Flowering of allergenically important plant species in relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation system and thermal time in the Czech Republic
- 139 Downloads
This paper analyses long-term (1960–2015) onset of flowering in 16 native terrestrial plants (11 of them produce important allergens) recorded in different parts of the Czech Republic (southern, central and northern part) in relation to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index of the preceding winter and thermal data—growing degree-days (GDD) and soil temperature. Flowering occurred significantly earlier following positive winter NAO phases (causing spring to be warmer than normal in Central Europe) in nearly all early-flowering (February, March, April) species; high Pearson correlation values were recorded in, e.g. wood anemone, common snowdrop, goat willow, common hazel and common alder. There was found a difference between the southern and northern part of the country, e.g. in silver birch and pedunculate oak. Out of the later-flowering (May–July) plant species, black elder and meadow foxtail also significantly correlated with the winter NAO index, lime tree correlated less markedly. The best results of a threshold for calculation of GDD to onset of beginning of flowering were found in lime tree—it was 5 °C at all three stations. Results of other taxa were more variable (e.g. 4–7 °C in goat willow; 6–10 °C in silver birch). Pearson correlation coefficients between NAO index and GDD were negative in lime tree at all thresholds (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 °C), while goat willow and silver birch were not so uniform (both positive and negative values). Correlation coefficients between phenophase onset and soil temperature (10 cm depth) had the highest values in silver birch, European larch and wood anemone. Stations situated at higher elevation showed negative correlation coefficient with soil temperature in common snowdrop, pedunculate oak, meadow foxtail and lime tree; other values were positive.
KeywordsNAO Allergology Czech Republic Onset of flowering Climate change GDD Soil temperature
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of CR within the National Sustainability Program I (NPU I), Grant Number LO1415 and by the National Agency for Agricultural Research “Crop modelling as a tool for increasing the production potential and food security of the Czech Republic under Climate Change”(QJ1310123).
- Anonymous. (2009). Methodical instructions number 10 for phenological stations—wild plants. Prague: CHMI.Google Scholar
- Bednářová, E., & Kučera, J. (2002). Phenological observations of two spruce stands (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) of different age in the years 1991–2000. Ekológia (Bratislava), 21(Suppl. 1), 98–106.Google Scholar
- Coufal, L., et al. (2004). Phenology atlas (p. 264). Prague: CHMI.Google Scholar
- Dahl, A., et al. (2013). Chapter 3 The onset, course and intensity of the pollen season. In M. Sofiev & K. C. H. Bergmann (Eds.), Allergenic pollen. A review of the production, release, distribution and health impacts (pp. 29–70). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4881-1.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, H., & Ihne, E. (1882). Phänologischer Aufruf. In E. Ihne & H. Hoffmann (Eds.), (1884 republished) Beiträge zur Phänologie (pp. 177–178). J. Ricker’sche Buchhandlung: Giessen.Google Scholar
- Kožnarová, V., & Klabzuba, J. (2010). Traditional and modern methods in weather and climate evaluation in biological disciplines. Praha: Výzkumný ústav rostlinné výroby.Google Scholar
- Kožnarová, V., Klabzuba, J., & Bureš, R. (1997). The use of thermopluviogram to evaluate agrometeorological year, season and month. Pamiet Pul., 110, 71–78.Google Scholar
- Kožnarová, V., Sulovská, S., & Hájková, L. (2011). Temporal variability of fruit trees phenophase onset in relation to synoptic situations within the CHMI phenological network in period 1991–2010. Úroda, vědecká příloha, 2011, 285–295.Google Scholar
- McMaster, G.S., Wilhelm, W. (1998). Is soil temperature better than air temperature for predicting winter wheat phenology? Agronomy J. 90, September–October. Publications from USDA-ARS/UNL Faculty. Paper 87. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/87.
- Menzel, A., Estrella, N., Schleip, C. (2008). Impacts of climate variability, trends and NAO on 20th Century European plant phenology. In S. Brönnimann et al. (Eds.), Climate variability and extremes during the past 100 years (Vol 33, pp. 221–233). Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-1-4020-6765-5 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6766-2.Google Scholar
- Nekovář, J., Koch, E., Kubin, E., Nejedlík, P., Sparks, T., & Wielgolaski, F. (Eds.). (2008). COST Action 725. The History and current status of plant phenology in Europe. Brussels: COST Office.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, M. D. (2003). Phenology: An integrative environmental science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. ISBN: 978-94-007-6924-3 (Print) 978-94-007-6925-0 (Online).Google Scholar
- Škvareninová, J. (2007). Charakteristika fenologických fáz jelše lepkavej (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) v Arboréte Borová hora v rokoch 1987–2006 [Characteristics of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Phenophases at Borová hora arboretum in 1987–2006]. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, XLIX, 17–29.Google Scholar
- Škvareninová, J. (2008). Start of spring phenophases in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) in the Zvolenská Basin, in relation to temperature sums. Meteorological Journal, 11(1–2), 15–20.Google Scholar
- Sobíšek, B., et al. (1993). Meteorological dictionary (1st ed.). Prague: Academia, Czech Ministry of Environment. ISBN 80-85368-45-5.Google Scholar
- Štěpánek, P. (2010a). AnClim—software for time series analysis. Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Science, MU Brno. http://www.climahom.eu/AnClim.html.
- Štěpánek, P. (2010b). ProClimDB—software for processing climatological datasets. CHMI, regional office Brno. http://www.climahom.eu/ProcData.html.