Advertisement

Are the patterns of zooplankton community structure different between lakes and reservoirs? A local and regional assessment across tropical ecosystems

  • Camila R. Cabral
  • Rafael D. Guariento
  • Fabio C. Ferreira
  • André M. Amado
  • Regina L. G. Nobre
  • Luciana S. Carneiro
  • Adriano CalimanEmail author
Article

Abstract

Lakes and reservoirs present contrasting differences regarding origin, age and trophic state that may influence their biological communities. In the face of the inevitably rising number of reservoirs worldwide, our objective was to investigate the differences in zooplankton community structure and diversity patterns from 98 tropical shallow lakes and reservoirs (northeast Brazil). We tested the hypothesis that reservoirs have less diverse communities, which could be associated with ecosystem age or high productivity (a typical local pattern). The results show that most reservoirs are eutrophic ecosystems that hold distinct zooplankton communities in comparison with lakes. Despite their higher productivity, reservoirs played an essential role in subsidizing zooplankton diversity as they had higher gamma diversity because of the number of exclusive species, especially for the Rotifera group. The zooplankton density and biomass were also higher in the reservoirs, but this pattern was not associated with higher species dominance. Lakes also played a central role in zooplankton diversity, having a distinct species composition. Jointly, lakes and reservoirs help to maintain the zooplankton species pool at a regional level, suggesting the importance of complementarity in community composition between artificial and natural aquatic ecosystems on large-scale patterns of zooplankton biodiversity.

Keywords

Local diversity Regional diversity Ecosystem age Eutrophication Drylands Caatinga biome 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants provided by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—www.cnpq.br) through the Universal Grant (Process 477637/2011-6) to LSC. CRC is thankful to Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES—www.capes.gov.br) for the concession of a PhD scholarship. AC and AMA gratefully acknowledge continuous funding through Research Productivity Grants provided by CNPq (Processes 304621/2015-3 and 310033/2017-9). AMA is thankful for the support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq through the Universal Grant (Proc. # 475537/2012-2). We are thankful to all staff members at the Limnology Laboratory at UFRN for helping us with fieldwork and laboratory analysis. We are also indebted to Gustavo Fonseca for reviewing an earlier version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10452_2019_9693_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material includes two additional tables showing (i) data for landscape properties and land-use cover for the sampled lakes and reservoirs and (ii) the zooplankton species list, species mean abundance and the proportion of exclusive species from natural lakes and reservoirs. (DOCX 32 kb)

References

  1. Albrecht C, Wilke T (2008) Ancient Lake Ohrid: biodiversity and evolution. Hydrobiologia 615(1):103Google Scholar
  2. Allen MR (2007) Measuring and modeling dispersal of adult zooplankton. Oecologia 153(1):135–143Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26(1):32–46Google Scholar
  4. Araújo JAA (1982) Dams in the Northeast of Brazil, 2nd edn. DNOCS—Brazilian National Department of Droughts, FortalezaGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthaud F, Vallod D, Robin J, Bornette G (2012) Eutrophication and drought disturbance shape functional diversity and life-history traits of aquatic plants in shallow lakes. Aquat Sci 74(3):471–481Google Scholar
  6. Barbosa JEL, Medeiros ESF, Brasil J, Cordeiro RS, Crispim MCB, Silva GHG (2012) Aquatic systems in semi-arid Brazil: limnology and management. Acta Limnol Braz 24(1):103–118Google Scholar
  7. Beisner BE, Peres-Neto PR, Lindström ES, Barnett A, Longhi ML (2006) The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87(12):2985–2991Google Scholar
  8. Bohonak AJ, Jenkins DG (2003) Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Lett 6(8):783–796Google Scholar
  9. Bottrell H, Duncan A, Gliwicz Z et al (1976) A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Nor J Zool 24(4):419–456Google Scholar
  10. Bouvy M, Pagano M, Troussellier M (2001) Effects of a cyanobacterial bloom (Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii) on bacteria and zooplankton communities in Ingazeira reservoir (northeast Brazil). Aquat Microb Ecol 25(3):215–227Google Scholar
  11. Bouvy M, Nascimento SM, Molica RJR, Ferreira A, Huszar V, Azevedo SMFO (2003) Limnological features in Tapacurá reservoir (northeast Brazil) during a severe drought. Hydrobiologia 493(1):115–130Google Scholar
  12. Branstrator DK (2010) Origins of types of lake basins. In: Likens GE (ed) Lake ecosystem ecology: a global perspective. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 191–202Google Scholar
  13. Brown J, Stevens G, Kaufman D (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27(1):597–623Google Scholar
  14. Canfield DE Jr, Watkins CE (1984) Relationships between zooplankton abundance and chlorophyll a concentrations in Florida lakes. J Freshw Ecol 2(4):335–344Google Scholar
  15. Chase J, Leibold M (2002) Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship. Nature 416(6879):427Google Scholar
  16. Chellappa NT, Costa MAM (2003) Dominant and co-existing species of Cyanobacteria from a Eutrophicated reservoir of Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil. Acta Oecol 24:S3–S10Google Scholar
  17. Chellappa NT, Câmara FRA, Rocha O (2009) Phytoplankton community: indicator of water quality in the Armando Ribeiro Gonçalves reservoir and Pataxó channel, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Braz J Biol 69(2):241–251Google Scholar
  18. Cooke GD, Welch EB, Peterson SA, Nichols SA (2016) Restoration and management of lakes and reservoirs, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. Corgosinho PHC, Pinto-Coelho RM (2006) Zooplankton biomass, abundance and allometric patterns along an eutrophic gradient at Furnas Reservoir (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Acta Limnol Bras 182:213–224Google Scholar
  20. Costa IAS, Azevedo SMF, Senna PAC, Bernardo RR, Costa SM, Chellappa NT (2006) Occurrence of toxin-producing cyanobacteria blooms in a Brazilian semiarid reservoir. Braz J Biol 66(1B):211–219Google Scholar
  21. Crossetti LO, de Bicudo D, de Bicudo CEM, Bini LM (2008) Phytoplankton biodiversity changes in a shallow tropical reservoir during the hypertrophication process. Braz J Biol 68(4):1061–1067Google Scholar
  22. da Costa MRA, Attayde JL, Becker V (2016) Effects of water level reduction on the dynamics of phytoplankton functional groups in tropical semi-arid shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 778(1):75–89Google Scholar
  23. De Araujo JC, Güntner A, Bronstert A (2006) Loss of reservoir volume by sediment deposition and its impact on water availability in semiarid Brazil. Hydrol Sci J 51(1):157–170Google Scholar
  24. Diniz MTM, Pereira VHC (2015) Climatologia do estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil: Sistemas atmosféricos atuantes e mapeamento de tipos de clima. Bol Goiano Geogr 35(3):488–506Google Scholar
  25. DNOCS (2015) Departamento Nacional de Obras Contra às Secas. História do DNOCS. http://www.dnocs.gov.br/. Accessed 1 Nov 2015
  26. Dodson SI, Arnott SE, Cottingham KL (2000) The relationship in lake communities between primary productivity and species richness. Ecology 81(10):2662–2679Google Scholar
  27. Dodson SI, Everhart WR, Jandl AK, Krauskopf SJ (2007) Effect of watershed land use and lake age on zooplankton species richness. Hydrobiologia 579(1):393–399Google Scholar
  28. Doubek JP, Carey CC (2017) Catchment, morphometric, and water quality characteristics differ between reservoirs and naturally formed lakes on a latitudinal gradient in the conterminous United States. Inland Waters 7(2):171–180Google Scholar
  29. Downing JA (2010) Emerging global role of small lakes and ponds: little things mean a lot. Limnetica 29(1):9–24Google Scholar
  30. Elmoor-Loureiro L (1997) Manual de Identificação de Cladóceros Límnicos Do Brasil. Ed. Universitária, Distrito FederalGoogle Scholar
  31. Eskinazi-Sant’Anna EM, Menezes R, Costa IM, Araújo M, Panosso R, Attayde JL (2013) Zooplankton assemblages in eutrophic reservoirs of the Brazilian semi-arid. Braz J Biol 73(1):37–52Google Scholar
  32. ESRI (2011) Arc hydro tools - tutorial, version 2.0. http://downloads.esri.com/archydro/ArcHydro/Tutorial/Doc/Arc%20Hydro%20Tools%202.0%20-%20Tutorial.pdf. Visited on 1 Oct 2015
  33. Esteves FA, Caliman A, Santangelo JM, Guariento RD, Farjalla VF, Bozelli RL (2008) Neotropical coastal lagoons: an appraisal of their biodiversity, functioning, threats and conservation management. Braz J Biol 68(4):967–981Google Scholar
  34. Fang Y, Cheng W, Zhang Y et al (2016) Changes in inland lakes on the Tibetan Plateau over the past 40 years. J Geogr Sci 26(4):415–438Google Scholar
  35. Fernández-Rosado MJ, Lucena J (2001) Space-time heterogeneities of the zooplankton distribution in La Concepción reservoir (Istán, Málaga; Spain). Hydrobiologia 455(1–3):157–170Google Scholar
  36. Figuerola J, Green A (2002) Dispersal of aquatic organisms by waterbirds: a review of past research and priorities for future studies. Freshw Biol 47(3):483–494Google Scholar
  37. Finan TJ, Nelson DR (2001) Making rain, making roads, making do: public and private adaptations to drought in Ceará, Northeast Brazil. Clim Res 9(2):97–108Google Scholar
  38. Ghidini AR, Serafim-Júnior M, Perbiche-Neves G, Brito L (2009) Distribution of planktonic cladocerans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) of a shallow eutrophic reservoir (Paraná State, Brazil). Panam J Aquat Sci 4(3):294–305Google Scholar
  39. Gilbert JJ (1974) Dormancy in rotifers. Trans Am Microsc Soc 43(4):490–513Google Scholar
  40. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4(4):379–391Google Scholar
  41. Hall DJ, Cooper WE, Werner EE (1970) An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol Oceanogr 15(6):839–928Google Scholar
  42. Harris R, Wiebe P, Lenz J, Skjoldal HR, Huntley M (eds) (2000) ICES zooplankton methodology manual. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Havel JE, Lee CE, Vander Zanden MJ (2005) Do reservoirs facilitate invasions into landscapes? Bioscience 55(6):518–525Google Scholar
  44. Havens KE, Beaver JR (2011) Composition, size, and biomass of zooplankton in large productive Florida lakes. Hydrobiologia 668(1):49–60Google Scholar
  45. INMET (2015) Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. Banco de Dados Meteorológicos para Ensino e Pesquisa. http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/%0Aindex.php?r=bdmep/bdmep. Accessed 1 July 2015
  46. Irz P, Odion M, Argillier C, Pont D (2006) Comparison between the fish communities of lakes, reservoirs and rivers: can natural systems help define the ecological potential of reservoirs? Aquat Sci 68(1):109–116Google Scholar
  47. Jespersen A, Christoffersen K (1987) Measurements of chlorophyll-a from phytoplankton using ethanol as extraction solvent. Arch für Hydrobiol 109:445–454Google Scholar
  48. Koste W (1978) Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas Ein Bestimmungswerk, Begründet von Max Voigt Überordnung Monogononta. (Gebrüder Borntraeger, ed.). StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuczyńska-Kippen N (2005) On body size and habitat selection in rotifers in a macrophye-dominated lake Budzyńskie, Poland. Aquat Ecol. 239(4):447–454Google Scholar
  50. Lazzaro X, Bouvy M, Ribeiro-Filho RA et al (2003) Do fish regulate phytoplankton in shallow eutrophic Northeast Brazilian reservoirs? Freshw Biol 48(4):649–668Google Scholar
  51. Lehner B, Döll P (2004) Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J Hydrol 296(1):1–22Google Scholar
  52. Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C et al (2011) High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9(9):494–502Google Scholar
  53. Leibold M (1999) Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol Ecol Res 1(1):73–95Google Scholar
  54. Maia-Barbosa PM, Peixoto RS, Guimarães S (2008) Zooplankton in littoral waters of a tropical lake: a revisited biodiversity. Braz J Biol 68:1069–1078Google Scholar
  55. Malveira VTC, de Araújo JC, Güntner A (2011) Hydrological impact of a high-density reservoir network in semiarid northeastern Brazil. J Hydrol Eng 17(1):109–117Google Scholar
  56. Manatunge J, Nakayama M, Priyadarshana T (2008) Environmental and social impacts of reservoirs: issues and mitigation. Ocean Aquat Ecosyst 1:212–255Google Scholar
  57. Manly BFJ (2006) Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology. Champman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  58. Masclaux H, Bourdier G, Jouve L, Duffaud E, Bec A (2014) Temporal changes in essential fatty acid availability in different food sources in the littoral macrophyte zone. Hydrobiologia 736(1):127–137Google Scholar
  59. McKindsey CW, Bourget E (2001) Diversity of a northern rocky intertidal community: the influence of body size and succession. Ecology 82(12):3462–3478Google Scholar
  60. Menezes RF, Attayde JL, Lacerot G, Kosten S, Souza LC, Costa LS, Van Nes EH, Jeppesen E (2012) Lower biodiversity of native fish but only marginally altered plankton biomass in tropical lakes hosting introduced piscivorous Cichla cf. ocellaris. Biol Invasions 14(7):1353–1363Google Scholar
  61. Merrix-Jones FL, Thackeray SJ, Ormerod SJ (2013) A global analysis of zooplankton in natural and artificial fresh waters. J Limnol 72(1):12Google Scholar
  62. Molle F (1991) Caractéristiques et potentialités des “açudes” du nordeste brésilien. Thesis, USTL MontpelierGoogle Scholar
  63. Moss BR (2009) Ecology of Fresh waters: man and medium, past to future. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36Google Scholar
  65. Nilsson C (2009) Reservoirs. In: Likens GE (ed) Encyclopedia of inland waters. Elsevier, Academic Press, Oxford, pp 211–219Google Scholar
  66. Nogueira MG, Oliveira PCR, Britto YT (2008) Zooplankton assemblages (Copepoda and Cladocera) in a cascade of reservoirs of a large tropical river (SE Brazil). Limnetica 27(1):151–170Google Scholar
  67. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P et al (2015) Vegan: community ecology packageGoogle Scholar
  68. Pagioro TA, Thomaz SM, Roberto MC (2005) Caracterização limnológica abiótica dos reservatórios. In: Rodrigues L, Thomaz SM, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC (eds) Biocenose de reservatórios: padrões espaciais e temporais. Rima, São Carlos, pp 17–38Google Scholar
  69. Paradis E (2012) Analysis of phylogenetics and evolution with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Parra G, Matias NG, Guerrero F, Boavida MJ (2009) Short term fluctuations of zooplankton abundance during autumn circulation in two reservoirs with contrasting trophic state. Limnetica 28:175–184Google Scholar
  71. Pauli HR (1989) A new method to estimate individual dry weights of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186(1):355–361Google Scholar
  72. Pekel J-F, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward AS (2016) High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540(7633):418Google Scholar
  73. Pianka E (1988) Evolutionary ecology, 4th edn. Harper & Rows, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Pinto-Coelho R, Pinel-Alloul B, Méthot G, Havens KE (2005) Crustacean zooplankton in lakes and reservoirs of temperate and tropical regions: variation with trophic status. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(2):348–361Google Scholar
  75. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 1 Jul 2015
  76. Rennie MD, Jackson LJ (2005) The influence of habitat complexity on littoral invertebrate distributions: patterns differ in shallow prairie lakes with and without fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 69(2):2088–2099Google Scholar
  77. Ricci C (2001) Dormancy patterns in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 446(1):1–11Google Scholar
  78. Rosenberg DM, McCully P, Pringle CM (2000) Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations: introduction. Bioscience 50(9):746–751Google Scholar
  79. Sampaio EV, Rocha O, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Tundisi JG (2002) Composition and abundance of zooplankton in the limnetic zone of seven reservoirs of the Paranapanema River, Brazil. Braz J Biol 62(3):525–545Google Scholar
  80. Santos-Silva E (2000) Revisão das espécies do “complexo nordestinus”(Wright, 1935) de Notodiaptomus Kiefer, 1936 (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae). Thesis, Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  81. Sendacz S, Caleffi S, Santos-Soares J (2006) Zooplankton biomass of reservoirs in different trophic conditions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazil J Biol 66(1B):337–350Google Scholar
  82. Shurin JB (2000) Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance, and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81(11):3074–3086Google Scholar
  83. Simões NR, Nunes AH, Dias JD, Lansac-Tôha FA, Velho LFM, Bonecker CC (2015) Impact of reservoirs on zooplankton diversity and implications for the conservation of natural aquatic environments. Hydrobiologia 758(1):3–17Google Scholar
  84. Soranno P, Carpenter S, He X (1993) Zooplankton biomass and body size. In: Carpenter S, Kitchell J (eds) The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–152Google Scholar
  85. Sousa W, Attayde JL, Rocha EDS, Eskinazi-Sant’Anna EM (2008) The response of zooplankton assemblages to variations in the water quality of four man-made lakes in semi-arid northeastern Brazil. J Plankton Res 30(6):699–708Google Scholar
  86. SUDENE (2010) Superintendência do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste. MAPAS. http://www.sudene.gov.br/. Accessed 1 Oct 2011
  87. Suthers IM, Rissik D (eds) (2009) Plankton: a guide to their ecology and monitoring for water quality. Csiro Publishing, ColinwoodGoogle Scholar
  88. They NH, Amado AM, Cotner JB (2017) Redfield ratios in inland waters: higher biological control of C: N: P ratios in tropical semi-arid high water residence time lakes. Front Microbiol 8:1505Google Scholar
  89. Thomaz SM, Dibble ED, Evangelista LR, Higuti J, Bini LM (2008) Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshw Biol 53(2):358–367Google Scholar
  90. Timms B (2009) Geomorphology of lake basins. In: Likens GE (ed) Encyclopedia of inland waters. Elsevier, Academic Press, Oxford, pp 203–210Google Scholar
  91. Tranvik LJ, Downing JA, Cotner JB et al (2009) Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol Oceanogr 54(6 part 2):2298–2314Google Scholar
  92. Tundisi JG, Matsumura-Tundisi T (2003) Integration of research and management in optimizing multiple uses of reservoirs: the experience in South America and Brazilian case studies. Aquat Biodivers 171:231–242Google Scholar
  93. Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27(1):337–363Google Scholar
  94. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (1991) Limnological analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilkinson GM, Pace ML, Cole JJ (2013) Terrestrial dominance of organic matter in north temperate lakes. Global Biogeochem Cycles 27(1):43–51Google Scholar
  96. Wojciechowski J, Heino J, Bini LM, Padial AA (2017) Temporal variation in phytoplankton beta diversity patterns and metacommunity structures across subtropical reservoirs. Freshw Biol 62(4):751–766Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de EcologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Ciências do MarUniversidade Federal de São PauloSantosBrazil
  3. 3.Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da SaúdeUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso do SulCampo GrandeBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de Oceanografia e LimnologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNatalBrazil
  5. 5.Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaJuiz de ForaBrazil

Personalised recommendations