Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 157–169 | Cite as

Fibre Break Failure Processes in Unidirectional Composites. Part 3: Unidirectional Plies Included in Laminates

Article

Abstract

The purpose of these three papers is not to just revisit the modelling of unidirectional composites. It is to provide a robust framework based on physical processes that can be used to optimise the design and long term reliability of internally pressurised filament wound structures. The results given in paper Parts 1 and 2 concerning the behaviour of unidirectional composites, such as carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin, are, here, extended to the behaviour of cross-plied composites consisting of unidirectional plies orientated at different angles with respect to the loading direction. In these laminates the plies orientated parallel to the loading direction (at 0) control the ultimate failure of the composite. This paper shows that the development of fibre breaks in analogous to that seen in the studies described in Part 1 and 2. Clustering of fibre breaks, shown by the development of 32-plets, preceedes failure just before specimen loaded monotonically break but develop in a more stable manner when subjected to steady high level loads. The effect of separating the 0 plies into thinner layers impedes the development of fibre breaks clusters and increases ultimate lifetimes.

Keywords

Fibres Laminates Micro-mechanics Numerical analysis 

1 Introduction

This paper follows on from the earlier studies (Part 1 and Part 2) which considered the kinetics of fibre breakage in unidirectional composites. The first paper considered monotically increasing tensile loads at speeds which enabled any viscoelastic effects to be ignored (Part 1). Such unidirectional composite plies make up structures such as can be found in filament wound pipes and pressure vessels. This type of structure is often used under load over periods of decades and the time dependent behaviour of the matrix can lead to progressive damage. It is this which was considered in Part 2. The whole study has been organised in three distinct parts (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3). Each part of this series is described in a separate paper making therefore a suite of 3 coherent papers.

This paper (Part 3) considers complex stratifications containing unidirectional plies. More precisely, cross-plied and angle-plied laminates made up of stacks of unidirectional plies arranged at various angles to one another are considered. It will be shown that some of the most important conclusions obtained for the unidirectional composite plates in Part 1 and Part 2 can be extended to more complex lay-ups in which unidirectional plies nevertheless control ultimate failure. The loading conditions which will be considered in this third paper are those which have been analysed in the two earlier papers; monotonic tensile loading (ML) for which the viscoelastic properties of the matrix of the composite can be neglected, and (ML-H) in which the H represents a speed high enough for the viscoelastic nature of the matrix to be inconsequential. In addition monotonically increasing then sustained tensile load tests (SL) are also considered for which the effects of the viscoelastic properties of the matrix must be considered. This paper considers the damage accumulation in the unidirectional plies of the proposed stacking sequences.

The major conclusions developed in the preceding papers (Parts 1 and 2) will be examined below for stratified laminates. They are:
  • that the high order i-plets (32-plets) (that is the number of Representative Volume Element consisting of 32 initially intact fibres but which all are now broken) are the key parameters controlling the failure of the unidirectional composite material;

  • that the slower the loading applied to the unidirectional composite specimen the lower the failure stress but the composite becomes more tolerant to the effect of clustering of fibre breaks, denoted by increasing numbers of high order i-plets being created;

  • that the viscoelasticity of the matrix induces clustering of fibre breaks;

  • that a definition of a critical state of damage, common to all types of loading does not seem to be possible. The effect of time has an important effect on the clustering of breaks which means that a definition of a critical damage state is not possible if the loading to which the composite is subjected allows the viscoelastic nature of the matrix to appear. However, if the loading does not allow the viscoelastic characteristics of the matrix to act, the damage state can be defined as the development of approximately 3% of the total theoretically possible 32-plets, randomly distributed in the composite (Tab. 4 in Part 1).

In addition the effect of confinement of plies being sandwiched between others is discussed. This latter point addresses the advisability of using thin plies separated by off-axis plies, or grouping all plies of one direction into thick plies.

Failure processes at the scale of individual fibres are difficult to observe experimentally and so have been studied through simulations. The F E 2 model of \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) laminates which has been used, has been described in detail in the first paper of this trilogy (Part 1) and is the continuation of earlier studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 16]. A Monte-Carlo process has been used to build a fibre strength distribution based on experimentally obtained data from tests on individual carbon fibres. This distribution assigns strength values to the fibres. It is clear that this random choice of fibre strengths could modify, more or less the conclusions reached. It is for this reason that the results presented in Part 1 correspond to those for which the probability of failure for the composite under high rate monotonic loading (ML-H) has been taken as equal to 0.5. Also, this distribution of local fibre strength is that which has been used to illustrate the results in this third paper (and was the same for the second paper). In this way the observed effects concerning the phenomena of fibre breaks were due to the type of loading applied rather than any perturbation due to the statistical analysis.

Terminology of the all the vocabulary and abbreviations used in these papers and defined in Part 1 is given in Section 5.

2 Failure of unidirectional plies contained in cross-ply and angle-ply laminates

A cross-plied composite laminate consisting of a core of unidirectional lamina \((0^{\circ }_{36})\), as studied in Parts 1 and 2, but sandwiched between two plies at 90 will first be considered. In addition three angle ply lay-ups will be examined in which the unidirectional lamina is considered successively as; one thick layer; divided into two; or four equal layers, sandwiched by plies at +70 and −70. The details and designations of these lay-ups are given in Table 1. For each of these laminates the first loading sequence considered is of the type ML-H at 1 MPa/s and the composite is taken to failure. The force at failure F M L is obtained from the curve F(t) versus < ε 11>, in the same manner as described for a unidirectional specimen in the first paper (Part1). The second loading sequence is of the type SL for a steady load equal to either 0.90×F M L or 0.96×F M L . The time to failure t S L is obtained from the curve < ε 11> versus t, as in the second paper (Part 2). For all of these loading conditions the characteristic points I and J, identified in Part 1 as indicating the onset of failure and ultimate failure points are found (Table 2, Table 5).
Table 1

Designation of stacking sequences studied

Stacking sequence

Designation

\((0^{\circ }_{36})\)

UD_1_36

\((90^{\circ }_{18} / 0^{\circ }_{36} / 90^{\circ }_{18})\)

CP_1_36

\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{9}/0^{\circ }_{36} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9} )\)

AP_1_36

\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/0^{\circ }_{18}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{5})_{S}\)

AP_2_18

\((\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})_{S}\)

AP_4_9

Table 2

Characteristics points in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s). (*): see Part 1

Stacking x

Point I

Point J

sequence

F S I N S T (MPa)

ε S I N S T

F M L (MPa)

ε M L

UD_1_36 (*)

2790

0.0200

2900

0.0222

CP_1_36

1526

0.0216

1570

0.0252

AP_1_36

1538

0.0216

1583

0.0246

AP_2_18

1538

0.0206

1583

0.0223

AP_4_9

1538

0.0203

1583

0.0223

For all the lamina, in all the loading situations considered, the high order i-plets (32-plets) are the key parameters of the failure of the unidirectional material, as was seen for the unidirectional composites treated in Parts 1 and 2.

In all the cases considered in this third part of the study in which the laminates were subjected to ML-H loadings, for which the viscosity of the matrix was not an issue, the values of the of the populations of fibre failures and of the high order i-plets (32-plets) were practically identical to those of the unidirectional plates tested earlier (Table 3). This means that the critical level of damage for the laminates, as for the unidirectional plates, was appromatively 3% of the maximum possible numbers of 32-plets randomly distributed within the composite. This was also the case for the reduction in overall properties (Table 4), so confirming the sudden-death nature of failure of composite laminates in which failure is controlled by the plies at 0.
Table 3

Damage state at characteristics points of the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s). (*): see Part 1.

Stacking

Point I

Point J

sequence

Fibre breaks (%)

32-plets (%)

Fibre breaks (%)

32-plets (%)

UD_1_36 (*)

4.36

2.77

11.70

9.14

CP_1_36

5.02

3.29

19.29

16.00

AP_1_36

5.21

3.45

15.00

12.00

AP_2_18

5.08

3.35

13.19

9.71

AP_4_9

5.06

3.33

11.00

8.92

Table 4

Secant rigidity at characteristics points of the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve (ML-H conditions, 1 MPa/s).(*) The reference is the secant rigidity at point B. (*): see Part 1.

Stacking

Secant rigidity

Secant rigidity loss

Secant rigidity loss

sequence

at Point B (MPa)

at Point I (%) (*)

at Point J (%) (*)

UD_1_36 (*)

145000

4

10

CP_1_36

72685

3

14

AP_1_36

73287

3

12

AP_2_18

76844

3

8

AP_4_9

77980

3

9

Equally when the laminates were loaded with SL type loads, for which the viscosity of the matrix must be considered because of the time effects involved in such loadings the values of the I and J points for the populations of fibre failures and of high order i-plets (32-plets) were very similar to the unidirectional case (Table 6). It is most significant that the clustering of fibre breaks effect was again seen in the laminate specimens, just as was seen for the unidirectional plates, which again raised the question of how to define the critical state of damage in these materials.

3 Failure of angle-ply laminates. Effect of confinement of the plies.

The above considerations have allowed the conclusions concerning the behaviour and failure of unidirectional plates to be extended to laminates consisting of unidirectional plies, either in one thick layer or separated into several plies by plies of different orientations. These simulations allow conclusions to be drawn on the effect of the confinement of the plies. In particular it allows the desirability or not of grouping plies of one fibre orientation 0 into a single thick layer or sandwiching fractions of this orientation within the laminate to create several thinner plies of the same orientation to be examined. This question has been studied using three angle-ply laminates designated as AP_1_36, AP_2_18 et AP_4_9 (Table 1).

The three lay-ups considered were made up of identical numbers of off-axis plies and of unidirectional plies \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) as studied in Part 1 et Part 2. The three lay-ups were distinguished by the unidirectional layers \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) being distributed into 1, 2 or 4 identical parts, which is to say :
  • laminate AP_1_36 consisted of a single layer of unidirectional plies \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) sandwiched between two layers of off-axis plies;

  • laminate AP_2_18 consisted of two identical layers \((0^{\circ }_{18})\) sandwiched and separated by identical off-axis layers plies;

  • laminate AP_4_9 consisted of four layers of \((0^{\circ }_{9})\) sandwiched and separated by off-axis plies.

The following analysis examines the effects of confining the 0 plies in off-axis plies and its effect on the development of the high order i-plets, which lead to failure and to any effect it might have on the clustering of fibre breaks.
In order to carry out this part of the study it should be underlined that the conditions simulated had to be as similar as possible to one another, for the different cases, for a realistic comparison to be carried out. Consequently it was necessary to initially ensure that the simulations are not affected by unrepresentative statistical variations. It is for this reason that it has been emphasised, earlier, that the distribution of the values at failure, generated by a Monte-Carlo process for the simulation of the unidirectional specimens \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) give a failure probability of 0.5, and also that this value is used for all the simulations presented in this series of papers. So as to clearly illustrate this effect let’s describe the unidirectional \((0^{\circ }_{36})\) and the angle-ply laminates in the following manner :
  • \((0^{\circ }_{36}) = (0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} / 0^{\circ }_{9d})\);

  • \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{9} / 0^{\circ }_{36} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9}) = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{9} / 0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} / 0^{\circ }_{9d} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{9})\);

  • \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/0^{\circ }_{18}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{5})_{S} = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{4}/ 0^{\circ }_{9a} / 0^{\circ }_{9b} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{10} / 0^{\circ }_{9c}/ 0^{\circ }_{9d} / \pm 70^{\circ }_{4})\);

  • \((\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/ 0^{\circ }_{9} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})_{S} = (\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/ 0^{\circ }_{9a} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9b}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{6} / 0^{\circ }_{9c} /\pm 70^{\circ }_{3}/0^{\circ }_{9d}/\pm 70^{\circ }_{3})\).

The statistical coherence of the calculations is, in this way, ensured as the distribution of the values at failure, called D R T a , respectively, D R T b , D R T c , D R T d , is used in all the simulations, always in the \((0^{\circ }_{9a})\) ply, respectively \((0^{\circ }_{9b})\), \((0^{\circ }_{9c})\), \((0^{\circ }_{9d})\).
Secondly it is convenient to define the magnitude of values having the same significance in each laminate and especially that which determines the point of instability J and others, such as secant rigidity, which will be used to reveal any effect of confinement. The point of failure of the composite has to be indicated by the variation of the longitudinal strain. As can be seen from Table 4 the secant rigidity of the structure increases as the plie thicknesses are reduced. This is explained as when the 0 plies are thick the off-axis plies are less constrained by them so that the value of < ε 11> also increases. This means that in order to correctly analyse the effects of confinement it is necessary to correlate the variations (notably that of the population of 32-plets) not as a function of < ε 11>, but with the average longitudinal strain over all the 0 plies in the laminate < ε 11>0. The result of this analysis is that it is seen that, for the three laminates considered, the value is always the same (Fig. 1) except for after the point of instability which, in any case, is only accessible through the numerical analysis and has no physical signification.
Fig. 1

Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). Comparison between the longitudinal strain averaged all over the specimen ( < ε 11>) and the longitudinal strain averaged only over the 0 plies ( < ε 11>0). a ML conditions (zoom close to the instability point). b SL conditions, F S L =0.96×F M L (zoom close to the instability point)

In the case of ML loadings, the effect of confinement is insignificant on the value of failure stress (Table 2): it should be highlighted that delamination was not considered in the modelling; in reality, the thinner-ply configurations should present higher delamination strength than the thicker-ply case. However there is a marked effect on the populations of high order i-plets (32-plets) at the point of instability J (Table 3) (although less obvious at the point of start of instability I): the more the 0 plies are thin the smaller is the population of fibre breaks and of the population of 32-plets although the value of the failure stress does not change. It should also be mentioned that Sihn et al. [17] observed experimentally an increase in initial stiffness in thin-ply specimens as has been numerically observed in this study (Table 4), which supports the different strains to failure in (Table 2). Another possible advantage of thin plies may be a reduction of porosity induced during manufacture.

In the case of SL loadings the effect of confinement becomes obvious on the time to failure (Table 5): the time to failure becomes longer as the 0 plies are increasingly confined. However the increase is particularly obvious if the steady applied load is small. That is to say that the confinement effect increases if the effects of the viscosity of the matrix has the time to have an effect: approximately 2% is gained on the lifetime for a steady load at 0.96×F M L however an increase of approximately 13% is seen for a steady load of 0.90×F M L . The populations of fibre breaks and of the development of 32-plets, are greatest at the point of instability when the plies are confined (Table 6). This seems to contradict the effects of confinement however the populations of fibre breaks and of 32-plets at the point of instability J are higher when the plies are confined as the times to failure are longer. If, however, the same loading durations are considered (Fig. 2, Fig. 3), these populations are always more numerous when the plies at 0 are thicker. This shows clearly the effect of confinement: the development of clusters of fibre breaks in the thin plies is hindered by the adjacent plies whereas they can develop more easily when in thicker plies, where they are less inhibited.
Fig. 2

Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). SL loading for F S L =0.90×F M L . a 32-plets (%) with time (s). b Zoom close to the instability point. Correlation with the longitudinal strain averaged over the 0 plies (<eps11>_0)

Fig. 3

Angle-ply sequences (AP_1_36, AP_2_18, AP_4_9). SL loading for F S L =0.96×F M L . a 32-plets (%) with time (s). b Zoom close to the instability point. Correlation with the longitudinal strain averaged over the 0 plies (<eps11>_0)

Table 5

Characteristics points in the < ε 11> versus t curve (SL conditions). (*): see Part 2

Stacking sequence

F S L

Point I

Point J

F S L

(MPa)

t S I N S T (s)

ε S I N S T

t S L (s)

ε S L

0.90×F M L

UD_1_36 (*)

2610

2000000

0.0202

2164610

0.0227

CP_1_36

1413

3832000

0.0215

4287310

0.0230

AP_1_36

1425

3357400

0.0215

3807670

0.0231

AP_2_18

1425

3201000

0.0201

4239970

0.0220

AP_4_9

1425

3119300

0.0198

4346020

0.0216

0.96×F M L

UD_1_36 (*)

2790

18000

0.0209

20429

0.0240

CP_1_36

1507

23717

0.0220

25096

0.0222

AP_1_36

1520

21604

0.0221

22328

0.0232

AP_2_18

1520

22052

0.0210

22533

0.0223

AP_4_9

1520

22200

0.0207

22800

0.0225

Table 6

Damage state at characteristics points of the < ε 11> versus t curve (SL conditions). (*): see Part 2

Stacking sequence

Point I

Point J

F S L

Fibre breaks (%)

32-plets (%)

Fibre breaks (%)

32-plets (%)

0.90×F M L

UD_1_36 (*)

15.03

13.97

28.90

23.50

CP_1_36

19.37

17.76

26.88

23.29

AP_1_36

19.96

18.23

28.11

23.68

AP_2_18

16.27

15.12

27.23

23.59

AP_4_9

15.62

14.54

26.72

23.35

0.96×F M L

UD_1_36 (*)

9.63

7.98

19.51

13.41

CP_1_36

11.27

9.54

12.60

10.79

AP_1_36

11.94

10.13

18.40

13.96

AP_2_18

11.34

9.63

17.66

14.20

AP_4_9

11.63

9.98

20.63

16.91

It can be seen that correlating the effects of confinement on the populations of 32-plets with < ε 11> rather than < ε 11>0 would have led to the wrong conclusion. It could have been erroneously concluded that less damage would be observed, with fewer fibre breaks, with the layup AP_4_9 (with respect tothe sequence AP_1_36 for example) as the strain < ε 11> was less (with respect to the sequence AP_1_36 for example) as fewere fibre breaks were induced and therefore the reduction in damage is due to the reduction of < ε 11>. In reality the strain seen by the 0 plies is the same in all the sequences. It is therefore the effect of confinement which causes the reduction in damage.

To resume, whatever the type of loading ML-H or SL, the conclusions are identical: the finer the layers at 0 the greater is the restriction of clustering. This result has already been experimentally demonstrated by Sihn et al. [17] and Wisnom et al. [24]. Once again, the model is confirmed by experimental results.

4 Conclusion

In this third and last part of this study we have examined the damage of the unidirectional plies within a cross-plied laminate, including the cases in which the plies were separated by off-axis layers, but for which failure was controlled by the failure of the unidirectional plies. The choice of lay-up reflected the fibre arrangement in filament wound pressure vessels. This behaviour was exactly analogous to the the single unidirectional plies subjected to a continuously increasing load considered in Part 1 or under steady loading until failure as in Part 2. In this paper the unidirectional plies were part of a stratified laminate and were surrounded by off-axis composite plies, however the loading patterns were the same.

The result of the analysis is that the results obtained with the single unidirectional plates are perfectly valid both qualitatively and quantitatively when they are included in a laminate:
  • it is always the population of high oder i-plets (32-plets) which is the key parameter for failure;

  • under type ML-H loading for which the viscosity of the matrix can be ignored:
    • a critical damage state can be defined as approximately 3% of all possible 32-plets, randomly distributed in the composite;

    • the effect of clustering of fibre breaks only becomes visible near the point of instability J on the curve F(t) versus < ε 11>;

  • under loading of type SL, for which the viscosity of the matrix becomes important:
    • the time over which the specimen is loaded has a marked effect on the clustering of fibre breaks;

    • a single critical state of damage is not therefore defineable;

    • the effect of clustering becomes visible from the beginning of the constant loading period and can become very large (more than 20 % of the fibre breaks clustered in 32-plets at the point of instability J on the curve < ε 11> versus t).

The simulation has also allowed the mute point of whether it is best to group all the plies of one orientation into one thick layer or to spread them throughout the thickness in several thinner plies 0 or if this is no importance. Whatever the type of loading ML-H or SL, the conclusions are identical: the finer the layers at 0 the greater the effect of clustering is restricted. In the case of loading of the type SL, the time to failure with the same number of plies (same number of off-axis plies; same number of plies at 0) increases in proportion to the number of plies at 0 spread throughout the thickness of the laminate as thin plies. However in the case of ML-H loading there is no difference in failure load but the high order i-plets are reduced if the plies at 0 are thinner.

In the future, the next step of the study has to take into account the variability of the local volume fraction and the matrix cracking phenomenon [1, 14, 19, 20, 21, 23] which appears in these materials and to confirm or not the conclusions of the present study.

Nevertheless these variables should not modify the main conclusions described above. The cracking of the matrix should have only an effect on the load transfer between fibres in those plies which are susceptible to cracking which is to say the off-axis plies. The effect of local variations of fibre volume fraction could lead to variations in damage states but this does not change the principal mechanism governing damage, especially under sustained loads, which is the viscosity of the matrix.

The results given in this three papers are solidly based on earlier studies (some of the oldest are Rosen [15], Cox [12], Zweben [25]) of which many have been cited in the list of references (Part 1). The present study owes much to earlier researchers who have described the physically based processes governing composite behaviour beginning with analytical techniques. These earlier studies based as they were on a logical examination of mechanical processes at the level of reinforcements, have allowed a general understanding of the phenomena governing composite behaviour and ultimately failure. The increasing computation power of computers has allowed the present authors to develop models based on the understanding of the phenomena in a earlier studies [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. It is now possible, with a reasonable computational time and by using multi-scale approach [13, 18, 22], for a detailed simulation of those physical phenomena involved in composite behaviour to be made. A comparison between the simulated behaviour of composites and the results obtained experimentally [16] shows close agreement and justifies the use of this model in the understanding of composite structures, such as pressure vessels [10]. It also allows a closer examination of processes which are very difficult or impossible to observe experimentally, such as the critical effect of clustering of fibre breaks, which is more or less important depending on the loading conditions.

5 Nomenclature

  • ML: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading
    • ML-H: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with High speed loading

    • ML-M: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with Medium speed loading

    • ML-L: Monotonic increasing tensile Loading with Low speed loading

  • SL: monotonic increasing then Sustained tensile Loading

  • t: time (s)

  • F(t) is the applied tensile stress in ML conditions

  • F M L is the tensile strength of the specimen in ML conditions

  • F S L is the sustained applied tensile stress in SL conditions

  • t S L is the time to failure of the specimen in SL conditions

  • <ε 11> is the average (over all the specimen) of the longitudinal strain

  • <ε 11>0 is the average (only over all the 0 plies of the specimen) of the longitudinal strain

  • the curve F(t) versus < ε 11> is the characteristic curve in ML condition

  • the curve < ε 11> versus t is the characteristic curve in SL condition

  • F M L is given by the intersection (point B) of the tangent at the origin of the curve F(t) versus < ε 11> and the tangent of the plateau of instability of the same curve. The strain for B is denoted as ε S I N S T

  • t S L is given by the intersection (point B) of the tangent of the sustained loading plateau of the curve < ε 11> versus t and the tangent of the plateau of instability of the same curve. The strain for B is denoted as ε S I N S T

  • the instability point of the characteristic curve is J. The coordinates of J are:
    • (ε M L , F M L ) in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve

    • (t S L , ε S L ) in < ε 11> versus t the curve

  • the Start of INStability (SINST) point of the characteristic curve is I. The coordinates of I are:
    • (ε S I N S T , F S I N S T ) in the F(t) versus < ε 11> curve

    • (t S I N S T , ε S I N S T ) in the < ε 11> versus t curve

  • an i-plet defines i fibres broken in the 32 fibres of the RVE (0-plet, 1-plet, 2-plet, 4-plet, 8-plet, 16-plet, 32-plet):
    • a non zero i-plet is considered of a small order if i≤4

    • a non zero i-plet is considered of a medium order if 8≤i≤16

    • a non zero i-plet is considered of a high order if i≥32

References

  1. 1.
    Aussedat, E., Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Comportement en compression des composites par une définition du mode de sollicitation en mécanique de l’endommagement. Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Série II 321, 533–540 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blassiau, S.: Modélisation des phénomènes microstructuraux au sein d’un composite unidirectionnel carbone/époxy et prédiction de durée de vie : contrôle et qualification de réservoirs bobinés. Thèse, Ecole des Mines de Paris (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 1, Micromechanisms and 3d analysis of load transfert, the elastic case. Compos. Struct. 74, 303–318 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 2, Influence of viscoelastic and plastic matrices on the mechanism of load transfert. Compos. Struct. 74, 319–331 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Damage accumulation processes and life prediction in unidirectional composites. Proc. R. Soc. (A) 463, 1135–1152 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Micromechanisms of load transfert in a unidirectional carbon-fibre epoxy composite due to fibre failures. part 3: multiscale reconstruction of composite behaviour. Compos. Struct. 83, 312–323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blassiau, S., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.: Three-dimensional analysis of load transfer micro-mechanisms in fibre/matrix composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 33–39 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bunsell, A. R., Thionnet, A.: Life prediction for carbon fibre filament wound composite structures. Phil. Mag. 90, 4129–4146 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camara, S., Bunsell, A. R., Thionnet, A., Allen, D. H.: Determination of lifetime probabilities of carbon fibre composite plates and pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36, 6031–6038 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chou, H.Y., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A. R.: Visual indicator for the detection of end-of-life criterion for composite high pressure vessels for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 16247–16255 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chou, H. Y., Zejli, H., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A., Mouritz, A., Bannister, M.: Détection et discrimination par émission acoustique des endommagements dans les composites stratifiés d’unidirectionnels rupture de fibre, macro et microfissuration intralaminaire, microdélaminage. comparaison expérience/modélisation. Matériaux 2010, 18-22 octobre. Nantes, France (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cox, H. L.: The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 72–79 (1951)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feyel, F.: A multilevel finite element method (fe2) to describe the response of highly non-linear structures using generalized continua. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192, 3233–3244 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Renard, J., Thionnet, A.: Damage in composites: from physical mechanisms to modelling. Compos. Sci. Technol., 642–646 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen, B. W.: Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J. 2, 1985–1991 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott, A. E., Sinclair, I., Spearing, S. M., Thionnet, A., Bunsell, A.R.: Damage accumulation in a carbon/epoxy composite: Comparison between a multiscale model and computed tomography experimental results. Compos. A 43, 1514–1522 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sihn, S., Kim, R. Y., Kawabe, K., Tsai, S. W.: Experimental studies of thin-ply laminated composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 996–1008 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Souza, F. V., Allen, D. H., Kim, Y. R.: Multiscale model for predicting damage evolution in composites due to impact loading. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2624–2634 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Talreja, R.: Multi-scale modeling in damage mechanics of composite materials. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 6800–6812 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thionnet, A.: From fracture to damage mechanics: a behavior law for microcracked bodies using the concept of crack opening mode. Compos. Struct. 92, 780–794 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Meso-macro approach to transverse cracking in laminated composites using talreja’s model. Compos. E. 3, 851–871 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Multi-scale analysis to determine fibre/matrix debonding criteria in sic/titanium composites with and without consideration of the manufacturing residual stresses. Compos. Sci. Technol. 58, 945–955 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thionnet, A., Renard, J.: Modelling unilateral damage effect in strongly anisotropic materials by the introduction of loading mode in damage mechanics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 36, 4269–4287 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wisnom, M. R., Hallet, S. R., Soutis, C.: Scaling effects in notched composites. J. Compos. Mater. 44, 195–210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zweben, C.: Tensile failure of fibers composites. AIAA J. 6, 2325–2331 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.a - Mines ParisTechCentre des Matériaux, CNRS UMR 7633Evry cedexFrance
  2. 2.b - Université de Bourgogne, MirandeDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations