Advertisement

Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 1247–1260 | Cite as

Microstructure Characterization by X-Ray Computed Tomography of C/C-SiC Ceramic Composites Fabricated with Different Carbon Fiber Architectures

  • Fan Wan
  • Talha J. Pirzada
  • Rongjun Liu
  • Yanfei Wang
  • Changrui Zhang
  • Thomas James MarrowEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 1.5k Downloads

Abstract

The microstructure morphologies have been characterized by high resolution laboratory X-ray computed tomography in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Carbon and Silicon Carbide (C/C-SiC) ceramic composites fabricated by Gaseous Silicon Infiltration (GSI) from C/C preforms of three different architectures: 3D stitched cloth fabric; 3D orthogonal woven fabric; and needled short-cut felt. Each composites’ microstructure was influenced by the structure of the C/C preform. By incorporating tomography with gravimetric analysis, the 3D distribution of the SiC was visualized, showing a connected SiC network in the needled short-cut felt, and more heterogeneous SiC formation on the surfaces of the fiber bundles in the stitched and woven fabrics. The needled short-cut felt provided the largest contact surface for the GSI reaction and generated ~56% volume fraction of SiC, which is almost twice and three times that achieved in the stitched and woven fabrics respectively. Differences in the open and closed pore distributions were also measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry and tomography.

Keywords

Carbon fiber architecture C/C-SiC composite Microstructure characterization X-ray computed tomography Mercury intrusion porosimetry 

1 Introduction

Carbon fiber reinforced carbon and silicon carbide composites (C/C-SiC) have gained widespread attention in aerospace structural systems [1] and advanced friction systems [2] due to their superior mechanical properties under normal and high temperatures [3, 4, 5], oxidation and ablation resistance [6, 7], and good friction and wear characteristics [8, 9]. Developments in these applications will place higher requirements on these materials, and there is a need to find effective ways to improve their properties. A universally recognized method to optimize material properties is through the control of microstructure [10, 11, 12]. However, C/C-SiC composites have complex three-dimensional spatially distributed structures that contain varying fractions of residual C, formed SiC, residual Si and porosity, which depend on the original carbon fiber architectures and fabrication conditions. Conventional two-dimensional imaging techniques such as optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can only provide very limited information of the 3D phase structure, and porosity characterization methods such as density measurement by the Archimedes principle (AP) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) cannot detect the closed pore structure.

X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is a relatively novel method for 3D microstructure characterization of bulk materials, using synchrotron or laboratory X-ray microscopes. Compared with conventional 2D characterization methods, XCT can provide accurate and high resolution 3D observations of the microstructure, while avoiding the possible introduction of manual damage during the sample preparation process. Consequently, XCT as an advanced non-destructive technique has been applied to a wide range of materials, including wood [13], concrete [14], gypsum [15], graphite [16, 17] and polymer composites [18]. Various ceramic matrix composites [19, 20, 21, 22, 23] have also been investigated, but only a few studies have examined C/C-SiC composites [24, 25, 26, 27].

In this work C/C-SiC composites that have been fabricated from different C/C preforms, which represent three typical carbon fiber architectures. These are a 3D stitched cloth fabric, a 3D orthogonal woven fabric and a needled short-cut felt, and the composites were fabricated from these preforms by the gaseous silicon infiltration (GSI) method. The microstructure morphologies of the C/C preforms and C/C-SiC composites have been visualized by high resolution laboratory XCT, and together with more conventional characterization by gravimetric analysis and mercury intrusion, their differences of material composition and porosity are considered. These observations are intended to provide useful references in material design and processing. The data may also be the platform for image-based modelling, which can be validated by in situ XCT observations that explore the relationship between microstructure and material performance [23, 28].

2 Materials and Characterization Methods

The three C/C preforms with different architectures of carbon fiber (T-300, fiber density 1.76 g/cm3 [29]) were: ① 3D stitched cloth fabric; ② 3D orthogonal woven fabric; and ③ needled short-cut felt. By their design, these preforms have fiber volume fractions between 50% to 65% (Table 1). The preforms were used as the reinforcement for C/C-SiC composites. The stitched and woven fabrics were first infiltrated by pyrolytic carbon (PyC) for 80 h through chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) [30] to achieve final densities of 1.21 g/cm3 and 1.35 g/cm3 respectively. The needled short-cut felt was infiltrated by CVI for 60 h to a density of 1.10 g/cm3. The C/C-SiC composites were prepared from the three preforms by gaseous silicon infiltration (GSI) [31] at 1700 °C for 2 h, and achieved final densities in composites ①, ② and ③ of 2.37 g/cm3, 2.16 g/cm3 and 2.61 g/cm3 respectively (Table 2).
Table 1

Densities and fiber contents of the C/C preform architectures. Average values ± sample standard deviation (n = 3). Preform densities measured by Archimedes principle (AP). Carbon content measured by segmentation of X-ray computed tomographs (XCT). Theoretical densities calculated using T-300 carbon fiber density of 1.76 g cm−3 [29]

Architecture

Before CVI

After CVI

Fiber volume fraction (%)

Theoretical Density (g cm−3)

Measured density (AP) (g cm−3)

Carbon content (XCT) (Vol.%)

Theoretical Density (XCT) (g cm−3)

3D stitched cloth fabric: ①

55

0.97

1.21 ± 0.05

69.7

1.23

3D orthogonal woven fabric: ②

65

1.15

1.35 ± 0.08

76.8

1.35

Needled short-cut felt: ③

50

0.88

1.10 ± 0.04

63.0

1.11

Table 2

Densities and phase contents of the C/C-SiC composites (GA: gravimetric analysis; XCT: X-ray computed tomography; AP: Archimedes Principle; MIP: Mercury intrusion porosity). Average values ± sample standard deviation (n = 3) for GA data

Architecture

C/C-SiC density

(g cm−3)

Carbon (Vol.%)

Silicon Carbide (Vol.%)

Silicon (Vol.%)

Porosity (Vol.%)

GA

XCT

GA

XCT

GA

XCT

GA

Closed pores (matrix) (XCT)

Open pores (MIP)

3D stitched cloth fabric: ①

2.37 ± 0.07

37.1 ± 1.17

41.0

29.6 ± 0.36

29.1

30.8 ± 1.14

29.9

2.50 ± 0.32

0.01

2.0

3D orthogonal woven fabric: ②

2.16 ± 0.06

54.1 ± 0.38

56.9

16.7 ± 0.63

19.0

25.8 ± 0.78

24.1

3.40 ± 0.31

0.02

2.8

Needled short-cut felt: ③

2.61 ± 0.03

21.5 ± 2.41

20.3

55.9 ± 1.82

56.4

20.5 ± 0.93

23.3

2.10 ± 0.17

0.21

0.8

The densities of the preforms and composites were measured in kerosene by the standard Archimedes principle:
$$ \rho =\frac{m_1}{m_3-{m}_2}\ {\rho}_k $$
(1)
where ρ is the density of the tested sample, ρk=0.8 g/cm3 is the density of kerosene at room temperature, m1 is the dry weight of sample, m2 is the submerged weight of the sample after full impregnation in kerosene and m3 is the wet weight of sample on removal from kerosene after full impregnation, with the liquid on sample surface wiped off. The materials were fabricated at the Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Ceramic Fibers and Composites at the National University of Defense Technology (China). The fabricated materials were plates, 50 mm × 50 mm in length and width, with thicknesses of 7 mm, 5.5 mm and 6 mm respectively for C/C-SiC composites ①, ② and ③.
The open porosity of the composites was measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry, using an AutoPore IV9510 Hg-porosimeter (Micromeritics) at Nanjing Forestry University. The tested coupons had dimensions of 3.8 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm, 4.6 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm and 7 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm, and weights of 0.36 g, 0.40 g and 0.73 g, for architectures ①, ② and ③ respectively. Gravimetric analysis (GA) [32] was applied to measure the phase contents of the composites using samples with dimensions of 2 mm × 4 mm × 10 mm. The volume fractions of Si (VSi%), C (VC%) and SiC (VSiC%) were calculated as:
$$ {V}_{Si}\%=\frac{\left({M}_1-{M}_2\right){\rho}_{C/C- SiC}}{M_1{\rho}_{Si}}\times 100\% $$
(2)
$$ {V}_C\%=\frac{\left({M}_2-{M}_3\right){\rho}_{C/C- SiC}}{M_1{\rho}_C}\times 100\% $$
(3)
$$ {V}_{SiC}\%=\frac{M_3{\rho}_{C/C- SiC}}{M_1{\rho}_{SiC}}\times 100\% $$
(4)
where: M1 is the initial dry weight of the sample; M2 is its dry weight after immersion in a mixture of nitric and hydrofluoric acids (HNO3:HF = 4:1) at 40 °C for 48 h to dissolve residual silicon; M3 is the dry weight after then heating in a muffle furnace at 800 °C for 6 h to oxidise the carbon. The initial measured density of the composite is ρC/C − SiC, and the theoretical densities of β−SiC (ρSiC) and Si (ρSi) are 3.20 g/cm3 and 2.33 g/cm3 respectively. The carbon density (assumed for both fibers and PyC), ρC, is 1.76 g/cm3 [29]. The total porosity (P) of the tested sample, obtained by gravimetric analysis is:
$$ P=1-{V}_{Si}\%-{V}_C\%-{V}_{Si C}\% $$
(5)

Samples of the C/C preforms and the C/C-SiC composites, cut by wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM), were examined by X-ray tomography. This was done using an Xradia Versa 510 X-ray microscope at Oxford University (Department of Materials), operated at 80 keV energy and 7 W power with 1600 radiographic projections obtained over a 360° rotation at an exposure time of 2 s per projection. The voxel dimension in the reconstructed tomographs was 7 μm, with a visualized volume that was a cylinder of 1012 voxel height and 980 voxel radius (i.e. ~ 7 mm). The microscope software was used for the sample reconstruction, with visualization by the Avizo 9.3.0 software.

3 Results

3.1 C/C Preform Microstructures

Tomograph slices of the C/C preforms (x-y and y-z planes) are presented in Fig. 1. The architecture of preform ① (Fig. 1a) shows the cross-woven horizontal fiber bundles (0o and 90o) have a significant irregularity in their array, and the locking stitch sutures (z-direction fiber bundle) are surrounded by large pores. Preform ② (Fig. 1b) has an architecture of regularly arranged 0°/90° fiber bundles in the x-y plane, separated by regularly arranged pores connected via small throats that surround the interpenetrating (z-direction) fiber bundles. Some structural defects can be observed, such as a missing horizontal fiber bundle that is labelled as Point A in Fig. 1b (i). The preform of architecture ③ has a typical felt structure with relatively uniform distributions of fibers and pores. 3D reconstructions of C/C preforms and their porosity, labeled by simple threshold segmentation (Hounsfield greyscale level), are shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1

Tomography slices of the C/C preforms: (a) 3D stitched cloth fabric, architecture ①; (b) 3D orthogonal woven fabric, architecture ②; (c) needled short-cut felt, architecture ③. Example vertical slice presented in (i) and horizontal slice with a zoomed inset in (ii). The image resolution is 7 μm per voxel. A weave defect is identified by “A”

Fig. 2

3D visualizations of C/C preforms by threshold segmentation of tomographs: (a) 3D stitched cloth fabric, architecture ①; (b) 3D orthogonal woven fabric, architecture ②; (c) needled short-cut felt, architecture ③. The carbon is shown in (i), and the porosity in (ii) (cropped by 0.7 mm at top and bottom to show internal structure). In (iii), a central subsection of the porosity (0.42 mm thickness) is shown

The porosity in architectures ① and ② is quite heterogeneously distributed while the porosity of architecture ③ appears more homogeneous. The proportion of the volume that is occupied by carbon in the XCT images of the preforms (measured by segmentation) has been used to calculate the theoretical density, assuming the density of T-300 carbon fiber (1.76 g cm−3) [29] is representative of both fibers and the CVI-deposited PyC. The results are quite consistent with the densities measured by the Archimedes principle (Table 1), which supports the reliability of the image segmentation of the carbon preforms. The theoretical densities predicted from the designed fiber content of the three architectures (i.e. between 50% to 65% by volume) are also summarized in Table 1 to illustrate the density increase that is due to the CVI-deposited PyC.

3.2 C/C-SiC Composite Microstructures

Regions of the 3D volume reconstructions of the C/C-SiC composites are shown in Fig. 3. These have been cropped to display the central region of each sample. Due to differences in electron density that determine the X-ray attenuation of each phase, the SiC/Si matrix has the brightest intensity and appears light compared to the darker grey carbon, in which the empty porosity and cracks appear darkest. Enlargements of parts of the tomograph sections, parallel to the y-z plane, are presented in Fig. 4a (i), Fig. 4b (i) and Fig. 4c (i). The regions between the C fiber bundles are almost completely filled by the matrix, and very few cracks and pores are observed. A small number of spherical closed pores (e.g. Figure 4b (i) and Fig. 4c (i)) are observed in the matrix of all the composites. In architecture ① and ②, interfacial, intra-bundle and matrix cracks can be observed (Fig. 4a (i) and Fig. 4b (i)). Similar cracks have been observed in braided and needled C/C-SiC composites [26, 27], and occur on cooling from the high temperature of the GSI process because of the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficient between the anisotropic arrangement of carbon fiber bundles and matrix. No such cracks are visible in architecture ③, which has a more isotropic fiber distribution.
Fig. 3

3D visualizations of the C/C-SiC composites, presented as orthogonal slices of the tomography data: (a) 3D stitched cloth fabric, architecture ①; (b) 3D orthogonal woven fabric, architecture ②; (c) needled short-cut felt, architecture ③

Fig. 4

Zoomed images from tomograph slices (7 μm/voxel) of C/C-SiC composites to show the effects of acid dissolution to remove Si: (a) 3D stitched cloth fabric, architecture ①; (b) 3D orthogonal woven fabric, architecture ②; (c) needled short-cut felt, architecture ③. Typical microstructures (i) before acid dissolution and (ii) after acid dissolution, to indicate intra-bundle, matrix and interfacial cracks, and closed porosity

Images of the composites that were tomographed after the first step of the gravimetric analysis (i.e. acid dissolution) are shown in Fig. 4a (ii), Fig. 4b (ii) and Fig. 4c (ii). The residual Si has been dissolved, and the distribution of SiC with respect to the carbon preform can now be readily distinguished. The strong X-ray attenuation contrast difference between SiC and C has introduced some tomograph reconstruction artefacts in Fig. 4b (ii), which are visible as horizontal dark streaks (in the x-y plane) across the vertical z-direction fiber bundles. In both architectures ① and ②, the SiC tends to be distributed at the surface of the fiber bundles, but there is also some penetration of SiC into the fiber bundles. The penetration of SiC into the fiber bundles is particularly obvious in the z-direction bundles, which suggests they may be less compacted than the x-y bundles. Architecture ③ presents the largest amount of SiC after the acid dissolution, compared with the other architectures.

Simple threshold segmentation (Hounsfield greyscale level) was used to label the different phases; C; SiC and porosity, the latter being representative of the Si that was dissolved by the acid immersion, and these are visualized in Fig. 5. The volume fractions of each segmented phase are in good agreement with the measurements by gravimetric analysis (Table 2). Architecture ③ contains the most SiC, with a content that is almost twice architecture ② and three times architecture ①. Correspondingly, architecture ③ has retained the least carbon concentration. All microstructures contain a similar fraction of residual silicon (23% to 30%).
Fig. 5

3D visualizations of C/C-SiC composites, by threshold segmentation of tomographs obtained after acid dissolution to remove Si: (a) 3D stitched cloth fabric, architecture ①; (b) 3D orthogonal woven fabric, architecture ②; (c) needled short-cut felt, architecture ③. The labeled volumes are (i) carbon, (ii) SiC, and (iii) porosity (representing dissolved Si)

3.3 Porosity Analysis

The total porosities, measured by the gravimetric analysis, are close to 2% to 3% in the three composites (Table 2). MIP measures only the open porosity, and this was greatest in architecture ② (~3%), intermediate in architecture ① (2%), and lowest in architecture ③ (~1%) (Table 2). The open pore size distributions are summarized in Fig. 6a (i), which shows the majority of the open pore volume comprises large pores that are greater than several hundred μm in diameter. Below this size, there is a similar pore size range in all three architectures. The lower porosity measured by MIP in architecture ③ is due to the smaller number of open pores.
Fig. 6

Analysis of porosity: (a) pore size distributions for (i) open pores detected from MIP and (ii) closed pores observed in matrix by XCT; (b) 3D visualizations of the closed pores in architecture ① (3D stitched cloth fabric), architecture ② (3D orthogonal woven fabric) and architecture ③ (needled short-cut felt)

Tomography can visualize both open and closed pores, and image segmentation has been used to identify and label the closed pores that were located in the matrix. The distributions of observed closed pores are summarized in Fig. 6a (ii), and visualized in Fig. 6b. The distribution of closed porosity across the pore size range is similar in all three architectures, but the total volume is significantly greater in architecture ③ due to a larger number of pores. Together, the open and closed porosities observed in architectures ① and ② are quite comparable to the total porosity that was measured by the gravimetric analysis. However, although architecture ③ has a significantly greater volume of observed closed porosity than architectures ① and ②, it is only approximately 0.2% of the total pore volume that was measured by gravimetric analysis. This indicates that a substantial fraction of closed porosity exists in architecture ③ that is too small to be visualized by XCT at 6 μm/voxel resolution (i.e. <100 μm3).

4 Discussion

The objective of this analysis was to demonstrate the potential of XCT for microstructural characterization in C/C-SiC composites. Conventional ceramographic sample preparation for surface examination risks introducing mechanical damage, and also cannot provide three-dimensional information without the use of serial sectioning. Non-destructive XCT allows the observed defects in the microstructure (e.g. Figure 1) to be more reliably attributed to the materials processing. C/C-SiC composites fabricated by silicon infiltration methods will contain a certain amount of residual Si [8], but this can be difficult to distinguish from SiC in a ceramographic analysis unless backscatter electron microscopy is used [33]. By incorporating non-destructive XCT observations into the gravimetric analysis process, in order to obtain tomographs before and after acid dissolution of silicon, the distribution of SiC that develops within and on the surfaces of the carbon preform (Fig. 4) can be visualized in 3D (Fig. 5).

C/C-SiC composites fabricated from different carbon fiber architectures present large differences in density and phase content (Table 2). To obtain best mechanical performance, a spatially continuous and uniform structure of the high strength SiC matrix is required. For architectures ① and ②, Fig. 5 shows that the SiC structures are almost continuous, but is not uniform. Architecture ③ achieved the largest density and produced the most SiC with a more uniform distribution at the macroscale. This is due to its porous felt structure, which provides the largest contact surface for reaction. This is confirmed in Fig. 4c (ii), which shows the residual SiC in architecture ③ after acid dissolution to remove the Si; it can be seen that the SiC tends to form on the surface of the carbon regions, with some penetration between the fiber bundles. Architecture ① and ② have large fiber bundles with relative flat surfaces, on which surface layers of SiC develop that may prevent further reaction from occurring, apart from some limited penetration into the intra-bundle defects within the fiber bundles. This is quite apparent in Fig. 4a (ii) and Fig. 4b (ii).

The level of residual Si in these composites is high (Table 2). Ideally, there should be complete conversion of Si to SiC, and the failure to achieve this is attributed to an insufficient reaction with the carbon preform. From comparison of the initial carbon volume fractions (Table 1) with the carbon content in the composite (Table 2), it can be seen that ~18%, ~11% and ~28% of the carbon reacted to form SiC in architectures ①, ② and ③, respectively. The CVI PyC is critical to form a continuous SiC structure and to prevent the carbon fiber preform from being eroded, especially for the z-direction fiber bundles. However, prolonged infiltration by CVI may close the small pore throats that are located at the junctions of the fiber bundles and are the connecting passages of the large pores, such as those in architecture ② (Fig. 2). This will prevent further infiltration to develop PyC and will produce closed voids [34], and it will also affect the penetration of Si during the GSI process. Alternative methods, such as Precursor Impregnation and Pyrolysis (PIP), which can produce a more porous carbon matrix [35, 36] may accordingly be more suitable for architecture ① and ② to improve their SiC content.

The architecture of carbon fiber preforms also has a strong impact on the pore distributions of C/C-SiC composites. The total porosity is low, and the significant difference (Table 2) between the total porosity measured by GA and that detected by XCT (closed pore) and MIP (open pore) is because the closed porosity comprises very small pores in the matrix and also within the fiber bundles that are below the resolution limit of the tomography. The closed pores located in the matrix (Fig. 4) are not significant to the material performance. However, intra-bundle pores that are in the carbon preform, which may be closed or open, can be detrimental to material performance. Closed intra-bundle pores can initiate cracks under mechanical loading [25], while open intra-bundle pores, which may be continuous, will act as a transport path for oxidation and may offset the beneficial effects of SiC to ablation resistance [37]. The microstructure characteristics and the proportion and distribution of open pores in architecture ③ indicate that it would be expected to have better oxidation-resistance than architectures ① and ②.

5 Conclusions

X-ray computed tomography (XCT) has been used to observe the microstructure morphologies of three types of C/C preforms and the C/C-SiC composites fabricated from them by Gaseous Silicon Infiltration (GSI). The preform architectures are observed to strongly influence the material composition and phase distribution. In particular the spatial connection of SiC is affected by the amount of free surface of carbon, and the amount of conversion of carbon to SiC by Si is affected by the CVI penetration into the preform to form PyC. The information obtained by 3D characterization of microstructure by XCT provides insights into the likely mechanical and oxidation properties of the composite.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge EPSRC Grant EP/M02833X/1 “University of Oxford: experimental equipment upgrade” that supported the Xradia Versa 510 microscope and facilities for data analysis and visualization. The research is part of the Project 2018JJ1029 supported by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China. The research data supporting this publication can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  1. 1.
    Patel, M., Saurabh, K., Prasad, V.B., Subrahmanyam, J.: High temperature C/C-SiC composite by liquid silicon infiltration: a literature review. Bull. Mater. Sci. 35, 67–77 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-011-0247-5 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krenkel, W., Berndt, F.: C/C-SiC composites for space applications and advanced friction systems. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 412, 177–181 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, T., Yu, X., Liu, H., Yang, H., Li, Y.: Tensile behavior of C/SiC composites plate after hypervelocity penetration: residual strength and fracture mechanism. Compos. Struct. 189, 378–385 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Z., Fang, G., Xie, J., Liang, J.: Experimental study of high-temperature tensile mechanical properties of 3D needled C/C-SiC composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 654, 271–277 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, C.P., Zhang, L., Wang, B., Huang, T., Jiao, G.Q.: Tensile behavior of 2D-C/SiC composites at elevated temperatures: experiment and modeling. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 37, 1281–1290 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong, Z.J., Liu, S.X., Li, X.K., Westwood, A., Yuan, G.M., Cui, Z.W., Cong, Y.: Influence of infiltration temperature on the microstructure and oxidation behavior of SiC-ZrC ceramic coating on C/C composites prepared by reactive melt infiltration. Ceram. Int. 41, 797–811 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui, Y., Li, A., Li, B., Ma, X., Bai, R., Zhang, W., Ren, M., Sun, J.: Microstructure and ablation mechanism of C/C-SiC composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 171–177 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou, X., Zhu, D., Xie, Q., Luo, F., Zhou, W.: Friction and wear properties of C/C-SiC braking composites. Ceram. Int. 38, 2467–2473 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qian, Y., Zhang, W., Ge, M., Wei, X.: Frictional response of a novel C/C-ZrB2-ZrC-SiC composite under simulated braking. J. Adv. Ceram. 2, 157–161 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-013-0055-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nie, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, L., Yin, X., Cheng, L., Ma, J.: Effect of stitch spacing on mechanical properties of carbon / silicon carbide composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2425–2432 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.012
  11. 11.
    Zhang, Y., Xiao, Z., Wang, J., Yang, J., Jin, Z.: Effect of pyrocarbon content in C/C preforms on microstructure and mechanical properties of the C/C-SiC composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 502, 64–69 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, H., Zhu, D., Wan, F., Zhou, W., Luo, F.: Influence of the C/C preform density on tribological characteristics of C/C-SiC composites under different conditions. Ceram. Int. 40, 16641–16646 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forsberg, F., Sjo, M., Mooser, R., Hack, E., Wyss, P.: Full three-dimensional strain measurements on wood exposed to three-point bending: analysis by use of digital volume correlation applied to synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography image data. Strain. 46, 47–60 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2009.00687.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, Z., Ren, W., Sharma, R., McDonald, S., Mostafavi, M., Vertyagina, Y., Marrow, T.J.: In-situ X-ray computed tomography characterisation of 3D fracture evolution and image-based numerical homogenisation of concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 75, 74–83 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kong, L., Ostadhassan, M., Li, C., Tamimi, N.: Pore characterization of 3D-printed gypsum rocks: a comprehensive approach. J. Mater. Sci. 53, 5063–5078 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1953-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marrow, T.J., Liu, D., Barhli, S.M., Saucedo Mora, L., Vertyagina, Y., Collins, D.M., Reinhard, C., Kabra, S., Flewitt, P.E.J., Smith, D.J.: In situ measurement of the strains within a mechanically loaded polygranular graphite. Carbon. 96, 285–302 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barhli, S.M., Saucedo-Mora, L., Jordan, M.S.L., Cinar, A.F., Reinhard, C., Mostafavi, M., Marrow, T.J.: Synchrotron X-ray characterization of crack strain fields in polygranular graphite. Carbon. 124, 357–371 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shen, H., Nutt, S., Hull, D.: Direct observation and measurement of fiber architecture in short fiber-polymer composite foam through micro-CT imaging. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 2113–2120 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.003
  19. 19.
    Chateau, C., Gélébart, L., Bornert, M., Crépin, J., Boller, E., Sauder, C., Ludwig, W.: In situ X-ray microtomography characterization of damage in SiC f / SiC minicomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 71, 916–924 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bale, H.A., Haboub, A., Macdowell, A.A., Nasiatka, J.R., Parkinson, D.Y., Cox, B.N., Marshall, D.B., Ritchie, R.O.: Real-time quantitative imaging of failure events in materials under load at temperatures above 1,600°C. Nat. Mater. 12, 40–46 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Melenka, G.W., Lepp, E., Cheung, B.K.O., Carey, J.P.: Micro-computed tomography analysis of tubular braided composites. Compos. Struct. 131, 384–396 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zou, C., Marrow, T.J., Reinhard, C., Li, B., Zhang, C., Wang, S.: Porosity characterization of fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composite using synchrotron X-ray computed tomography. J. Instrum. 11, C03052 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saucedo-Mora, L., Zou, C., Lowe, T., Marrow, T.J.: Three-dimensional measurement and cohesive element modelling of deformation and damage in a 2.5-dimensional woven ceramic matrix composite. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 40, 683–695 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hausherr, J.M., Krenkel, W.: Nondestructive characterization of high-performance C / SiC-ceramics using X-ray-computed tomography. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 7, 361–368 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02449.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wan, F., Zhao, S., Liu, R., Zhang, C., Marrow, T.J.: In situ observation of compression damage in a three-dimensional braided carbon Fiber reinforced carbon and silicon carbide (C/C-SiC) ceramic composite. Microsc. Microanal. 24, 227–237 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927618000351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wan, F., Liu, R., Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Zhang, C., James, T.: In situ observation of compression damage in a 3D needled-punched carbon fiber-silicon carbide ceramic matrix composite. Compos. Struct. 210, 189–201 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wan, F., Liu, R., Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Zhang, C., James, T.: Damage development during flexural loading of a 5-directional braided C / C- SiC composite , characterized by X-ray tomography and digital volume correlation. Ceram. Int. 45, 5601–5612 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saucedo-Mora, L., Marrow, T.J.: Multi-scale damage modelling in a ceramic matrix composite using a finite-element microstructure meshfree methodology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 20150276 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu, S., Zhang, L., Yin, X., Cheng, L., Liu, Y.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of SiC and carbon hybrid Fiber reinforced SiC matrix composite. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 8, 308–316 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02588.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yan, C., Liu, R., Zhang, C., Cao, Y.: Effect of PyC interphase thickness on mechanical and ablation properties of 3D C f / ZrC – SiC composite. Ceram. Int. 42, 12756–12762 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang, L., Liu, R.J., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Cao, Y.: Si/SiC optical coatings for C/SiC composites via gel-casting and gas silicon infiltration: effects of carbon black content. J. Alloys Compd. 711, 162–168 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nie, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, S., Xu, F., Cheng, L., Ma, J., Yin, X.: Microstructure, thermophysical, and ablative performances of a 3D needled C/C-SiC composite. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 7, 197–206 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02341.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schulte-Fischedick, J., Zern, A., Mayer, J., Rühle, M., Frieß, M., Krenkel, W., Kochendörfer, R.: The morphology of silicon carbide in C/C-SiC composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 332, 146–152 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01719-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Granda, M., Patrick, J.W., Walker, A., Casal, E., Bermejo, J., Menendez, R.: Densification of unidirectional C/C composites by melted pitch impregnation. Carbon. 36, 943–952 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fitzer, E., Hüttner, W., Manocha, L.M.: Influence of process parameters on the mechanical properties of carbon_carbon-composites with pitch as matrix precursor. Carbon. 18, 291–295 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kanno, K., Fernandez, J.J., Fortin, F., Korai, Y., Mochida, I.: Modifications to carbonization of mesophase pitch by addition of carbon blacks. Carbon. 35, 1627–1637 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu, L., Li, H., Hao, K., Shi, X., Li, K., Ni, C.: Effect of SiC location on the ablation of C/C-SiC composites in two heat fluxes. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 345–354 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2014.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Aerospace Science and EngineeringNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.Department of MaterialsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations