Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 555–581 | Cite as

Modeling the Effect of Multiple Matrix Cracking Modes on Cyclic Hysteresis Loops of 2D Woven Ceramic-Matrix Composites

Article
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of multiple matrix cracking modes on cyclic loading/unloading hysteresis loops of 2D woven ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) has been investigated. The interface slip between fibers and the matrix existed in matrix cracking mode 3 and mode 5, in which matrix cracking and interface debonding occurred in longitudinal yarns, are considered as the major reason for hysteresis loops of 2D woven CMCs. The effects of fiber volume content, peak stress, matrix crack spacing, interface properties, matrix cracking mode proportion and interface wear on interface slip and hysteresis loops have been analyzed. The cyclic loading/unloading hysteresis loops of 2D woven SiC/SiC composite corresponding to different peak stresses have been predicted using the present analysis. It was found that the damage parameter, i.e., the proportion of matrix cracking mode 3 in the entire cracking modes of the composite, increases with increasing peak stress.

Keywords

Ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) Woven Hysteresis loops Matrix cracking Interface debonding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province for the funding that made this research study possible

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This study has received the support from the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province through the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20140813), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. NS2016070).

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Naslain, R.: Design, preparation and properties of non-oxide CMCs for application in engines and nuclear reactors: an overview. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 155–170 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bednarcyk, B.A., Mital, S.K., Pineda, E.J., Arnold, S.M.: Multiscale modeling of ceramic matrix composites. 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dynam. Mat. Conf. 5–9 January 2015, Kissimmee, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gowayed, Y., Ojard, G., Santhosh, U., Jefferso, G.: Modeling of crack density in ceramic matrix composites. J. Compos. Mater. 49, 2285–94 (2015). doi: 10.1177/0021998314545188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reynaud, P.: Cyclic fatigue of ceramic-matrix composites at ambient and elevated temperatures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56, 809–814 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00025-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fantozzi, G., Reynaud, P.: Mechanical hysteresis in ceramic matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 521–522, 18–23 (2009). doi: 10.1016/jmsea.2008.09.128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kotil, T., Holmes, J.W., Comninou, M.: Origin of hysteresis observed during fatigue of ceramic matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1879–1883 (1990). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05239.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pryce, A.W., Smith, P.A.: Matrix cracking in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites under quasi-static and cyclic loading. Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1269–1281 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90178-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahn, B.K., Curtin, W.A.: Strain and hysteresis by stochastic matrix cracking in ceramic matrix composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45, 177–209 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00081-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Solti, J.P., Mall, S., Robertson, D.D.: Modeling damage in unidirectional ceramic-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 54, 55–66 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00041-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vagaggini, E., Domergue, J.M., Evans, A.G.: Relationships between hysteresis measurements and the constituent properties of ceramic matrix composites: I, theory. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2709–2720 (1995). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08046.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hutchison, J.W., Jensen, H.M.: Models of fiber debonding and pullout in brittle composites with friction. Mech. Mater. 9, 139–163 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0167-6636(90)90037-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, C.D., Holmes, J.W., Barber, J.R.: Estimation of interfacial shear in ceramic composites from frictional heating measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2802–808 (1991). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06846.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Z.G.: Influence of interface de-bonding on the fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. Chin. J. Solid Mech. 30, 8–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Z.G.: Effect of fiber Poisson contraction on fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. J. Nanjing Uni. Aero. Astron. 41, 181–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, L.B., Song, Y.D.: Influnece of fiber failure on fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 30, 12–25 (2011). doi: 10.1177/0731684410386273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, L.B.: Modeling the effect of interface wear on fatigue hysteresis behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. Online (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10443-015-9442-7 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Y.C.: Estimate interface shear stress of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic matrix composites from hysteresis loops. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20, 693–707 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10443-012-9297-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuo, W.S., Chou, T.W.: Multiple cracking of unidirectional and cross-ply ceramic matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 745–755 (1995). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08242.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lamon, J.: A micromechanics-based approach to the mechanical behavior of brittle-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 2259–2272 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00120-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, P., Wang, B., Zhen, W.Q., Jiao, G.Q.: Tensile loading/unloading stress–strain behavior of 2D-SiC/SiC composites. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 31, 676–68 (2014). doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2014.03.020 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil AviationNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations