, Volume 21, Issue 3–4, pp 173–179 | Cite as

Using selective media to assess aerosolization damage and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation susceptibility of Serratia marcescens



This study determined whether selective media, McConkey agar (MC) and minimal salt glucose agar (MA) are suitable for monitoring aerosolization damage of airborne Serratia marcescens in our laboratory aerosol exposure system and assessed the relationship between bacterial culturability in these media and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) susceptibility of the bacteria. Two types of bacterial cultures were prepared. The first culture was taken from bacteria growing on Tryptic soy agar (TSA) as complete medium (fresh culture), which provided nearly 100% of MC/MA tolerant bacteria, while the second one was prepared from freezing the fresh culture (frozen culture), which produced 55 and 81% of MC and MA tolerant bacteria, respectively. We monitored bacterial culturability in TSA, MC and MA from these cultures in the nebulizer reservoir and bioaerosls collected on a six-stage Andersen cascade bio-impactor. The results indicated that both concentration and percentage of MC/MA tolerant bacteria maintained at a similar level during nebulization. For the bioaerosols, although the concentration recovered in the media from the fresh culture was higher than that from the frozen culture, the percentage of MC/MA tolerant bacteria was similar to that before aerosolization. We concluded that MC and MA are not suitable for monitoring aerosolization damage of the bacteria. Moreover, culturability of the bacteria in MC and MA has no effect on their survival after aerosolization. With respect to the bacterial susceptibility to UVGI, MC/MA sensitive and tolerant population as well as the fresh and frozen cultures showed the same susceptibility.


aerosolization cell damage selective media Serratia marcescens UV germicidal irradition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



I would like to express my gratitude to the Croucher Foundation, Hong Kong for the award of a post-doctoral research fellowship, Drs. Melvin First and Steve Rudnick for reviewing the manuscript, Kevin Banahan for technical support on the experimental chamber and Ginadelle Romain for assistance in undertaking part of the experiments.


  1. Billi D. Potts M. (2002). Life and Death of dried prokaryotes. Res Microbiol 153: 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brickner P.W., Vincent R.L., First M.W., Nardell E., Murray M., Kaufman W. (2003). The application of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation to control transmission of airborne disease: bioterrorism countermeasure. Public Health Reports 118: 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole E.C., Cook C.E. (1998). Characterization of infectious aerosols in health care facilities: an aid to effective engineering controls and preventive strategies. Am J Infect Control 26: 453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox C.S. (1987). The aerobiological pathway of microorganisms. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffiths W.D., Stewart I.W., Reading A.R., Futter S.J. (1996). Effect of aerosolisation, growth phase and residence time in spray and collection fluids on the culturability of cells and spores. J Aerosol Sci 27: 803–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidelberg J.F., Shahamat M., Levin M., Rahman I., Stelma G., Grim C., Colwell R.R. (1997). Effect of aerosolization on culturability and viability of gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3585–3588Google Scholar
  7. Hurst A. (1977). Bacterial injury: a review. Can J Microbiol 23: 935–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ingram L.O., Buttke T.M. (1984). Effects of alcohols on micro-organisms. Adv Microbial Physiol 25: 253–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kowalski W.J., Bahnfleth W.P. (2000). UVGI design basics for air and surface disinfection. HPAC Eng 72: 100–110Google Scholar
  10. Lai K.M., Burge H.A., First M.W. (2004). Size and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation susceptibility of Serratia marcescens when aerosolized from different suspending media. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 2021–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitscherlich E., Marth E.H. (1984). Microbial survival in the environment. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ray B., Speck M.L. (1973). Freeze-injury in bacteria. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 4: 161–213Google Scholar
  13. Setlow R.B. (2002). Shedding light on protein, nucleic acids, cells, humans, and fish. Mutat Res 511: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stewart S.L., Grinshpun S.A., Willeke K., Terzieva S., Ulevicius V., Donnelly J. (1995). Effect of impact stress on microbial recovery on an agar surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 61: 1232–1239Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental HealthHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations