Advertisement

Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 711–725 | Cite as

Aquatic hyphomycetes, benthic macroinvertebrates and leaf litter decomposition in streams naturally differing in riparian vegetation

  • Verónica Ferreira
  • José Castela
  • Paulo Rosa
  • Alan Mosele Tonin
  • Luz Boyero
  • Manuel A. S. Graça
Article

Abstract

Small forest streams and their riparian vegetation are closely linked ecosystems. Stream consumers obtain most of their energy from leaf litter provided by the terrestrial vegetation. Thus, understanding the relationship between riparian vegetation, aquatic communities and litter decomposition may help explaining the variability in aquatic communities and processes among non-impacted streams, and anticipate their responses to anthropogenic-induced changes in the riparian vegetation. We surveyed 10 small non-impacted forest streams in central Portugal for riparian vegetation (species richness), benthic litter (species richness and biomass), aquatic hyphomycete conidia in transport (species richness and conidia concentration) and macroinvertebrates associated with benthic litter (taxon richness, density and biomass), during the litter fall peak. We found significant correlations between (a) aquatic communities and riparian vegetation species richness, (b) aquatic communities and benthic litter species richness and biomass and (c) within aquatic communities. Oak litter decomposition rates (from a previous experiment on the same streams) were also correlated with riparian tree species richness. This survey showed that spatial variability in riparian vegetation, benthic litter, aquatic communities and litter decomposition can be high even within a relatively small area, and allowed the identification of complex interactions between these components of the aquatic detrital food web. The positive correlation between aquatic hyphomycete species richness, macroinvertebrate taxon richness, litter decomposition and riparian tree species richness suggests that anthropogenic-induced decreases in riparian species richness may affect aquatic communities and processes. Surveys over streams naturally differing in environmental conditions may allow forecasting the response of aquatic communities and processes to anthropogenic activities.

Keywords

Deciduous vegetation Forest streams Litter breakdown Litter processing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Elsa Rodrigues for ion chromatography analysis and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This study was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the strategic project UID/MAR/04292/2013 granted to MARE and by the National Geographic Society’s Committee for Research and Exploration through the project 7980-06 granted to Luz Boyero. Financial support granted to Verónica Ferreira by the FCT (SFRH/BPD/34368/2006, program POPH/FSE; IF/00129/2014) is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10452_2016_9588_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (844 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 844 kb)

References

  1. Abelho M, Graça MAS (1996) Effects of eucalyptus afforestation on leaf litter dynamics and macroinvertebrate community structure of streams in Central Portugal. Hydrobiologia 324:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Arsuffi TL, Suberkropp K (1984) Leaf processing capabilities of aquatic hyphomycetes: interspecific differences and influence on shredder feeding preferences. Oikos 42:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arsuffi TL, Suberkropp K (1986) Growth of two stream caddisflies (Trichoptera) on leaves colonized by different fungal species. J N Am Benthol Soc 5:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arsuffi TL, Suberkropp K (1988) Effects of fungal mycelia and enzymatically degraded leaves on feeding and performance of caddisfly (Trichoptera) larvae. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo-Pereira HVS, Graça MAS, González JM (2006) Life history of Lepidostoma hirtum in an Iberian stream and its role on organic matter processing. Hydrobiologia 559:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bärlocher F (2000) Water-borne conidia of aquatic hyphomycetes: seasonal and yearly patterns in Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada. Can J Bot 78:157–167Google Scholar
  8. Bärlocher F, Brendelberger H (2004) Clearance of aquatic hyphomycete spores by a benthic suspension feeder. Limnol Oceanogr 49:2292–2296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bärlocher F, Corkum M (2003) Nutrient enrichment overwhelms diversity effects in leaf decomposition by stream fungi. Oikos 101:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bärlocher F, Graça MAS (2002) Exotic riparian vegetation lowers fungal diversity but not leaf decomposition in Portuguese streams. Freshw Biol 47:1123–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benke AC, Huryn AD, Smock LA, Wallace JB (1999) Length-mass relationships in North America with particular reference to the southeastern United States. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:308–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyero L (2011) Expression of a behaviourally mediated morphology in response to different predators. Ecol Res 26:1065–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burgherr P, Meyer EI (1997) Regression analysis of linear body dimensions vs. dry mass in stream macroinvertebrates. Arch Hydrobiol 139:101–112Google Scholar
  14. Canhoto C (1994) A decomposição e utilização das folhas de Eucalyptus globulus como fonte alimentar por detritívoros aquáticos. Dissertation, University of CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  15. Canhoto C, Graça MAS (1995) Food value of introduced eucalypt leaves for a Mediterranean stream detritivore: tipula lateralis. Freshw Biol 34:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canhoto C, Graça MAS (1996) Decomposition of Eucalyptus globulus leaves and three native leaf species (Alnus glutinosa, Castanea sativa and Quercus faginea) in a Portuguese low order stream. Hydrobiologia 333:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canhoto C, Graça MAS (1998) Leaf retention: a comparative study between two stream categories and leaf types. Verh Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol 16:990–993Google Scholar
  18. Canhoto C, Graça MAS (2006) Digestive tract and leaf processing capacity of the stream invertebrate Tipula lateralis Meig. Can J Zool 84:1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Canhoto C, Graça MAS (2008) Interactions between fungi and stream invertebrates: back to the future. In: Sridhar S, Bärlocher F, Hyde KD (eds) Novel techniques and ideas in mycology. Fungal Diversity Research Series 20. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 302–325Google Scholar
  20. Chung N, Suberkropp K (2009) Effects of aquatic fungi on feeding preferences and bioenergetics of Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera: limnephilidae). Hydrobiologia 630:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cornut J, Elger A, Lambrigot D, Marmonier P, Chauvet E (2010) Early stages of leaf decomposition are mediated by aquatic fungi in the hyporheic zone of woodland streams. Freshw Biol 55:2541–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Correa-Araneda F, Boyero L, Figueroa R, Sánchez C, Abdala R, Ruiz-García A, Graça MAS (2015) Joint effects of climate warming and exotic litter (Eucalyptus globulus Labill.) on stream detritivore fitness and litter breakdown. Aquat Sci 77:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Costa JLPDO (2014) Os caminhos da invasão do género Acacia Mill. na Bacia do Rio Arouce. Dissertation, University of CoimbraGoogle Scholar
  24. Cummins KW, Wilzbach MA, Gates DM, Perry JB, Taliaferro WB (1989) Shredders and riparian vegetation. Bioscience 39:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Danger M, Gessner MO, Bärlocher F (2016) Ecological stoichiometry of aquatic fungi: current knowledge and perspectives. Fungal Ecol 19:100–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobson M, Hildrew AG (1992) A test of resource limitation among shredding detritivores in low order streams in southern England. J Anim Ecol 61:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Domingos C, Ferreira V, Canhoto C, Swan C (2015) Effect of warming and presence of a dominant shredder on litter decomposition and in the variability patterns of macroinvertebrate and fungal assemblages. Aquat Sci 77:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duarte S, Pascoal C, Cássio F, Bärlocher F (2006) Aquatic hyphomycete diversity and identity affect leaf litter decomposition in microcosms. Oecologia 147:658–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dudgeon D (1994) The influence of riparian vegetation on macroinvertebrate community structure and functional organization in six New Guinea streams. Hydrobiologia 294:65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fabre E, Chauvet E (1998) Leaf breakdown along an altitudinal stream gradient. Arch Hydrobiol 141:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernandes I, Seena S, Pascoal C, Cássio F (2014) Elevated temperature may intensify the positive effects of nutrients on microbial decomposition in streams. Freshw Biol 59:2390–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferreira V, Canhoto C (2015) Future increase in temperature may stimulate litter decomposition in temperate mountain streams: evidence from a stream manipulation experiment. Freshw Biol 60:881–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ferreira V, Elosegi A, Gulis V, Pozo J, Graça MAS (2006a) Eucalyptus plantations affect fungal communities associated with leaf-litter decomposition in Iberian streams. Arch Hydrobiol 166:467–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferreira V, Gulis V, Graça MAS (2006b) Whole-stream nitrate addition affects litter decomposition and associated fungi but not invertebrates.Oecologia 149:718–729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferreira V, Encalada AC, Graça MAS (2012) Effects of litter diversity on decomposition and biological colonization of submerged litter in temperate and tropical streams. Freshw Sci 31:945–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferreira V, Chauvet E, Canhoto C (2015a) Effects of experimental warming, litter species, and presence of macroinvertebrates on litter decomposition and associated decomposers in a temperate mountain stream.Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ferreira V, Larrañaga A, Gulis V, Basaguren A, Elosegi A, Graça MAS, Pozo J (2015b) The effects of eucalypt plantations on plant litter decomposition and macroinvertebrate communities in Iberian streams. For Ecol Manage 335:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferreira V, Koricheva J, Pozo J, Graça MAS (2016) A meta-analysis on the effects of changes in the composition of native forests on litter decomposition in streams. For Ecol Manage 364:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frainer A, Moretti MS, Xu W, Gessner MO (2015) No evidence for leaf-trait dissimilarity effects on litter decomposition, fungal decomposers, and nutrient dynamics. Ecology 96:550–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Funck JA, Bec A, Perrière F, Felten V, Danger M (2015) Aquatic hyphomycetes: a potential source of polyunsaturated fatty acids in detritus-based stream food webs. Fungal Ecol 13:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gessner MO, Chauvet E (1994) Importance of stream microfungi in controlling breakdown rates of leaf litter. Ecology 75:1807–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gessner MO, Thomas M, Jean-Louis AM, Chauvet E (1993) Stable successional patterns of aquatic hyphomycetes on leaves decaying in a summer cool stream. Mycol Res 97:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gonçalves J F Jr, Santos AM, Esteves FA (2004) The influence of the chemical composition of Typha domingensis and Nymphaea ampla detritus on invertebrate colonization during decomposition in a Brazilian coastal lagoon. Hydrobiologia 527:125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gonçalves J F Jr, Rezende RS, Gregório RS, Valentin GC (2014) Relationship between dynamics of litterfall and riparian plant species in a tropical stream. Limnologica 44:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gönczöl J, Révay Á (1999) Studies on the aquatic hyphomycetes of the Morgó stream, Hungary. II. Seasonal periodicity of conidial populations. Arch Hydrobiol 144:495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gönczöl J, Révay Á (2004) Aquatic hyphomycetes in two streams differing in discharge and distribution of leaf litter. Studia Bot Hung 35:45–58Google Scholar
  48. Graça MAS, Pinto P, Cortes R, Coimbra N, Oliveira S, Morais M, Carvalho MJ, Malo J (2004) Factors affecting macroinvertebrate richness and diversity in Portuguese streams: a two-scale analysis. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO (2005) Methods to study litter decomposition. A practical guide.Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gulis V (2001) Are there any substrate preferences in aquatic hyphomycetes? Mycol Res 105:1088–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gulis V, Suberkropp K (2003) Leaf litter decomposition and microbial activity in nutrient-enriched and unaltered reaches of a headwater stream. Freshw Biol 48:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gulis V, Suberkropp K (2004) Effects of whole-stream nutrient enrichment on the concentration and abundance of aquatic hyphomycete conidia in transport. Mycologia 96:57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Gulis V, Ferreira V, Graça MAS (2006) Stimulation of leaf litter decomposition and associated fungi and invertebrates by moderate eutrophication: implications for stream assessment. Freshwat Biol 51:1655–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. IPMA (Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera) (2007). Accessed 2 Oct 2007. http://www.meteo.pt/pt/clima/clima.jsp
  55. Johnston TA, Cunjak RA (1999) Dry mass-length relationships for benthic insects: a review with new data from Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada. Freshw Biol 41:653–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2000) Ecosystem process rate increases with animal species richness: evidence from leaf-eating, aquatic insects. Oikos 89:519–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2003) Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia 134:554–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Jonsson M, Malmqvist B (2005) Species richness and composition effects in a detrital processing chain. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jonsson M, Malmqvist B, Hoffsten P-O (2001) Leaf litter breakdown rates in boreal streams: does shredder species richness matter? Freshw Biol 46:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kominoski JS, Shah JJF, Canhoto C, Fischer DG, Giling DP, González E, Griffiths NA, Larrañaga A, LeRoy CJ, Mineau MM, McElarney YR, Shirley SM, Swan CM, McElarney YR (2013) Forecasting functional implications of global changes in riparian plant communities. Front Ecol Environ 11:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laitung B, Chauvet E (2005) Vegetation diversity increases species richness of leaf-decaying fungal communities in woodland streams. Arch Hydrobiol 164:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Laitung B, Pretty JL, Chauvet E, Dobson M (2002) Response of aquatic hyphomycete communities to enhanced stream retention in areas impacted by commercial forestry. Freshw Biol 47:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Larrañaga S, Díez JR, Elosegi A, Pozo J (2003) Leaf retention in streams of the Agüera basin (northern Spain). Aquat Sci 65:158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lecerf A, Dobson M, Dang CK, Chauvet E (2005) Riparian plant species loss alters trophic dynamics in detritus-based stream ecosystems. Oecologia 146:432–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Lecerf A, Marie G, Kominoski JS, LeRoy CJ, Bernadet C, Swan CM (2011) Incubation time, functional litter diversity, and habitat characteristics predict litter-mixing effects on decomposition. Ecology 92:160–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Leuven RS, Brock TC, van Druten HA (1985) Effects of preservation on dry-and ash-free dry weight biomass of some common aquatic macro-invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 127:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Meyer E (1989) The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates. Arch Hydrobiol 117:191–203Google Scholar
  69. Molinero J, Pozo J (2003) Balances de hojarasca en dos arroyos forestados: impacto de las plantaciones de eucalipto en el funcionamiento ecológico de un sistema lótico. Limnetica 22:63–70Google Scholar
  70. Moretti MS, Loyola RD, Becker B, Callisto M (2009) Leaf abundance and phenolic concentrations codetermine the selection of case-building materials by Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae). Hydrobiologia 630:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Negishi JN, Richardson JS (2003) Responses of organic matter and macroinvertebrates to placements of boulder clusters in a small stream of southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Olden JD, Poff NL, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19:18–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Ostrofsky ML (1997) Relationship between chemical characteristics of autumn-shed leaves and aquatic processing rates. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rajashekhar M, Kaveriappa KM (2003) Diversity of aquatic hyphomycetes in the aquatic ecosystems of the Western Ghats of India. Hydrobiologia 501:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  76. Richardson JS (1991) Seasonal food limitation of detritivores in a montane stream: an experimental test. Ecology 72:873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rosemond AD, Pringle CM, Ramírez A, Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2002) Landscape variation in phosphorus concentration and effects on detritus-based tropical streams. Limnol Oceanogr 47:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schindler MH, Gessner MO (2009) Functional leaf traits and biodiversity effects on litter decomposition in a stream. Ecology 90:1641–1649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Srivastava DS, Lawton JH (1998) Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am Nat 152:510–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Suberkropp K, Arsuffi TL (1984) Degradation, growth, and changes in palatability of leaves colonized by six aquatic hyphomycete species. Mycologia 76:398–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Suberkropp K, Chauvet E (1995) Regulation of leaf breakdown by fungi in streams: influences of water chemistry. Ecology 76:1433–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swan CM, Palmer MA (2004) Leaf diversity alters litter breakdown in a Piedmont stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 23:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Swan CM, Palmer MA (2006) Composition of speciose leaf litter alters stream detritivore growth, feeding activity and leaf breakdown. Oecologia 47:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P (2000) Invertébrés d’eau douce: systématique, biologie, écologie. CNRS éditions, ParisGoogle Scholar
  85. Tiegs SD, Peter FD, Robinson CT, Uehlinger U, Gessner MO (2008) Leaf decomposition and invertebrate colonization responses to manipulated litter quantity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vieira-Lanero R (2000) Las larvas de los tricópteros de Galicia (Insecta: Trichoptera). Dissertation, Universidad de Santiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
  87. von Schiller D, Solimini AG (2005) Differential effects of preservation on the estimation of biomass of two common mayfly species. Arch Hydrobiol 164:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wallace J, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR (1997) Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science 277:102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences CentreUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Limnology Laboratory, Department of Ecology, IBUniversity of Brasília (UnB)BrasíliaBrazil
  4. 4.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)LeioaSpain
  5. 5.IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for ScienceBilbaoSpain
  6. 6.College of Science and EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations