Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 123–151 | Cite as

The Function Debate in Philosophy

Review Article

Abstract

This paper reviews the debate on the notion of biological function and on functional explanation as this takes place in philosophy. It describes the different perspectives, issues, intuitions, theories and arguments that have emerged. The author shows that the debate has been too heavily influenced by the concerns of a naturalistic philosophy of mind and argues that in order to improve our understanding of biology the attention should be shifted from the study of intuitions to the study of the actual practice of biological inquiry.

Key Words

function functional explanation teleology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, F.R. (1979). A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 493–518.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, C., M. Bekoff and G.V. Lauder (Eds). (1997). Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Amundson, R. and G.V. Lauder (1994). Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). (2002). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Baublys, K.K. (1975). Comments on some recent analyses of functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 42: 496–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedau, M. (1992). Where's the good in teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter (1987). Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bock, W.J. (1999). Functional and evolutionary explanations in morphology. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49: 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bock, W.J. and G. von Wahlert (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 49–68.Google Scholar
  11. Boorse, C. (1976). Wright on functions. Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boorse, C. (2002). A Rebuttal on Functions. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 63–112.Google Scholar
  13. Brandon, R.N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  14. Buller, D.J. (1998). Etiological theories of function: A geographical survey. Biology and Philosophy 13: 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buller, D.J. (Ed). (1999). Function, Selection and Design. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Canfield, J. (1964). Teleological explanation in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14: 285–295.Google Scholar
  17. Canfield, J. (1965). Teleological explanation in biology: A reply. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 327–331.Google Scholar
  18. Craver, C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  22. Davies, P.S. (2000). The nature of natural norms: Why selected functions are systemic capacity functions. Noûs 34: 85–107.Google Scholar
  23. Davies, P.S. (2001). Norms of Nature. Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Dretske, F.L. (1988). Explaining Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Enç, B. (1979). Function attributions and functional explanations. Philosophy of Science 46: 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Enç, B. and F. Adams (1992). Functions and goal directedness. Philosophy of Science 59: 635–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  29. Frankfurt, H.G. and B. Poole (1966). Functional analyses in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 69–72.Google Scholar
  30. Futuyma, D. (1997). Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  31. Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  32. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1993). Functions: Consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.Google Scholar
  33. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1994). A modern history theory of functions. Noûs 28: 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gould, S.J. and E.S. Vrba (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.Google Scholar
  35. Griffiths, P.E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.Google Scholar
  36. Hempel, C.G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In: Gross, L. (Ed). Symposium on Sociological Theory. Harper and Row, New York. pp. 271–287.Google Scholar
  37. Hempel, C.G. and P. Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15: 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hinde, R.A. (1975). The concept of function. In: Baerends, G.R., C. Beer and A. Manning (Eds). Function and Evolution in Behavior. Clarendon, Oxford. pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  39. Horan, B.L. (1989). Functional explanations in sociobiology. Biology and Philosophy 4: 131–158, 205–228.Google Scholar
  40. Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and design. In: French, P.A., T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (Eds). Philosophy of Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. pp. 379–397.Google Scholar
  42. Kuipers, T.A.F. (1986). The logic of functional explanation in biology. In: The Tasks of Contemporary Philosophy. Proceedings of the 10th Wittgenstein Symposium (Kirchberg/Wechsel, 1985). Hölder-Pitcher-Tempsky, Vienna. pp. 110–114.Google Scholar
  43. Kuipers, T.A.F. (2001). Structures in Science: Heuristic Patterns Based on Cognitive Structures. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  44. Kuipers, T.A.F. and A. Wisniewski (1994). An erotetic approach to explanation by specification. Erkenntnis 40: 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lannoo, M.J. and S.J. Lannoo (1993). Why do electric fishes swim backwards? Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 157–165.Google Scholar
  46. Lennox, J.G. (1993). Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lenoir, T. (1982). The Strategy of Life. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  48. Mahner, M. and M. Bunge (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  49. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.Google Scholar
  50. Mayr, E. (1993). Proximate and ultimate causation. Biology and Philosophy 8: 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayr, E. (1997). This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Millikan, R.G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Millikan, R.G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content. Philosophical Review 95: 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Millikan, R.G. (1989a). An ambiguity in the notion “Function”. Biology and Philosophy 4: 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Millikan, R.G. (1989b). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Millikan, R.G. (1993a). Propensities, exaptations, and the brain. In: White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge. pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
  57. Millikan, R.G. (1993b). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  58. Millikan, R.G. (2002). Biofunctions: Two paradigms. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 113–143.Google Scholar
  59. Mitchell, S.D. (1989). The causal background of functional explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3: 213–230.Google Scholar
  60. Mitchell, S.D. (1993). Dispositions or etiologies? A comment on Bigelow and Pargetter. Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mitchell, S.D. (1995). Function, fitness and disposition. Biology and Philosophy 10: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Munson, R. (1972). Biological adaptation: A reply. Philosophy of Science 39: 529–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  64. Nagel, E. (1977). Teleology revisited. Journal of Philosophy 74: 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Neander, K. (1980). Teleology in Biology. Paper presented to the AAP conference in 1980.Google Scholar
  66. Neander, K. (1983). Abnormal Psychobiology. Ph.D. Thesis. La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  67. Neander, K. (1991a). Function as selected effects: The conceptual analyst's defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Neander, K. (1991b). The teleological notion of ‘Function’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neander, K. (2004). Teleological theories of mental content. In: E.E. Zalta (Ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2004).Google Scholar
  70. Nissen, L. (1980). Nagel's self-regulation analysis of teleology. Philosophical Forum 12: 128–138.Google Scholar
  71. Nissen, L. (1993). Four ways of eliminating mind from teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nissen, L. (1997). Teleological Language in the Life Sciences. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.Google Scholar
  73. Pap, A. (1962). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and Representation. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  75. Prior, E.W. (1985). What is wrong with etiological accounts of biological function? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 310–328.Google Scholar
  76. Ruse, M. (1971). Functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 38: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruse, M. (1973). The Philosophy of Biology. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  78. Ruse, M. (2002). Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
  79. Salmon, W.C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  80. Salmon, W.C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  81. Schaffner, K.F. (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  82. Schwartz, P.H. (1999). Proper function and recent selection. Philosophy of Science 66: S210–S222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  84. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Walsh, D.M. (1996). Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Walsh, D.M. and A. Ariew (1996). A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514.Google Scholar
  87. Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  88. Wimsatt, W.C. (1972). Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  90. Wouters, A.G. (1999). Explanation Without a Cause. Utrecht University. Ph.D. Thesis. Electronically available at http://www.knoware.nl/users/arnow/diss/Google Scholar
  91. Wouters, A.G. (2003). Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science 34: 633–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wouters, A.G. (2005). The functional perspective of organismic biology. In: Reydon, T.A.C. and L. Hemerik (Eds). Current Themes in Theoretical Biology: A Dutch Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 33–69.Google Scholar
  93. Wouters, A.G. (forthcoming). Functional explanation in biology. In: R. Festa, A. Alisda and J. Peijnenburg (Eds). Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry. Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  94. Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of BiologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations