Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 579–585

Effect of mixed diets (cyanobacteria and green algae) on the population growth of the cladocerans Ceriodaphnia dubia and Moina macrocopa

  • Alejandro Federico Alva-Martínez
  • S. S. S. Sarma
  • S. Nandini


Microcystis aeruginosa, a cosmopolitan form, is a colonial cyanobacterium, which is also common in many freshwater bodies in Mexico. In eutrophic water bodies cyanobacteria are often the main phytoplankton that co-exist with cladocerans. We evaluated the effect of mixed diets, comprising 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% on dry weight basis of M. aeruginosa, and the rest of one of two green algal species (Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acutus), on the population growth of the cladocerans Ceriodaphnia dubia and Moina macrocopa. Regardless of the share of M. aeruginosa in the mixed diet, C. dubia fed Chlorella had a longer initial lag phase. However, in mixed diet with S. acutus, the lag phase of C. dubia increased with increasing proportion of M. aeruginosa. When raised on 100% M. aeruginosa, the population growth of C. dubia was lowered compared with 100% S. acutus or 100% C. vulgaris. Increased proportion of M. aeruginosa in the mixed diet also resulted in decreased abundance of M. macrocopa. Irrespective of diet type, M. macrocopa had a shorter lag phase than C. dubia. Depending on the diet type, the rate of population increase (r) of C. dubia varied from 0.07 to 0.26 d−1 while that of M. macrocopa was higher (0.14–0.61 d−1). For both cladoceran species, the lower r values were obtained when fed Microcystis. Our study showed that the strain of M. aeruginosa was not highly toxic to cause total elimination of either C. dubia or M. macrocopa. Addition of a green algal component to the diet improved the population growth rates of both cladoceran species.


Zooplankton growth Cyanobacteria Ceriodaphnia Moina Mixed diet 


  1. Alva-Martínez AF, Sarma SSS, Nandini S (2004) Population growth of Daphnia pulex (Cladocera) on a mixed diet (Microcystis aeruginosa with Chlorella or Scenedesmus). Crustaceana 77:973–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alva-Martínez AF, Sarma SSS, Nandini S (2007) Population dynamics of Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus havanaensis (Rotifera) on mixed diets with Microcystis aeruginosa and green algae. Hidrobiologica (In press)Google Scholar
  3. Borowitzka MA, Borowitzka LJ (1988) Micro-algal biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen F, Xie P (2003) The effects of fresh and decomposed Microcystis aeruginosa on cladocerans from a subtropic Chinese lake. J Freshwater Ecol 18:97–104Google Scholar
  5. DeMott WR (1989) The role of competition in zooplankton succession. In: Sommer U (ed) Plankton ecology: succession in Plankton communities. Springer, New York, pp 195–252Google Scholar
  6. Dodson SI, Frey DG (2001) Cladocera and other branchiopoda. In: Thorp JH, Covich AP (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, London, pp 850–914Google Scholar
  7. Ferrão-Filho AS, Azevedo SMFO (2003) Effects of unicellular and colonial forms of toxic Microcystis aeruginosa from laboratory cultures and natural populations on tropical cladocerans. Aquatic Ecol 37:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrão-Filho AS, Arcifa MS, Fileto C (2005) Influence of seston quantity and quality on growth of tropical cladocerans. Braz J Biol 65:77–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores-Burgos J, Sarma SSS, Nandini S (2003) Population growth of zooplankton (rotifers and cladocerans) fed Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acutus in different proportions. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 31:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghadouani A, Pinel-Alloul B, Plath K, Codd GA, Lampert W (2004) Effects of Microcystis aeruginosa and purified microcystin-LR on the feeding behavior of Daphnia pulicaria. Limnol Oceanogr 49:666–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulati RD, DeMott WR (1999) The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshw Biol 38:753–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo N, Xie P (2006) Development of tolerance against toxic Microcystis aeruginosa in three cladocerans and the ecological implications. Env Poll 143:513–518Google Scholar
  13. Gupta S (1998) Cyanobacterial toxins: microcystin-LR. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd edn.. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 95–110Google Scholar
  14. Gustafsson S, Hansson LA (2004) Development of tolerance against toxic cyanobacteria in Daphnia. Aquatic Ecol 38:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jungmann D, Ludwichowski KU, Faltin V, Benndorf J (1996) Field study to investigate environmental factors that could affect microcystin synthesis of a Microcystis population in the Bautzen reservoir. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol 81:493–501Google Scholar
  16. Kardinaal WEA, Visser PM (2005) Dynamics of cyanobacterial toxins. In: Huismann J, Matthijs CP, Visser PM (eds) Harmful cyanobacteria. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 41–63Google Scholar
  17. Kořinek V (2002) Cladocera. In: Fernando CH (ed) Guide to tropical freshwater zooplankton. Identification, ecology and impacts on fisheries. Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 69–97Google Scholar
  18. Krebs CJ (1985) Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 3rd edn. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampert W (1987) Laboratory studies on zooplankton-cyanobacteria interactions. New Zealand J Mar Freshw Res 21:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lürling M (2003) Daphnia growth on microcystin-producing and microcystin-free Microcystis aeruginosa in different mixtures with the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Limnol Oceanogr 48:2214–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lürling M, van Donk E (1997) Life history consequences for Daphnia pulex feeding on nutrient-limited phytoplankton. Freshw Biol 38:693–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monakov AV (2003) Feeding freshwater invertebrates. Kenobi Productions, Gent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakano S, Ishii N, Manage PM, Kawabata Z (1998) Trophic roles of heterotrophic nanoflagellates and ciliates among planktonic organisms in a hypereutrophic pond. Aquatic Microb Ecol 16:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nandini S, Rao TR (1998) Somatic and population growth in selected cladoceran and rotifer species offered the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa as food. Aquatic Ecol 31:283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nandini S, Sarma SSS (2000) Lifetable demography of four cladoceran species in relation to algal food (Chlorella vulgaris) density. Hydrobiologia 435:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nandini S, Sarma SSS (2003) Population growth of some genera of cladocerans (Cladocera) in relation to algal food (Chlorella vulgaris) levels. Hydrobiologia 491:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nandini S, Ramírez-García P, Sarma SSS (2005) Seasonal variations in the species diversity of planktonic rotifers in Lake Xochimilco, Mexico. J Freshw Ecol 20:287–294Google Scholar
  28. Piorreck M, Pohl P (1984) Formation of biomass, total protein, chlorophylls, lipids and fatty acids in green and blue-green algae during one growth phase. Phytochemistry 23:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reinikainen M, Hietala J, Walls M (1999) Reproductive allocation in Daphnia exposed to toxic cyanobacteria. J Plankton Res 21:1553–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarma SSS, Nandini S, Gulati RD (2005) Life history strategies of cladocerans: comparisons of tropical and temperate taxa. Hydrobiologia 542:315–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thostrup L, Christoffersen K (1999) Accumulation of microcystin in Daphnia magna feeding on toxic Microcystis. Arch Hydrobiol 145:447–467Google Scholar
  32. Weber CI (1993) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. 4th ed. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  33. Zohary T, Robarts RD (1990) Hyperscums and the population dynamics of Microcystis aeruginosa. J Plankton Res 12:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zöllner E, Santer B, Boersma M, Hoppe H, Jürgens K (2003) Cascading predation effects of Daphnia and copepods on microbial food web components. Freshw Biol 48:2174–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Federico Alva-Martínez
    • 1
  • S. S. S. Sarma
    • 2
  • S. Nandini
    • 3
  1. 1.Doctoral ProgrammeAutonomous Metropolitan UniversityMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, Building UMF, Division of Research and Postgradulate StudiesNational Autonomous University of MexicoTlalnepantlaMexico
  3. 3.UIICSE, Division of Research and Postgraduate StudiesNational Autonomous University of MexicoTlalnepantlaMexico

Personalised recommendations