Modeling the Effect of Multiple Matrix Cracking Modes on Cyclic Hysteresis Loops of 2D Woven Ceramic-Matrix Composites
- 126 Downloads
Abstract
In this paper, the effect of multiple matrix cracking modes on cyclic loading/unloading hysteresis loops of 2D woven ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) has been investigated. The interface slip between fibers and the matrix existed in matrix cracking mode 3 and mode 5, in which matrix cracking and interface debonding occurred in longitudinal yarns, are considered as the major reason for hysteresis loops of 2D woven CMCs. The effects of fiber volume content, peak stress, matrix crack spacing, interface properties, matrix cracking mode proportion and interface wear on interface slip and hysteresis loops have been analyzed. The cyclic loading/unloading hysteresis loops of 2D woven SiC/SiC composite corresponding to different peak stresses have been predicted using the present analysis. It was found that the damage parameter, i.e., the proportion of matrix cracking mode 3 in the entire cracking modes of the composite, increases with increasing peak stress.
Keywords
Ceramic-matrix composites (CMCs) Woven Hysteresis loops Matrix cracking Interface debondingNotes
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province for the funding that made this research study possible
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Funding
This study has received the support from the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province through the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20140813), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. NS2016070).
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Naslain, R.: Design, preparation and properties of non-oxide CMCs for application in engines and nuclear reactors: an overview. Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 155–170 (2004). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bednarcyk, B.A., Mital, S.K., Pineda, E.J., Arnold, S.M.: Multiscale modeling of ceramic matrix composites. 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dynam. Mat. Conf. 5–9 January 2015, Kissimmee, FloridaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gowayed, Y., Ojard, G., Santhosh, U., Jefferso, G.: Modeling of crack density in ceramic matrix composites. J. Compos. Mater. 49, 2285–94 (2015). doi: 10.1177/0021998314545188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Reynaud, P.: Cyclic fatigue of ceramic-matrix composites at ambient and elevated temperatures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56, 809–814 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00025-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Fantozzi, G., Reynaud, P.: Mechanical hysteresis in ceramic matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. 521–522, 18–23 (2009). doi: 10.1016/jmsea.2008.09.128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kotil, T., Holmes, J.W., Comninou, M.: Origin of hysteresis observed during fatigue of ceramic matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1879–1883 (1990). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05239.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pryce, A.W., Smith, P.A.: Matrix cracking in unidirectional ceramic matrix composites under quasi-static and cyclic loading. Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 1269–1281 (1993). doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90178-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ahn, B.K., Curtin, W.A.: Strain and hysteresis by stochastic matrix cracking in ceramic matrix composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45, 177–209 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00081-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Solti, J.P., Mall, S., Robertson, D.D.: Modeling damage in unidirectional ceramic-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 54, 55–66 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00041-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Vagaggini, E., Domergue, J.M., Evans, A.G.: Relationships between hysteresis measurements and the constituent properties of ceramic matrix composites: I, theory. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2709–2720 (1995). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08046.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hutchison, J.W., Jensen, H.M.: Models of fiber debonding and pullout in brittle composites with friction. Mech. Mater. 9, 139–163 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0167-6636(90)90037-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Cho, C.D., Holmes, J.W., Barber, J.R.: Estimation of interfacial shear in ceramic composites from frictional heating measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2802–808 (1991). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06846.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Z.G.: Influence of interface de-bonding on the fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. Chin. J. Solid Mech. 30, 8–14 (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Z.G.: Effect of fiber Poisson contraction on fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. J. Nanjing Uni. Aero. Astron. 41, 181–6 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Li, L.B., Song, Y.D.: Influnece of fiber failure on fatigue hysteresis loops of ceramic matrix composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 30, 12–25 (2011). doi: 10.1177/0731684410386273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Li, L.B.: Modeling the effect of interface wear on fatigue hysteresis behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites. Appl. Compos. Mater. Online (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10443-015-9442-7 Google Scholar
- 17.Li, L.B., Song, Y.D., Sun, Y.C.: Estimate interface shear stress of unidirectional C/SiC ceramic matrix composites from hysteresis loops. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20, 693–707 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10443-012-9297-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kuo, W.S., Chou, T.W.: Multiple cracking of unidirectional and cross-ply ceramic matrix composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 745–755 (1995). doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08242.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lamon, J.: A micromechanics-based approach to the mechanical behavior of brittle-matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 2259–2272 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00120-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Li, P., Wang, B., Zhen, W.Q., Jiao, G.Q.: Tensile loading/unloading stress–strain behavior of 2D-SiC/SiC composites. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 31, 676–68 (2014). doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2014.03.020 Google Scholar