Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 685–700

Impact of urban development on aquatic macroinvertebrates in south eastern Australia: degradation of in-stream habitats and comparison with non-urban streams

  • Peter J. Davies
  • Ian A. Wright
  • Sophia J. Findlay
  • Olof J. Jonasson
  • Shelley Burgin
Article
  • 942 Downloads

Abstract

Internationally, waterways within urban areas are subject to broad-scale environmental impairment from urban land uses. In this study, we used in-stream macroinvertebrates as surrogates to measure the aquatic health of urban streams in the established suburbs of northern Sydney, in temperate south eastern Australia. We compared these with samples collected from streams flowing in adjacent naturally vegetated catchments. Macroinvertebrates were collected over a 30-month period from riffle, edge and pool rock habitats and were identified to the family level. Macroinvertebrate assemblages were assessed against the influence of imperviousness and other catchment and water quality variables. The study revealed that urban streams were significantly impaired compared with those that flowed through naturally vegetated non-urban catchments. Urban streams had consistently lower family richness, and sensitive guilds were rare or missing. We found that variation in community assemblages among the in-stream habitats (pool edges, riffles and pool rocks) were more pronounced within streams in naturally vegetated catchments than in urban waterways.

Keywords

Urban stream syndrome Urban waterways Aquatic macroinvertebrates Aquatic health Urban water quality 

References

  1. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2004) Population estimates by age and sex. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Aplin G, Beggs P, Brierley G, Cleugh H, Curson P, Mitchell P, Pitman A, Rich D (1999) Global environmental crises: an Australian perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold CL, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthington AH, Conrick DL, Connell DW, Outridge PM (1982) The ecology of a polluted urban creek. Australian Water Resources Council, Technical Paper No. 68, Australian Government Printing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. Beavan L, Sadler J, Pinder C (2001) The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia 445:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BoM (Bureau of Meteorology) (2007) Special climate statement 14. Six years of widespread drought in southern and eastern Australia November 2001 to October 2007. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/statements/scs14.pdf. Accessed 6 December 2009
  9. BoM (Bureau of Meteorology) (2009) Summary statistics riverview observatory, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw_066131.shtml. Accessed 6 December 2009
  10. Booth DB, Jackson CR (1997) Urbanization of aquatic systems—degradation thresholds, stormwater detention, and the limits of mitigation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33:1077–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cairns J Jr, Pratt JR (1993) A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds) Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 10–27Google Scholar
  12. Campbell IC (1978) A biological investigation of an organically polluted urban stream in Victoria. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 29:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Watershed Protection (2003) Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic ecosystems. Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott CityGoogle Scholar
  14. Chessman BC (1995) Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: a procedure based on habitat-specific sampling, family level identification and a biotic index. Aust J Ecol 20:122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chessman BC (2003) New sensitivity grades for Australian river macroinvertebrates. Mar Freshw Res 54:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chessman BC, Williams SA (1999) Biodiversity and conservation of river macroinvertebrates. Pac Conserv Biol 5:36–55Google Scholar
  17. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke KR, Ainsworth M (1993) A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen JE (2003) Human population: the next century. Science 302:1172–1175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Corkum LD (1989) Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North America. Freshw Biol 21:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummins KW, Klug MJ (1979) Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Curby P, Macleod V (2006) Under the canopy: a centenary history of ku-ring-gai council. Ku-ring-gai Council, GordonGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies PJ, Wright IA, Jonasson OJ, Findlay SJ (2009) Effects of concrete and PVC pipes on water chemistry, presented at 6th international water sensitive urban design conference and Hydropolis, 5–8 May 2009, Perth, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  24. Department of Planning (2007) North sub-region: draft subregional strategy. New South Wales Department of Planning, Newcastle, NSWGoogle Scholar
  25. DEST, EPA, and WRDC (1994) River bioassessment manual, Version 1.0, National river processes and management program, monitoring river health initiative. Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Environment Protection Agency, and Land and Water Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
  26. DMR (1983) Sydney Australia 1:100 000: Geological Series Sheet 9130, 1st edn, Geological Survey of New South Wales, Department of Mineral Resources, Maitland, NSWGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunn T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Fairweather PG (1990) Sewage and the biota on seashores: assessment of impact in relation to natural variability. Environ Monit Assess 14:197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fanelli G, Testi A (2008) Detecting large and fine scale patterns of abundance in towns by means of plant species inventories: maps of Memeroby in the town of Rome. In: Wagner LN (ed) Urbanization: 21st century issues and challenges. Nova Science, New York, pp 197–211Google Scholar
  30. Gregory KJ, Davis RJ, Downs PW (1992) Identification of river channel change due to urbanization. Appl Geogr 12:299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gresens SE, Belt KT, Tang JA, Gwinn DC, Banks PA (2007) Temporal and spatial responses of Chironomidae (Diptera) and other benthic invertebrates to urban stormwater runoff. Hydrobiologia 575:173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Taylor SL (2004) The influence of urban density and drainage infrastructure on the concentrations and loads of pollutants in small streams. Environ Manag 34:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawking JH (1994) A preliminary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates from Australian freshwaters. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology Identification Guide No. 2. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury, NSWGoogle Scholar
  34. Jenkins RA, Wade KR, Pugh E (1984) Macroinvertebrate-habitat relationships in the River Teifi catchment and the significance to conservation. Freshw Biol 14:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jolly VH, Chapman MA (1966) A preliminary biological study of the effects of pollution on Farmers’s Creek and Cox’s River, New South Wales. Hydrobiologia 27:160–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein RD (1979) Urbanization and stream quality impairment. Water Resour Bull 15:948–963Google Scholar
  37. Ladson AR (2004) Optimising urban stream rehabilitation planning and execution. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Technical Report 04/7. Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. Lake JC, Leishman MR (2004) Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores. Biol Conserv 117:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lenat DR, Penrose DL (1996) History of the EPT taxa richness metric. Bull N Am Benthol Soc 13:305–307Google Scholar
  40. Leopold LB (1968) Hydrology for urban land planning: a guidebook on the hydrological effects of urban land. US Circular 554, US Geological Survey, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Marchant R, Barmutta LA, Chessman BC (1994) Preliminary study of the ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate communities from running waters in Victoria, Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 45:945–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:602–612Google Scholar
  43. Moerke AH, Lamberti GA (2004) Restoring stream ecosystems: lessons from a Mid Western State. Restor Ecol 12:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norris RH, Lake PS, Swain R (1982) Ecological effects of mine effluents on the South Esk River, north- eastern Tasmania (III). Benthic macroinvertebrates. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 33:789–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parsons M, Norris RH (1996) The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshw Biol 36:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pedersen ER, Perkins MA (1986) The use of benthic macroinvertebrate data for evaluating impacts of urban runoff. Hydrobiologia 139:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Resh VH, Jackson JK (1993) Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds) Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 195–233Google Scholar
  49. Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (1993) Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Roy AH, Rosemond AD, Paul MJ, Leigh DS, Wallace JB (2003) Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia U.S.A.). Freshw Biol 48:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutt GP, Weatherly NS, Ormerod SJ (1989) Microhabitat availability in Welsh moorland and forest streams as a determinant of macroinvertebrate distribution. Freshw Biol 22:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suren AM (2000) Effects of urbanisation. In: Collie KJ, Winterbourne MJ (eds) New Zealand stream invertebrates: ecology and implications for management. New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch, pp 260–288Google Scholar
  53. Underwood AJ (1991) Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 42:569–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Der Hammen H, Smit H (1996) The water mites (Acari : Hydrachnidia) of streams in the Netherlands: distribution and ecological aspects on a regional scale. Neth J Aquat Ecol 30:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walsh CJ (2006) Biological indicators of stream health using macroinvertebrate assemblage composition: a comparison of sensitivity to an urban gradient. Mar Freshw Res 57:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walsh CJ, Breen PF (2001) A biological approach to assessing the potential success of habitat restoration in urban streams. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 27:3654–3658Google Scholar
  57. Walsh CJ, Sharpe AK, Breen PF, Sonneman JA (2001) Effects of urbanisation on streams of the Melbourne region, Victoria, Australia. I. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Freshw Biol 46:535–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh CJ, Sim PT, Yoo J (2002) Methods for the determination of catchment imperviousness and drainage connection. Project 210. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, ClaytonGoogle Scholar
  59. Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, Ladson AR (2005) Stream restoration in urban catchments through re-design stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:690–750Google Scholar
  60. Warwick RM (1993) Environmental impact studies on marine communities: pragmatical considerations. Aust J Ecol 18:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright IA, Burgin S (2009) Comparison of sewage and coal mine drainage impacts on stream macroinvertebrates within an otherwise clean upland catchment, south-eastern Australia. Water Air Soil Poll 204:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright IA, Chessman BC, Fairweather PG, Benson LJ (1995) Measuring the impact of sewage effluent of an upland stream: the effect of different levels of taxonomic resolution and quantification. Aust J Ecol 20:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, Furse M (eds) (2000) Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, AmblesideGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Davies
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ian A. Wright
    • 2
  • Sophia J. Findlay
    • 1
  • Olof J. Jonasson
    • 1
  • Shelley Burgin
    • 2
  1. 1.Ku-ring-gai CouncilPymbleAustralia
  2. 2.College of Health and ScienceUniversity of Western SydneySouth Penrith Distribution CentreAustralia
  3. 3.Macquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations