Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 685–695 | Cite as

Do age-related changes in feeding habits of brown trout alter structural properties of food webs?

  • Javier Sánchez-HernándezEmail author


The aim of this study was to quantify changes in food webs based on ontogenetic dietary shifts of a top fish predator (here brown trout Salmo trutta L.). Here, the food web of a river in Central Spain (River Tormes) was studied to test the hypothesis that food web structural properties may change according to age-related changes in feeding habits of brown trout. Thus, the food web was established separately for age-0, age-1 and age-2 brown trout using a forward procedure (individual, modular and river networks); next the complete trophic networks were established. Overall, the networks were characterized by generalist predators with numerous prey types; specialized feeding was limited to a low number of taxa. Food web structural properties (number of links, connectance and linkage density) had the highest values in the age-1 scenario. The highest trophic level (i.e. the highest number of energy steps) was also found in the age-1 scenario, but the lowest in the age-0 scenario. Vulnerability and generalization tend to be higher in age-1 and age-0 scenarios, respectively. The present study exemplifies that age-specific brown trout predation on invertebrate predators emerged as the key factor to understand the changes in food web structural properties among age scenarios. I conclude that ontogenetic dietary shifts of brown trout promote changes in food web structural properties. This conclusion underscores the importance of considering different life history stages of species (i.e. to cover their ontogenetic dietary shifts) in food web construction.


Age-related traits Apex predator Food web Ontogeny Structural network properties 



I am very grateful to Ricardo Sánchez Grande and Fernando Sánchez Grande for their field assistance. The author thank the facilities given by the Station of Hydrobiology of the USC “Encoro do Con”, with special mention to Dr. Fernando Cobo who lent all the necessary equipment to carry out the field work. I also appreciate constructive comments from two anonymous referees, which considerably improved the quality of the manuscript. The Servicio Territorial de Medio Ambiente de Ávila (Junta de Castilla y León) granted permission for sampling. Flow data was gathered by the Duero Basin Water Authority. J. Sánchez-Hernández was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the Galician Plan for Research, Innovation, and Growth 2011–2015 (PlanI2C, Xunta de Galicia).

Supplementary material

10452_2016_9586_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)
10452_2016_9586_MOESM2_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 28 kb)
10452_2016_9586_MOESM3_ESM.txt (2 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (TXT 2 kb)
10452_2016_9586_MOESM4_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 12 kb)
10452_2016_9586_MOESM5_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. Alonso-González C (2003) Caracterización de la dinámica de poblaciones de trucha común (Salmo trutta L.) en la cuenca alta del rio Tormes y de los principales factores que influyen en ella. PhD Thesis, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid (In Spanish) Google Scholar
  2. Amundsen P-A, Knudsen R, Bryhni H (2010) Niche use and resource partitioning of Arctic charr, European whitefish and grayling in a subarctic lake. Hydrobiologia 650:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbosa P, Castellanos I (2005) Ecology of predator–prey interactions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Basaguren A, Riaño P, Pozo J (2002) Life history patterns and dietary changes of several caddisfly species in a northern Spain stream. Arch Hyrobiol 155:23–41Google Scholar
  5. Baum JK, Worm B (2009) Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances. J Anim Ecol 78:699–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolnick DI, Yang LH, Fordyce JA, Davis JM, Svanbäck R (2002) Measuring individual-level resource specialization. Ecology 83:2936–2941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnet AMR (1969) Territorial behaviour in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). New Zeal J Mar Freshwat Res 3:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa GC (2009) Predator size, prey size, and dietary niche breadth relationships in marine predators. Ecology 90:2014–2019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinno A (2016) Package ‘dunn.testʼ. Available from Accessed 13 June 2016
  10. Dunne JA (2009) Food webs. In: Meyers RA (ed) Complex networks and graph theory section of the encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York, pp 3661–3682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunne JA, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP et al (2013) Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity. PLoS Biol 11:e1001579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott JM (1994) Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerking SD (1994) Feeding ecology of fish. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  14. Grey J (2001) Ontogeny and dietary specialization in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) from Loch Ness, Scotland, examined using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Freshwat Fish 10:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Pedersen LJ, Jensen L (1997) Top-down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia 342(343):151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeley ER, Grant JWA (1997) Allometry of diet selectivity in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1894–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Link JS, Stockhausen WT, Methratta ET (2005) Food-web theory in marine ecosystems. In: Belgrano A, Scharler UM, Dunne J, Ulanowicz RE (eds) Aquatic food webs: an ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 98–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinez ND (1991) Artifacts or attributes? Effects of resolution on the Little Rock Lake food web. Ecol Monogr 61:367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meissner K, Muotka T (2006) The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments. J Anim Ecol 75:421–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Montori A, Tierno de Figueroa JM, Santos X (2006) The diet of the brown trout Salmo trutta (L.) during the reproductive period: size-related and sexual effects. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morisita M (1959) Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ Ser E 3:65–80Google Scholar
  23. Nakazawa T (2011) Ontogenetic niche shift, food-web coupling, and alternative stable states. Theor Ecol 4:479–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakazawa T (2015) Ontogenetic niche shifts matter in community ecology: a review and future perspectives. Popul Ecol 57:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oscoz J, Galicia D, Miranda R (eds) (2011) Identification guides of freshwater macroinvertebrates of Spain. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker SM, Huryn AD (2013) Disturbance and productivity as codeterminants of stream food web complexity in the Arctic. Limnol Oceanogr 58:2158–2170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peralta-Maraver I, López-Rodríguez MJ, Tierno de Figueroa JM (2012) Life history of two aquatic insects in the Cacín stream (SE Spain): Leuctra geniculata (Plecoptera) and Serratella ignita (Ephemeroptera). Zool baetica 23:57–68Google Scholar
  28. Planque B, Primicerio R, Michalsen K et al (2014) Who eats whom in the Barents Sea: a food web topology from plankton to whales. Ecology 95:1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polis GA, Holt RD, Menge BA, Winemiller K (1996) Time, space and life history: influences on food webs. In: Polis GA, Winemiller K (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 435–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quevedo M, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2009) Intrapopulation niche partitioning in a generalist predator limits food web connectivity. Ecology 90:2263–2274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Rincón PA, Lobón-Cerviá J (1999) Prey-size selection by brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in a stream in northern Spain. Can J Zool 77:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rudolf VHW, Rasmussen NL (2013) Ontogenetic functional diversity: size-structure of a keystone predator alters functioning of a complex ecosystem. Ecology 94:1046–1056CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sánchez-Carmona R, Encina L, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Rodríguez-Sánchez MV, Granado-Lorencio C (2012) Food web structure in Mediterranean streams: exploring stabilizing forces in these ecosystems. Aquat Ecol 46:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sánchez-Hernández J, Cobo F (2012) Summer differences in behavioural feeding habits and use of feeding habitat among brown trout (Pisces) age classes in a temperate area. Ital J Zool 79:468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sánchez-Hernández J, Cobo F (2015) Adaptive flexibility in the feeding behaviour of brown trout: optimal prey size. Zool Stud 54:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sánchez-Hernández J, Cobo F (2016) Ontogenetic shifts in terrestrial reliance of stream-dwelling brown trout. J Limnol. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1322 Google Scholar
  38. Sánchez-Hernández J, Nunn AD (2016) Environmental changes in a Mediterranean river: implications for the fish assemblage. Ecohydrology. doi: 10.1002/eco.1737 Google Scholar
  39. Sánchez-Hernández J, Vieira-Lanero R, Servia MJ, Cobo F (2011a) Feeding habits of four sympatric fish species in the Iberian Peninsula: keys to understanding coexistence using prey traits. Hydrobiologia 667:119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sánchez-Hernández J, Vieira-Lanero R, Servia MJ, Cobo F (2011b) First feeding diet of young brown trout fry in a temperate area: disentangling constrains and food selection. Hydrobiologia 663:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sánchez-Hernández J, Servia MJ, Vieira-Lanero R, Cobo F (2013) Ontogenetic dietary shifts in a predatory freshwater fish species: the brown trout as an example of a dynamic fish species. In: Türker H (ed) New advances and contributions to fish biology. InTech, Croatia, pp 271–298Google Scholar
  42. Sánchez-Hernández J, Cobo F, Amundsen P-A (2015) Food web topology in high mountain lakes. PLoS ONE 10(11):e0143016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Savage RE (1931) The relation between the feeding of the herring off the cast coast of England and the plankton of the surrounding waters. Fishery Invest Ser II 12:1–88Google Scholar
  44. Schoener TW (1989) Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology 70:1559–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith EP, Zaret TM (1982) Bias in estimating niche overlap. Ecology 63:1248–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Svanbäck R, Quevedo M, Olsson J, Eklöv P (2015) Individuals in food webs: the relationships between trophic position, omnivory and among-individual diet variation. Oecologia 178:103–114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P (2002) Invertebratébrés d’eau douce. Systematique, biologie, écologie. CNRS Editions, Paris (In French) Google Scholar
  48. Wallace RK Jr (1981) An assessment of diet overlap indexes. Trans Am Fish Soc 110:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams RJ (2010) Network3D [computer program]. Microsoft Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Worischka S, Hellmann C, Berendonk TU, Winkelmann C (2014) Fish predation can induce mesohabitat-specific differences in food web structures in small stream ecosystems. Aquat Ecol 48:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoon I, Williams RJ, Levine E, Yoon S, Dunne JA, Martinez ND (2004) Webs on the Web (WoW): 3D visualization of ecological networks on the WWW for collaborative research and education. Proc SPIE 5295, Visualization and Data Analysis 5295:124–132Google Scholar
  52. Zhang J (2015) Package ‘spaaʼ. Accessed 16 June 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations