Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 515–524 | Cite as

The efficacy of Scenedesmus morphology as a defense mechanism against grazing by selected species of rotifers and cladocerans

  • S.M. Mayeli
  • S. Nandini
  • S.S.S. Sarma

Abstract

Phytoplankton often develop various defense mechanisms in response to zooplankton grazing, such as spines and colonies. While it is now known that increased spine length and cells in a colony of members of the genus Scenedesmus, when zooplankton grazing is intense, helps in reducing zooplankton filtering rates, the effect of these defense mechanisms at the population level has been observed in few studies. Here we present data on the growth rates of four zooplankton species, Brachionus calyciflorus, B. patulus, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia pulex at two food levels using two species of colony-forming Scenedesmus spp.: S. acutus (cell length = 18.2 ± 0.4 µm; width = 4.2 ± 0.1 µm; average colony length = 90 µm; width: 21 µm) and S. quadricauda (cell length: 21 ± 0.5 width 7.5 ± 0.3 µm; average colony length: 84 µm; width: 30 µm). Whereas S. acutus had no spines, S. quadricauda had spines of 6–10 µm. Population growth experiments of the test rotifers and cladocerans were conducted in 100 ml containers with 50 ml of the medium with test algae. Algae concentrations used were: 13 and 52 mg dw l–1 of each of the two algal species offered in colonial forms. We used an initial inoculation zooplankter density of 1 ind. ml–1 for either of the rotifer species and 0.2 ind. ml–1 for either of the cladoceran species. In all, we had 64 test containers (4 test species of zooplankton × 2 test species of algae × 2 algal densities × 4 replicates). We found a significant effect of algal size on the growth rates of all the four tested species of zooplankton. The population growth rates of zooplankton ranged from −0.58 to 0.66 and were significantly higher on diet of S. acutus than of S. quadricauda. Thus, our study confirms that the larger colony size and the formation of spines in S. quadricauda were effective defenses against grazing by both rotifers and smaller sized cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia but that larger-bodied Daphnia pulex could exploit both the algal populations equally.

Algal defenses Cladocerans Population growth rates Rotifers Scenedesmus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous 1985. Methods of measuring the acute toxicity of ef-fluents to freshwater and marine organisms. US Environment Protection Agency EPA/600/4–85/013.Google Scholar
  2. Burns C.W. 1968. The relationship between filter feeding cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13: 675–678.Google Scholar
  3. Cyr H. and Pace M.L. 1993. Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 361: 148–150.Google Scholar
  4. Cyr H. and Curtis J.M. 1999. Zooplankton community size structure and taxonomic composition affects size selective grazing in natural communities. Oecologia 118: 306–315.Google Scholar
  5. DeMott W.R. 1985. Relations between filter mesh size, feeding mode and capture efficiency for cladocerans feeding on ultra-fine particles. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 21: 125–134.Google Scholar
  6. DeMott W.R. 1995. The influence of prey hardness on Daphnia's selectivity for large prey. Hydrobiologia 307: 127–138.Google Scholar
  7. DeMott W.R. and Moxter F. 1991. Foraging on cyanobacteria by copepods: Responses to chemical defenses and resource abundance. Ecology 72: 1820–1834.Google Scholar
  8. Dodoson S. and Frey D.G. 1991. Cladocera and other branchiopoda. In: J. H. Thorp and A. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, pp. 732–776.Google Scholar
  9. Fernando C.H., Paggi J.C. and Rajapksa R. 1987. Daphnia in tropical lowlands. Mem. Ist. Ital. Idrobiol. 45: 107–141.Google Scholar
  10. Gliwicz Z.M. 1990. Why do cladocerans fail to control algal blooms?. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 83–97.Google Scholar
  11. Hessen D.O. and van Donk E. 1993. Morphological changes in Scenedesmus induced by substances released from Daphnia. Arch. Hydrobiol. 127: 129–140.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchinson G.E. 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. Vol. 2. Introduction to the Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton. JohnWiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1115 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Iyer N. 1994. Responses of freshwater zooplankton to nutrient enrichment and cyanobacteria: Field observations, enclosure studies and laboratory experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Delhi, India, 234 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Kerfoot W.C. and Sih A. 1987. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. Univ. Press New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, 386 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Kobayashi T. 1991. Body lengths and maximum gut food particles sizes of dominant cladocerans and calanoid copepods in Wallerawang reservoir, New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 42: 399–408.Google Scholar
  16. Lampert W. 1987. Laboratory studies on zooplankton-cyanobacteria interactions. N.Z.J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 21: 483–490.Google Scholar
  17. Lampert W. and Sommer U. 1997. Limnoecology: The Ecology of Lakes and Streams. USAOxford University Press. New York, USA, 382 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Reinikainen M. and Repka S. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity in lifehistory traits and feeding appendages in two species of Daphnia fed a natural phytoplankton assemblage. Aquatic Ecol. 37: 409–405.Google Scholar
  19. Rothhaupt K.O. and von Elert E. 1994. Chemical induction of colony formation in a green alga (Scenedesmus acutus) by grazers (Daphnia). Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 1543–1550.Google Scholar
  20. Lürling M. and van Donk E. 1996. Zooplankton-induced unicell transformation in Scenedesmus acutus and its effect on growth of herbivore Daphnia. Oecologia 108: 432–437.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch M. 1980. Aphanizomenon blooms: Alternate control and cultivation by Daphnia pulex. Am. Soc. Limnol. Oceanogr. Spec. Symp. 3: 299–304.Google Scholar
  22. Mangas-Ramírez E., Sarma S.S.S. and Nandini S. 2001. Acute end chronic toxicity of ammonium chloride to the cladoceran Daphnia pulex Leydig in relation to algal food density. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 67: 834–840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nandini S. and Rao T.R. 1998. Somatic and population growth in selected cladoceran and rotifer species offered the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa as food. Aquatic Ecol. 31: 283–298.Google Scholar
  24. Nandini S. and Sarma S.S.S. 2000. Lifetable demography of four cladoceran species in relation to algal food (Chlorella vulgaris) density. Hydrobiologia 435: 117–126.Google Scholar
  25. Ooms-Wilms A. 1998. On the food uptake and population dynamics of rotifers in a shallow eutrophic lake. Ph.D thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  26. Ortega M.M. 1984. Catálogo de algas continentales recientes de México, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 566 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Pavón L.E., Sarma S.S.S. and Nandini S. 2001. Effect of different densities of live and dead Chlorella vulgaris on the population growth of rotifers Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus patulus (Rotifera). Rev. Biol. Trop. 49: 821–828.Google Scholar
  28. Porter K.G., Gerritsen J. and Orcutt J.D. Jr. 1982. The effect of food concentration on swimming patterns, feeding behaviour, ingestion, assimilation, and respiration by Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 935–949.Google Scholar
  29. Rothhaupt K.O. 1988. Mechanistic resource competition theory applied to laboratory experiments with zooplankton. Nature 333: 660–662.Google Scholar
  30. Ruttner-Kolisko A. 1974. Plankton rotifers. Die Binnengewasser Bd. 26: 1–146.Google Scholar
  31. Sarma S.S.S., Ramirez-Perez T., Nandini S. and Peñalosa-Castro I. 2001. Combined effects of food concentration and the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on the population dynamics of Brachionus patulus (Rotifera). Ecotoxicology 10: 91–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sarnelle O. 1993. Herbivore effects on phytoplankton succession in a eutrophic lake. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 129–149.Google Scholar
  33. Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 2000. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company. New York, USA, 883 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Sommer U. 1985. Comparison between steady state and non-steady state competition: experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30: 335.Google Scholar
  35. Sommer U. 1989. The role of competition for resources in phytoplankton succession. In: U. Sommer (ed.), Plankton Ecology: Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp. 57–106.Google Scholar
  36. Tavera R., Novelo E. and Comas A. 2000. Chlorococclean algae (s.l.) from the Ecological park of Xochimilco, Mexico. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 136:65–94.Google Scholar
  37. Trainor F.R. 1998. Biological aspects of Scenedesmus (Chlorophyceae) phenotypic plasticity. Nova Hedwigia Beih.117: 1–367Google Scholar
  38. van Donk E., Lürling M. and Lampert W. 1999. Consumer-induced changes in phytoplankton: Inducibility, costs, benefits and impacts on grazers, pp. 89–103. In Tollrian R. and Harvell C.D. (eds), The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton Univ., Press. 383 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Watanabe M.F., Park H.D. and Watanabe M. 1994. Composition of Microcystis species and heptapeptide toxins. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25: 2226–2229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.M. Mayeli
    • 1
  • S. Nandini
    • 1
  • S.S.S. Sarma
    • 2
  1. 1.UIICSE, Division of Research and Postgraduate StudiesNational Autonomous University of MexicoTlalnepantlaMexico
  2. 2.Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, Building UMF, Division of Research and Postgraduate StudiesNational Autonomous University of MexicoTlalnepantlaMexico

Personalised recommendations