Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 225–244 | Cite as

Test and Modelling of Impact on Pre-Loaded Composite Panels

  • A. K. Pickett
  • M. R. C. Fouinneteau
  • P. Middendorf
Article

Abstract

Currently test and simulation of low and high speed impact of Aerospace composite structures is undertaken in an unloaded state. In reality this may not be the case and significant internal stresses could be present during an impact event such as bird strike during landing, or takeoff. In order to investigate the effects of internal loading on damage and failure of composite materials a series of experimental and simulation studies have been undertaken on three composite types having different fibres, resins and lay-ups. For each composite type panels have been manufactured and transversely impacted under the condition of ‘unloading’ or ‘pre-loading’. For preloading a rig has been constructed that can impose a constant in plane strain of up to 0.25% prior to impact. Results have clearly shown that preloading does lower the composite impact tolerance and change the observed failure modes. Simulation of experiments have also been conducted and have provided an encouraging agreement with test results in terms of both impact force time histories and prediction of the observed failure mechanisms.

Keywords

A- carbon fibres B- impact behaviour C- damage mechanics D- finite element analysis E-failure criterion 

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM D7136, Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event, May 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM D7137, Standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composites, May 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whittingham, B., Marshall, I.H., Mitrevski, T., Jones, R.: The response of composite structures with pre-stress subject to low velocity impact damage. Composite Structures 66, 685–698 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikkor, K.M., Thomson, R.S., Herszberg, I., Weller, T., Mouritz, A.P.: Finite element modelling of impact on preloaded composite panels. Composite Structure 75, 501–513 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    PAM-CRASH™, ESI Software Engineering Systems International, 99 rue des Solets, SILIC 112, 94513 Rungis cedex France, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ladevèze, P., Le Dantec, E.: Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites. Composites Science and Technology 43, 257–267 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greve L. and Pickett A.K., Modelling damage and failure in carbon/epoxy Non Crimp Fabric composites including effects of fabric pre-shear. Composites Part A, 37(11), pp 1983–2001, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pickett A. K. and Fouinneteau M. R. C., Material characterisation and calibration of a meso-mechanical damage model for braid reinforced composites, Composites: Part A, 37, pp 368–377, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fouinneteau M. R. C., Pickett A. K., Shear Mechanism modelling of heavy tow braided composites using a meso-mechanical damage model, Composites Part A, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hillerborg, A., Modeer, M., Petersson, P.E.: Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement concrete Res 6, 773–782 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allix, O., Ladevèze, P.: Inter-laminar interface modelling for the prediction of laminates delamination. Composite structures 22, 235–242 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, A.F., Pickett, A.K., Rozycki, P.: Computational methods for predicting impact damage in composite structures. Composites Science and Technology 61, 2138–2192 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO international standard DIS15024. Fibre-reinforced plastic composites — Determination of Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM draft standard D30.06. Protocol for interlaminar fracture testing, End-Notched Flexure (ENF), revised April 24, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reeder, J.R., Crews, J.H.: Mixed-mode bending method for delamination testing. AIAA Journal 28(7), 1270–1276 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greve L. and Pickett A. K., Delamination testing and modelling for composite crash simulation, Composites science and technology, 66, pp 816–826, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grossir, S.: Mechanical Characterization and Simulation of Composite Impacts. MSc thesis, Cranfield University, UK (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Pickett
    • 1
  • M. R. C. Fouinneteau
    • 2
  • P. Middendorf
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Aircraft DesignUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.School of Applied ScienceCranfield UniversityBedfordshireUK
  3. 3.EADSOttobrunnGermany

Personalised recommendations