Advertisement

Enhancing Counseling Gatekeeping with Performance Appraisal Protocols

  • Christine Suniti BhatEmail author
Article

Abstract

Academic and site supervisors of counselors-in-training perform the important function of serving as gatekeepers to the counseling profession. Their endorsement of a trainee implies that the trainee is capable of carrying out the role of a counselor in an ethical and effective manner, without endangering clients. Limited guidelines and training in the gatekeeping function pose a problem for supervisors. In the quest for improved gatekeeping processes, the counseling profession may achieve greater clarity and fairness by incorporating performance appraisal protocols from the business and management fields.

Key Words

gatekeeping counselor training counselor supervision counselor evaluation counselors-in-training 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Counseling Association. (1995). Code of ethics and standards of practice. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Association for Counselor Education and Supervision. (1993). Ethical guidelines for counselor educators and supervisors. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Baldo, T. D., Softas-Nall, B. C., & Shaw, S. F. (1997). Student review and retention in counselor education: An alternative to Frame and Stevens-Smith. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 245–253.Google Scholar
  4. Bemak, F., Epp, L. R., & Keys S. G. (1999). Impaired graduate students: A process model of graduate program monitoring and intervention. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 21, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision(2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP). (2001). Ethical Framework for Good Practice in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://www.bacp.co.uk/ethical_framework/
  7. Canadian Counselling Association. (2000). Code of ethics (3rd ed.). Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://www.ccacc.ca/coe.htm
  8. Carroll, M., & Right, C. (1997). Clinical supervision: Luxury or necessity? In I. Horton & V. Varma (Eds.), Needs of counsellors and psychotherapists (pp. 135–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, B. Z. (1987). The ethics of social work supervision revisited. Social Work, 32, 194–196.Google Scholar
  10. Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (1998). Issues and ethics in the helping professions(5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks /Cole.Google Scholar
  11. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (1994). CACREP accreditation standards and procedures manual. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Custer, G. (1994, November). Can universities be liable for incompetent grads? APA Monitor, 25(11), 7.Google Scholar
  13. Elman, N., Forrest, L., Vacha-Haase, T., & Gizara, S. (1999). A systems perspective on trainee impairment: Continuing the dialogue. Counseling Psychologist, 27(5), 712–721.Google Scholar
  14. Frame, M. W., & Stevens-Smith, P. (1995). Out of harm's way: Enhancing monitoring and dismissal processes in counselor education programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 118– 129.Google Scholar
  15. Forrest, L., Elman, N., Gizara, S., & Vacha-Haase, T. (1999). Trainee impairment: A review of identification, remediation, dismissal and legal issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(5), 627–686.Google Scholar
  16. Gautbatz, M. D., & Vera, E. M. (2002). Do formalized gatekeeping procedures increase programs' follow-up with deficient trainees? Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(4), 294–306.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, L. J., & Bradley, L. J. (2001). Evaluation in supervision. In L. J. Bradley & N. Ladany (Eds.), Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (3rd ed.), (pp. 271–303). New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grote, R. C. (1996). The complete guide to performance appraisal. New York: AMACOM.Google Scholar
  19. Grote, R. C. (2002). The performance appraisal question and answer book: A survival guide for managers. New York: AMACOM.Google Scholar
  20. Harris v. Blake and the Board of Trustees of the University of Northern Colorado. 798, F.2d 419 (CO 10, 1986).Google Scholar
  21. Kerl, S. B., Garcia, J. L., McCullough, C. S., & Maxwell, M. E. (2002). Systematic evaluation of professional performance: Legally supported procedure and process. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 321–332.Google Scholar
  22. Lamb, D., Presser, N., Pfost, K., Baum, M., Jackson, R., & Jarvis, P. (1987). Confronting professional impairment during the internship: Identification, due process, and remediation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamb, D. H., Cochran, D. J., & Jackson, V. R. (1991). Training and organizational issues associated with identifying and responding to intern impairment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22(4), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lumadue, C. A., & Duffey, T. H. (1999). The role of graduate programs as gatekeepers: A model for evaluating student counselor competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 101–109.Google Scholar
  25. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Pope, K. S., & Vasquez, M. J. T. (1998). Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: A practical guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Schoener, G. R. (1999). Practicing what we preach. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(5), 693–701.Google Scholar
  28. Sussman, M. B. (1992). A curious calling: Unconscious motivations for practicing psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  29. Vasquez, M. J. T. (1999). Trainee impairment: A response from a feminist/multicultural retired trainer. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(5), 687–692.Google Scholar
  30. Vacha-Haase, T., Davenport, D. S., & Kerewsky, S. D. (2004). Problematic students: Gatekeeping practices of academic professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wheeler, S. (1996). The limits of tolerance in assessing the competence of counselling trainees. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 18, 173–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, Administration, & CounselingCalifornia State UniversityLong Beach
  2. 2.EDPACCSULBLong Beach

Personalised recommendations