Advertisement

Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 361–372 | Cite as

Temperature and kairomone induced life history plasticity in coexisting Daphnia

  • Randall J. BernotEmail author
  • Walter K. Dodds
  • Michael C. Quist
  • Christopher S. Guy
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

We investigated the life history alterations of coexisting Daphnia species responding to environmental temperature and predator cues. In a laboratory experiment, we measured Daphnia life history plasticity under different predation risk and temperature treatments that simulate changing environmental conditions. Daphnia pulicaria abundance and size at first reproduction (SFR) declined, while ephippia (resting egg) formation increased at high temperatures. Daphnia mendotae abundance and clutch size increased with predation risk at high temperatures, but produced few ephippia. Thus, each species exhibited phenotypic plasticity, but responded in sharply different ways to the same environmental cues. In Glen Elder reservoir, Kansas USA, D. pulicaria dominance shifted to D. mendotae dominance as temperature and predation risk increased from March to June in both 1999 and 2000. Field estimates of life history shifts mirrored the laboratory experiment results, suggesting that similar phenotypic responses to seasonal cues contribute to seasonal Daphnia population trends. These results illustrate species-specific differences in life history plasticity among coexisting zooplankton taxa.

Keywords

Daphnia pulicaria Daphnia mendotae Life history Phenotypic plasticity Ephippia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Bernot, C. Oppert, S. Butler, J. Delp, J. Hart, K. Gido, N. Gerlanc, C. Smith, K. Kemp, J. Nechols, J. Trexler, and G. Lamberti. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on previous versions of this manuscript and K. Austin and the staff at Glen Elder State Park for their assistance with this and other research on Glen Elder Reservoir. Funding was provided by the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks through Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration, Project F-45-R2 and Kansas State University.

References

  1. Alekseev V, Lampert W (2001) Maternal control of resting-egg production in Daphnia. Nature 414:899–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barata C, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia magna Straus: variable maturation instar as an adaptive response to predation pressure. Oecologia 129:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernot RJ (2003) Ecological concsequences of Daphnia phenotypic plasticity in a Great Plains reservoir. PhD Dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas USA, 127 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernot RJ, Turner AM (2001) Predator identity and trait-mediated indirect effects in a littoral food web. Oecologia 129:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernot RJ, Dodds WK, Quist MC, Guy CS (2004a) Larval fish-induced phenotypic plasticity of coexisting Daphnia: an enclosure experiment. Freshw Biol 49:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernot RJ, Dodds WK, Quist MC, Guy CS (2004b) Spatial and temporal variability of zooplankton in a Great Plains reservoir. Hydrobiologia 525: 101–112Google Scholar
  7. Burks RL, Jeppesen E, Lodge DM (2000) Macrophyte and fish chemicals suppress Daphnia growth and alter life history traits. Oikos 88:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cáceres CE (1997) Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: a field test of the storage effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9171–9175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cáceres CE (1998a) Interspecific variation in the abundance, production and emergence of Daphnia diapausing eggs. Ecology 79:1699–1710Google Scholar
  10. Cáceres CE (1998b) Seasonal dynamics and interspecific competition in Oneida Lake Daphnia. Oecologia 115: 233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho GR, Hughes RN (1983) The effect of food availability, female culture-density and photoperiod on ephippia production in Daphnia magna Straus (Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshw Biol 13:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chase JM (1999) To grow or to reproduce? The role of life history plasticity in food web dynamics. Am Nat 154:571–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Abramo LR (1980) The stimulus for the asexual-sexual switch in Moina macrocopa. Limnol Oceanogr 25:422–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) (2004) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerrish GA, Cáceres CE (2003) Genetic versus environmental influence on pigment variation in the ephippia of Daphnia pulicaria. Freshw Biol 48:1971–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gliwicz ZM (1990) Food thresholds and body size in cladocerans. Nature 343:638–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grime JP, Crick JC, Rincon JE (1986) The ecological significance of plasticity. In: Jennings DH, Trewava AJ (eds) Plasticity in plants. Pindar Scarborough, North Yorkshire, pp 5–29Google Scholar
  18. Gulbrandsen J, Johnsen GH (1990) Temperature-dependent development of parthenogenetic embryos in Daphnia pulex de Geer. J Plank Res 12:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall DJ (1964) An experimental approach to the dynamics of a natural population of Daphnia galeata mendotae. Ecology 45:94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu SS, Tessier AJ (1995) Seasonal succession and the strength of intra- and interspecific competition in a Daphnia assemblage. Ecology 76:2278–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuehl RO (2000) Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. Duxbury PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Lass S, Spaak P (2003) Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review. Hydrobiologia 491:221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leibold MA (1991) Trophic interactions and habitat segregation between competing Daphnia species. Oecologia 86:510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leibold MA, Tessier AJ (1991). Contrasting patterns of body size for coexisting Daphnia species that segregate by habitat. Oecologia 86:342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leibold MA, Tessier AJ (1998) Experimental compromise and mechanistic approaches to the evolutionary ecology of interacting Daphnia species. In: Resetarits WJ Jr, Bernardo J (eds) Experimental ecology: issues and perspectives. Oxford University Press, pp 96–112Google Scholar
  26. Mehner T (2000). Influences of spring warming on the predation rate of underyearling fish on Daphnia – a deterministic simulation approach. Freshw Biol 45:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mittelbach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mortimer CH (1935) Untersuchungen über den generationsweschel der Cladoceran. Naturwissenschaften 23:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paloheimo JE (1974) Calculation of instantaneous birth rate. Limnol Oceanogr 19:692–694Google Scholar
  30. Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR, Taylor BW, Dahl J (2002) Predator chemicals induce changes in mayfly life history traits: a whole stream manipulation. Ecology 83:612–617Google Scholar
  31. Pfrender ME, Spitze K, Lehmann N (2000) Multi-locus genetic evidence for rapid ecologically based speciation in Daphnia. Mol Ecol 9:1717–1735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Quist MC, Guy CS, Bernot RJ (2002) Ecology of larval white bass in a large Kansas reservoir. N Am J Fish Manage 22:637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Relyea RA (2001) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82:523–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reznick DN, Butler MJI, Rodd FH, Ross P (1996) Life history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50:1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakwinska O (1998) Plasticity of Daphnia magna life history traits in response to temperature and information about a predator. Freshw Biol 39:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ślusarczyk M (1999) Predator-induced diapause in Daphnia magna may require two chemical cues. Oecologia 119:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sommer U (1989) Plankton ecology: succession in plankton communities. Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  39. Spitze K (1991) Chaoborus predation and life-history evolution in Daphnia pulex: temporal pattern of population diversity, fitness, and mean life history. Evolution 45:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Stibor H, Lampert W (1993) Estimating the size at maturity in field populations of Daphnia (Cladocera). Freshw Biol 30:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stibor H, Lampert WH (2000) Components of additive variance in life-history traits of Daphnia hyalina: seasonal differences in the response to predator signals. Oikos 88:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stross R (1971) Photoperiodism and diapause in Daphnia: a strategy for all seasons. Trans Am Micro Soc 90:110–112Google Scholar
  44. Taylor BE, Gabriel W (1992) To grow or not to grow: optimal resource allocation for Daphnia. Am Nat 139: 248–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tessier AJ, Leibold MA, Tsao J (2000) A fundamental trade-off in resource exploitation by Daphnia and consequences to plankton communities. Ecology 81:826–841Google Scholar
  46. Threlkeld ST (1979) The midsummer dynamics of two Daphnia species in Wintergreen Lake, Michigan. Ecology 60:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) (1999) Ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall J. Bernot
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Walter K. Dodds
    • 1
  • Michael C. Quist
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christopher S. Guy
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMurray State UniversityMurrayUSA
  3. 3.Natural Resource Ecology and ManagementIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Geological Survey—Biological Resources Division, Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Department of EcologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations