Advertisement

Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 19, Issue 3–4, pp 379–391 | Cite as

Mechanical Characterization of an Alternative Technique to Embed Sensors in Composite Structures: The Monitoring Patch

  • Mauricio Torres Arellano
  • Laurent Crouzeix
  • Francis Collombet
  • Bernard Douchin
  • Yves-Henri Grunevald
Article

Abstract

Sensor embedding is one of the main operations in dealing with composites in-core instrumentation. In this work, an alternative encapsulation technique called “monitoring patch” is proposed to achieve correct sensor embedding, to facilitate the industrialised instrumentation procedure and to adapt the sensors according to the geometry and material heterogeneities required of the composite structures. The monitoring patch is mainly developed with the aim to reduce the variability effects produced if the sensor alone is placed. In this initial study, a first patch’s configuration is manufactured with CTMI pre-impregnate epoxy–woven glass, hosting two kinds of silicon prism sensors. The monitoring patch is then placed in the thick middle plane of an epoxy-carbon M21 T700GC quasi-isotropic plate. The plates are instrumented with strain gauges and tested using digital image correlation (DIC). The strain field maps are calculated to analyse the over-strain zones and to infer fracture paths. At the same time, a FEM model is developed to compare the numerical and the experimental observations. The results show that the mechanical strength of the instrumented plates is not significantly affected by the presence of the patch. The failure path of the instrumented plates with monitoring patch is found along the patch perimeter; therefore, the sensors can be recovered without damage even after the failure of the instrumented structure. The feasibility of the monitoring patch is discussed with other embedding techniques. In further studies, the monitoring patch will host a streaming sensor with an aim to carry out in-core strain measurements.

Keywords

Monitoring patch Silicon sensor Embedding Strain field Digital image correlation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present work is part of the research project “Multi-sensor Instrumentation for Composite Materials and Structures (I2MC)” financially supported by the Thematic Advanced Research Network for Aeronautic and Space Sciences & Technologies of Toulouse (RTRA STAE).

The first author conveys his special appreciation to the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) for the financial support.

The Centre for Spatial Studies on Rays (CESR) and the Laboratory of Analysis and Architecture of Systems (LAAS) are also acknowledged for their technical and scientific collaborations as members of the I2MC project.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, W., McKenzie, I., Jones, R.: Development of life extension strategies for Australian military aircrafts, using structural health monitoring of composite repair joints. Compos. Struct. 66, 133–143 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kudela, P., Ostachowicz, W., Zak, A.: Damage detection in composite plates with embedded PZT tranducers. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 22, 1327–1335 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, J., Wu, X., Li, G., Taheri, F., Pang, S.S.: Development of a smart composite pipe joint integrated with piezoelectric layers under tensile loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 5370–5385 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou, G., Sim, L.M.: Evaluating damage in a smart composite laminates using embedded EFPI strain sensors. Opt. Lasers Eng. 47, 1063–1068 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leng, J., Asundi, A.: Structural health monitoring of smart composites materials by using EFPI and FBG sensors. Sens. Actuators A 103, 330–340 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hautamaki, C., Zurn, S., Mantell, S.C., Polla, D.L.: Experimental evaluation of MEMS strain sensors embedded in composites. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 8, 272–279 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, J., Ha, S., Chang, F.K.: Monitoring impacts events using a system identification method. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. 47, 2011–2021 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mueller, I., Chang, F.K., Roy, S., Mittal, M., Lonkar, K., Larrosa, C.: A robust structural health monitoring technique for airframe structures. Proceedings of the “7th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring” (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaudenzi, P., Olivier, M., Sala, G.: Development of an active composite with embedded piezoelectric sensors and actuators for structure actuation and control. Proceedings of the “54th International Astronautical Congress” (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sala, G., Olivier, M.: Embedded piezoelectric sensors and actuators for control of active composite structures. www.naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk (2004)
  11. 11.
    Warketin, D.J., Crawley, E.F., Senturia, S.D.: The feasibility of embedded electronics for intelligent structures. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 3, 462–482 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mall, S., Coleman, J.M.: Monotonic and fatigue loading behavior of a quasi-isotropic graphite/epoxy laminate embedded with piezoelectric sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 7, 822–832 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mall, S.: Integrity of graphite/epoxy laminate embedded with piezoelectric sensor/actuator under monotonic and fatigue loads. Smart Mater. Struct. 11, 527–533 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen, J.P., Vizzini, A.J.: Fatigue response of a host structure with interlaced embedded devices. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11, 902–909 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, Y., Nemat-Nasser, S.: Structural integrity of composite laminates with embedded micro-sensors. Sens. Syst. Netw. 65, 1–5 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaff, K., Rye, P., Nemat-Nasser, S.: Optimization of sensor introduction into laminated composites. Proceedings of the “SEM Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics” (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paget, C.A., Levin, K.: Structural integrity of composites with embedded piezoelectric ceramic transducer. Proceedings of the “Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems” (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mall, S., Hsu, T.L.: Electromechanical fatigue behavior of graphite/epoxy laminate embedded with piezoelectric actuator. Smart Mater. Struct. 9, 78–84 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yocum, M., Abramovich, H., Grunwald, A.: Fully reversed electromechanical behavior of composite laminate with embedded piezoelectric actuator/sensor. Smart Mater. Struct. 12, 556–564 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Torres, M., Crouzeix, L., Collombet, F., Douchin, B., Grunevald, Y.H.: Mechanical performance of composite structures with embedded silica sensors: concept of monitoring patch. Proceedings of the “14th European Conference on Composites Materials” (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Collombet, F., Grunevald, Y.H., Zitoune, R., Mulle, M.: Economical value added of Multi Instrumented Technological Evaluators for the development of composite civil aircraft. Proceedings of the “16th National Journeys on Composites” (2009), hal-00430585–version 1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mulle, M., Zitoune, R., Collombet, F., Grunevald, Y.H.: Embedded FBGs and 3D-DIC for the stress analysis of a structural specimen subjected to bending. Compos. Struct. 91, 48–55 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mukherjee, A., Varughese, B.: Design guidelines for ply drop-off in laminated composite structures. Compos. B 32, 153–164 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mukherjee, A., Varughese, B.: A ply drop-off element for analysis of tapered laminated composites. Compos. Struct. 39, 123–144 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mukherjee, A., Varughese, B.: Development of a specialized finite element for the analysis of composites structures with ply drop-off. Compos. Struct. 46, 1–16 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mukherjee, A., Varughese, B.: A ply drop-off element for inclusion of drop-off in the global analysis of layered composite structures. Comput. Struct. 54, 865–870 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Her, S.C.: Stress analysis of ply drop-off in composite structures. Compos. Struct. 57, 235–244 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torres, M., Crouzeix, L., Collombet, F., Douchin, B., Hernandez, H., Gonzalez, J.L.: Strain field measurement of filament-wound composites at ±55° using digital image correlation: an approach for unit cells employing flat specimens. Compos. Struct. 94, 2457–2464 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Périé, J.N., Calloch, S., Cluzel, C., Hild, F.: Analysis of a multiaxial test on a C/C composite by using digital image correlation and a damage model. Exp. Mech. 42, 318–328 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Crouzeix, L., Périé, J.N., Collombet, F., Douchin, B.: An orthotropic variant of the equilibrium GAP method applied to the analysis of a biaxial test on a composite material. Composites A 40, 1732–1740 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crouzeix, L., Périé, J.N., Torres, M., Douchin, B., Collombet, F., Hernandez, H.: On the use of digital image correlation and equilibrium GAP method for mechanical characterization of filament winding pipes. Proceedings of the 16th National Journeys on Composites (JNC) (2009), hal-00429798–version 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauricio Torres Arellano
    • 1
  • Laurent Crouzeix
    • 1
  • Francis Collombet
    • 1
  • Bernard Douchin
    • 1
  • Yves-Henri Grunevald
    • 2
  1. 1.Université de Toulouse, INSA, UPS, ICA (Institut Clément Ader)ToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Composites, Expertise & SolutionsCastanet TolosanFrance

Personalised recommendations