Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 427–446 | Cite as

Discrete Mesh Approach in Morphogenesis Modelling: the Example of Gastrulation

  • J. Demongeot
  • A. Lontos
  • E. Promayon
Regular Article


Morphogenesis is a general concept in biology including all the processes which generate tissue shapes and cellular organizations in a living organism. Many hybrid formalizations (i.e., with both discrete and continuous parts) have been proposed for modelling morphogenesis in embryonic or adult animals, like gastrulation. We propose first to study the ventral furrow invagination as the initial step of gastrulation, early stage of embryogenesis. We focus on the study of the connection between the apical constriction of the ventral cells and the initiation of the invagination. For that, we have created a 3D biomechanical model of the embryo of the Drosophila melanogaster based on the finite element method. Each cell is modelled by an elastic hexahedron contour and is firmly attached to its neighbouring cells. A uniform initial distribution of elastic and contractile forces is applied to cells along the model. Numerical simulations show that invagination starts at ventral curved extremities of the embryo and then propagates to the ventral medial layer. Then, this observation already made in some experiments can be attributed uniquely to the specific shape of the embryo and we provide mechanical evidence to support it. Results of the simulations of the “pill-shaped” geometry of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo are compared with those of a spherical geometry corresponding to the Xenopus lævis embryo. Eventually, we propose to study the influence of cell proliferation on the end of the process of invagination represented by the closure of the ventral furrow.


Discrete mesh modelling Morphogenesis Gastrulation Ventral furrow 



We thank VHP NoE (EC) and MEC grant from CONICYT (Chile) for financially aiding our research.

Supplementary material

Open image in new window
10441_2016_9301_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1790 kb)


  1. Allard J, Cotin S, Faure F, Bensoussan P, Poyer F, Duriez C, Delingette H, Grisoni L (2007) Sofa—an open source framework for medical simulation. In: Westwood JD, Haluck RS, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Vosburgh KG (eds) 15th medicine meets virtual reality. IOP Press, Bristol, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  2. Bidhendi A, Korhonen R (2012) A finite element study of micropipette aspiration of single cells: effect of compressibility. Comput Math Methods Med. doi: 10.1155/2012/192618 Google Scholar
  3. Blackiston DJ, McLaughlin KA, Levin M (2009) Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation. Cell Cycle 8:3519–3528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bownes M (1975) A photographic study of development in the living embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. J Embryol Exp Morphol 33:789–801Google Scholar
  5. Brodland G, Conte V, Cranston P, Veldhuis J, Narasimhan S, Hutson M, Jacinto A, Ulrich F, Baum B, Miodownik M (2010) Video force microscopy reveals the mechanics of ventral furrow invagination in drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22111–22116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006591107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conte V, Munoz J, Miodownik M (2007) A 3D finite element model of ventral furrow invagination in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui C, Yang X, Chuai M, Glazier JA, Weijer CJ (2005) Analysis of tissue flow patterns during primitive streak formation in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 284:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davidson L, Oster G, Keller R, Koehl M (1999) Measurements of mechanical properties of the blastula wall reveal which hypothesized mechanisms of primary invagination are physically plausible in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol 209:221–238. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes-Hoang R, Parmar K, Christiansen A, Phelps C, Brand A, Wieschaus E (2005) Folded gastrulation, cell shape change and the control of myosin localization. Development 132:4165–4178. doi: 10.1242/dev.01938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faure F, Allard J, Cotin S, Neumann P, Bensoussan P, Duriez C, Delingette H, Grisoni L (2007) Sofa: a modular yet efficient simulation framework. In: Surgetica. (ed) Computer-aided medical interventions: tools and applications. Sauramps Médical, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Forest L, Demongeot J (2008) A general formalism for tissue morphogenesis based on cellular dynamics and control system interactions. Acta Biotheor 56:51–74. doi: 10.1007/s10441-008-9030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forgacs G, Newman S (2005) Biological physics of the developing embryo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi: 10.2277/0521783372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fouard C, Deram A, Keraval Y, Promayon E (2012) CamiTK: a modular framework integrating visualization, image processing and biomechanical modelling. In: Payan Y (ed) Studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, pp 323–354Google Scholar
  14. Galle J, Loeffler M, Drasdo D (2005) Modeling the effect of deregulated proliferation and apoptosis on the growth dynamics of epithelial cell populations in vitro. Biophys J 88:62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gjorevski N, Nelson CM (2010) The mechanics of development: models and methods for tissue morphogenesis. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 90:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gumbiner B (2005) Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:622–634. doi: 10.1038/nrm1699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardin J, Keller R (1988) The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. Development 103:211–230Google Scholar
  18. Karr T, Alberts B (1986) Organization of the cytoskeleton in early drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol 102:1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leptin M (1999) Gastrulation in drosophila: the logic and the cellular mechanisms. EMBO J 18:3187–3192. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.12.3187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leptin M, Grunewald B (1990) Cell shape changes during gastrulation in drosophila. Development 110:73–84Google Scholar
  21. Mammoto T, Ingber DE (2010) Mechanical control of tissue and organ development. Development 137:1407–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maniotis A, Chen C, Ingber D (1997) Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin A, Kaschube M, Wieschaus E (2008) Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457:495–499. doi: 10.1038/nature07522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin A, Gelbart M, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Kaschube M, Wieschaus E (2010) Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J Cell Biol 188:735–749. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200910099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Millard TH, Martin P (2008) Dynamic analysis of filopodial interactions during the zippering phase of Drosophila dorsal closure. Development 135:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyoshi J, Takai Y (2008) Structural and functional associations of apical junctions with cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Biomembranes 1778:670–691. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Navis A, Bagnat M (2015) Developing pressures: fluid forces driving morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 32:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nesme M, Marchal M, Promayon E, Chabanas M, Payan Y, Faure F (2005) Physically realistic interactive simulation for biological soft tissues. Recent Res Dev Biomech 2:1–22Google Scholar
  29. Oda H, Tsukita S (2000) Real-time imaging of cell-cell adherens junctions reveals that drosophila mesoderm invagination begins with two phases of apical constriction of cells. J Cell Sci 114:493–501Google Scholar
  30. Royou A, Field C, Sisson J, Sullivan W, Karess R (2004) Reassessing the role and dynamics of non-muscle myosin ii during furrow formation in early drosophila embryos. Mol Biol Cell 15:838–850. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-06-0440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schejter E, Wieschaus E (1993) Functional elements of the cytoskeleton in the early drosophila embryo. Annu Rev Cell Biol 9:67–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.000435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stephanou A, Tracqui P (2002) Cytomechanics of cell deformations and migration: from models to experiments. C R Biol 325:295–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sweeton D, Parks S, Costa M, Wieschaus E (1991) Gastrulation in drosophila: the formation of the ventral furrow and posterior midgut invaginations. Development 112:775–789Google Scholar
  34. Tepass U, Hartenstein V (1994) The development of cellular junctions in the drosophila embryo. Dev Biol 161:563–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tracqui P (2006) Mechanical instabilities as a central issue for in silico analysis of cell dynamics. Proc IEEE Soc 94:710–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tracqui P, Mendjeli M (1999) Modelling 3-dimensional growth of brain tumours from time series of scans. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 9:581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tracqui P, Cruywagen GC, Woodward DE, Bartoo GT, Murray JD, Alvord EC Jr (1995) A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of chemotherapy on spatio-temporal growth. Cell Prolif 28:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tracqui P, Namy P, Ohayon J (2005) Cellular networks morphogenesis induced by mechanically stressed microenvironments. J Biol Phys Chem 5:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tranqui L, Tracqui P (2000) Mechanical signaling and angiogenesis: the integration of cell—extracellular matrix couplings. C R Acad Sci Sér III 322:1–17Google Scholar
  40. Vailhe B, Ronot X, Tracqui P, Usson Y, Tranqui L (1997) In vitro angiogenesis is modulated by the mechanical properties of fibrin gels and is related to αvβ3 integrin localization. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal 33:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang X, Devarajan V (2005) 1D and 2D structured mass-spring models with preload. Visual Comput 21:429–448. doi: 10.1007/s00371-005-0303-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodward DE, Cook J, Tracqui P, Cruywagen GC, Murray JD, Alvord EC Jr (1996) A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of extent of surgical resection. Cell Prolif 29:269–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1996.tb01580.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AGIM, Faculty of Medicine of GrenobleUniversity J. FourierLa TroncheFrance
  2. 2.TIMC-IMAG, Faculty of Medicine of GrenobleUniversity J. FourierLa TroncheFrance

Personalised recommendations