Aerobiologia

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 77–87 | Cite as

Urban allergophytes of central Italy

Original Paper

Abstract

This research was designed to compare allergenic flora of various cities of central Italy. Because the data on this problem are rather scant, we wanted to highlight the relationships among the ecological conditions of the urban habitats, and the plants whose pollens cause allergic manifestations in the human population. Our results pointed out that the structural design of the urban land use types play an important role in the distribution of allergophytes. The compact structure of the historic city center does not impede the establishment of allergophytes. Actually, it promotes some species that come from the dry pastures and rocky walls of the surrounding ecosystems. Allergenicity was revealed throughout the urban area, with a prevalence of species with monoporate pollens characteristic of the Poaceae. Highly allergenic plants are present in the central zone (within the city walls) and in some peripheral land use models (urban road verges). The particular abundance of Urticaceae with small triporate pollen grains and of various cultivated species, introduced by man for aesthetic reasons, contributes to the increase of allergophytism. The study points out the role of the interactions between the allergenic flora, human impact through the land use patterns, urban fauna, and the meso- and microclimatic conditions of the cities studied.

Keywords

Allergophytes Ecological strategies Pollen Urban ecosystems Central Italy 

References

  1. Accorsi, C. A., & Bandini Mazzanti, M. (1980). Studi sui pollini allergogeni. Parietaria officinalis L. e Parietaria judaica L.: Posizione sistematica, morfologia e biometria del polline. Webbia, 34(2), 634–661.Google Scholar
  2. Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53, 1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allergome (2003–2006). A database of allergenic molecules. Latina: Institutions for Allergome Project, Italy. http://www.allergome.org.
  4. Antrop, M. (2004). Landscpe changes and the urbanisation process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullock, J. M., Kenward, K. E., & Hails, R. S. (2002). Dispersal ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Cariñanos, P., Alcazar, P., Galàn C., & Dominguez, E. (2002). Privet pollen (Ligustrum L.) as potential cause of pollinosis in the city of Cordoba, south-west Spain. Allergy, 57, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diekmann, M. (2003). Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology—a review. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4(6): 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dow, K. (2000). Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosystems, 4, 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., & Paulissen, D. (1991). Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa (2nd ed.). Scripta Geobotanica, 18, 1–258.Google Scholar
  10. Eriksson, N. E. (1993). Food introduced urticaria. Allergy Supplement, 48, 48–49.Google Scholar
  11. Falinski, J. B. (1998). Invasive allien species, vegetation dynamics and neophytism. Phytocoenosis, 10 (N.S.), Supplementum Cartographiae Geobotanicae, 9, 163–187.Google Scholar
  12. Farina, A. (1997). Landscape structure and breeding bird distribution in a sub-mediterranean agroecosystem. Landscape Ecology, 12, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldman, R. E., & Krannitz, P. G. (2004). Bird composition of oak ecosystem fragments in an urbanized setting: The influence of adjacent coniferous forest fragments. Ecoscience, 11(3), 338–346.Google Scholar
  14. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscape and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  15. Forman R. T. T., Sperling D., Bissonette J. A., Clevenger A. P., Cutshall C. D., Dale V. H., Fahrig L., France R., Goldman C. R., Heanue K., Jones J. A., Swanson F. J., Turrentine T., & Winter T. C. (Eds.) (2003). Road ecology. Science and solutions. Washington DC: Island.Google Scholar
  16. Garzia Mozo, H., Comtois, P., & Kuehne, E. (2004). Aerobiological clines: The role of topography as a barrier for establishing dispersal corridors. Aerobiologia, 20, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godron, M., & Forman, R. T. T. (1983). Landscape modification and changing ecological characteristics. In H. A. Mooney & M. Godron (Eds.), Disturbance and ecosystems (pp. 12–28). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Gottman, J., & Harper, R. A. (1967). Metropolis on the move: Geographers look at urban sprawl. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Grant Smith, E. (1990). Sampling and identifying allergenic pollens and molds. San Antonio, Texas: Blewstone Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grime, J. P. (2001). Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties (2nd ed.). Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
  21. Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Redman C. L., & Pickett, S. T. A. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50(7), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haberl, H. (1997). Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: implications for sustainable development. Ambio, 26(3), 143–146.Google Scholar
  23. Hess, G. R., & Fischer, R. A. (2001). Communicating clearly about conservation corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hruska, K. (2000). Phytoecological research in the urban environment in Italy. Acta Botánica Croatica, 59(1), 135–143.Google Scholar
  25. Hruska, K. (2003). Assesment of urban allergophytes using an allergen index. Aerobiologia, 19(2), 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hruska, K. (2006). Notes on the evolution and organization of the urban ecosystem. Urban Ecosystems, 9(4), 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hruska, K., & Piarulli, C. (1995). Ricerche sui rapporti tra le allergofite urbane e le allergopatie nella popolazione umana. Informatore Botanico Italiano, 27(2–3), 245–252.Google Scholar
  28. Kornas, J. (1982). Man’s impact upon the flora. Processes and effects. Memorabilia Zoologica, 37, 11–30.Google Scholar
  29. Kowarik, I. (1990). Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanisation in central Europe. In H. Sukopp & S. Hejny (Eds.), Urban ecology: Plants and plant communities in urban environment (pp. 46–74). Den Haag: SPB Academic.Google Scholar
  30. Larson, D. W., Matthes, U., Kelly, P. E., Lundholm, J. T., & Gerrath, J. A. (2004). The urban cliff revolution: New findings on the origins and evolution of human habitats. Whiteside, Canada: Fitzhenry & Markham.Google Scholar
  31. Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. McDonnell, M. J., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1997). Humans as components of ecosystems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. McDonnell, M. J., Pickett, S. T. A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, C., Parmelee R. W., Carreiro, M. M., & Medley, K. (1997). Ecosystem processes along an urban to rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinney, M. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127(3), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oberdorfer, E. (1975). Die Mauerfugen Vegetation Siziliens. Phytocoenologia, 2(1–2): 146–153.Google Scholar
  36. Oberdorfer, E. (1977–1992). Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften I, II, III, IV. Jena: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Palmieri, S., & Siani, A. M. (2000). Clima urbano. In K. Hruska (Ed.), Ecologia urbana (pp. 35–62). Napoli: CUEN.Google Scholar
  38. Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Nilson, C. H., Poyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., & Costanza, R. (2001). Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Platt-Mills, T. A. (1994). How environment affects patients with allergic disease: Indoor allergies and asthma. Annals of Allergy, 72(4), 381–384.Google Scholar
  40. Pysek, P., & Hulme, P. E. (2005). Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: Linking pattern to process. Ecoscience, 12(3), 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pysek, P., Richardson D. M., Rejmanek M., Webster G. L., Williamson M., & Kirschner, J. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: Towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53(1), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quirce, S., & Sastre, J. (1998). Occupational asthma. Allergy, 53, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan, P. D., Harper, D. A. T., & Whalley, J. S. (1994). PALSTAT: User’s manual and case histories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Staffolani, L. (2007). Studio ecologico del potenziale fitoallergenico nell’ecosistema urbano dell’Italia centrale. Italy: Dissertation, University of Camerino.Google Scholar
  45. Sukopp, H. (1998a). On the study of anthropogenic plant migrations in central Europe. In K. Starfinger, I. Edwards, I. Kowarik, & M. Williamson (Eds.), Ecological mechanisms and human responses (pp. 43–56). Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Sukopp, H. (1998b). Urban ecology—scientific and practical aspects. In J. Breuste, H. Feldmann, & O. Uhlmann (Eds.), Urban ecology (pp. 3–16). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Sukopp, H., Numata, M., & Huber, A. (1995). Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning. The Hague: SPB Academic.Google Scholar
  48. Turner B. L., Clark W. C., Kates R. W., Richards J. F., Mathews J. T., & Meyer W. B. (Eds.) (1991). The earth as transformed by human action: Global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Van der Pijl, L. (1982). Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Wittig, R. (2004). The origin and development of the urban flora of Central Europe. Urban Ecosystems, 7, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Resources Institute (2001). World resources 2000–2001. Washington DC: WRI.Google Scholar
  52. Zerbe S., Maurer U., Schmitz S., & Sukopp, H. (2002). Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential nature conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences – Botany and Ecology SectionUniversity of CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations