Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 921–940 | Cite as

Transient Dynamic Response and Failure of Sandwich Composite Structures under Impact Loading with Fluid Structure Interaction

  • Y. W. Kwon
  • M. A. Violette
  • R. D. McCrillis
  • J. M. Didoszak
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) effect on transient dynamic response and failure of sandwich composite structures under impact loading. The primary sandwich composite used in this study consisted of a 6.35 mm balsa core and a multi-ply symmetrical plain weave 6 oz E-glass skin. Both clamped sandwich composite plates and beams were studied using a uniquely designed vertical drop-weight testing machine. There were three impact conditions on which these experiments focused. The first of these conditions was completely dry (or air surrounded) testing. The second condition was completely water submerged. The final condition was also a water submerged test with air support at the backside of the plates. The tests were conducted sequentially, progressing from a low to high drop height to determine the onset and spread of damage to the sandwich composite when impacted with the test machine. The study showed the FSI effect on sandwich composite structures is very critical such that impact force, strain response, and damage size are generally much greater with FSI under the same impact condition. As a result, damage initiates at much lower impact energy conditions with the effect of FSI. Neglecting to account for FSI effects on sandwich composite structures results in very non-conservative analysis and design. Additionally, it was observed that the damage location changed for sandwich composite beams with the effect of FSI.

Keywords

Fluid–structure interaction Sandwich composites Damage Impact 

References

  1. 1.
    Vinson, J.R., Sierakowski, R.L.: The behavior of structures composed of composite materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Secaucus (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NASA Preferred Reliability Practices: Structural Laminate Composites for Space Applications, Practice No. PD-ED-1217, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Dr. Pasadena, CA USA, Dec 2009, http://engineer.jpl.nasa.gov/practices/1217.pdf Accessed August 24, 2010.
  3. 3.
    Business Development in the New Navy, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp, Boulder, CO USA, Aug 2003 http://www.nps.edu/academics/institutes/meyer/docs/SI4000/Seminar_topics_04/Navy_Marketing_Brief_Ball_Aerospace.pdf Accessed August 24, 2010.
  4. 4.
    LeGault, M.R.: DDG-1000 Zumwalt: stealth warship. Compos. Tech. (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffiths, B.: Rudder gets new twist with composites. Compos. Tech. (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aslan, Z., Karakuzu, R., Okutan, B.: The response of laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Struct 59, 119–127 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwon, Y.W., Wojcik, G.W.: Impact study of sandwich composite structures with delamination. J Compos Mater 32(5), 407–430 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abrate, S.: Impact engineering of composite structures. Cambridge, (CISM Courses and Lectures, Vol. 526), printed in Italy, Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baucom, J.N., Zikry, M.A.: Low velocity impact damage progression in woven E-glass composite systems. Compos Appl Sci Manuf 36(5), 658–664 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mines, R.A.W., Worrall, C.M., Gibson, A.G.: Low velocity perforation behaviour of polymer composite sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng 21(10), 855–879 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwon, Y.W., Owens, A.C., Kwon, A.S., Didoszak, J.M.: Experimental Study of Impact on Composite Plates with Fluid–structure Interaction. Int J Multiphys 4(3), 259–271 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon, Y.W.: Study of fluid effects on dynamics of composite structures. ASME J Pres Ves Tech 133, 031301–031306 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kwon, Y.W., Owens, A.C.: Dynamic responses of composite structures with fluid–structure interaction. Adv. Compos. Mater. IN-TECH publisher, (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mouritz, A.P., Gellert, E., Burchill, P., Challis, K.: Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos Struct 53, 21–41 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DIAB Sandwich Handbook: Sandwich Concept, DIAB AB, box 201, S-312 22, Laholm, Sweden, Sept 2003, http://www.diabgroup.com/europe/literature/e_pdf_files/man_pdf/sandwich_hb.pdf Accessed August 23, 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. W. Kwon
    • 1
  • M. A. Violette
    • 1
  • R. D. McCrillis
    • 1
  • J. M. Didoszak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical & Aerospace EngineeringNaval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations