Fibre Break Failure Processes in Unidirectional Composites. Part 3: Unidirectional Plies Included in Laminates
- 269 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The purpose of these three papers is not to just revisit the modelling of unidirectional composites. It is to provide a robust framework based on physical processes that can be used to optimise the design and long term reliability of internally pressurised filament wound structures. The results given in paper Parts 1 and 2 concerning the behaviour of unidirectional composites, such as carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin, are, here, extended to the behaviour of cross-plied composites consisting of unidirectional plies orientated at different angles with respect to the loading direction. In these laminates the plies orientated parallel to the loading direction (at 0∘) control the ultimate failure of the composite. This paper shows that the development of fibre breaks in analogous to that seen in the studies described in Part 1 and 2. Clustering of fibre breaks, shown by the development of 32-plets, preceedes failure just before specimen loaded monotonically break but develop in a more stable manner when subjected to steady high level loads. The effect of separating the 0∘ plies into thinner layers impedes the development of fibre breaks clusters and increases ultimate lifetimes.
Keywords
Fibres Laminates Micro-mechanics Numerical analysis1 Introduction
This paper follows on from the earlier studies (Part 1 and Part 2) which considered the kinetics of fibre breakage in unidirectional composites. The first paper considered monotically increasing tensile loads at speeds which enabled any viscoelastic effects to be ignored (Part 1). Such unidirectional composite plies make up structures such as can be found in filament wound pipes and pressure vessels. This type of structure is often used under load over periods of decades and the time dependent behaviour of the matrix can lead to progressive damage. It is this which was considered in Part 2. The whole study has been organised in three distinct parts (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3). Each part of this series is described in a separate paper making therefore a suite of 3 coherent papers.
This paper (Part 3) considers complex stratifications containing unidirectional plies. More precisely, cross-plied and angle-plied laminates made up of stacks of unidirectional plies arranged at various angles to one another are considered. It will be shown that some of the most important conclusions obtained for the unidirectional composite plates in Part 1 and Part 2 can be extended to more complex lay-ups in which unidirectional plies nevertheless control ultimate failure. The loading conditions which will be considered in this third paper are those which have been analysed in the two earlier papers; monotonic tensile loading (ML) for which the viscoelastic properties of the matrix of the composite can be neglected, and (ML-H) in which the H represents a speed high enough for the viscoelastic nature of the matrix to be inconsequential. In addition monotonically increasing then sustained tensile load tests (SL) are also considered for which the effects of the viscoelastic properties of the matrix must be considered. This paper considers the damage accumulation in the unidirectional plies of the proposed stacking sequences.
-
that the high order i-plets (32-plets) (that is the number of Representative Volume Element consisting of 32 initially intact fibres but which all are now broken) are the key parameters controlling the failure of the unidirectional composite material;
-
that the slower the loading applied to the unidirectional composite specimen the lower the failure stress but the composite becomes more tolerant to the effect of clustering of fibre breaks, denoted by increasing numbers of high order i-plets being created;
-
that the viscoelasticity of the matrix induces clustering of fibre breaks;
-
that a definition of a critical state of damage, common to all types of loading does not seem to be possible. The effect of time has an important effect on the clustering of breaks which means that a definition of a critical damage state is not possible if the loading to which the composite is subjected allows the viscoelastic nature of the matrix to appear. However, if the loading does not allow the viscoelastic characteristics of the matrix to act, the damage state can be defined as the development of approximately 3% of the total theoretically possible 32-plets, randomly distributed in the composite (Tab. 4 in Part 1).
Failure processes at the scale of individual fibres are difficult to observe experimentally and so have been studied through simulations. The F E 2 model of \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) laminates which has been used, has been described in detail in the first paper of this trilogy (Part 1) and is the continuation of earlier studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16]. A Monte-Carlo process has been used to build a fibre strength distribution based on experimentally obtained data from tests on individual carbon fibres. This distribution assigns strength values to the fibres. It is clear that this random choice of fibre strengths could modify, more or less the conclusions reached. It is for this reason that the results presented in Part 1 correspond to those for which the probability of failure for the composite under high rate monotonic loading (ML-H) has been taken as equal to 0.5. Also, this distribution of local fibre strength is that which has been used to illustrate the results in this third paper (and was the same for the second paper). In this way the observed effects concerning the phenomena of fibre breaks were due to the type of loading applied rather than any perturbation due to the statistical analysis.
Terminology of the all the vocabulary and abbreviations used in these papers and defined in Part 1 is given in Section 5.
2 Failure of unidirectional plies contained in cross-ply and angle-ply laminates
Designation of stacking sequences studied
| Stacking sequence | Designation |
|---|---|
| \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) | UD_1_36 |
| \((90^{\circ }_{18} / 0^{\circ }_{36} / 90^{\circ }_{18})\) | CP_1_36 |
| \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{9}/0^{\circ }_{36} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9} )\) | AP_1_36 |
| \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/0^{\circ }_{18}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{5})_{S}\) | AP_2_18 |
| \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})_{S}\) | AP_4_9 |
Characteristics points in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s). (*): see Part 1
| Stacking x | Point I | Point J | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sequence | F S I N S T (MPa) | ε S I N S T | F M L (MPa) | ε M L |
| UD_1_36 (*) | 2790 | 0.0200 | 2900 | 0.0222 |
| CP_1_36 | 1526 | 0.0216 | 1570 | 0.0252 |
| AP_1_36 | 1538 | 0.0216 | 1583 | 0.0246 |
| AP_2_18 | 1538 | 0.0206 | 1583 | 0.0223 |
| AP_4_9 | 1538 | 0.0203 | 1583 | 0.0223 |
For all the lamina, in all the loading situations considered, the high order i-plets (32-plets) are the key parameters of the failure of the unidirectional material, as was seen for the unidirectional composites treated in Parts 1 and 2.
Damage state at characteristics points of the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s). (*): see Part 1.
| Stacking | Point I | Point J | ||
| sequence | Fibre breaks (%) | 32-plets (%) | Fibre breaks (%) | 32-plets (%) |
| UD_1_36 (*) | 4.36 | 2.77 | 11.70 | 9.14 |
| CP_1_36 | 5.02 | 3.29 | 19.29 | 16.00 |
| AP_1_36 | 5.21 | 3.45 | 15.00 | 12.00 |
| AP_2_18 | 5.08 | 3.35 | 13.19 | 9.71 |
| AP_4_9 | 5.06 | 3.33 | 11.00 | 8.92 |
Secant rigidity at characteristics points of the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s).(*) The reference is the secant rigidity at point B. (*): see Part 1.
| Stacking | Secant rigidity | Secant rigidity loss | Secant rigidity loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| sequence | at Point B (MPa) | at Point I (%) (*) | at Point J (%) (*) |
| UD_1_36 (*) | 145000 | 4 | 10 |
| CP_1_36 | 72685 | 3 | 14 |
| AP_1_36 | 73287 | 3 | 12 |
| AP_2_18 | 76844 | 3 | 8 |
| AP_4_9 | 77980 | 3 | 9 |
Equally when the laminates were loaded with SL type loads, for which the viscosity of the matrix must be considered because of the time effects involved in such loadings the values of the I and J points for the populations of fibre failures and of high order i-plets (32-plets) were very similar to the unidirectional case (Table 6). It is most significant that the clustering of fibre breaks effect was again seen in the laminate specimens, just as was seen for the unidirectional plates, which again raised the question of how to define the critical state of damage in these materials.
3 Failure of angle-ply laminates. Effect of confinement of the plies.
The above considerations have allowed the conclusions concerning the behaviour and failure of unidirectional plates to be extended to laminates consisting of unidirectional plies, either in one thick layer or separated into several plies by plies of different orientations. These simulations allow conclusions to be drawn on the effect of the confinement of the plies. In particular it allows the desirability or not of grouping plies of one fibre orientation 0∘ into a single thick layer or sandwiching fractions of this orientation within the laminate to create several thinner plies of the same orientation to be examined. This question has been studied using three angle-ply laminates designated as AP_1_36, AP_2_18 et AP_4_9 (Table 1).
-
laminate AP_1_36 consisted of a single layer of unidirectional plies \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) sandwiched between two layers of off-axis plies;
-
laminate AP_2_18 consisted of two identical layers \((0^{\circ }_{18})\) sandwiched and separated by identical off-axis layers plies;
-
laminate AP_4_9 consisted of four layers of \((0^{\circ }_{9})\) sandwiched and separated by off-axis plies.
-
\((0^{\circ }_{36}) = (0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} / 0^{\circ }_{9d})\);
-
\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{9} / 0^{\circ }_{36} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9}) = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{9} / 0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} / 0^{\circ }_{9d} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9})\);
-
\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/0^{\circ }_{18}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{5})_{S} = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/ 0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{10} / 0^{\circ }_{9c}/ 0^{\circ }_{9d} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{4})\);
-
\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/ 0^{\circ }_{9} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})_{S} = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/ 0^{\circ }_{9a} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9b}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{6} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9d}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})\).
Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). Comparison between the longitudinal strain averaged all over the specimen ( < ε 11>) and the longitudinal strain averaged only over the 0∘ plies ( < ε 11>0). a ML conditions (zoom close to the instability point). b SL conditions, F S L =0.96×F M L (zoom close to the instability point)
In the case of ML loadings, the effect of confinement is insignificant on the value of failure stress (Table 2): it should be highlighted that delamination was not considered in the modelling; in reality, the thinner-ply configurations should present higher delamination strength than the thicker-ply case. However there is a marked effect on the populations of high order i-plets (32-plets) at the point of instability J (Table 3) (although less obvious at the point of start of instability I): the more the 0∘ plies are thin the smaller is the population of fibre breaks and of the population of 32-plets although the value of the failure stress does not change. It should also be mentioned that Sihn et al. [17] observed experimentally an increase in initial stiffness in thin-ply specimens as has been numerically observed in this study (Table 4), which supports the different strains to failure in (Table 2). Another possible advantage of thin plies may be a reduction of porosity induced during manufacture.
Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). SL loading for F S L =0.90×F M L . a 32-plets (%) with time (s). b Zoom close to the instability point. Correlation with the longitudinal strain averaged over the 0∘ plies (<eps11>_0)
Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). SL loading for F S L =0.96×F M L . a 32-plets (%) with time (s). b Zoom close to the instability point. Correlation with the longitudinal strain averaged over the 0∘ plies (<eps11>_0)
Characteristics points in the < ε 11> versus t curve (SL conditions). (*): see Part 2
| Stacking sequence | F S L | Point I | Point J | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F S L | (MPa) | t S I N S T (s) | ε S I N S T | t S L (s) | ε S L |
| 0.90×F M L | |||||
| UD_1_36 (*) | 2610 | 2000000 | 0.0202 | 2164610 | 0.0227 |
| CP_1_36 | 1413 | 3832000 | 0.0215 | 4287310 | 0.0230 |
| AP_1_36 | 1425 | 3357400 | 0.0215 | 3807670 | 0.0231 |
| AP_2_18 | 1425 | 3201000 | 0.0201 | 4239970 | 0.0220 |
| AP_4_9 | 1425 | 3119300 | 0.0198 | 4346020 | 0.0216 |
| 0.96×F M L | |||||
| UD_1_36 (*) | 2790 | 18000 | 0.0209 | 20429 | 0.0240 |
| CP_1_36 | 1507 | 23717 | 0.0220 | 25096 | 0.0222 |
| AP_1_36 | 1520 | 21604 | 0.0221 | 22328 | 0.0232 |
| AP_2_18 | 1520 | 22052 | 0.0210 | 22533 | 0.0223 |
| AP_4_9 | 1520 | 22200 | 0.0207 | 22800 | 0.0225 |
Damage state at characteristics points of the < ε 11> versus t curve (SL conditions). (*): see Part 2
| Stacking sequence | Point I | Point J | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F S L | Fibre breaks (%) | 32-plets (%) | Fibre breaks (%) | 32-plets (%) |
| 0.90×F M L | ||||
| UD_1_36 (*) | 15.03 | 13.97 | 28.90 | 23.50 |
| CP_1_36 | 19.37 | 17.76 | 26.88 | 23.29 |
| AP_1_36 | 19.96 | 18.23 | 28.11 | 23.68 |
| AP_2_18 | 16.27 | 15.12 | 27.23 | 23.59 |
| AP_4_9 | 15.62 | 14.54 | 26.72 | 23.35 |
| 0.96×F M L | ||||
| UD_1_36 (*) | 9.63 | 7.98 | 19.51 | 13.41 |
| CP_1_36 | 11.27 | 9.54 | 12.60 | 10.79 |
| AP_1_36 | 11.94 | 10.13 | 18.40 | 13.96 |
| AP_2_18 | 11.34 | 9.63 | 17.66 | 14.20 |
| AP_4_9 | 11.63 | 9.98 | 20.63 | 16.91 |
It can be seen that correlating the effects of confinement on the populations of 32-plets with < ε 11> rather than < ε 11>0 would have led to the wrong conclusion. It could have been erroneously concluded that less damage would be observed, with fewer fibre breaks, with the layup AP_4_9 (with respect tothe sequence AP_1_36 for example) as the strain < ε 11> was less (with respect to the sequence AP_1_36 for example) as fewere fibre breaks were induced and therefore the reduction in damage is due to the reduction of < ε 11>. In reality the strain seen by the 0∘ plies is the same in all the sequences. It is therefore the effect of confinement which causes the reduction in damage.
To resume, whatever the type of loading ML-H or SL, the conclusions are identical: the finer the layers at 0∘ the greater is the restriction of clustering. This result has already been experimentally demonstrated by Sihn et al. [17] and Wisnom et al. [24]. Once again, the model is confirmed by experimental results.
4 Conclusion
In this third and last part of this study we have examined the damage of the unidirectional plies within a cross-plied laminate, including the cases in which the plies were separated by off-axis layers, but for which failure was controlled by the failure of the unidirectional plies. The choice of lay-up reflected the fibre arrangement in filament wound pressure vessels. This behaviour was exactly analogous to the the single unidirectional plies subjected to a continuously increasing load considered in Part 1 or under steady loading until failure as in Part 2. In this paper the unidirectional plies were part of a stratified laminate and were surrounded by off-axis composite plies, however the loading patterns were the same.
-
it is always the population of high oder i-plets (32-plets) which is the key parameter for failure;
- under type ML-H loading for which the viscosity of the matrix can be ignored:
-
a critical damage state can be defined as approximately 3% of all possible 32-plets, randomly distributed in the composite;
-
the effect of clustering of fibre breaks only becomes visible near the point of instability J on the curve F(t) versus < ε 11>;
-
- under loading of type SL, for which the viscosity of the matrix becomes important:
-
the time over which the specimen is loaded has a marked effect on the clustering of fibre breaks;
-
a single critical state of damage is not therefore defineable;
-
the effect of clustering becomes visible from the beginning of the constant loading period and can become very large (more than 20 % of the fibre breaks clustered in 32-plets at the point of instability J on the curve < ε 11> versus t).
-
The simulation has also allowed the mute point of whether it is best to group all the plies of one orientation into one thick layer or to spread them throughout the thickness in several thinner plies 0∘ or if this is no importance. Whatever the type of loading ML-H or SL, the conclusions are identical: the finer the layers at 0∘ the greater the effect of clustering is restricted. In the case of loading of the type SL, the time to failure with the same number of plies (same number of off-axis plies; same number of plies at 0∘) increases in proportion to the number of plies at 0∘ spread throughout the thickness of the laminate as thin plies. However in the case of ML-H loading there is no difference in failure load but the high order i-plets are reduced if the plies at 0∘ are thinner.
In the future, the next step of the study has to take into account the variability of the local volume fraction and the matrix cracking phenomenon [1, 14, 19, 20, 21, 23] which appears in these materials and to confirm or not the conclusions of the present study.
Nevertheless these variables should not modify the main conclusions described above. The cracking of the matrix should have only an effect on the load transfer between fibres in those plies which are susceptible to cracking which is to say the off-axis plies. The effect of local variations of fibre volume fraction could lead to variations in damage states but this does not change the principal mechanism governing damage, especially under sustained loads, which is the viscosity of the matrix.
The results given in this three papers are solidly based on earlier studies (some of the oldest are Rosen [15], Cox [12], Zweben [25]) of which many have been cited in the list of references (Part 1). The present study owes much to earlier researchers who have described the physically based processes governing composite behaviour beginning with analytical techniques. These earlier studies based as they were on a logical examination of mechanical processes at the level of reinforcements, have allowed a general understanding of the phenomena governing composite behaviour and ultimately failure. The increasing computation power of computers has allowed the present authors to develop models based on the understanding of the phenomena in a earlier studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. It is now possible, with a reasonable computational time and by using multi-scale approach [13, 18, 22], for a detailed simulation of those physical phenomena involved in composite behaviour to be made. A comparison between the simulated behaviour of composites and the results obtained experimentally [16] shows close agreement and justifies the use of this model in the understanding of composite structures, such as pressure vessels [10]. It also allows a closer examination of processes which are very difficult or impossible to observe experimentally, such as the critical effect of clustering of fibre breaks, which is more or less important depending on the loading conditions.
5 Nomenclature
- ML: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading
-
ML-H: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with High speed loading
-
ML-M: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with Medium speed loading
-
ML-L: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with Low speed loading
-
-
SL: monotonic increasing then Sustained tensile Loading
-
t: time (s)
-
F(t) is the applied tensile stress in ML conditions
-
F M L is the tensile strength of the specimen in ML conditions
-
F S L is the sustained applied tensile stress in SL conditions
-
t S L is the time to failure of the specimen in SL conditions
-
<ε 11> is the average (over all the specimen) of the longitudinal strain
-
<ε 11>0 is the average (only over all the 0∘ plies of the specimen) of the longitudinal strain
-
the curve F(t) versus < ε 11> is the characteristic curve in ML condition
-
the curve < ε 11> versus t is the characteristic curve in SL condition
-
F M L is given by the intersection (point B) of the tangent at the origin of the curve F(t) versus < ε 11> and the tangent of the plateau of instability of the same curve. The strain for B is denoted as ε S I N S T
-
t S L is given by the intersection (point B) of the tangent of the sustained loading plateau of the curve < ε 11> versus t and the tangent of the plateau of instability of the same curve. The strain for B is denoted as ε S I N S T
- the instability point of the characteristic curve is J. The coordinates of J are:
-
(ε M L , F M L ) in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve
-
(t S L , ε S L ) in < ε 11> versus t the curve
-
- the Start of INStability (SINST) point of the characteristic curve is I. The coordinates of I are:
-
(ε S I N S T , F S I N S T ) in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve
-
(t S I N S T , ε S I N S T ) in the < ε 11> versus t curve
-
- an i-plet defines i fibres broken in the 32 fibres of the RVE (0-plet, 1-plet, 2-plet, 4-plet, 8-plet, 16-plet, 32-plet):
-
a non zero i-plet is considered of a small order if i≤4
-
a non zero i-plet is considered of a medium order if 8≤i≤16
-
a non zero i-plet is considered of a high order if i≥32
-
References
- 1.Aussedat, E., Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Comportement en compression des composites par une définition du mode de sollicitation en mécanique de l’endommagement. Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Série II 321, 533–540 (1995)Google Scholar
- 2.Blassiau, S.: Modélisation des phénomènes microstructuraux au sein d’un composite unidirectionnel carbone/époxy et prédiction de durée de vie : contrôle et qualification de réservoirs bobinés. Thèse, Ecole des Mines de Paris (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 1, Micromechanisms and 3d analysis of load transfert, the elastic case. Compos. Struct. 74, 303–318 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 2, Influence of viscoelastic and plastic matrices on the mechanism of load transfert. Compos. Struct. 74, 319–331 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Damage accumulation processes and life prediction in unidirectional composites. Proc. R. Soc. (A) 463, 1135–1152 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 3: multiscale reconstruction of composite behaviour. Compos. Struct. 83, 312–323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Three-dimensional analysis of load transfer micro-mechanisms in fibre/matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 33–39 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bunsell, A. R., Thionnet, A.: Life prediction for carbon fibre filament wound composite structures. Phil. Mag. 90, 4129–4146 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Camara, S., Bunsell, A. R., Thionnet, A., Allen, D. H.: Determination of lifetime probabilities of carbon fibre composite plates and pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36, 6031–6038 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Chou, H.Y., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A. R.: Visual indicator for the detection of end-of-life criterion for composite high pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 16247–16255 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chou, H. Y., Zejli, H., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A., Mouritz, A., Bannister, M.: Détection et discrimination par émission acoustique des endommagements dans les composites stratifiés d’unidirectionnels rupture de fibre, macro et microfissuration intralaminaire, microdélaminage. comparaison expérience/modélisation. Matériaux 2010, 18-22 octobre. Nantes, France (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Cox, H. L.: The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 72–79 (1951)Google Scholar
- 13.Feyel, F.: A multilevel finite element method (fe2) to describe the response of highly non-linear structures using generalized continua. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192, 3233–3244 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Renard, J., Thionnet, A.: Damage in composites: from physical mechanisms to modelling. Compos. Sci. Technol., 642–646 (2007)Google Scholar
- 15.Rosen, B. W.: Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J. 2, 1985–1991 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Scott, A. E., Sinclair, I., Spearing, S. M., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.R.: Damage accumulation in a carbon/epoxy composite: Comparison between a multiscale model and computed tomography experimental results. Compos. A 43, 1514–1522 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sihn, S., Kim, R. Y., Kawabe, K., Tsai, S. W.: Experimental studies of thin-ply laminated composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 996–1008 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Souza, F. V., Allen, D. H., Kim, Y. R.: Multiscale model for predicting damage evolution in composites due to impact loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2624–2634 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Talreja, R.: Multi-scale modeling in damage mechanics of composite materials. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 6800–6812 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Thionnet, A.: From fracture to damage mechanics: a behavior law for microcracked bodies using the concept of crack opening mode. Compos. Struct. 92, 780–794 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Meso-macro approach to transverse cracking in laminated composites using talreja’s model. Compos. E. 3, 851–871 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Multi-scale analysis to determine fibre/matrix debonding criteria in sic/titanium composites with and without consideration of the manufacturing residual stresses. Compos. Sci. Technol. 58, 945–955 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Modelling unilateral damage effect in strongly anisotropic materials by the introduction of loading mode in damage mechanics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 4269–4287 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wisnom, M. R., Hallet, S. R., Soutis, C.: Scaling effects in notched composites. J. Compos. Mater. 44, 195–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Zweben, C.: Tensile failure of fibers composites. AIAA J. 6, 2325–2331 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar


