Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Statistical quantification of the effect of thermal stratification on patterns of dispersion in a freshwater zooplankton community

  • Stephen J. Thackeray
  • D. Glen George
  • Roger I. Jones
  • Ian J. Winfield


The vertical distribution of crustacean zooplankton species was examined during 2000 in Windermere, Cumbria. Patterns of dispersion were evaluated quantitatively using two different approaches. Firstly, Morisita’s index was used to test whether patterns of dispersion differed significantly from a state of randomness and, secondly, the relative distribution of zooplankton individuals between the epilimnion and hypolimnion was investigated, for a series of standardised vertical profiles of organism density. All six of the dominant species of planktonic crustaceans showed aggregated patterns of dispersion throughout the year. For most species, patterns of dispersion were affected by the onset and breakdown of thermal stratification in the lake. The degree of aggregation in the vertical plane, measured using Morisita’s index, increased when the lake became thermally stratified. Furthermore, for most species, there was a positive association between the degree of vertical differentiation in abundance across the thermocline, and the degree of temperature differentiation in the stratified water column. The results of the present analysis provide quantitative evidence for the phenomenon known as ‘zooplankton stratification’ and for temporal variation in patterns of zooplankton dispersion.

Key words

Morisita’s index Plankton Spatial heterogeneity Zooplankton stratification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We thank S. C. Maberly and an anonymous reviewer for providing useful comments on the manuscript and J. B. James and J. M. Fletcher for assistance in collecting the field data. The work was funded under a studentship awarded to S. J. Thackeray by the Freshwater Biological Association.


  1. Anderson RM, Gordon DM, Crawley MJ and Hassell MP (1982) Variability in the abundance of animal and plant species. Nature 296: 245–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeli N, Pinel-Alloul B, Balvay G, Menard I (1995) Diel patterns of feeding and vertical migration in daphnids and diaptomids during the clear water phase in Lake Geneva (France). Hydrobiologia 300: 163–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begon M., Harper J.L. and Townsend C.R. 1996. Ecology, 3rd ed. Blackwell ScienceGoogle Scholar
  4. Burns CW, Mitchell SF (1980) Seasonal succession and the vertical distribution of zooplankton in Lake Hayes and Lake Johnson. N Z Jl Mar freshwat Res 14: 189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dutilleul P, Legendre P (1993) Spatial heterogeneity against heteroscedasticity: an ecological paradigm versus a statistical concept. Oikos 66: 152–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott J.M. 1977. Some Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Samples of Benthic Invertebrates. Freshwater Biological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott JM (2002) A quantitative study of day-night changes in the spatial distribution of insects in a stony stream. J Anim Ecol 71: 112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall CJ, Burns CW (2002) Mortality and growth responses of Daphnia carinata to increases in temperature and salinity. Freshwat Biol 47: 451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halsband-Lenk C, Hirche HJ, Carlotti F (2002) Temperature impact on reproduction and development of congener copepod populations. J expl mar Biol Ecol 271: 121–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harding JP, Smith WA (1974) A key to the British cyclopoid and calanoid copepods. Freshwater Biological Association, AmblesideGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris GP, Smith RH (1977) Observations of small scale spatial patterns of phytoplankton populations. Limnol Oceanogr 22: 887–899Google Scholar
  12. Hofmann W (1975) The influence of spring circulation on zooplankton dynamics in Plussee. Verh int Verein theor angew Limnol 19: 1241–1250Google Scholar
  13. Kessler K, Lampert W (2004) Fitness optimization of Daphnia in a trade-off between food and temperature. Oecologia 140: 381–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lampert W, Muck P (1985) Multiple aspects of food limitation in zooplankton communities: the Daphnia - Eudiaptomus example. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 21: 311–322Google Scholar
  15. Lampert W, Sommer U (1997) Limnoecology. The ecology of lakes and streams. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcogliese DJ, Esch GW (1992) Alterations of vertical distribution and migration of zooplankton in relation to temperature. Am Midl Nat 128: 139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matsumura-Tundisi T (1997) Composition and vertical distribution of zooplankton in Lake Dom Helvecio. In: Tundisi JG, Saijo Y (eds) Limnological Studies on the Rio Doce Valley Lakes, Brazil. Brazilian Academy of Sciences University of Sau Paulo School of Engineering at S Carlos and Centre for Water Resources and Applied Ecology, Brazil, pp. 265–274Google Scholar
  18. Miracle MR (1977) Migration, patchiness, and distribution in time and space of planktonic rotifers. Ergebn Limnol 8: 19–37Google Scholar
  19. Muller H (1985) The niches of Bosmina coregoni and Bosmina longirostris in the ecosystem of Lake Constance. Verh int Verein theor angew Limnol 22: 3137–3143Google Scholar
  20. Reynolds CS (1984) The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Ringelberg J (1995) Changes in light intensity and diel vertical migration: a comparison of marine and freshwater environments. J mar biol Ass UK 75: 15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ringelberg J, Flik BJG, Lindenaar D, Royackers K (1991a) Diel vertical migration of Daphnia hyalina (sensu latiori) in Lake Maarsseveen: Part 1. Aspects of seasonal and daily timing. Arch Hydrobiol 121: 129–145Google Scholar
  23. Ringelberg J, Flik BJG, Lindenaar D, Royackers K (1991b) Diel vertical migration of Eudiaptomus gracilis during a short summer period. Hydrobiol. Bull. 25: 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruttner F (1953) Fundamentals of limnology. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandercock GA (1967) A study of selected mechaniams for the coexistence of Diaptomus spp. in Clarke Lake, Ontario. Limnol Oceanogr 12: 97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scourfield DJ, Harding JP (1966) A key to the British species of freshwater cladocera. Freshwater Biological Association, AmblesideGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor LR (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189: 732–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor LR (1983) Behavioural dynamics. Nature 303: 801–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor LR (1984) Assessing and interpreting the spatial distributions of insect populations. A Rev Ent 29: 321–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor LR, Taylor RAJ (1977) Aggregation, migration and population mechanics. Nature 265: 415–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor LR, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (1978) The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. J Anim Ecol 47: 383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Work KA, Gophen M (1999) Factors which affect the abundance of an invasive cladoceran, Daphnia lumholtzi, in U.S. reservoirs. Freshwat Biol 42: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Thackeray
    • 1
  • D. Glen George
    • 1
  • Roger I. Jones
    • 2
  • Ian J. Winfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and HydrologyLancaster Environment CentreBailrigg, LancasterUK
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskylän YliopistoFinland

Personalised recommendations