Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Decomposition of aboveground and belowground organs of wild rice (Zizania latifolia): mass loss and nutrient changes

Article

Abstract

Decomposition of aboveground and belowground organs of the emergent macrophyte Z.latifolia was investigated using a litterbag technique for a period of 359 days in a freshwater marsh in Japan. Aboveground parts were classified into: leaves, sheaths and stems. Belowground parts were classified into: horizontal rhizomes (new rhizome, hard rhizome, soft rhizome) and vertical rhizome (stembase). The decay rate (k) was 0.0036 day−1, 0.0033 day−1 and 0.0021 day−1 for leaves, sheaths and stems, respectively. For belowground parts, the decay rate varied considerably from 0.0018 day−1 to 0.0079 day−1, according to differences in the initial chemical compositions of rhizomes. After 359 days of decay, new rhizomes lost 94% of their original dry mass, compared with a loss of 48–84% for the other rhizomes. There was a significant positive relationship between litter quality and decay rate for horizontal rhizomes. For the new rhizomes, which had an internal nitrogen content of 24.2 mg N g−1 dry mass, the mass loss was 40% higher than that of soft rhizomes, which had an internal N content of 9.8 mg N g−1 dry mass. Over the period of 359 days, the nitrogen concentration in all rhizome types decreased to levels lower than initial values, but the phosphorus concentration remained constant after an initial leaching loss. Most nitrogen and phosphorus were lost during the first 45 days of decay. Changes in carbon to nitrogen (C:N) and carbon to phosphorus (C:P) ratios basically followed inversed trends of the nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations.

Keywords

Decay rate Emergent macrophyte Litter quality Rhizome litter Wetland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted while N.K.L. was receiving a postgraduate scholarship from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture (Monbukagaku-sho), Japan. This study was financially supported by the Foundation of River and Watershed Management. We are grateful to Dr. Takeshi Fujino for his kind help in field experiments, and thank Dr. Ekram Azim and Dr. Nguyen Thi Hong Lien for helpful suggestions in improving this manuscript.

References

  1. Aerts R, Caluwe H de (1997) Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78: 244–260Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong J, Armstrong W, Beckett PM, Halder JE, Lythe S, Holt R, Sinclair A (1996) Pathways of aeration and the mechanisms and beneficial effects of humidity and venturi-induced convections in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud. Aquat Bot 54: 177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin AT, Vitousek PM (2000) Precipitation, decomposition and litter decomposability of metrosideros polymorpha in native forests on Hawai’i. J Ecol 88: 129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg B, Ekbohm M, McClaugherty JC, Rutigliano F, Virzo de Santo A (1996) Maximum decomposition limits of forest litter types: a synthesis. Can J Bot 74: 659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg B, Matzner E (1997) Effect of N deposition on decomposition of plant litter and soil organic matter in forest systems. Environ Rev 5: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brix H (1993) Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: system design, removal processes, and treatment performance. In: Moshiri GA (ed) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–21Google Scholar
  7. Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, Rowland AP (1994) Decomposition of the tree leaf litter grown under elevated CO2: effect of litter quality. Plant Soil 163: 121–130Google Scholar
  8. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Hasegawa K (1993) Analysis of Food. Baifukan Publisher, Tokyo, 179 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Cadish G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature. Plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  11. Hietz P (1992) Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex. Steud.) litter in lake Neusiedl, Austria. Aquat Bot 43: 211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jorgensen SE, Nielsen SN, Jorgensen LA (1991) Handbook of parameters and ecotoxicology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1263 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Larsen VJ, Schierup HH (1981) Macrophyte cycling of zinc, copper, lead and cadmium in the littoral zone of a polluted and non-polluted lake. II. Seasonal changes in heavy metal content of aboveground biomass and decomposing leaves of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Aquat Bot 11: 211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McKane RB, Rastetter EB, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Laundre JA, Chapin FS (1997) Climate effects on tundra carbon storage inferred from experimental data and a model. Ecology 78: 1170–1187Google Scholar
  15. Melillo JM, Naiman RJ, Aber JD, Linkins AE (1984) Factors controlling mass loss and nitrogen dynamics of plant litter decaying in northern streams. Bot Mar Sci 35: 341–356Google Scholar
  16. Murphy KL, Klopatek JM, Klopatek CC (1998) The effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition along an elevation gradient. Ecol Appl 8: 1061–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Okuda S. 1978. Plant sociological studies on the vegetation of the alluvial plains in the Kanto district, central Japan. Bull Inst Environ Sci Yokohama Nat Univ 4: 43–112Google Scholar
  18. Parnas H (1975) Model for decomposition of organic material by microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 7: 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Planter M (1970) Elution of mineral components out of dead reed Phragmites communis Trin. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 17:357–362Google Scholar
  20. Polunin NVC (1984) The decomposition of emerged macrophytes in fresh water. Adv Ecol Res 14: 115–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prescott CE (1995) Does nitrogen availability control rates of litter decomposition in forest? Plant Soil 168/169: 83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlesinger WH, Hasey MM (1981) Decomposition of chaparral shrub foliage: losses of organic and inorganic constituents from deciduous and evergreen leaves. Ecology 62: 762–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith VC, Bradford MA (2003) Litter quality impacts on grassland litter decomposition are differently dependent on soil fauna across time. Appl Soil Ecol 24: 197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Parsons WFJ (1989) Nitrogen and lignin contents as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70: 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tian G, Kang BT, Brussard L (1992) Effects of chemical composition on N, Ca and Mg release during incubation of leaves from selected agroforestry and fallow plant species. Biogeochemistry 16: 103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Valk AG, Rhymer JM, Murkin HR (1991) Flooding and decomposition of litter of four emergent plant species in a prairie wetland. Wetlands 11: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wieder RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63: 1636–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wild U, Kamp T, Lenz A, Heinz S, Pfadenhauer J (2001) Cultivation of Typha spp in constructed wetlands for peatland restoration. Ecol Eng 17: 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wrubleski DA, Murkin HR, Van der Valk AG, Nelson JW (1997) Decomposition of emergent macrophyte roots and rhizomes in a northern prairie marsh. Aquat Bot 58: 121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamasaki S (1984) Role of plant aeration in zonation of Zizania latifolia and Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 18: 287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zang Q, Zak JC (1995) Effects of gap size on litter decomposition and microbial activity in a subtropical forest. Ecology 76: 2196–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nguyen Kim Lan
    • 1
  • Takashi Asaeda
    • 1
  • Jagath Manatunge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Human Engineering, Laboratory of Engineering EcologySaitama UniversitySaitama-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations