Epipelon responses to N and P enrichment and the relationships with phytoplankton and zooplankton in a mesotrophic reservoir
The phototrophic epipelon has been suggested to play an important role in ecosystems, especially those with shallow depths; however, only a few studies have investigated this function. Nutrient availability has been shown to be a determining factor for autotrophic interactions and can potentially interfere with the food web, as eutrophication. Thus, we evaluated the responses of epipelon, phytoplankton and zooplankton to combined and isolated N and P addition, during the enrichment period (14 days) and after 12 days with no enrichment. It was hypothesized that P addition (the limiting nutrient) should decrease the photosynthetic potential of the epipelon, due to the rapid increase in phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass, which can strongly attenuate light, and that the opposite effect would be observed after a period with no enrichment. We developed an in situ experiment with combined and isolated N and P enrichment at open-bottom mesocosms. The addition of P, individually and combined, augmented phytoplankton chlorophyll-a concentrations during the enrichment period, while zooplankton density only responded positively after day 14. After 12 days with no enrichment, the phytoplankton chlorophyll-a and zooplankton density decreased. While P enrichment had no significant effect on epipelon chlorophyll-a, there was a significant increase in the photosynthetic potential detected 12 days after the enrichment was stopped. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that P enrichment reduces the photosynthetic potential of epipelon, and that variations in nutrient availability can modulate relationships among phytoplankton, zooplankton and epipelon. Drastic changes in the growth and development of the phototrophic epipelon, due to the input of nutrients, could directly impact the functioning of shallow tropical lakes and reservoirs.
KeywordsChlorophyll-a concentrations N and P enrichment Open-bottomed mesocosms Zooplankton density
The authors would like to acknowledge the FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) for financial support (Grant No. 2009/52253-4) and for a scholarship to DAT and RWL (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES). We are grateful to all the students and technicians involved in the laboratory and fieldwork.
- Bicudo CEM, Carmo CF, Bicudo DC, Henry R, Pião ACS, Santos CM, Lopes MRM (2002) Morfologia e morfometria de três reservatórios do PEFI. In: Bicudo DC, Forti MC, Bicudo CEM (eds) Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga: unidade de conservação ameaçada pela urbanização de São Paulo. Editora Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp 141–158Google Scholar
- Cano MG, Casco MA, Claps MC (2016) Epipelon dynamics in a shallow lake through a turbid-and a clear-water regime. J Limnol 75(2):355–368Google Scholar
- Fernando CH (2002) Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. In Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton: identification, ecology and impact on fisheries. BackhuysGoogle Scholar
- Fryer G (1986) Structure, function and behaviour, and the elucidation of evolution in copepods and other crustaceans. Syllogeus 58:150–157Google Scholar
- Golterman HL, Clymo RS, Ohmstad MAM (1978) Methods for physical and chemical analysis of freshwaters. International biological programmer (handbook 8), 2ª edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hill WR, Roberts BJ, Francoeur SN, Fanta SE (2011) Resource synergy in stream periphyton communities. J Ecol 99:454–463Google Scholar
- Johnston CA (1991) Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: effects on surface water quality. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 21(5–6):491–565Google Scholar
- Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF (1978) Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Ruttner-Kollisko A (1974) Rotatoria. Supplement. Die Binnengewässer 27(1):146Google Scholar
- Strickland JDH, Parsons TR (1960) A manual of seawater analysis. J Fish Res Board Can 125:1–185Google Scholar