Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 19, Issue 3–4, pp 705–721 | Cite as

Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Mechanical Behavior of Composite Corrugated Core

Article

Abstract

Tensile and flexural characteristics of corrugated laminate panels were studied using numerical and analytical methods and compared with experimental data. Prepreg laminates of glass fiber plain woven cloth were hand-laid by use of a heat gun to ease the creation of the panel. The corrugated panels were then manufactured by using a trapezoidal machined aluminium mould. First, a series of simple tension tests were performed on standard samples to evaluate the material characteristics. Next, the corrugated panels were subjected to tensile and three-point bending tests. The force-displacement graphs were recorded. Numerical and analytical solutions were proposed to simulate the mechanical behavior of the panels. In order to model the energy dissipation due to delamination phenomenon observed in tensile tests in all members of corrugated core, plastic behavior was assigned to the whole geometry, not only to the corner regions. Contrary to the literature, it is shown that the three-stage mechanical behavior of composite corrugated core is not confined to aramid reinforced corrugated laminates and can be observed in other types such as fiber glass. The results reveal that the mechanical behavior of the core in tension is sensitive to the variation of core height. In addition, for the first time, the behavior of composite corrugated core was studied and verified in bending. Finally, the analytical and numerical results were validated by comparing them with experimental data. A good degree of correlation was observed which showed the suitability of the finite element model for predicting the mechanical behavior of corrugated laminate panels.

Keywords

Composite corrugated core Finite element analysis Glass fiber Three-point bending test Tensile test 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, D.: Impact behavior and energy absorption of paper honeycomb sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng 36, 110–114 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tipping S, Stojadinovic B. Innovative corrugated steel shear walls for multi-story residential buildings, In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October, 2008. p. 12–17.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lafreniere M. Design of a Formula SAE Racecar Chassis: Composite Analysis Utilizing Altair Engineering OptiStruct Software, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, March, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGowan DM, Ambur DR. Damage-Tolerance characteristics of composite fuselage sandwich structure with thick face sheets, National aeronautics and space administration, Langley research center, Hampton, Virigina 23681–0001, February 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Heimbs, P. Middendorf, C. Hampf, F. Hähnel, K. Wolf. Aircraft sandwich structures with folded core under impact load, 8th International Conference on Sandwich Structures, ICSS 8 A. J. M. Ferreira (Editor), FEUP, Porto, 2008Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Degussa. Röhm GmbH & Co. KG, Fatigue behaviour of sandwich foam core materials –comparison of different core materials, Pg-Tp-Sa , Kirschenallee , D-64293 Darmstadt ,GermanyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luo S, Suhling JC, Considine JM, Laufenberg TL. The bending stiffness of corrugated board, AMD-Vol. 145/MD-Vol. 36, Mech Cellul Mater ASME 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilchrist AC, Suhling JC, Urbanik TJ. Nonlinear finite element modeling of corrugated board, AMD-Vol. 231/MD-Vol. 85 Mech Cellul Mater SME 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yokozeki, T., Takeda, S., Ogasawara, T., Ishikawa, T.: Mechanical properties of corrugated composites for candidate materials of flexible wing structures. Composites A 37, 1578–1586 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daxner, T., Flatscher,T., and Rammerstorfer, F.G., Optimum design of corrugated board under buckling constraints, 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, COEX Seoul, Korea, May 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thill C, Etches JA, Bond IP, Potter KD,Weaver PM. Corrugated composite structures for aircraft morphing skin applications, 18th International Conference of Adaptive Structures and Technologies, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, October, 2007Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thill, C., Etches, J.A., Bond, I.P., Potter, K.D., Weaver, P.M., Wisnom, M.D.: Investigation of trapezoidal corrugated aramid/epoxy laminates under large tensile displacements transverse to the corrugation direction. Composites A 41, 168–176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leekitwattana M, Boyd SW, Shenoi RA. Evaluation of the transverse shear stiffness of a steel bi-directional corrugated-strip-core sandwich beam, J Const Steel Res, doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.07.010
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials D 3039/D 3039 M-08. Test Conshohocken (PA, USA): ASTM International; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Standard Test Method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions C393-00. test Conshohocken (PA, USA): ASTM International; 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Standard Test Method for In-Plane Shear Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by the Rail Shear Method, ASTM D4255 / D4255M - 01(2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations