Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 361–381 | Cite as

Mathematical Analysis of a Two Strain HIV/AIDS Model with Antiretroviral Treatment

Regular Article

Abstract

A two strain HIV/AIDS model with treatment which allows AIDS patients with sensitive HIV-strain to undergo amelioration is presented as a system of non-linear ordinary differential equations. The disease-free equilibrium is shown to be globally asymptotically stable when the associated epidemic threshold known as the basic reproduction number for the model is less than unity. The centre manifold theory is used to show that the sensitive HIV-strain only and resistant HIV-strain only endemic equilibria are locally asymptotically stable when the associated reproduction numbers are greater than unity. Qualitative analysis of the model including positivity, boundedness and persistence of solutions are presented. The model is numerically analysed to assess the effects of treatment with amelioration on the dynamics of a two strain HIV/AIDS model. Numerical simulations of the model show that the two strains co-exist whenever the reproduction numbers exceed unity. Further, treatment with amelioration may result in an increase in the total number of infective individuals (asymptomatic) but results in a decrease in the number of AIDS patients. Further, analysis of the reproduction numbers show that antiretroviral resistance increases with increase in antiretroviral use.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS model Two strains Treatment with amelioration Center manifold theory Stability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

C. P. Bhunu would like to acknowledge the financial support given to him by International Clinical Operational Health Services Research Training Award (ICOHRTA) through the Biomedical Research Training Institute (BRTI). The authors would like thank the anonymous referrees whose commends and suggestions really improved our work.

References

  1. Ackleh AS, Allen LJS (2004) Competitive exclusion in SIS and SIR epidemic models with total cross immunity and density-dependent host mortality. Discret Contin Dyn Syst B (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Allen LJS, Kirupaharan N (2005) Asymptotic dynamics of deterministic and stochastic epidemic models with multiple pathogens. Int J Numer Anal Model 2(3):329–344Google Scholar
  3. Allen LJS, Langais M, Phillips CJ (2003) The dynamics of two viral infections in a single host population with applications to hantavirus. Math Biosci 186:191–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson RM, Gupta S, May RM (1991) Potential of community-wide chemotherapy or immunotherapy to control the spread of HIV-1. Nature 350:356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baggaley RF, Ferguson NM, Garnett GP (2005) The epidemiological impact of antiretroviral use predicted by mathematical models: a review. Emerg Themes EpidemiolGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbalat I (1959) Syst\(\grave e\) me d’\(\acute e\) quationdiff \(\acute e\) rentielle d’Oscillation, Nonlin \(\acute e\) aires. Rev Roum Math Pures Appl 4:267–270Google Scholar
  7. Birkoff G, Rota GC (1982) Ordinary differential equations. Ginn, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Blower SM, Gerberding JL (1998) Understanding, predicting and controlling the emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a theoretical framework. J Mol Med 76:624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blyuss KB, Kyrychko YN (2005) On a basic model of a two-disease epidemic. Appl Math Comput 160:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr J (1981) Applications of centre manifold theory. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Castillo-Chavez C, Feng Z (1997) To treat or not to treat: the case of tuberculosis. J Math Biol 35: 629–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castillo-Chavez C, Feng Z (1998) Mathematical models for the disease dynamics of tuberculosis. World Scientific Press, Singapore, pp 629–656Google Scholar
  13. Castillo-Chavez C, Song B (2004) Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications. Math Biosci Eng 1(2):361–404Google Scholar
  14. Castillo-Chavez C, Feng Z, Huang W (2002) On the computation of R 0 and its role on global stability. http://math.la.asu.edu/chavez/2002/JB276.pdf
  15. Dye C, William BG (2000) Criteria for the control of drug resistant tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:8180–8185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer P, Walton DA, Furin JJ (2000) The changing face of AIDS: implications for policy and practice. In: Mayer K, Pizer H (ed) The emergence of AIDS: the impact on immunology, microbiology,and public health. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrington PR, Lader BA (2002) Extent of cross resistance between agents used to treat HIV-1 infection in clinically derived isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:909–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsu Schmizt SF (2000) Effects of treatment or/and vaccination on HIV transmission in homosexuals with genetic heterogeneity. Math Biosci 167:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsu Schmizt SF (2002) Effects of genetic heterogeneity on HIV transmission in homosexuals populations. In: Castillo-Chavez C, Blower S, van den Driessche P, Kirshner D, Yakubu A-A (eds) Mathematical approaches for emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: models, methods and theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 245–260Google Scholar
  20. Hofbauer J, So JWH (1989) Uniform persistence and repellers for maps. Proc Am Math Soc 107:1137–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyman JM, Li J, Stanley EA (1999) The differential infectivity and staged progression models for the transmission of HIV. Math Biosci 155:77–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korobeinikov A, Maini PK (2004) A Lyapunov function and global properties for SIR and SEIR epidemiological models with nonlinear incidence. Math Biosci Eng 1(1):57–60Google Scholar
  23. Lader BA, Darby G, Richman DD (1989) HIV with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine isolated during prolonged therapy. Science 243:1731–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levy SB (1992) The antibiotic paradox: how miracle drugs are destroying the miracle. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Martcheva M, Ianelli M, Xue-Zhi-Li (2007) Subthreshold coexistence of strains: the impact of vaccination and mutation. Math Biosci Eng 4(2):287–317Google Scholar
  26. May R, Nowak M (1995) Coinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proc R Soc Lond 261:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mukandavire Z, Garira W (2006) HIV/AIDS model for assessing the effects of prophylactic sterilizing vaccines, condoms and treatment with amelioration. J Biol Syst 14(3):323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naresh R, Tripathi A (2005) Modelling and analysis of HIV-TB co-infection in a variable population size. Math Model Anal 10(3):275–286Google Scholar
  29. Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2002) Super-and coinfection: the two extremes. In: Dieckmann U, Metz JAJ, Sabelis M, Sigmund K (eds) Adaptive dynamics of infectious diseases: in pursuit of virulence management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Operskalski EA, Stram DO, Busch MP, Huang et al (1997) Role of viral load in heterosexual transmission of human immunodeciency virus type-1 by blood transfusion recipients. Am J Epidemiol 146(8):655–661Google Scholar
  31. Quinones-Mateu ME, Arts EJ (2002) Fitness of drug resistant HIV-1: methodology and clinical implications. Drug Resist Updat 5:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossberry W, Seal A, Mphuka S (2005) Assessing the application of the three ones in Zambia. DFID Health System Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Schinazi RF, Lader BA, Mellow JW (2000) Mutations in retroviral genes associated with drug resistance: 2000–2001 update. Int Antiviral News 6:65–91Google Scholar
  34. Sharomi O, Podder CN, Gumel AB, Song B (2007) Mathematical analysis of the transmission dynamics of HIV/TB co-infection in the presence of treatment. Math Biosci Eng (accepted)Google Scholar
  35. Steven W, Kaye S, Corrah T (2004) Antiretroviral therapy in Africa. Br Med J 328:280–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UNAIDS/WHO (2005) AIDS epidemic update. UNAIDS/WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  37. van den Driessche P, Watmough J (2002) Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for the compartmental models of disease transmission. Math Biosci 180:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics, Modelling Biomedical Systems Research GroupNational University of Science and TechnologyBulawayoZimbabwe
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Applied MathematicsUniversity of VendaThohoyandouSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations