Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 65–79 | Cite as

Multiple Explanations in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory

  • Walter J. BockEmail author
Regular Article


Variational evolutionary theory as advocated by Darwin is not a single theory, but a bundle of related but independent theories, namely: (a) variational evolution; (b) gradualism rather than large leaps; (c) processes of phyletic evolution and of speciation; (d) causes for the formation of varying individuals in populations and for the action of selective agents; and (e) all organisms evolved from a common ancestor. The first four are nomological-deductive explanations and the fifth is historical-narrative. Therefore evolutionary theory must be divided into nomological and historical theories which are both testable against objective empirical observations. To be scientific, historical evolutionary theories must be based on well corroborated nomological theories, both evolutionary and functional. Nomological and general historical evolutionary theories are well tested and must be considered as strongly corroborated scientific theories. Opponents of evolutionary theory are concerned only with historical evolutionary theories, having little interest in nomological theory. Yet given a well corroborated nomological evolutionary theory, historical evolutionary theories follow automatically. If understood correctly, both forms of evolutionary theories stand on their own as corroborated scientific theories and should not be labeled as facts.


 Evolution Explanations Nomological theory Historical theory 


  1. Barrett PH, Weinshank DJ, Gottleber TT (1981) A concordance to Darwin’s origin of species, 1st edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, xv + 834 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bock WJ (1967) The use of adaptive characters in avian classification. In: Snow DW (ed) Proceedings of the XIV international ornithological congress, pp 61–74. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock WJ (1980) The definition and recognition of biological adaptation. Am Zool 20:217–227Google Scholar
  4. Bock WJ (1993) Selection and fitness; definitions and uses; 1859 and now. Proc Zoolog Soc Calcutta, Haldane Comm vol, pp 7–26Google Scholar
  5. Bock WJ (2000) Towards a new metaphysics: the need for an enlarged philosophy of science. Biol Philos 15:603–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bock WJ (2003) Ecological aspects of the evolutionary processes. Zool Sci 20:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bock WJ (2004) Explanations in systematics. In: Williams D, Forey PL (eds) Milestones in systematics. London: systematics association special, vol Ser 67. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 49–56Google Scholar
  8. Bock WJ (2007) Explanations in evolutionary theory. J Zoolog Syst Evol Res 45:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock WJ (2009a) Design—an inappropriate concept in evolutionary theory. J Zool Syst Evol Res 47(1):7–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bock WJ (2009b) The Darwin–Wallace myth of 1858. Proc Zool Soc Calcutta 62(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowler PJ (1975) The changing meaning of “Evolution”. J Hist Ideas 36(1):95–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowler PJ (1989) Evolution. The history of an idea. University of California Press, Berkeley (Revised Edition, xvi + 432 pp)Google Scholar
  13. Darwin C (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. J Proc Linn Soc Zool 3:46–52Google Scholar
  14. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species. London, John Murray; Facsimile of the first edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, ix + 513 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobzhansky T (1959) Variation and evolution. Proc Am Philos Soc 103(2):252–263Google Scholar
  16. Ehrlich PR, Holm RW (1963) The process of evolution. McGraw-Hill, New York, xvi + 347 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher RA (1930) The genetic theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford (Revised Edition New York, Dover)Google Scholar
  18. Futuyma DJ (1986) Evolutionary biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, xii + 600 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation, 2nd edn. Colunbia University Press, New York, iii + 563 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Hahn MWE (2008) Toward a selection theory of molecular evolution. Evolution 62(2):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hull D (1999) The use and abuse of sir Karl Popper. Biol Philos 14:481–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 82(2):131–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennings HS (1937) Formation, inheritance and variation of the teeth in Difflugia corona. A study of the morphogenic activities of rhizopod protoplasm. J Exp Zool 77:287–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lerner IM (1959) The concept of natural selection: a centennial view. Proc Am Philos Soc 103(2):173–182Google Scholar
  26. Lewontin R (1983) The organism as the subject and object of evolution. Scientia 118:63–82Google Scholar
  27. Mayr E (1959) Isolation as an evolutionary factor. Proc Am Philos Soc 103(2):221–230Google Scholar
  28. Mayr E (1962) Accident or design: the paradox of evolution. In: The evolution of living organisms. Proceedings of the Darwin Centenary Symposium of the Royal Society of Victoria, Melbourne, 1959. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  29. Mayr E (1988) Toward a new philosophy of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, x + 564 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayr E (1991) One long argument. Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, xiv + 195 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayr E (1997) This is biology. The science of the living world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, xv + 327 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayr E (2001) What evolution is. Basic Books, New York, xvii + 318 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Mayr E (2004) What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge University Press, New York, xiv + 232 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayr E, Bock WJ (2002) Classifications and other ordering systems. Z Zool Syst Evol Forsch 40:1–25Google Scholar
  35. Nagel E (1961) The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Brace and World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Nordenskiöld E (1928) The history of biology. A survey. Tudor Publishing, New York, xii + 616 +v ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Paley W (1802) Natural theology; or evidences of the existence and attributes of the diety, collected from the appearances of nature. R. Faulder, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Platnick NI, Gaffney ES (1978) Systematics and the Popperian paradigm. Syst Zool 27:381–388, 1978bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Popper K (1957) The poverty of historicism. Routledge & Kegen Paul, London (Boston, Ma., Beacon Press), xiv + 166 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Popper K (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson & Co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Popper K (1974) Autobiography of Karl Popper. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of Karl Popper. Part one. Open Court, LaSalle, pp 2–181 xvi + 670 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards RJ (1992) The meaning of evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, xv + 205 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Perspective: evolution of flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: wright revisited. Evolution 55(7):1269–1282Google Scholar
  44. Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2007) Spatial differentiation for flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: was wright right? Evolution 61(11):2528–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schilpp PA (ed) (1974) The philosophy of Karl Popper. The library of living philosophers, vol XIV, Two books. Open Court, La SalleGoogle Scholar
  46. Simpson GG (1959) Anatomy and morphology; classification and evolution: 1859 and 1959. Proc Am Philos Soc 103(2):286–306Google Scholar
  47. Simpson GG (1963) Biology and the nature of science. Science 134(3550):81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spencer H (1852) The development hypothesis. Republished in Spencer, 1896. Essays scientific and political. vol I:1–7. New York (from Bowler, 1975. p 106)Google Scholar
  49. Spencer H (1864) Principles of biology. London (from Bowler, 1975. p 108)Google Scholar
  50. Wallace AR (1858) On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. J Proc Linn Soc Zool 3:53–632Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations