Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 59, Issue 3–4, pp 251–271

Causal and Mechanistic Explanations in Ecology

Regular Article
  • 293 Downloads

Abstract

How are scientific explanations possible in ecology, given that there do not appear to be many—if any—ecological laws? To answer this question, I present and defend an account of scientific causal explanation in which ecological generalizations are explanatory if they are invariant rather than lawlike. An invariant generalization continues to hold or be valid under a special change—called an intervention—that changes the value of its variables. According to this account, causes are difference-makers that can be intervened upon to manipulate or control their effects. I apply the account to ecological generalizations to show that invariance under interventions as a criterion of explanatory relevance provides interesting interpretations for the explanatory status of many ecological generalizations. Thus, I argue that there could be causal explanations in ecology by generalizations that are not, in a strict sense, laws. I also address the issue of mechanistic explanations in ecology by arguing that invariance and modularity constitute such explanations.

Keywords

Causes Invariance Laws Mechanisms Modularity Scientific explanation 

References

  1. Ashton KG, Tracy MC, Queiroz A (2000) Is Bergmann’s rule valid for mammals? Am Nat 156:390–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (2005) Explanation: a mechanist alternative. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 36:421–441Google Scholar
  3. Bednekoff P (2003) Lawless biology. Am Biol Teach 65:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berryman AA (2003) On principles, laws and theory in population ecology. Oikos 103:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ, Loder N (1999) Geographic gradients in body size: a clarification of Bergmann’s rule. Divers Distrib 5:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogen J (2005) Regularities and causality; generalizations and causal explanations. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 36:397–420Google Scholar
  7. Bonner JT (1968) Size change in development and evolution. In: Macurda DB (ed) Paleobiological aspects of growth and development. Paleontological Society, Michigan, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  8. Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Cartwright N (2002) Against modularity, the causal Markov condition, and any link between the two: comments on Hausman and Woodward. Brit J Philos Sci 53:411–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright N (2004) Causation: one word, many things. Philos Sci 71:805–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1983) The functional significance of variation in body size among mammals. In: Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (eds) Advances in the study of mammalian behavior. American Society of Mammalogists, Shippensburg (Pennsylvania), pp 632–663Google Scholar
  12. Colyvan M, Ginzburg LR (2003) Laws of nature and laws of ecology. Oikos 101:649–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook RE (1974) Origin of the highland avifauna of Southern Venezuela. System Zool 23:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craver CF (2002) Interlevel experiments and multilevel mechanisms in the neuroscience of memory. Philos Sci 69:S83–S97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craver CF (2007) Explaining the brain. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darden L (2002) Strategies for discovering mechanisms: schema instantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward chaining. Philos Sci 69:S354–S365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darden L (2005) Relations among fields: Mendelian, cytological and molecular mechanisms. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 36:349–371Google Scholar
  19. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444Google Scholar
  20. Durán LR, Castilla JC (1989) Variation and persistence of the middle rocky intertidal community of central Chile, with and without human harvesting. Mar Biol 103:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaston KJ (1996) Species-range-size distributions: patterns, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 11:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert FS (1980) The equilibrium theory of island biogeography: fact or fiction? J Biogeogr 7:209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glennan S (1996) Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44:49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glennan S (2005) Modeling mechanisms. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 36:443–464Google Scholar
  25. Gould SJ (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev 41:587–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hairston NG (1989) Ecological experiments. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Hausman DM, Woodward J (1999) Independence, invariance and the causal Markov condition. Brit J Philos Sci 50:521–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hausman DM, Woodward J (2004) Manipulation and the causal Markov condition. Philos Sci 71:846–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Hempel CG, Oppenheim P (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philos Sci 15:135–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hitchcock CR (1995) Salmon on explanatory relevance. Philos Sci 62:304–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hitchcock CR, Woodward J (2003) Explanatory generalizations, part II: plumbing explantory depth. Noûs 37:181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kitcher P (1989) Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In: Kitcher P, Salmon WC (eds) Scientific explanation. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol 13. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 410–505Google Scholar
  34. Lange M (2005) Ecological laws: what would they be and why would they matter? Oikos 110:394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawton JH (1996) Patterns in ecology. Oikos 75:145–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis D (1973) Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Loehle G (1990) Philosophical tools: reply to Shrader-Frechette and McCoy. Oikos 58:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Machamer P, Darden L, Craver CF (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philos Sci 67:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mancosu P (2008) Explanation in mathematics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/mathematics-explanation/
  41. Marquet PA (2000) Invariants, scaling laws, and ecological complexity. Science 289:1487–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marquet PA, Quiñones RA, Abades S, Labra F, Tognelli M, Arim M, Rivadeneira M (2005) Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems. J Exp Biol 208:1749–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinney ML (1990) Trends in body-size evolution. In: McNamara KJ (ed) Evolutionary trends. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 75–118Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell SD (1997) Pragmatic laws. Philos Sci 64:S468–S479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchell SD (2000) Dimensions of scientific law. Philos Sci 67:242–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitchell SD (2002) Ceteris paribus—an inadequate representation for biological contingency. Erkenntnis 57:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mitchell SD (2008) Exporting causal knowledge in evolutionary and developmental biology. Philos Sci 75:697–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murray BG (1999) Is theoretical ecology a science? A reply to Turchin (1999). Oikos 87:594–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murray BG (2000) Universal laws and predictive theory in ecology and evolution. Oikos 89:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murray BG (2001) Are ecological and evolutionary theories scientific? Biol Rev 76:255–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murray BG (2004) Laws, hypotheses, guesses. Am Biol Teach 66:598–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagel E (1961) The structure of science. Harcourt, Brace and World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Newell ND (1949) Phyletic size increase, an important trend illustrated by fossil invertebrates. Evolution 3:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Hara RB (2005) The anarchist’s guide to ecological theory. Or, we don’t need no stinkin’ laws. Oikos 110:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Owen-Smith N (2005) Incorporating fundamental laws of biology and physics into population ecology: the metaphysiological approach. Oikos 111:611–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paine RT, Vadas RL (1969) The effects of grazing by sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus Spp., on benthic algal populations. Limn Oceanogr 14:710–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pâslaru V (2009) Ecological explanation between manipulation and mechanism description. Philos Sci 76:821–837Google Scholar
  59. Perini L (2005) Explanation in two dimensions: diagrams and biological explanation. Biol Philos 20:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Peters RH (1991) A critique of ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Pianka ER (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am Nat 100:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Preston FW (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: part II. Ecology 43:410–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Psillos S (2002) Causation and explanation. Acumen, CheshamGoogle Scholar
  65. Raerinne JP (2010) Allometries and scaling laws interpreted as laws: a reply to elgin. Biol Philos. doi:10.1007/s10539-010-9203-9
  66. Raerinne JP (2010) Generalizations and Models in Ecology. Dissertation, University of Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  67. Rensch B (1960) The laws of evolution. In: Tax S (ed) Evolution after darwin, vol 1. University of Chicago, Chicago, pp 95–116Google Scholar
  68. Sagoff M (1985) Fact and value in ecological science. Environ Eth 7:99–116Google Scholar
  69. Salmon WC (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  70. Salmon WC (1989) Four decades of scientific explanation. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  71. Salmon WC (1994) Causality without counterfactuals. Philos Sci 61:297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sandborg D (1998) Mathematical explanation and the theory of why-questions. Brit J Philos Sci 49:603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shrader-Frechette K, McCoy ED (eds) (1993) Method in ecology: strategies for conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Shrader-Frechette K, McCoy ED (1994) Applied ecology and the logic of case studies. Philos Sci 61:228–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Simberloff DS (1974) Equilibrium theory of island biogeography and ecology. Ann Rev Ecol System 5:161–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simberloff DS (1976) Experimental zoogeography of islands: effects of island size. Ecology 57:629–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Simberloff DS (1982) The status of competition theory in ecology. Annal Zool Fenn 19:241–253Google Scholar
  78. Slobodkin LB (1964) Experimental populations of Hydrida. J Anim Ecol 33(Supplement):131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Steel DP (2006) Comment on Hausman and Woodward on the causal Markov condition. Brit J Philos Sci 57:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Steel DP (2008) Across the boundaries. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Tabery JG (2004) Synthesizing activities and interactions in the concept of a mechanism. Philos Sci 71:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Turchin P (2001) Does population ecology have general laws? Oikos 94:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Williamson M (1989) The Macarthur and Wilson theory today: true but trivial. J Biogeogr 16:3–4Google Scholar
  84. Wimsatt WC (1976) Reductive explanation: a functional account. In: Cohen RS, Hooker CA, Michalos AC, Van Evra JW (eds) PSA 1974. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 671–710Google Scholar
  85. Woodward J (2000) Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. Brit J Philos Sci 51:197–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Woodward J (2001) Law and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philos Sci 68:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woodward J (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philos Sci 69:S366–S377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woodward J (2003a) Making things happen. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  89. Woodward J (2003b) Experimentation, causal inference, and instrumental realism. In: Radder H (ed) The philosophy of scientific experimentation. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 87–118Google Scholar
  90. Woodward J (2006) Sensitive and insensitive causation. Philos Rev 115:1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, sensitivity, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25:287–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woodward J, Hitchcock CR (2003) Explanatory generalizations, part I: a counterfactual account. Noûs 37:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ylikoski P, Kuorikoski J (2010) Dissecting explanatory power. Philos Stud 148:201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations