.4

201

Populus

12.3

174

Poaceae

12.3

258

Acer

16.2

103

4 Discussion

4.1 Limitations and caveats

We have presented pollen calendars and analyses of pollen start dates and season duration. Our analyses are limited by the number of NAB stations available to us and by missing data. Only 31 of the 51 stations we received from NAB met our data inclusion criteria, thus limiting the spatial resolution of our analysis. Temporal limitations also limit our analyses: Many stations do not sample pollen every day and most do not sample year-round. The temporal limitations influenced our choice of start date definition: We chose a definition that was less sensitive to missing data. We are not able to draw conclusions related to the Cupressaceae pollen start date because it is likely that some stations do not begin sampling until after Cupressaceae pollen is already present in the atmosphere. This is unfortunate, as Cupressaceae pollen is widespread and is the second most abundant allergenic pollen in the USA. Cupressaceae was the only taxon to be clearly adversely affected by late sampling in this study. However, a trend of earlier start dates for many allergenic pollen taxa has been observed in past decades (van Vliet et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2014b), and climate change is projected to continue to cause earlier start dates (van Vliet et al. 2002; Ariano et al. 2010; Galán et al. 2005; Garcia-Mozo et al. 2006). This trend in earlier start dates could potentially cause the sampling to begin too late to detect the start date of other allergenic taxa. Better monitoring and analysis of the main pollen season would be achieved with daily pollen concentration data collected year-round.

The NAB allows the use of two different pollen samplers, which sample pollen counts that are significantly correlated but not equal. Although the difference between the two is small and thought to have no clinical difference (Crisp et al. 2013), no quantitative comparison has been undertaken. In this study, we did use with reservation, the pollen data regardless of sampling method. In addition, lack of important station metadata makes it difficult to assess factors that could affect data quality; e.g., the Seattle station moved location in April 2, 2012 (Northwest Asthma & Allergy Center Web site) and the Atlanta station moved in June 2010 (e-mail communication with R. Panethere, Atlanta Allergy and Asthma Clinic, June 14, 2018), but these location changes are not noted in the NAB metadata. Local sources of pollen have a significant impact on sampled pollen, and a location change could produce different pollen concentrations (Sofiev et al. 2006).

The geographic distribution of the NAB stations is relatively sparse in the western half of the CUSSC region. This restricts our ability to analyze pollen characteristics on the continental scale. Pollen calendars are location dependent, so it is important to have enough stations to resolve the spatial variability of pollen. The general sparsity of western stations appears to have been worsened by a lower response rate to our data request among western stations. Requests for pollen data are brokered by the NAB, but each station has its own criteria for granting access, leading to different data coverage across data requests and applications that likely affect generalizability of research findings.

4.2 Conclusions and recommendations

We have presented pollen calendars for four stations in the CUSSC region and created pollen calendars for the other 27 stations from the subset of the NAB dataset that met our data inclusion criteria (supplementary figures). Our focus is on documenting and characterizing the spatial and temporal structure of the main pollen season for allergenic pollen taxa across the CUSSC region. Our pollen calendars update and expand upon work done by Levetin (1998), Kosisky et al. (2010), and Zhang et al. (2014a). Pollen calendars are location dependent due to the regional nature of plant ecology and climate. A handful of allergenic taxa constitute the principal allergenic pollen load in most regions studied.

Despite the sparse spatial resolution of the NAB data, there is a clear latitudinal signal to the start date (e.g., for Quercus pollen, see Figs. 5a, 7a). Zhang et al. (2014b) observed the start dates in Betula and Quercus to be earlier at lower latitudes. We have expanded their study to include eleven important allergenic pollen taxa. The NAB stations show the same latitudinal dependence in all important allergenic tree pollen taxa with the exception of fall-pollinating Ulmus, which shows no latitude dependence. Latitude is a proxy for temperature and length of daylight. That said, the three stations on the west coast (San Jose, CA, Eugene, OR, and Seattle, WA) feature earlier start dates for tree pollen than is observed at other stations at the same latitude in the interior USA. This indicates that another factor, such as temperature, is influencing the start date. The west coast region is moderated by the transport of air from the Pacific Ocean and has a milder climate and warmer winters than the continental interior. Plant phenology, such as the time of pollen release, is highly dependent on temperature. Indeed, accumulated heat is used in many models that forecast main pollen season characteristics (Zhang et al. 2015; Galán et al. 1998; García-Mozo et al. 2008; Ritenberga et al. 2018).

The duration of the main pollen season for important allergenic pollen taxa is negatively correlated with the start date; hence, stations at lower latitudes with earlier start dates also have longer pollen seasons (e.g., see Fig. 8 for Quercus). The dependence of pollen season duration on latitude is less distinct than for start date, which suggests other environmental factors may contribute to the duration of the pollen season. Such factors could include weather prior to and during the pollen season: temperature, rain, wind, and sun. Other factors such as atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration can affect the amount of pollen produced: Ambrosia has been observed to produce more pollen and more allergenic pollen under increased CO2 levels (Ziska et al. 2003; Ziska and Caulfield 2000; Singer et al. 2005).

It is often assumed that trees only release pollen in spring, grasses in summer, and weeds in fall. The pollen calendars for Ulmus (Fig. 5b) show that some species of Ulmus release pollen in the late summer and early fall; Poaceae pollen (Fig. 5d) is detected in the atmosphere from March through November; and Cupressaceae pollen (Fig. 4d and supplementary materials) can be found in atmosphere in the fall and winter. We can use these pollen calendars to help inform the allergy community to improve diagnosis and treatment.

The NAB pollen dataset has non-trivial amounts of missing data, and the number of stations is small in the western half of the CUSSC region. The limited spatiotemporal resolution of the pollen data affected the analyses we were able to conduct. Improvement in the spatiotemporal resolution of the data would lead to more complete analyses and a chance of better health outcomes for individuals with pollen allergies. We encourage the NAB to advocate for consistent year-round daily sampling of pollen concentrations and to increase the number of stations in the western CUSSC region.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following for their help and support: Dr. Lewis Ziska at the United States Department of Agriculture, Dr. Shubhayu Saha, Ms. Claudia Brown, Dr. Ambarish Vaidyanathan, Mr. Arie Manangan at the Climate and Health Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Abby Swann at the University of Washington. We especially like to thank all the NAB stations for providing the pollen concentration data.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Grant 15-HAQST15-0025, Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Science (ROSES-2015), Program Element A.46: Health and Air Quality Applied Sciences Team, and the Tamaki Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10453_2019_9601_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 12678 kb)

References

  1. Ariano, R., Canonica, G. W., & Passalacqua, G. (2010). Possible role of climate changes in variations in pollen seasons and allergic sensitizations during 27 years. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,104(3), 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2009.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastl, K., Kmenta, M., Pessi, A.-M., Prank, M., Saarto, A., Sofiev, M., et al. (2016). First comparison of symptom data with allergen content (Bet v 1 and Phl p 5 measurements) and pollen data from four European regions during 2009–2011. Science of the Total Environment,548–549, 229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bousquet, J., Khaltaev, N., Cruz, A. A., Denburg, J., Fokkens, W. J., Togias, A., et al. (2008). Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA). Allergy,63, 8–160.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01620.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruin-Weller, D., Weller, F. R., & Monchy, D. (1999). Repeated allergen challenge as a new research model for studying allergic reactions. Clinical and Experimental Allergy,29(2), 159–165.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00434.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, I. D., McDonald, K., Flannigan, M. D., & Kringayark, J. (1999). Long-distance transport of pollen into the Arctic. Nature,399(6731), 29–30.  https://doi.org/10.1038/19891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Allergies and hay fever. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/allergies.htm. Accessed June 4, 2018.
  7. Connell, J. T. (1968). Quantitative intranasal pollen challenge: II. Effect of daily pollen challenge, environmental pollen exposure, and placebo challenge on the nasal membrane. Journal of Allergy,41(3), 123–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8707(68)90053-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crisp, H. C., Gomez, R. A., White, K. M., & Quinn, J. M. (2013). A side-by-side comparison of Rotorod and Burkard pollen and spore collections. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,111(2), 118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2013.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Amato, G., Spieksma, F. T. M., Liccardi, G., Jäger, S., Russo, M., Kontou-Fili, K., et al. (1998). Pollen-related allergy in Europe. Allergy,53(6), 567–578.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03932.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Weger, L. A., Bergmann, K. C., Rantio-Lehtimäki, A., Dahl, A., Buters, J., Déchamp, C., et al. (2013). Impact of pollen. In M. Sofiev & K.-C. Bergmann (Eds.), Allergenic pollen: A review of the production, release, distribution and health impacts (pp. 161–215). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deen, W., Hunt, L. A., & Swanton, C. J. (1998). Photothermal time describes common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia phenological development and growth. Weed Science,46(5), 561–568.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500091104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elvira-Rendueles, B., Zapata, J. J., Miralles, J. C., Moreno, J. M., García-Sánchez, A., Negral, L., et al. (2017). Aerobiological importance and allergic sensitization to Amaranthaceae under arid climate conditions. Science of the Total Environment,583, 478–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emberlin, J. (2009). Grass, tree and weed pollen. In A. B. Kay, A. P. Kaplan, J. Bousquet, & P. G. Holt (Eds.), Allergy and allergic diseases (2nd ed., pp. 942–962). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Frenz, D. A. (1999). Comparing pollen and spore counts collected with the Rotorod Sampler and Burkard spore trap. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,83(5), 341–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62828-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frenz, D. A. (2001). Interpreting atmospheric pollen counts for use in clinical allergy: Allergic symptomology. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,86(2), 150–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62683-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuhrmann, C. M., Sugg, M. M., & Konrad, C. E. (2016). Airborne pollen characteristics and the influence of temperature and precipitation in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (1999–2012). Aerobiologia,32(4), 683–696.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-016-9442-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galán, C., Fuillerat, M. J., Comtois, P., & Domínguez, E. (1998). A predictive study of Cupressaceae pollen season onset, severity, maximum value and maximum value date. Aerobiologia,14(2–3), 195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galán, C., García-Mozo, H., Vázquez, L., Ruiz, L., de la Guardia, C. D., & Trigo, M. M. (2005). Heat requirement for the onset of the Olea europaea L. pollen season in several sites in Andalusia and the effect of the expected future climate change. International Journal of Biometeorology,49(3), 184–188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-004-0223-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Mozo, H., Chuine, I., Aira, M. J., Belmonte, J., Bermejo, D., Díaz de la Guardia, C., et al. (2008). Regional phenological models for forecasting the start and peak of the Quercus pollen season in Spain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,148(3), 372–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia-Mozo, H., Galan, C., Jato, V., Belmonte, J., de la Guardia, C., Fernandez, D., et al. (2006). Quercus pollen season dynamics in the Iberian peninsula: Response to meteorological parameters and possible consequences of climate change. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine: AAEM,13(2), 209–224.Google Scholar
  21. Gastaminza, G., Lombardero, M., Bernaola, G., Antepara, I., Muñoz, D., Gamboa, P. M., et al. (2009). Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of pine pollen. Clinical and Experimental Allergy,39(9), 1438–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03308.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jantunen, J., Saarinen, K., & Rantio-Lehtimäki, A. (2012). Allergy symptoms in relation to alder and birch pollen concentrations in Finland. Aerobiologia,28(2), 169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-011-9221-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jato, V., Rodríguez-Rajo, F. J., Alcázar, P., Nuntiis, P. D., Galán, C., & Mandrioli, P. (2006). May the definition of pollen season influence aerobiological results? Aerobiologia,22(1), 13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-005-9011-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katotomichelakis, M., Nikolaidis, C., Makris, M., Zhang, N., Aggelides, X., Constantinidis, T. C., et al. (2015). The clinical significance of the pollen calendar of the Western Thrace/northeast Greece region in allergic rhinitis. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology,5(12), 1156–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keynan, N., Waisel, Y., Shomer-Ilan, A., Goren, A., & Brener, S. (1991). Annual variations of air-borne pollen in the Coastal Plain of Israel. Grana,30(2), 477–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139109432013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kihlström, A., Lilja, G., Pershagen, G., & Hedlin, G. (2002). Exposure to birch pollen in infancy and development of atopic disease in childhood. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,110(1), 78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.125829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kosisky, S. E., Marks, M. S., & Nelson, M. R. (2010). Pollen aeroallergens in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area: A 10-year volumetric survey (1998–2007). Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,104(3), 223–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2010.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamb, C. E., Ratner, P. H., Johnson, C. E., Ambegaonkar, A. J., Joshi, A. V., Day, D., et al. (2006). Economic impact of workplace productivity losses due to allergic rhinitis compared with select medical conditions in the United States from an employer perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion,22(6), 1203–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X112552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levetin, E. (1998). A long-term study of winter and early spring tree pollen in the Tulsa, Oklahoma atmosphere. Aerobiologia,14(1), 21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, W. H., Vinay, P., & Zenger, V. (1983). Airborne and allergenic pollen of North America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lou, H. (2017). Sensitization patterns and minimum screening panels for aeroallergens in self-reported allergic rhinitis in China. Scientific Reports. Retrieved January 14, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-10111-9.
  32. Marcotte, D. E. (2015). Allergy test: Seasonal allergens and performance in school. Journal of Health Economics,40, 132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meltzer, E. O., & Bukstein, D. A. (2011). The economic impact of allergic rhinitis and current guidelines for treatment. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology,106(2), S12–S16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2010.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nathan, R. A. (2007). The burden of allergic rhinitis. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings,28(1), 3–9.  https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2007.28.2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Negrini, A. C., Voltolini, S., Troise, C., & Arobba, D. (1992). Comparison between Urticaceae Parietaria pollen count and hay fever symptoms: Assessment of a threshold-value. Aerobiologia,8(3), 325–329.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Northwest Asthma & Allergy Center. List of locations. http://www.nwasthma.com/locations/list-of-locations/. Accessed May 30, 2018.
  37. Park, H. J., Lim, H. S., Park, K. H., Lee, J.-H., Park, J.-W., & Hong, C.-S. (2014). Changes in allergen sensitization over the last 30 years in Korea respiratory allergic patients: A single-center. Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research,6(5), 434–443.  https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2014.6.5.434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pawankar, R., Canonica, G., Holgate, S., & Lockey, R. (2011). WAO white book on allergy. Milwaukee: World Allergy Organization.Google Scholar
  39. Ranta, H., Kubin, E., Siljamo, P., Sofiev, M., Linkosalo, T., Oksanen, A., et al. (2006). Long distance pollen transport cause problems for determining the timing of birch pollen season in Fennoscandia by using phenological observations. Grana,45(4), 297–304.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00173130600984740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rapiejko, P., Stanlaewicz, W., Szczygielski, K., & Jurkiewicz, D. (2007). Threshold pollen count necessary to evoke allergic symptoms. Otolaryngologia Polska=The Polish Otolaryngology,61(4), 591–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6657(07)70491-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ritenberga, O., Sofiev, M., Siljamo, P., Saarto, A., Dahl, A., Ekebom, A., et al. (2018). A statistical model for predicting the inter-annual variability of birch pollen abundance in Northern and North-Eastern Europe. Science of the Total Environment,615, 228–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers, C. A. (1997). An aeropalynological study of metropolitan Toronto. Aerobiologia,13(4), 243–257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers, C. A. (2001). Pollenosis in North America. In G. D’Amato, S. Bonini, J. Bousquet et al. (Eds.), Pollenosis 2000: Global approach (pp. 107–112). Naples: JGC Editions.Google Scholar
  44. Rogers, C. A., & Levetin, E. (1998). Evidence of long-distance transport of mountain cedar pollen into Tulsa, Oklahoma. International Journal of Biometeorology,42(2), 65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silverberg, J. I., Braunstein, M., & Lee-Wong, M. (2015). Association between climate factors, pollen counts, and childhood hay fever prevalence in the United States. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,135(2), 463–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sin, B., & Togias, A. (2011). Pathophysiology of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society,8(1), 106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.201008-057RN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singer, B. D., Ziska, L. H., Frenz, D. A., Gebhard, D. E., & Straka, J. G. (2005). Increasing Amb a 1 content in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) pollen as a function of rising atmospheric CO2 concentration. Functional Plant Biology,32(7), 667–670.  https://doi.org/10.1071/FP05039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sofiev, M., & Bergmann, K. C. (2013). Allergenic pollen: A review of the production, release, distribution and health impacts. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sofiev, M., Siljamo, P., Ranta, H., & Rantio-Lehtimäki, A. (2006). Towards numerical forecasting of long-range air transport of birch pollen: Theoretical considerations and a feasibility study. International Journal of Biometeorology,50(6), 392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-006-0027-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Solomon, W. R., & Platts-Mills, T. (1998). Aerobiology and inhalant allergens. In E. Middleton, C. E. Reed, E. F. Ellis, et al. (Eds.), Allergy principles and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 367–393). St Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
  51. Sung, M., Kim, S. W., Kim, J. H., & Lim, D. H. (2017). Regional difference of causative pollen in children with allergic rhinitis. Journal of Korean Medical Science,32(6), 926–932.  https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.6.926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Vliet, A. J. H., Overeem, A., Groot, R. S. D., Jacobs, A. F. G., & Spieksma, F. T. M. (2002). The influence of temperature and climate change on the timing of pollen release in the Netherlands. International Journal of Climatology,22(14), 1757–1767.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wheatley, L. M., & Togias, A. (2015). Allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med,372, 456–463.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp1412282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Y., Bielory, L., Cai, T., Mi, Z., & Georgopoulos, P. (2015). Predicting onset and duration of airborne allergenic pollen season in the United States. Atmospheric Environment,103, 297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, Y., Bielory, L., & Georgopoulos, P. G. (2014a). Climate change effect on Betula (birch) and Quercus (oak) pollen seasons in US. International Journal of Biometeorology,58(5), 909–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, Y., Bielory, L., Mi, Z., Cai, T., Robock, A., & Georgopoulos, P. (2014b). Allergenic pollen season variations in the past two decades under changing climate in the United States. Global Change Biology,21(4), 1581–1589.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ziska, L. H., & Caulfield, F. A. (2000). Rising CO2 and pollen production of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), a known allergy-inducing species: Implications for public health. Functional Plant Biology,27(10), 893–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ziska, L. H., Gebhard, D. E., Frenz, D. A., Faulkner, S., Singer, B. D., & Straka, J. G. (2003). Cities as harbingers of climate change: Common ragweed, urbanization, and public health. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,111(2), 290–295.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2003.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ziska, L., Knowlton, K., Rogers, C., Dalan, D., Tierney, N., Elder, M. A., et al. (2011). Recent warming by latitude associated with increased length of ragweed pollen season in central North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,108(10), 4248–4251.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014107108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of the EnvironmentUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Global Health, Schools of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations