Advertisement

Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 97–107 | Cite as

Still waters run deep: marbled crayfish dominates over red swamp crayfish in agonistic interactions

  • Md Shakhawate HossainEmail author
  • Jan Kubec
  • Antonín Kouba
  • Pavel Kozák
  • Miloš Buřič
Article

Abstract

Intra- and interspecific interactions contribute to the successful establishment and consequent spreading of species in the environment, which became particularly apparent in the context of ongoing biological invasions. The parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Procambarus virginalis, Lyko 2017 is recently recognized as an emerging invader due to its high adaptability, fast growth, early maturation, and high fecundity. The present study explored the interaction patterns of size-matched (including 15 body parts morphometry evaluation) pairs of marbled crayfish and red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii, a well-known highly aggressive and widely distributed invader of freshwater ecosystems. Despite this, marbled crayfish won significantly more fights and establish dominancy in more cases in both premature and mature experimental trials. Premature red swamp crayfish pairs were more active in contact and fight initiation than mature. In mature, the dominance over female red swamp crayfish was 100%, in males it reached 60%. Premature marbled crayfish dominated in more than 75% pairs. Agonistic behaviour and intensity of fights significantly dropped after establishment of dominance in particular (size and sex) pairs. Therefore, we confirmed that sex and age (size) have effects on agonistic behaviour in crayfish as well as the dominance of marbled crayfish within similarly sized specimens. Despite described behavioural patterns, we can expect that the situation in the potential sympatric occurrence of both species will not be as clear as found in experimental conditions due to greater maximal size of red swamp crayfish.

Keywords

Competition Dominance Interaction Procambarus virginalis Procambarus clarkii 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic - Projects “CENAKVA” (No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024), “CENAKVA II” (No. LO1205 under the NPU I program) and by the Grant Agency of University of South Bohemia Nos. 012/2016/Z and 017/2016/Z. We also deeply appreciate the assistance of Dr. Zen Faulkes and for his valuable comments during manuscript preparation.

Supplementary material

10452_2019_9675_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Aquiloni L, Gherardi F (2008) Extended mother-offspring relationships in crayfish: the return behaviour of juvenile Procambarus clarkii. Ethol 114:946–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquiloni L, Buřič M, Gherardi F (2008) Crayfish females eavesdrop on fighting males before choosing the dominant mate. Curr Biol 18:462–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman DA, Moore PA (2005) The role of chemical signals in the social behavior of crayfish. Chem Senses 30:305–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergman DA, Martin AL, Moore PA (2005) Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 70:485–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohman P, Edsman L, Martin P, Scholtz G (2013) The first Marmorkrebs (Decapoda: Astacida: Cambaridae) in Scandinavia. BioInvasion Rec 2:227–232.  https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2013.2.3.09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovbjerg RV (1953) Dominance order in the crayfish Orconectes virilis (Hagen). Physiol Zool 26:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovbjerg RV (1956) Some factors affecting aggressive behavior in crayfish. Physiol Zool 29:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breithaupt T, Eger P (2002) Urine makes the difference. J Exp Biol 205:1221–1231Google Scholar
  9. Buřič M, Kouba A, Kozák P (2010) Intra-sex dimorphism in crayfish females. Zoology 113:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buřič M et al (2018) Environmentally relevant concentrations of tramadol and citalopram alter behaviour of an aquatic invertebrate. Aquat Toxicol 200:226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chucholl C (2015) Marbled crayfish gaining ground in Europe: the role of the pet trade as invasion pathway. In: Tadashi Kawai ZF, Scholtz G (eds) Freshwater crayfish: a global overview. CRC Press, New York, pp 83–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chucholl C, Morawetz K, Groß H (2012) The clones are coming–strong increase in Marmorkrebs [Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis] records from Europe. Aquat Inavasions 7:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Draud M, Macías-Ordóñez R, Verga J, Itzkowitz M (2004) Female and male Texas cichlids (Herichthys cyanoguttatum) do not fight by the same rules. Behav Ecol 15:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckworth RA (2008) Adaptive dispersal strategies and the dynamics of a range expansion. Am Nat 172:4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards DH, Fricke RA, Barnett LD, Yeh S-R, Leise EM (1994a) The onset of response habituation during the growth of the lateral giant neuron of crayfish. J Neurophysiol 72:890–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards DH, Yeh S-R, Barnett LD, Nagappan PR (1994b) Changes in synaptic integration during the growth of the lateral giant neuron of crayfish. J Neuophysiol 72:899–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Estonian Research Council (2018) Invasive marbled crayfish found in Narva power plant cooling canal. https://phys.org/news/2018-06-invasive-marbled-crayfishnarva-power.html. Accessed 8 June 2018
  18. Farca Luna AJ, Hurtado-Zavala JI, Reischig T, Heinrich R (2009) Circadian regulation of agonistic behavior in groups of parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Procambarus sp. J Biol Rhythms 24:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faulkes Z, Feria TP, Muñoz J (2012) Do marmorkrebs, Procambarus fallax f. virginalis, threaten freshwater Japanese ecosystems? Aquat Biosyst 8:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fort M, Hossain MS, Kouba A, Buric M, Kozak P (2019) Agonistic interactions and dominance establishment in three crayfish species non-native to Europe. Limnologica 74:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gherardi F (2002) Behavior. In: Holdich DM (ed) Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 258–290Google Scholar
  22. Gherardi F, Cioni A (2004) Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. Behaviour 141:1297–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gherardi F, Daniels WH (2004) Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species. Can J Zool 82:1923–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herberholz J, McCurdy C, Edwards DH (2007) Direct benefits of social dominance in juvenile crayfish. Biol Bull 213:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Höjesjö J, Johnsson JI, Petersson E, Järvi T (1998) The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta). Behav Ecol 9:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holdich D, Haffner P, Noël P (2006) Species files. In: Souty-Grosset C, Holdich D, Noel PY, Reynolds JD, Haffner P (eds) Atlas of crayfish in Europe, vol 64. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris Patrimoines naturels, Paris, pp 50–129Google Scholar
  27. Holdich D, Reynolds J, Souty-Grosset C, Sibley P (2009) A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 11:394–395Google Scholar
  28. Hossain MS, Patoka J, Kouba A, Buřič M (2018) Clonal crayfish as biological model: a review on marbled crayfish. Biologia 73:841–855.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0098-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huber R, Kravitz E (1995) A quantitative analysis of agonistic behavior in juvenile American lobsters (Homarus americanus L.). Brain Behav Evol 46:72–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hudina S, Hock K (2012) Behavioural determinants of agonistic success in invasive crayfish. Behav Processes 91:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hudina S, Galić N, Roessink I, Hock K (2011) Competitive interactions between co-occurring invaders: identifying asymmetries between two invasive crayfish species. Biol Invasions 13:1791–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hudina S, Hock K, Radović A, Klobučar G, Petković J, Jelić M, Maguire I (2016) Species-specific differences in dynamics of agonistic interactions may contribute to the competitive advantage of the invasive signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) over the native narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus). Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 49:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huntingford FA (2013) Animal conflict. Chapman & Hall Animal Behaviour Series. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Issa FA, Adamson DJ, Edwards DH (1999) Dominance hierarchy formation in juvenile crayfish Procambarus clarkii. J Exp Biol 202:3497–3506Google Scholar
  35. Janský V, Mutkovič A (2010) Rak Procambarus sp. (Crustacea: Decapoda: Cambaridae)–Prvŷ Nález na Slovensku. Acta Rerum Naturalium Musei Nationalis Slovaci Bratislava 56:64–67Google Scholar
  36. Jimenez SA, Faulkes Z (2010) Establishment and care of a colony of parthenogenetic marbled crayfish, Marmorkrebs. Invertebr Rearing 1:10–18Google Scholar
  37. Jimenez SA, Faulkes Z (2011) Can the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish Marmorkrebs compete with other crayfish species in fights? J Ethol 29:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jones JP et al (2009) The perfect invader: a parthenogenic crayfish poses a new threat to Madagascar’s freshwater biodiversity. Biol Invasions 11:1475–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kasuya A, Nagayama T (2016) Habituation of Backward Escape Swimming in the Marbled Crayfish. Zool Sci 33:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kawai T, Takahata M (eds) (2010) Biology of crayfish. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  41. Kawai T, Faulkes Z, Scholtz G (2016) Freshwater crayfish: a global overview. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kouba A et al (2016) The significance of droughts for hyporheic dwellers: evidence from freshwater crayfish. Sci Rep 6:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kravitz EA (1988) Hormonal control of behavior: amines and the biasing of behavioral output in lobsters. Science 241:1775–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lang F, Govind C, Costello WJ, Greene SI (1977) Developmental neuroethology: changes in escape and defensive behavior during growth of the lobster. Science 197:682–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindqvist OV, Huner J (1999) Life history characteristics of crayfish: What makes some of them good colonizers? In: Gherardi F, Holdich DM (eds) Crayfish in Europe as Alien Species: How to make the best of the bad situation?. A. A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 23–30Google Scholar
  47. Linzmaier SM, Goebel LS, Ruland F, Jeschke JM (2018) Behavioral differences in an over-invasion scenario: marbled vs. spiny-cheek crayfish. Ecosphere 9:e02385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lipták B, Mrugała A, Pekárik L, Mutkovič A, Gruľa D, Petrusek A, Kouba A (2016) Expansion of the marbled crayfish in Slovakia: beginning of an invasion in the Danube catchment? J Limnol 75:305–312Google Scholar
  49. Lőkkös A, Müller T, Kovács K, Várkonyi L, Specziár A, Martin P (2016) The alien, parthenogenetic marbled crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) is entering Kis-Balaton (Hungary), one of Europe’s most important wetland biotopes. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 417:1–9Google Scholar
  50. Manning A, Dawkins MS (2012) An introduction to animal behaviour, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martin P, Kohlmann K, Scholtz G (2007) The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish) produces genetically uniform offspring. Naturwissenschaften 94:843–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin P, Thonagel S, Scholtz G (2016) The parthenogenetic Marmorkrebs (Malacostraca: Decapoda: Cambaridae) is a triploid organism. J Zool Syst Evol Res 54:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Momohara Y, Kanai A, Nagayama T (2013) Aminergic control of social status in crayfish agonistic encounters. PLoS One 8:e74489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nonnis-Marzano F, Scalici M, Chiesa S, Gherardi F, Piccinini A, Gibertini G (2009) The first record of the marbled crayfish adds further threats to fresh waters in Italy. Aquat Invasions 4:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Novitsky RA, Son MO (2016) The first records of Marmorkrebs [Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis](Crustacea, Decapoda, Cambaridae) in Ukraine. Ecol Monten 5:44–46Google Scholar
  56. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pârvulescu L, Togor A, Lele S-F, Scheu S, Şinca D, Panteleit J (2017) First established population of marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis (Decapoda, Cambaridae) in Romania. BioInvasions Rec 6:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patoka J et al (2016) Predictions of marbled crayfish establishment in conurbations fulfilled: evidences from the Czech Republic. Biologia 71:1380–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pavey C, Fielder D (1996) The influence of size differntial on agonistic behaviour in the freshwater crayfish, Cherax cuspidatus (Decapoda: Parastacidae). J Zool 238:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reynolds J (2002) Growth and reproduction. In: Holdich DM (ed) Biology of freshwater crayfish. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 152–191Google Scholar
  61. Rubenstein DI, Hazlett BA (1974) Examination of the agonistic behaviour of the crayfish Orconectes virilis by character analysis. Behaviour 50:193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rutherford P, Dunham D, Allison V (1996) Antennule use and agonistic success in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 69:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Samardžić M, Lucić A, Maguire I, Hudina S (2014) The first record of the marbled crayfish (Procambarus fallax (Hagen, 1870) f. virginalis) in Croatia. Crayfish News 36:4Google Scholar
  64. Sato D, Nagayama T (2012) Development of agonistic encounters in dominance hierarchy formation in Juvenile crayfish. J Exp Biol 215:1210–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schneider RAZ, Schneider RW, Moore PA (1999) Recognition of dominance status by chemoreception in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Chem Ecol 25:781–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scholtz G et al (2003) Ecology: parthenogenesis in an outsider crayfish. Nature 421:806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schroeder L, Huber R (2001) Fight strategies differ with size and allometric growth of claws in crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 138:1437–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seitz R, Vilpoux K, Hopp U, Harzsch S, Maier G (2005) Ontogeny of the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish): a parthenogenetic crayfish with unknown origin and phylogenetic position. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 303:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shine R (1989) Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol 64:419–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sih A, Cote J, Evans M, Fogarty S, Pruitt J (2012) Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecol Lett 15:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith MR, Dunham DW (1996) Antennae mediate agonistic physical contact in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 69:668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Souty-Grosset C, Holdich DM, Noël PY (2006) Atlas of crayfish in Europe. Collection patrimoines naturels. Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, ParisGoogle Scholar
  73. Souty-Grosset C, Anastácio PM, Aquiloni L, Banha F, Choquer J, Chucholl C, Tricarico E (2016) The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Limnol Ecol Manag Inland Waters 58:78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steele AN, Belanger RM, Moore PA (2018) Exposure through runoff and ground water contamination differentially impact behavior and physiology of crustaceans in fluvial systems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 75:436–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stein RA (1976) Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activities. Can J Zool 54:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor CA, Warren ML Jr, Fitzpatrick J Jr, Hobbs HH III, Jezerinac RF, Pflieger WL, Robison HW (1996) Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 21:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  78. Veselý L, Buřič M, Kouba A (2015) Hardy exotics species in temperate zone: can “warm water” crayfish invaders establish regardless of low temperatures? In: Scientific reports 5Google Scholar
  79. Vogt G, Tolley L, Scholtz G (2004) Life stages and reproductive components of the Marmorkrebs (marbled crayfish), the first parthenogenetic decapod crustacean. J Morphol 261:286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vogt G, Huber M, Thiemann M, van den Boogaart G, Schmitz OJ, Schubart CD (2008) Production of different phenotypes from the same genotype in the same environment by developmental variation. J Exp Biol 211:510–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vojkovská R, Horká I, Tricarico E, Ďuriš Z (2014) New record of the parthenogenetic marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis from Italy. Crustaceana 87:1386–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vye C, Cobb J, Bradley T, Gabbay J, Genizi A, Karplus I (1997) Predicting the winning or losing of symmetrical contests in the American lobster Homarus americanus (Milne-Edwards). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 217:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Whitehouse ME (1997) Experience influences male–male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 53:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson JD (1992) Correlates of agonistic display by great tits Parus major. Behaviour 121:168–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilson EO (2000) Sociobiology. 25th Anniversary Edition edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Wofford SJ (2013) Sex and fighting: male and female crayfish utilize different assessment strategies during agonistic behavior. Bowling Green State University, Bowling GreenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of HydrocenosesUniversity of South Bohemia in České BudějoviceVodňanyCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations